Undisputed

Undisputed

AVERAGE FPS
56
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 56 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 20 31 38 52
1440p QHD 32 49 60 83
1080p Full HD 44 68 83 115

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 52
3840x2160 Medium 38
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Ultra 20
2560x1440 Low 83
2560x1440 Medium 60
2560x1440 High 49
2560x1440 Ultra 32
1920x1080 Low 115
1920x1080 Medium 83
1920x1080 High 68
1920x1080 Ultra 44

Undisputed with AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + Intel Arc B370, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and Intel Arc B370 pairing is a study in stark imbalance for Undisputed. The CPU is a high-end desktop part with strong multithreaded performance, while the GPU is an integrated-class mobile chip that ranks in the bottom percentile of all graphics cards. The benchmark data shows this combo produces playable frame rates only at 1080p with lower settings, and the measured results clearly indicate the Intel Arc B370 is the primary constraint in nearly every scenario.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT brings substantial processing capability to this pairing. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. This Zen 3 architecture part, codenamed Vermeer, sits on the AMD Socket AM4 platform and is built on a 7 nm process from TSMC. The CPU features 32 MB of shared L3 cache, with 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core. Its memory bandwidth is rated at 51.2 GB/s, and it supports DDR4 memory. The 5800XT ranks in the 81st percentile among all CPUs tested on this benchmark database.

The CPU's synthetic benchmark scores further illustrate its capability. In Cinebench R23, the 5800XT scores 23794 in multicore and 3359 in single-core tests. Its PassMark multithread score is 28053, with a single-thread score of 3535. The 3DMark 16-thread test yields a score of 7683, while the max-thread score is 7680. These figures place the 5800XT in close competition with several mobile processors: the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868 (a 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS both score 29955 (a -0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29713 (a 0.6% delta). The performance parity with these parts shows the 5800XT is a solid, modern 8-core CPU.

In Undisputed, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and frame pacing. The data shows that at 1080p Low settings, this combo achieves 115 FPS, which is the highest measured result. Even at 1080p High, the combo hits 68 FPS. These results suggest the 5800XT is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions and settings. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for a sports title like this, which typically does not require extreme core counts. The 5800XT's single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3359 Cinebench R23 score, is also strong enough to avoid being a bottleneck in most gameplay situations.

However, the CPU's potential is largely unrealized in this configuration because the GPU cannot translate its processing power into higher frame rates, especially at higher resolutions. The 5800XT is a desktop part with a 105 W TDP, designed for sustained performance, but the integrated GPU paired with it is not. The CPU could easily drive higher frame rates if the graphics component were more capable, but the data shows that frame rates drop dramatically as resolution and settings increase, which points directly at the GPU as the performance ceiling.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B370 is a fundamentally different class of hardware. It is part of the Arc Graphics-M generation (Panther Lake), built on Intel's 3 nm process with the Xe3-LPG architecture. Its integrated nature is highlighted by its bus interface, which is "IGP" (Integrated Graphics Processor), and its slot width is also "IGP". The GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. It features 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 render output units, along with 10 ray tracing cores. Its theoretical performance is rated at 6.144 TFLOPS for FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1).

Crucially, the Arc B370 has no dedicated VRAM. Its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared", meaning it relies on the system's main memory. Its memory bandwidth is "System Dependent", which means its performance can vary based on the system's DDR4 memory configuration. The GPU's TDP is just 25 W, and it has no power connectors, reinforcing its mobile, low-power design. The benchmark data shows this GPU ranks in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. Its nearest rivals are all older discrete parts: the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186 (-0.2% delta), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190 (-0.5% delta), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192 (-0.7% delta), and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168 (1.4% delta).

This GPU's performance in Undisputed is the defining factor of this combo. The data shows it is the bottleneck at every resolution and setting. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 115 FPS, which is respectable, but this is the absolute ceiling for this pairing. As the resolution increases to 1440p, the frame rate at Low settings drops to 83 FPS, and at 4K, it falls to 52 FPS. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU is struggling to fill the larger pixel counts. The lack of dedicated VRAM and the reliance on shared system memory likely contributes to this performance drop, as bandwidth becomes a limiting factor.

The Arc B370's low ROP count (20) and modest texture rate (96.00 GTexel/s) also hinder its ability to handle higher resolutions and settings. The 3DMark score of 1184 places it in the same performance tier as GPUs from over a decade ago, which is a clear indicator of its limited capabilities. In Undisputed, this translates to a hard ceiling on what settings are playable.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo is at 1080p with Low settings. This is the only configuration that achieves a consistently high frame rate, hitting 115 FPS. At 1080p Medium, the frame rate drops to 83 FPS, which is still playable but represents a 28% decrease from Low. The 1080p High preset yields 68 FPS, which is acceptable for slower-paced sports games, but the drop from Low is significant.

The data shows that the Ultra preset is not a viable option for this combo. At 1080p Ultra, the average frame rate falls to 44 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 32 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it is a slideshow at 20 FPS. These numbers indicate that the Ultra preset is simply too demanding for the Intel Arc B370.

For a balance between visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 1080p is the sweet spot. It provides a 83 FPS average with measured minimums of 70 FPS and maximums of 95 FPS. This frametime consistency suggests a stable experience without major stutters. The High preset at 1080p (68 FPS) is also playable, but the data suggests that the Medium preset offers a better balance, as the 15 FPS gain from dropping from High to Medium is substantial.

At 1440p, the options are more limited. The Low preset at 1440p hits 83 FPS, which is identical to the 1080p Medium score. This suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor, as lowering the resolution does not yield a full linear gain. The 1440p Medium preset is right at the edge of playability at 60 FPS, but the 4K Low preset falls to 52 FPS. For a consistent experience, sticking to 1080p is the only sensible recommendation. Playing at 4K with any setting above Low is not advisable, as the data shows the frame rates drop to 38 FPS for Medium and 31 FPS for High, both of which are too low for a responsive experience.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The overall ranking for this specific combination of CPU and GPU in Undisputed is poor. The combo ranks 3429 out of 3718 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 8% of all systems tested. This low rank is almost entirely attributable to the Intel Arc B370's performance, as the CPU is a high-tier part.

The rank of 3429 out of 3718 indicates that the vast majority of other hardware pairings can achieve higher frame rates in this game. This is despite the 5800XT's strong CPU performance, which ranks in the 81st percentile. The discrepancy between the CPU's high percentile and the combo's low rank underscores the GPU bottleneck. The data suggests that even a modestly more powerful discrete GPU paired with a weaker CPU would likely outperform this combo, because the CPU has plenty of headroom.

The GPU's 5th percentile ranking is a clear outlier when paired with an 81st percentile CPU. This creates a system where the CPU's capabilities are wasted. The nearestRivals data for the GPU shows it competing with integrated graphics from the early 2010s, which confirms its lack of suitability for modern gaming at higher settings. In the context of Undisputed, this combo will struggle to deliver a smooth experience at any resolution above 1080p, and even at 1080p, it requires lower settings to maintain high frame rates.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The frame rate scaling across resolutions provides a clear picture of the limiting component. At Low settings, the frame rates are 115 FPS at 1080p, 83 FPS at 1440p, and 52 FPS at 4K. This represents a 28% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 37% drop from 1440p to 4K. This scaling is characteristic of a GPU-bound system, where the rendering load increases significantly with each resolution step.

At Medium settings, the frame rates are 83 FPS at 1080p, 60 FPS at 1440p, and 38 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 28%, and from 1440p to 4K is 37%. The percentage drops are very similar to the Low settings, which confirms that the GPU is the bottleneck regardless of the quality preset. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see less of a frame rate drop when increasing resolution, because the CPU's workload would remain relatively constant. The data shows the opposite, with significant drops at higher resolutions.

The fact that 4K High (31 FPS) and 4K Ultra (20 FPS) are nearly unplayable, while 1080p Low (115 FPS) is very smooth, indicates that the Intel Arc B370's rendering capabilities are the primary constraint. The GPU's pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and its 20 ROPs are simply insufficient for 4K resolution, even at lower quality settings. The scaling pattern is a textbook example of a GPU bottleneck, where the CPU has ample headroom to provide higher frame rates if the graphics hardware could keep up.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at this combo's performance envelope.

At 1920x1080, the results are as follows:

  • Low: 115 FPS average.
  • Medium: 83 FPS average, with minimums of 70 FPS and maximums of 95 FPS.
  • High: 68 FPS average.
  • Ultra: 44 FPS average.

The 1080p results show a clear decline as settings increase. The jump from Low to Medium is a loss of 32 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High is a loss of 15 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra is a loss of 24 FPS. The difference between the Low and Ultra presets is 71 FPS, which is a 62% reduction in performance.

At 2560x1440, the results are:

  • Low: 83 FPS average.
  • Medium: 60 FPS average, with minimums of 51 FPS and maximums of 69 FPS.
  • High: 49 FPS average.
  • Ultra: 32 FPS average.

The 1440p results follow the same pattern. The Low preset is the only one that remains above 60 FPS. The Medium preset is right at the 60 FPS threshold, but its minimum of 51 FPS suggests occasional dips below the target. The High preset drops to 49 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 32 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at each setting shows a performance loss of 28-36%, depending on the preset.

At 3840x2160, the results are:

  • Low: 52 FPS average.
  • Medium: 38 FPS average, with minimums of 32 FPS and maximums of 43 FPS.
  • High: 31 FPS average.
  • Ultra: 20 FPS average.

The 4K results are uniformly poor. Even the Low preset fails to maintain a smooth 60 FPS, achieving only 52 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 38 FPS, and the High and Ultra presets are unplayable at 31 FPS and 20 FPS respectively. The data shows that this combo is not suitable for 4K gaming in Undisputed, as even the lowest settings cannot provide a consistent, playable frame rate. The overall trend across all resolutions and settings confirms that the Intel Arc B370 is the definitive performance limiter, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT's capabilities are left largely untapped.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 4800 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B370

VRAM System Shared System Shared
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2400 MHz MHz
TDP 25 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + Intel Arc B370 in Undisputed

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 52.0
3840x2160 Medium 38.0
3840x2160 High 31.0
3840x2160 Ultra 20.0
2560x1440 Low 83.0
2560x1440 Medium 60.0
2560x1440 High 49.0
2560x1440 Ultra 32.0
1920x1080 Low 115.0
1920x1080 Medium 83.0
1920x1080 High 68.0
1920x1080 Ultra 44.0

Undisputed with Ryzen 7 5800XT + Other GPUs

See how Undisputed performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Undisputed with Arc B370 + Other CPUs

See how Undisputed performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800XT + Arc B370

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.