Assetto Corsa

The Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a firmly mid-pack experience in Assetto Corsa, securing a combo rank of 2315 out of 2897 tested configurations. This places the pairing in the lower half of the database, indicating that while the hardware is capable of running the game, it does not leverage the simulation’s lighter engine load to push into upper-tier performance territory. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU at higher resolutions, but the combination remains a functional choice for 1080p and 1440p play, with the data showing a steep performance cliff only when Ultra settings and 4K are combined.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2315 out of 2897 puts it in the 20th percentile of all tested pairings for this title. This is a modest result, reflecting a system that handles the game competently but without headroom for maxed-out visuals. The CPU, the Intel Core i5-11400F, sits at the 71st percentile against all CPUs in the database, meaning its processing power is above average. Its 3DMark single-thread score of 868 and multi-thread score of 5652 show a balanced chip, which aligns with Assetto Corsa’s reliance on single-core performance for physics and AI.

In direct comparison, the i5-11400F’s average benchmark score of 17177 places it nearly identical to rivals like the AMD EPYC 7H12 (17120, +0.3%) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U (17074, +0.6%). It trails the Intel Core i5-12450H (17239, -0.4%) and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (17278, -0.6%) by negligible margins. These sub-1% deltas mean the CPU is not the differentiator here; the GPU’s 65th percentile standing against all GPUs is the limiting factor. The Arc B570’s average score of 20556 is within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534) and 0.1% behind the Intel Arc A750 (20582), confirming that the GPU is a solid mid-range part that excels in rasterization but struggles with the demands of Ultra presets in this older title.

The rank reflects a system that is not optimized for Assetto Corsa’s highest settings. For context, the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 16908 and single-thread score of 2981 are strong, but the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 14195 is only modest. The data suggests that for this game, the combo is best suited for competitive or high-refresh-rate play at lower settings, rather than cinematic 4K experiences.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 brings 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, yielding 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is adequate for Assetto Corsa at 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K Ultra numbers indicate a hard ceiling. The GPU’s base and boost clocks are both locked at 2500 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). These clocks are moderate, and the 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs are the architectural workhorses.

In practice, the GPU’s role is most visible in the scaling from Low to Ultra settings. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 181 FPS, which drops to 78 FPS at Ultra—a 57% reduction. This tells us the GPU is fully engaged when detail levels rise. The 4K Ultra result of 33 FPS is particularly telling: the 10 GB VRAM is not exhausted (the game is not VRAM-hungry), but the compute throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 is insufficient for 8.3 million pixels with heavy shading. The GPU’s pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s are mid-range figures, and the data shows they cannot sustain 60 FPS at 4K with any preset above Low.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Arc B570’s deltaPct values are all within 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX 3070 Mobile, Intel Arc A750, and AMD Radeon R9 M390X. This means that in raw benchmark terms, the GPU is near-identical to those parts, but the Assetto Corsa measured FPS shows a different story—likely due to driver optimization for this specific title. The 4K Medium result of 54 FPS with a min of 46 and max of 62 shows the GPU can handle moderate loads, but the jump to High at 41 FPS and Ultra at 33 FPS is a steep decline, indicating that the card’s 80 ROPs are a bottleneck for fill-rate-heavy scenes.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal preset for this combo is Medium, which provides the best balance between visual fidelity and playable frame rates across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the combo delivers 127 FPS average, with a minimum of 108 and maximum of 146, ensuring smooth gameplay on standard 60 Hz or even 144 Hz monitors. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 89 FPS, still above the 60 FPS threshold, with a min of 76 and max of 102. This is the recommended sweet spot for high-resolution play without sacrificing responsiveness.

For 4K, the data shows that only Low settings are viable for competitive play, with 76 FPS average. Medium at 4K drops to 54 FPS, which is borderline for racing sims where frame pacing matters. High and Ultra at 4K are not recommended, as the 41 FPS and 33 FPS averages are below the playable threshold for a fast-paced driving game. If visual quality is the priority, High at 1440p (67 FPS) is a better compromise than Medium at 4K, as the higher pixel density often masks the missing effects.

The Ultra preset is only advisable for 1080p, where it hits 78 FPS, but even then, the jump from High (96 FPS) to Ultra (78 FPS) is a 19% performance cost. Given that Assetto Corsa is a simulation where frame rate consistency matters, the data suggests sticking with High at 1080p or Medium at 1440p for the most reliable experience. The Low preset at 1080p (181 FPS) is excessive for most displays, but it demonstrates the combo’s ability to push high refresh rates if needed.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1080p Resolution: The combo scales from 181 FPS at Low to 78 FPS at Ultra. Low and Medium (127 FPS) are well above 100 FPS, providing headroom for high-refresh monitors. High sits at 96 FPS, which is still smooth, but the gap between High and Ultra (18 FPS difference) suggests diminishing returns on the Ultra preset. The Medium preset’s min of 108 and max of 146 show tight frame delivery, ideal for online racing.

1440p Resolution: Low delivers 127 FPS, a 30% drop from 1080p, showing the GPU is still strong at lower settings. Medium hits 89 FPS (min 76, max 102), which is the most balanced option. High falls to 67 FPS, still playable but approaching the limit for 60 Hz displays. Ultra drops to 55 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS target, making it a marginal choice for casual play.

4K Resolution: The numbers reveal a stark limitation. Low is the only preset above 60 FPS at 76 FPS. Medium drops to 54 FPS (min 46, max 62), which is inconsistent and can cause stutter. High at 41 FPS and Ultra at 33 FPS are effectively unplayable for a racing sim, as the frame times become too long. The delta between 1080p Low (181 FPS) and 4K Low (76 FPS) is a 58% reduction, while the delta between 1080p Ultra (78 FPS) and 4K Ultra (33 FPS) is a 58% reduction as well, showing a consistent scaling penalty across presets.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and reveals the GPU as the limiting component. At Low settings, 1080p yields 181 FPS, 1440p yields 127 FPS (a 30% drop), and 4K yields 76 FPS (a 58% drop from 1080p). This scaling is roughly linear with pixel count, indicating the GPU is compute-bound at lower settings. At Medium, the drop from 127 FPS (1080p) to 89 FPS (1440p) is a 30% reduction, and to 54 FPS (4K) is a 57% reduction. The consistency of these percentages across presets suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck; if it were, we would see smaller deltas at lower resolutions where the GPU has more headroom.

The 4K High result of 41 FPS versus 1080p High of 96 FPS is a 57% drop, while the 4K Ultra of 33 FPS versus 1080p Ultra of 78 FPS is a 58% drop. This uniform scaling is a classic sign of a GPU-limited scenario. The CPU’s 12 threads and 4.4 GHz boost clock are sufficient to feed the GPU at all tested settings, as evidenced by the high FPS at 1080p Low (181 FPS), which would be impossible if the CPU were the constraint. The data indicates that the Arc B570’s 160-bit memory bus and 380 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K pixel fill rate demands exceed the GPU’s 200.0 GPixel/s capability.

For players targeting 4K, the only viable path is Low settings, which sacrifices too much visual detail for a racing sim. The 1440p Medium result (89 FPS) is the practical ceiling for this combo, offering a balance that leverages the CPU’s strength while keeping the GPU within its comfort zone. The scaling analysis confirms that upgrading the GPU would provide the most benefit for this game, as the CPU is clearly not the limiting factor in any resolution or preset combination.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution and preset for this combo in Assetto Corsa?*

A: The data shows that 1080p Medium (127 FPS) or 1440p Medium (89 FPS) provide the best balance of visual quality and playable frame rates. For 4K, only Low settings (76 FPS) are recommended, as Medium drops to 54 FPS and High/Ultra fall below 41 FPS.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Assetto Corsa?*

A: Only at Low settings, which deliver 76 FPS. Medium at 4K (54 FPS) is borderline, while High (41 FPS) and Ultra (33 FPS) are not playable for a smooth racing experience. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM is not the issue; the compute and fill-rate limits are.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-11400F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 17177 is within 0.6% of the AMD EPYC 7H12, Intel Core i5-12450H, AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G, and Intel Core Ultra 7 164U. This indicates near-identical processing power, so the GPU choice matters more for this game.

Q: Is the Intel Arc B570 a good match for this CPU?

A: The data shows a balanced pairing for 1080p and 1440p, with the GPU being the limiting factor at 4K. The GPU’s average score of 20556 is comparable to the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750, but the measured FPS in this title indicates it is best suited for Medium presets at higher resolutions.

Q: What is the 1080p Ultra performance like?

A: At 1080p Ultra, the combo delivers 78 FPS average. This is playable, but the drop from High (96 FPS) is significant. For competitive play, High or Medium are better choices due to higher frame rates and more consistent frame pacing.

Q: Does the combo show any CPU bottleneck?

A: No. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K is consistent (around 58% reduction across all presets), which is a hallmark of GPU limitation. The CPU’s high scores in single-thread benchmarks (868 in 3DMark, 2024 in Cinebench R23) ensure it is not the constraint in this title.