Undisputed

# Undisputed with AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

This combo places at rank 735 out of 3,718 tested combinations in Undisputed, which puts it in the top 20% of all systems evaluated for this boxing simulation. The pairing of an 8-core Zen 3 processor with a 20 GB RDNA 3 GPU delivers frame rates that are consistently high across all resolution tiers, though the performance scaling between settings reveals where this system's true strengths and limitations lie.

How This Combo Ranks

At rank 735 of 3,718 tested combos, this configuration sits comfortably in the upper quartile of all systems benchmarked for Undisputed. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT holds an 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 29,879. Its nearest rivals in synthetic testing are remarkably close: the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29,868 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 29,955 (-0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29,713 (0.6% delta). This clustering suggests that the 5800XT's processing power is essentially at parity with those competing chips, making the CPU a consistent but not differentiating factor in this combo's overall ranking.

The GPU side tells a more nuanced story. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT sits at the 55th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13,745. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 660M at 13,812 (-0.5% delta), the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile at 13,821 (-0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 570X at 13,871 (-0.9% delta). Interestingly, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scores 13,543, a 1.5% positive delta for the 7900 XT. This places the GPU in a mid-pack position relative to the broader GPU landscape, yet the measured frame rates in Undisputed are anything but mid-pack.

The discrepancy between the GPU's modest percentile ranking and the combo's strong in-game position suggests that Undisputed's workload favors the specific architecture and memory configuration of the RX 7900 XT. The combo's rank of 735 out of 3,718 indicates that roughly 80% of tested systems fall below this configuration in this particular title, a strong showing for a pairing where each component individually ranks lower than the combined result would suggest.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data across four settings presets at three resolutions provides a clear picture of where this combo delivers its optimal experience. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves 155 FPS average, while High reaches 240 FPS, Medium hits 290 FPS, and Low produces 404 FPS. The jump from Ultra to High represents a 54.8% frame rate increase, while moving from High to Medium adds another 20.8%. At this resolution, the Medium preset at 290 FPS offers the best balance, as it remains far above any display refresh rate concern while the minimal FPS of 247 ensures consistent frame pacing.

At 2560x1440, the pattern shifts. Ultra delivers 112 FPS, High produces 174 FPS, Medium reaches 210 FPS, and Low achieves 292 FPS. The Medium preset again stands out, with its 210 FPS average and 178 FPS minimum providing a smooth experience on high-refresh monitors. However, the High preset at 174 FPS also remains viable for those prioritizing visual quality over raw headroom.

At 3840x2160, the recommendations change character. Ultra drops to 71 FPS, High sits at 110 FPS, Medium reaches 133 FPS, and Low tops out at 185 FPS. Here, the High preset at 110 FPS represents the best overall experience, as it maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while delivering substantially better visual fidelity than Medium. The Ultra preset at 71 FPS is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes, making High the recommended choice for 4K gaming with this combo.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate progression from 1080p to 4K reveals the scaling characteristics of this configuration. At High settings, the average FPS moves from 240 at 1920x1080 to 174 at 2560x1440 (a 27.5% drop) and then to 110 at 3840x2160 (a 36.8% drop from 1440p). This represents a total reduction of 54.2% from 1080p to 4K at High settings.

The Low settings preset shows more aggressive scaling: 404 FPS at 1080p drops to 292 FPS at 1440p (27.7% decrease) and then to 185 FPS at 4K (36.6% decrease from 1440p). The total drop from 1080p to 4K is 54.2%, nearly identical to the High preset's scaling.

Medium settings follow a similar trajectory: 290 FPS at 1080p, 210 FPS at 1440p (27.6% decrease), and 133 FPS at 4K (36.7% decrease from 1440p). The consistency of these percentage drops across presets indicates that resolution scaling is uniform regardless of graphical load.

For Ultra settings, the progression is 155 FPS at 1080p, 112 FPS at 1440p (27.7% decrease), and 71 FPS at 4K (36.6% decrease from 1440p). The identical scaling percentages across all four presets—approximately 27.7% from 1080p to 1440p and 36.7% from 1440p to 4K—strongly suggest that the limiting factor at higher resolutions is the GPU's pixel throughput and memory bandwidth rather than any CPU bottleneck. The RX 7900 XT's 800.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 459.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are being exercised progressively harder as resolution increases, with the CPU's role remaining constant.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest raw performance. Low settings produce an average of 404 FPS, which is the single highest measured value across all configurations. Medium settings average 290 FPS with a minimum of 247 FPS and maximum of 334 FPS. High settings average 240 FPS, while Ultra drops to 155 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 249 FPS, indicating that the GPU has substantial headroom even at the highest quality preset.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 292 FPS on Low, 210 FPS on Medium (with a 178 FPS minimum and 241 FPS maximum), 174 FPS on High, and 112 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset's minimum of 178 FPS ensures that even the most demanding scenes remain well above typical high-refresh display thresholds.

At 3840x2160, performance remains strong but the gap between presets narrows in absolute terms. Low averages 185 FPS, Medium averages 133 FPS (with a 113 FPS minimum and 153 FPS maximum), High averages 110 FPS, and Ultra averages 71 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 4K is 114 FPS, roughly half the spread seen at 1080p, reflecting the GPU's diminishing headroom as pixel count increases.

The Medium preset is the only one with complete min/max data across all three resolutions, providing insight into frame consistency. At 4K, the Medium preset's 113 FPS minimum is 85% of its 133 FPS average, while at 1440p the 178 FPS minimum is 84.8% of the 210 FPS average, and at 1080p the 247 FPS minimum is 85.2% of the 290 FPS average. This consistent ratio suggests stable frame pacing across resolutions.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT brings substantial resources to bear on Undisputed. Its 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus provides 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is crucial for the game's texture streaming and scene complexity. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1387 MHz, a game clock of 2025 MHz, and a boost clock of 2394 MHz, with memory running at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective).

The GPU's compute capabilities include 5,376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operation units. Its 84 ray tracing cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), though Undisputed's performance profile suggests the game primarily stresses traditional rasterization. The 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 804.4 GTexel/s texture rate provide ample headroom for the game's visual effects.

The memory configuration is particularly relevant at higher resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the combo still manages 71 FPS, indicating that the 20 GB frame buffer is not a limiting factor even at maximum settings. The 800.0 GB/s bandwidth supports the resolution scaling pattern observed, where frame rates drop by approximately 27.7% from 1080p to 1440p and 36.7% from 1440p to 4K, consistent with the increased pixel throughput demands.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 13,745 and 55th percentile ranking among all GPUs might suggest mid-pack performance, but the measured results in Undisputed tell a different story. The 110 FPS average at 4K High settings demonstrates that this GPU is well-suited to the game's rendering requirements, likely due to the combination of high memory bandwidth and substantial rasterization throughput.

FAQ

Q: How well does this combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo averages 71 FPS. This is playable but leaves minimal headroom for demanding scenes, making High settings at 110 FPS a more comfortable choice for 4K gaming.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers 210 FPS average with a 178 FPS minimum, making it the optimal balance of visual quality and performance. The High preset at 174 FPS is also viable for those prioritizing visual fidelity.

Q: Does this combo experience CPU or GPU bottlenecking in Undisputed?

A: The consistent resolution scaling percentages (approximately 27.7% from 1080p to 1440p and 36.7% from 1440p to 4K across all presets) indicate the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, with the CPU maintaining sufficient headroom throughout.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings average 404 FPS while Ultra averages 155 FPS, a difference of 249 FPS. This wide gap demonstrates the GPU's substantial rendering headroom at lower resolutions.

Q: How does the RX 7900 XT compare to its nearest GPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RX 7900 XT scores 13,745 on average, with the AMD Radeon 660M at 13,812 (-0.5% delta), NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile at 13,821 (-0.5% delta), and AMD Radeon RX 570X at 13,871 (-0.9% delta). The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scores 13,543, a 1.5% delta in favor of the 7900 XT.

Q: Is the 20 GB VRAM sufficient for Undisputed at maximum settings?

A: Yes, the 20 GB configuration handles all tested presets without issue. Even at 4K Ultra (71 FPS), the frame buffer is not a limiting factor, as performance scales consistently with resolution rather than showing memory-related stutters.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT provides 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz. This Vermeer chip, built on TSMC's 7 nm process with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, includes 32 MB of shared L3 cache alongside 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core. The processor supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 5800XT demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,794 and single-core score of 3,359. Its Passmark multithread score of 28,053 and single-thread score of 3,535 further characterize its processing capabilities. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 29,879, places it within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X.

For Undisputed specifically, the CPU's role appears to be providing consistent frame delivery rather than being the primary performance driver. The resolution scaling data shows uniform frame rate reductions across all presets when moving to higher resolutions, which indicates the CPU maintains more than adequate processing headroom even at 1080p where the GPU is producing over 400 FPS on Low settings. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,683 and 8-thread score of 6,141 suggest the processor can handle the game's simulation and AI workloads without becoming a bottleneck.

The CPU's 105 W TDP and unlocked multiplier make it a flexible platform component, though the measured results show that its performance in this title is sufficient to keep the GPU fully utilized across all tested configurations. The combination of 8 cores with 32 MB L3 cache provides a balanced foundation for the game's physics and opponent AI calculations, while the 4.80 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded performance for gameplay logic.