Undisputed

# Undisputed with AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 7600

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 delivers a consistently playable experience in Undisputed across most settings and resolutions, with the combo ranking 1080th out of 1580 tested combinations in this title. The 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 processor provides strong baseline performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,794 and single-core score of 3,359, while the RX 7600's RDNA 3.0 architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory handles the game's rendering demands. Measured frame rates reveal that the CPU is rarely the limiting factor, as even at 1080p Low the system reaches 229.4 FPS average, suggesting the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher settings and resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the best-performing settings preset at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers the highest measured average FPS at 229.4, followed by Medium at 166.3, High at 135.3, and Ultra at 91.8. The Ultra preset still maintains a playable frame rate, but the gap between Low and Ultra is substantial.

Q: How does the system perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 41.4 on Ultra to 105.2 on Low, with High at 63.4 and Medium at 75.1. The Ultra preset dips below 60 FPS, indicating that 4K Ultra is not a smooth experience with this hardware combination.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5800XT competitive with other CPUs in this class?

A: The processor holds an 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 29,774. It sits within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29,740), AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (29,856), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (29,682), and AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29,868) in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU's relative standing among all graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 ranks in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 20,258. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, scores 20,146 (0.6% faster), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534 (1.3% faster).

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1440p to 4K?

A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 97.9 at 2560x1440 to 63.4 at 3840x2160, a reduction of 35.2%. At Low settings, the drop is from 167.3 to 105.2, a 37.1% reduction.

Q: Can the system hit 60 FPS at 4K with any settings?

A: Yes, but only with lower presets. At 4K, the Low preset averages 105.2 FPS and Medium averages 75.1 FPS, while High averages 63.4 FPS. Only the Ultra preset falls below 60 FPS at 41.4 average.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data indicates that the Low preset provides the most headroom for high-refresh-rate displays, especially at 1080p where it reaches 229.4 FPS. However, for a balanced experience that maintains visual quality without sacrificing smoothness, the Medium preset is the most practical choice. At 1080p Medium, the system delivers 166.3 FPS, which exceeds the refresh rate of most standard monitors while still offering improved visuals over Low.

At 1440p, the Medium preset again offers the best compromise, with 122.6 FPS average. This is sufficient for high-refresh 1440p panels and remains well above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset at 1440p still delivers acceptable performance at 97.9 FPS, making it viable for players who prioritize visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 65.8 FPS, which is playable but leaves little margin for demanding scenes.

For 4K gaming, the data shows that Ultra is not a practical option at 41.4 FPS. The High preset barely maintains 63.4 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 75.1 FPS offers the best balance at this resolution, providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while retaining moderate visual quality. Players targeting 4K should stick with Medium or lower presets to ensure consistent performance.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound performance at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the system drops from 229.4 FPS at 1080p to 167.3 FPS at 1440p (27.1% reduction) and further to 105.2 FPS at 4K (37.1% reduction from 1440p). This scaling is consistent with a GPU that becomes increasingly stressed as pixel count rises.

At High settings, the reduction is even more pronounced: 135.3 FPS at 1080p drops to 97.9 FPS at 1440p (27.6% reduction) and then to 63.4 FPS at 4K (35.2% reduction from 1440p). The Ultra preset shows the steepest absolute decline, from 91.8 FPS at 1080p to 65.8 FPS at 1440p (28.3% reduction) and finally to 41.4 FPS at 4K (37.1% reduction).

The relatively consistent percentage drops across settings indicate that the GPU is the primary limiting component throughout. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a PassMark multi-thread score of 27,988 and 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,683, ensures it is not constraining frame rates even at 1080p, where frame rates reach their highest values. The RX 7600's 8 GB memory capacity and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth appear sufficient for this title, as the frame rate scaling follows expected resolution-based trends rather than showing sudden collapses that would indicate memory capacity issues.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates across all presets. The Low preset averages 229.4 FPS, Medium averages 166.3 FPS, High averages 135.3 FPS, and Ultra averages 91.8 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium is 63.1 FPS, while the gap from Medium to High is 31.0 FPS, and High to Ultra is 43.5 FPS. This suggests that the Ultra preset incurs a significant performance cost relative to High.

Moving to 2560x1440, the measured averages are 167.3 FPS on Low, 122.6 FPS on Medium, 97.9 FPS on High, and 65.8 FPS on Ultra. The relative ordering remains identical to 1080p, with Low outperforming Medium by 44.7 FPS, Medium outperforming High by 24.7 FPS, and High outperforming Ultra by 32.1 FPS. The 1440p results show that all presets except Ultra maintain frame rates above 90 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the averages drop to 105.2 FPS on Low, 75.1 FPS on Medium, 63.4 FPS on High, and 41.4 FPS on Ultra. The Low preset remains the only option that clears 100 FPS at 4K. The Medium and High presets both stay above 60 FPS, but the Ultra preset falls well below playable thresholds. The data shows a consistent pattern across all resolutions: Low provides roughly 1.4x the performance of Medium, which in turn provides about 1.2x the performance of High, while Ultra consistently delivers the lowest frame rates.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600's specifications directly influence the observed performance in Undisputed. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2655 MHz, with a game clock of 2250 MHz. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which appears sufficient for this sports title based on the measured frame rates.

The GPU's 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines deliver a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s. The 32 ray tracing cores support the RDNA 3.0 architecture's feature set, though the game's performance scaling suggests that rasterization performance is the primary determinant of frame rates. The 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute throughput provides ample raw processing power for the game's rendering workload.

The RX 7600's benchmark scores place it firmly in the mid-range segment, with a PassMark G3D score of 16,634 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,310. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, scores only 0.6% higher on average, indicating that the standard RX 7600 is not significantly disadvantaged in this pairing. The GPU's 63rd percentile ranking among all GPUs reflects its position as a capable 1080p and 1440p performer, which aligns with the measured results showing playable frame rates at those resolutions across most settings.

At 4K, the GPU's limitations become apparent, particularly at the Ultra preset where the 41.4 FPS average indicates that the 8 GB memory capacity and 204 mm² die size are insufficient for the most demanding settings. The RDNA 3.0 architecture's 6 nm process node from TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors, provides efficient performance per watt, though the 165 W TDP and dual-slot cooler design suggest the card is designed for mainstream systems rather than high-end 4K gaming.