Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X paired with the Intel Arc B570 presents a fascinating study in system balance for Undisputed. This combination sits at the 2256th position out of 2813 tested combos in the database, placing it in the lower-mid tier of overall performance. The data reveals a system where the high-core-count CPU is largely unburdened by the game's demands, leaving the GPU as the definitive arbiter of frame rates across all settings and resolutions.

The Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. Its base clock is 4.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and it draws a TDP of 170 W. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 29,300 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2,016.5 in single-core, with a Geekbench multicore score of 19,267. This raw computational power places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 53,288. Its nearest rivals in aggregate performance include the AMD EPYC 7313P (0.2% faster), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (0.3% slower), and the Intel Core i7-14700F (0.6% slower).

For a sports title like Undisputed, the CPU's massive thread count is largely irrelevant. The game's physics and AI for two boxers in a ring do not scale to 24 threads. The data supports this: at 1080p Low settings, the system produces 195 FPS, which is far beyond the refresh rate of most displays. Even at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 34, a figure that suggests the CPU is never the bottleneck. The 7900X's single-thread performance, demonstrated by its 2,016.5 Cinebench R23 single-core score, ensures that the game's primary simulation thread is fed adequately. However, the performance ceiling is not defined by the CPU. The fact that the FPS drops from 195 at 1080p Low to 116 at 1080p High, and then to 75 at 1080p Ultra, shows a clear GPU limitation, as the CPU's workload does not change significantly with graphical settings.

The Ryzen 9 7900X's 64 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth) provide a robust platform. Yet, these features do not translate into a competitive advantage in this specific game. The benchmark results indicate that the processor is effectively "along for the ride," providing a stable foundation without ever becoming the limiting factor. The data strongly suggests that the CPU's 91st percentile ranking is meaningless for this title, as the GPU's 65th percentile ranking is what truly dictates the experience.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear hierarchy of playable settings for this combo. The goal is to maintain a frame rate that is smooth and consistent, ideally above 60 FPS for a fast-paced sports sim. The data shows that this is achievable, but the headroom varies dramatically by resolution.

At 1080p, the system is exceptionally capable. The Low preset yields an average of 195 FPS, Medium produces 141 FPS, and High drops to 116 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only one that falls below the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 75 FPS. For the best experience at this resolution, the High preset is the sweet spot. It offers a substantial visual upgrade over Medium (which averages 141 FPS) while still maintaining a 116 FPS average, leaving ample headroom for any dips. The Ultra preset, while visually superior, is not worth the 35% performance penalty it incurs relative to High.

Moving to 1440p, the balance shifts. The Low preset still delivers a high 141 FPS, and Medium is also viable at 102 FPS. However, the High preset drops to 84 FPS, and Ultra falls to 54 FPS. At this resolution, the Medium preset appears to be the optimal choice. It provides a solid frame rate of 102 FPS, which is smooth and responsive, while offering a significant visual improvement over Low. The High preset, with an 84 FPS average, is still playable but begins to approach the point where frame time consistency could become an issue. The Ultra preset, at 54 FPS, is below the 60 FPS target and should be avoided for competitive play.

At 4K, the GPU is clearly overmatched. Only the Low preset manages to stay above the 60 FPS line, averaging 89 FPS. The Medium preset averages 64 FPS (with a recorded minimum of 55 FPS), which is technically playable but shows significant strain. The High preset drops to 53 FPS, and Ultra is a slideshow at 34 FPS. For a playable experience at 4K, the Low preset is the only reliable option. The Medium preset's 64 FPS average is tempting, but the 55 FPS minimum indicates that the experience will not be consistently smooth. The data suggests that 4K gaming is not this combo's forte; the GPU simply lacks the raw throughput for high-fidelity 4K rendering.

FAQ

*Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X a bottleneck for the Intel Arc B570 in Undisputed?*

A: No. The benchmark data shows that the CPU is never the limiting factor. The frame rates scale inversely with graphical settings and resolution, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU's massive thread count and high clock speeds are more than sufficient to handle the game's logic.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor?

A: The Medium preset is the recommended choice. It delivers an average of 102 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. While the High preset offers better visuals, its 84 FPS average is a significant step down, and the Ultra preset falls below the playable threshold at 54 FPS.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming at Undisputed?*

A: Only at the Low settings preset, which averages 89 FPS. The Medium preset averages 64 FPS but has a minimum of 55 FPS, which can lead to noticeable stutters. For a consistent experience, 4K is not recommended unless you are willing to use the Low preset.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570's performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Arc B570's average benchmark score is 20,556. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20,534, which is 0.1% slower. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20,582, making it 0.1% faster than the B570. This indicates the B570 is positioned in a highly competitive performance band.

Q: Does the Ryzen 9 7900X's high core count provide any benefit in this game?

A: No, the data suggests it does not. Undisputed is a sports title that does not utilize the 12 cores and 24 threads effectively. The single-thread performance is sufficient, but the additional cores are idle resources. The performance is dictated entirely by the GPU's rendering capabilities.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between the High and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: The High preset averages 116 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 75 FPS. This represents a 41 FPS (or 35%) drop in performance for the visual fidelity uplift that the Ultra preset provides.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 9 7900X and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2256th out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This ranking places it in the bottom 20% of all systems tested. The data indicates that this low ranking is almost entirely due to the GPU's performance ceiling. The CPU is a top-tier processor, ranking in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, but this strength is neutralized in a game that is heavily GPU-dependent.

The combo's position is a clear reflection of the Arc B570's standing in the GPU hierarchy. With a percentile rank of 65th among all GPUs, the B570 is a mid-range performer. Its average benchmark score of 20,556 puts it in direct competition with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% faster) and the Intel Arc A750 (0.1% slower). In the context of Undisputed, this translates to a system that can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming well, but struggles at 4K.

The ranking also highlights a system imbalance from a pure gaming perspective. The Ryzen 9 7900X is a high-end desktop processor, while the Arc B570 is a more budget-conscious offering. In a CPU-light game like Undisputed, the CPU's potential is wasted. A more modest CPU paired with a stronger GPU would likely achieve a higher combo rank. The data shows that the 7900X's 91st percentile CPU score does not boost the system's rank because the GPU is the sole determinant of the final frame rate. The 2256th rank out of 2813 is a direct consequence of the GPU's 65th percentile performance being the limiting factor.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is the definitive performance bottleneck in this configuration for Undisputed. This GPU, based on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage), is built on a 5 nm process and features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. It operates at a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz, with memory running at 19 Gbps effective. The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, along with 18 ray tracing cores. Its compute capabilities include an FP32 throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Arc B570 scores 14,195 in Passmark G3D and 83,514 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its average benchmark score is 20,556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% faster) and the Intel Arc A750 (0.1% slower). The data shows that this GPU is positioned for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, which is precisely where the measured FPS in Undisputed confirms its capabilities.

The GPU's role is to render the game's visuals, and the measured FPS data shows a clear performance curve. At 1080p, the GPU can push high frame rates, but at 4K, it is overwhelmed. The memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s and the 10 GB VRAM capacity are sufficient for the game's textures, but the raw compute power (11.52 TFLOPS) is not enough to maintain high frame rates at demanding resolutions and settings. The performance drop from 116 FPS at 1080p High to 84 FPS at 1440p High, and then to 53 FPS at 4K High, illustrates a linear decrease that is characteristic of a GPU that is hitting its fill-rate and shader limits. The GPU is the single most important component in this system for determining the Undisputed experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system's performance across all resolution and settings combinations.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: The system achieves an average of 195 FPS. This is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo.
• Medium: The average FPS is 141, with a minimum of 120 and a maximum of 162. This shows a 27.7% drop from Low.
• High: The average FPS is 116. This is a further 17.7% drop from Medium.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 75. This is a 35.3% drop from High, making it the most demanding preset.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: The average FPS is 141. This is the same as the 1080p Medium setting, illustrating the resolution's impact.
• Medium: The average FPS is 102, with a minimum of 86 and a maximum of 117.
• High: The average FPS is 84. This is a 17.6% drop from Medium.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 54. This falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: The average FPS is 89. This is the only 4K setting that provides a smooth experience.
• Medium: The average FPS is 64, with a minimum of 55 and a maximum of 74. The minimum FPS indicates potential stuttering.
• High: The average FPS is 53. This is below the 60 FPS target.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 34. This is the lowest recorded frame rate and is not recommended for gameplay.

The data shows a consistent pattern: each step up in settings (Low to Medium, Medium to High, High to Ultra) results in a significant FPS penalty, typically between 17% and 35%. This indicates that the GPU is heavily taxed by the game's visual effects at higher presets.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals a clear and predictable pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, which confirms the GPU-bound nature of this system. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K is not linear, but it shows how the GPU's fill-rate limits are reached.

At the High settings preset, the system averages 116 FPS at 1080p. Moving to 1440p, the average drops to 84 FPS, a 27.6% decrease. Moving to 4K, the average drops to 53 FPS, a 36.9% decrease from 1440p and a 54.3% decrease from 1080p. This shows that the GPU is responsible for the frame rate, as the CPU's workload is constant.

At the Medium settings preset, the pattern is similar. The system averages 141 FPS at 1080p, 102 FPS at 1440p (a 27.7% drop), and 64 FPS at 4K (a 37.3% drop from 1440p and a 54.6% drop from 1080p). The consistency of these percentage drops across presets is a strong indicator that the GPU is the sole limiting factor. If the CPU were a bottleneck, we would expect the FPS to be more similar across resolutions at lower settings, as the CPU's work is resolution-independent.

The drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 27-28% across all settings. The drop from 1440p to 4K is roughly 37-38%. This larger drop at higher resolutions is a classic sign of a GPU running out of pixel-pushing power. The Arc B570's pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s is simply insufficient for 4K at high fidelity. The data implies that to achieve a stable 60 FPS at 4K, the user would need to use the Low preset, which averages 89 FPS, or potentially lower the resolution scale. The system is clearly optimized for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it provides a highly playable experience at medium-to-high settings. The 4K experience is severely compromised, reinforcing the conclusion that the Intel Arc B570 is the definitive performance ceiling for this combo.