Undisputed

The Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a surprisingly robust experience in Undisputed, a sports title that favors high frame rates. In the database’s aggregate ranking of all tested processor and graphics card combinations, this pairing sits at rank 1641 out of 3718 combos, placing it in the 56th percentile of all systems evaluated. This mid-pack standing is somewhat deceptive, as the measured frame rates in this specific game are consistently high, suggesting that the combination is well-balanced for the title’s demands. The data indicates a system that is never the bottleneck at common resolutions, with the GPU’s capabilities and the CPU’s six-core architecture aligning well with the game’s engine.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame field places this specific pairing at 1641 out of 3718 tested combinations. This percentile placement, roughly in the upper half of all systems, does not tell the full story of its in-game performance. The data shows that the system achieves an average of 290 FPS at 1080p Low settings, which is an exceptionally high number that would place it far above the median experience for most users. The ranking reflects the aggregate of all possible workloads, but for Undisputed specifically, the measured rows show a system that is clearly capable of driving high refresh rate monitors without compromise.

Comparing the components to their nearest rivals helps contextualize the pairing. The Intel Core i5-11400F’s average benchmark score is 17177, which is a mere 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7H12 and 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-12450H. This indicates that the CPU’s processing power is typical for its class, providing no unusual advantage or disadvantage in compute-heavy scenarios. On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has an average score of 26331, which is 1.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT and 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary. The data suggests that the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing, and its performance relative to its direct competitors is what allows the system to achieve such high frame rates. The combination’s overall rank is a function of the CPU’s middling position and the GPU’s slightly above-average standing, but the game-specific results show they work together synergistically.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the primary driver of frame rate in this configuration, and its specifications directly explain the measured performance. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. In a game like Undisputed, which is not typically memory-bandwidth constrained at the tested settings, this capacity is sufficient to avoid stuttering or texture pop-in. The core clocks are set at a base of 2280 MHz with a boost of 2497 MHz, and these frequencies, combined with 3840 shading units, allow the card to process the game’s geometry and effects efficiently.

The GPU’s 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores are present but largely idle in this title, as Undisputed does not appear to leverage ray tracing or DLSS features in the measured data. The raw rasterization performance, quantified by a pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s, is what determines the output. The benchmark results show that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 51, but it is not the bottleneck at lower resolutions. The data indicates that the card’s 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is ample for this sports title, and the bottleneck shifts to the CPU only at the lowest settings and resolutions, where the system hits 290 FPS.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions, highlighting the shift in system bottleneck. Moving from 1080p to 1440p to 4K, the average frame rate at High settings drops from 172 FPS to 125 FPS to 79 FPS, respectively. This represents a 27% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a further 37% reduction from 1440p to 4K. These percentages indicate a classic GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions, where the increased pixel count demands more from the graphics card’s shading units and memory bandwidth.

At Low settings, the scaling is even more pronounced. The system achieves 290 FPS at 1080p, which drops to 209 FPS at 1440p and 132 FPS at 4K. The fact that the system can still exceed 130 FPS at 4K Low suggests that the CPU is not holding the system back even at the highest resolution, but the GPU is doing the heavy lifting. The data shows that the limiting component is clearly the GPU at 4K, as the frame rate scales almost linearly with the pixel count. Conversely, at 1080p Low, the 290 FPS figure is likely near the CPU’s maximum output for this game, as the GPU has headroom to render more frames but is constrained by the processor’s ability to issue draw calls. The results demonstrate a well-balanced system that becomes GPU-limited as resolution increases.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full set of measured frame rates provides a detailed view of the system’s capabilities. At 1920x1080, the system performs exceptionally well across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 290 FPS, while Medium settings yield 208 FPS with a minimum of 177 FPS and a maximum of 240 FPS. High settings drop to 172 FPS, and Ultra settings still deliver a very playable 111 FPS. The data shows that even at the highest preset, the system maintains a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold, making 1080p a non-issue for competitive play.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. Low settings average 209 FPS, Medium settings average 151 FPS with a minimum of 128 FPS and a maximum of 173 FPS, and High settings average 125 FPS. Ultra settings at 1440p produce an average of 80 FPS, which is still smooth for most displays. The drop from High to Ultra at this resolution is significant, a 36% reduction, indicating that the Ultra preset introduces costly effects that tax the GPU.

At 3840x2160, the system begins to show its limits. Low settings average 132 FPS, Medium settings average 95 FPS with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS, and High settings average 79 FPS. Ultra settings at 4K are the only configuration that falls below the 60 FPS mark, averaging just 51 FPS. This is the only scenario where the system cannot guarantee a smooth experience, and the data suggests that users with 4K displays should avoid the Ultra preset.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Rocket Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its 12 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support are sufficient for the demands of Undisputed. The CPU’s benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14340 and a single-core score of 2024, indicate that it has solid processing power for a mid-range chip. However, its percentile ranking of 71 against all CPUs shows that it is not a high-end part.

In this game, the CPU’s role becomes apparent at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the system hits 290 FPS, which is likely the ceiling imposed by the CPU’s single-thread performance. The boost clock of 4.40 GHz is crucial here, as the game’s physics and AI calculations are largely single-threaded. The data shows that the CPU is never the primary bottleneck at 4K, where the GPU is clearly limiting performance. However, the 290 FPS figure at 1080p Low suggests that the CPU is reaching its maximum output, as the GPU could theoretically render more frames. The 3DMark single-thread score of 868 and the Passmark single-thread score of 2981 confirm that this processor is capable of feeding the GPU adequately, but it has a hard limit that prevents even higher frame rates at the lowest settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user’s display resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p users, the High preset offers the best balance, delivering 172 FPS, which is sufficient for 144Hz and 165Hz monitors. The Ultra preset at 111 FPS is still playable on 100Hz displays, but the 35% performance drop from High to Ultra suggests that the visual fidelity gain may not justify the frame rate loss. For competitive players seeking maximum responsiveness, the Low preset at 290 FPS is the best choice, but the Medium preset at 208 FPS provides a better visual experience without sacrificing much performance.

For 1440p users, the High preset is the clear winner, averaging 125 FPS, which is ideal for 120Hz and 144Hz monitors. The Medium preset at 151 FPS is also excellent for higher refresh rate panels, but the High preset offers a better balance of visual quality and speed. The Ultra preset at 80 FPS is only recommended for users with 60Hz displays who prioritize image quality over smoothness. The data shows that the system can handle 1440p High without issue, making it the sweet spot for this resolution.

For 4K users, the High preset is the only viable option for a smooth experience, averaging 79 FPS. The Medium preset at 95 FPS is also acceptable for 60Hz displays, but the Low preset at 132 FPS is the best choice for users with 120Hz+ 4K monitors, as it provides the highest frame rate while still maintaining a playable visual experience. The Ultra preset at 51 FPS should be avoided, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold and will result in noticeable stuttering. The data clearly indicates that High is the maximum recommended preset for 4K gaming with this combination.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to use with this combo for a 144Hz monitor?

A: For a 144Hz display, the data shows that 1440p High settings, averaging 125 FPS, or 1080p High settings, averaging 172 FPS, are the best choices. Both exceed the 144Hz refresh rate, ensuring a smooth experience without the need to lower visual quality.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?

A: Yes, but with limitations. The measured data shows that at 4K High settings, the system averages 79 FPS, which is playable on 60Hz displays. However, 4K Ultra settings drop to 51 FPS, which is below the ideal 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-11400F has an average benchmark score of 17177, which is 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7H12 and 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-12450H. This indicates that it performs nearly identically to its closest competitors.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1080p and 4K at High settings?

A: At 1080p High, the system averages 172 FPS, while at 4K High, it averages 79 FPS. This represents a 54% reduction in frame rate, demonstrating the significant load increase on the GPU at higher resolutions.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor at 4K Ultra settings?

A: The data indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K Ultra, as the average FPS drops to 51. The CPU’s performance, with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, is sufficient to feed the GPU, but the RTX 5060’s 8 GB of memory and 19.18 TFLOPS of compute power are not enough to maintain high frame rates at this extreme setting.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the data?

A: The lowest recorded average FPS is 51 at 4K Ultra settings. The only minimum FPS values provided are for Medium settings: 177 FPS at 1080p, 128 FPS at 1440p, and 81 FPS at 4K, all of which are well above playable thresholds.