Undisputed

The Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 delivers a wide performance envelope in Undisputed, ranging from highly competitive esports-level frame rates at 1080p to playable, but demanding, 4K experiences. This combination places in the 61st percentile of all tested combos, suggesting a balanced pairing where neither component consistently bottlenecks the other across the tested settings. The data indicates a system capable of smooth gameplay, with the primary variable being the user's preference for visual fidelity versus raw frame rate.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is significant and reveals a shift in the system's bottleneck. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 241 FPS, which drops to 174 FPS at 2560x1440, and further to 110 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 54% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, a substantial scaling cost that points to the GPU becoming the primary limiting factor as pixel count increases.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings. At Medium quality, the average FPS drops from 173 at 1080p to 125 at 1440p (a 28% decrease), then to 79 at 4K (a 37% decrease from 1440p). The High preset follows a similar trajectory: 144 FPS at 1080p, 104 at 1440p, and 66 at 4K. This consistent drop-off indicates that while the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at lower resolutions, the RTX 5050's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus become increasingly strained as resolution rises.

The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic scaling penalty, with frame rates falling from 92 FPS at 1080p to 67 at 1440p, and finally to 42 at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is below the 60 FPS threshold commonly considered the minimum for smooth gameplay, suggesting that this resolution/settings combination is only suitable for users who prioritize image quality over responsiveness. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 68 FPS, compared to a 149 FPS gap at 1080p, demonstrating that the GPU's limitations compress the performance range at higher resolutions.

Interestingly, the frame rate scaling between 1440p and 4K is less severe than between 1080p and 1440p at most settings. For example, High settings drop 40 FPS from 1080p to 1440p, but only 38 FPS from 1440p to 4K. This suggests that the RTX 5050 hits a memory bandwidth wall around the 1440p mark, where the 320.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes saturated, leading to diminishing returns as resolution increases further.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Rocket Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14340 and a Passmark multithread score of 16908. However, its single-thread performance, measured by a 3DMark single-thread score of 868 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1777, is more modest, which could impact games that rely heavily on single-core performance.

In Undisputed, a sports title, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU at higher resolutions, but it becomes more relevant at 1080p. The fact that the combo achieves 241 FPS at 1080p Low suggests the i5-11400F has sufficient headroom to drive the RTX 5050 at high frame rates. The CPU's 12 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for feeding the GPU with draw calls and game logic.

The i5-11400F's 65W TDP and 14 nm process node are older technologies compared to the GPU's 5 nm TSMC process, but the benchmark data shows the combo performs well. The CPU's percentile ranking of 71 against all CPUs indicates it is above average, and its average benchmark score of 17177 places it within 0.6% of rivals like the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and Intel Core Ultra 7 164U. This suggests the i5-11400F is not a limiting factor in most scenarios, particularly at 1440p and 4K where the GPU is clearly the bottleneck.

At 1080p Ultra, the 92 FPS result is likely more CPU-bound than at higher resolutions, but the i5-11400F's 4.40 GHz boost clock helps maintain playable frame rates. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 5619 and 8-thread score of 4691 indicate solid scaling across its 12 threads, which is beneficial for games that utilize multiple cores for physics and AI calculations. Overall, the data shows the i5-11400F provides a stable foundation for this GPU, with no evidence of severe CPU-induced frame pacing issues.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-11400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 1722 out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the 61st percentile. This is a respectable position, indicating that the pairing performs better than a majority of tested systems. The ranking suggests the combo is well-matched for this game, avoiding the severe bottlenecks that would push it lower in the standings.

The GPU's individual performance contributes significantly to this ranking. The RTX 5050 has a Passmark G3D score of 17326 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 21035 is within 1.6% of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and 0.6% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, showing it trades blows with these older but capable cards. The CPU's 71st percentile ranking is slightly higher than the GPU's, reinforcing that the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in this pairing.

The combo's rank of 1722 out of 2813 means there are 1091 combos that perform better, but also 1091 that perform worse. This puts the i5-11400F + RTX 5050 in the upper-middle tier of performance. For a sports game like Undisputed, which may not be as demanding as AAA shooters or open-world titles, this ranking indicates the combo can handle the game's requirements at most settings without issue. The data suggests that users with this combo should expect smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K requiring settings adjustments to maintain playable frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best performance. Low settings produce an average of 241 FPS, which is well above any high-refresh-rate monitor's capabilities. Medium settings reduce this to 173 FPS, with a minimum of 147 FPS and a maximum of 200 FPS, showing consistent frame delivery. High settings yield 144 FPS average, still excellent for competitive play. Ultra settings drop to 92 FPS, which remains smooth for most users, though the gap between Low and Ultra is substantial at 149 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong. Low settings average 174 FPS, which is still high enough for 144Hz displays. Medium settings produce 125 FPS, with a minimum of 107 FPS and a maximum of 144 FPS, ensuring no significant stutters. High settings average 104 FPS, which is adequate for 100Hz+ monitors. Ultra settings drop to 67 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold, but the lack of min/max data for this preset makes it difficult to assess frame time consistency.

At 3840x2160, performance becomes more variable. Low settings average 110 FPS, which is surprisingly high for 4K and suggests the game is not extremely demanding at lower quality presets. Medium settings average 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS, indicating playable performance with some dips. High settings drop to 66 FPS, right at the edge of smooth gameplay. Ultra settings average 42 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for most users, making this preset only suitable for screenshots or slow-paced play.

The data shows that the sweet spot for this combo is 1440p Medium to High, where frame rates remain above 100 FPS with good visual quality. At 1080p, users can push to Ultra for 92 FPS, but the visual difference between High and Ultra may not justify the 52 FPS loss. At 4K, Medium settings provide the best balance of quality and performance at 79 FPS.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Undisputed?*

A: The data indicates 2560x1440 is the optimal resolution, as it delivers 125 FPS at Medium settings and 174 FPS at Low settings, providing a good balance between visual fidelity and high frame rates. At 1080p, frame rates exceed 144 FPS at High settings, but the increased resolution at 1440p offers better image quality without sacrificing smoothness.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, but with limitations. At 4K Low settings, the combo averages 110 FPS, which is playable. Medium settings average 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS, which is also acceptable. However, High settings drop to 66 FPS and Ultra falls to 42 FPS, so users should stick to Medium or lower for a consistently smooth 4K experience.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035, which is 1.6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713) and 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153). It also trails the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21379) by 1.6%, showing it performs competitively with these cards.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-11400F a bottleneck for the RTX 5050?

A: Based on the benchmark data, the i5-11400F does not appear to be a significant bottleneck. Its average benchmark score of 17177 is within 0.6% of the AMD EPYC 7H12 (17120) and 0.4% of the Intel Core i5-12450H (17239). The combo's ranking in the 61st percentile suggests the CPU and GPU are well-matched for this game.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo averages 92 FPS. This is below the 144 FPS achieved at High settings, but still above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The 52 FPS difference between High and Ultra may prompt users to choose High for a more responsive experience.

Q: Does the combo perform better at 1080p or 1440p?

A: The combo performs better in terms of raw frame rates at 1080p, with 241 FPS at Low settings compared to 174 FPS at 1440p. However, the performance at 1440p is still excellent, and the higher resolution provides a sharper image. For competitive play, 1080p is preferable, while 1440p offers a better visual experience without sacrificing much performance.

Settings Recommendations

For users with a 1080p display, the High preset is the recommended choice, delivering 144 FPS average. This provides a fluid experience that takes advantage of high-refresh-rate monitors. Those with 144Hz displays may prefer Medium settings at 173 FPS for additional headroom, but the visual trade-off is noticeable. Ultra settings at 92 FPS are only recommended for users who prioritize image quality over frame rate and have a 60Hz or 75Hz monitor.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the best balance of quality and performance, averaging 125 FPS with a minimum of 107 FPS. This ensures smooth gameplay even during intense moments. High settings at 104 FPS are also viable for users with 100Hz displays, but the 21 FPS drop from Medium may not be worth the visual upgrade for all users. Low settings at 174 FPS are overkill for most displays and should only be used for maximum competitive advantage.

For 4K displays, Medium settings are the recommended choice, averaging 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS. This provides playable performance while maintaining a reasonable level of visual detail. Low settings at 110 FPS offer a much smoother experience but with significantly reduced visual quality. High settings at 66 FPS are borderline playable, but the 13 FPS drop from Medium makes them a risky choice for fast-paced gameplay. Ultra settings at 42 FPS should be avoided for actual gameplay, as the frame rate is too low for a responsive experience.

Overall, the data suggests that users should prioritize Medium settings at 1440p for the best overall experience, as it offers high frame rates and good visual quality. For those who prefer higher resolutions, 4K Medium is the sweet spot, while 1080p High is perfect for competitive play. The combo is versatile enough to handle a range of preferences, but the measured FPS data clearly indicates which settings provide the most consistent and enjoyable experience.