Undisputed

FAQ

Q: What is the best overall preset for this CPU/GPU combination in Undisputed?

A: The data shows the High preset delivers the most balanced experience. At 1920x1080, High produces 182 FPS average, which is 84.6% above the 60 FPS target and 34.9% below the Low preset's 308 FPS. At 2560x1440, High averages 133.1 FPS, while at 3840x2160 it still achieves 86.3 FPS. This preset keeps frame rates well above playable thresholds across all resolutions without the extreme performance drop seen at Ultra.

Q: How does the RTX 3070's memory configuration affect performance at 4K?

A: The RTX 3070 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS falls to 53.9, which is the lowest measured result in the entire dataset. The 37.5% performance drop from High (86.3 FPS) to Ultra (53.9 FPS) at 4K suggests the 8 GB capacity may be a limiting factor when texture and geometry demands escalate at that resolution.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance relative to its multi-threaded capability?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G scores 2,930 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 20,755 in multi-core, giving a ratio of roughly 7.1:1. The 3DMark single-thread score of 899 versus 6,629 for 16 threads shows a similar pattern. This indicates the CPU has strong per-core performance for gaming workloads while still offering substantial multi-threaded headroom for background tasks.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations in Undisputed?

A: The combination ranks 722 out of 1,580 tested combos, placing it in the 45.7th percentile. This means roughly 45.7% of tested configurations perform worse, while 54.3% perform better. Given that the CPU sits in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs and the GPU in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, the mid-pack game ranking suggests Undisputed may be more sensitive to other system factors.

Q: What is the FPS drop when moving from Low to Ultra at each resolution?

A: At 1920x1080, the drop from Low (308 FPS) to Ultra (119 FPS) is 61.4%. At 2560x1440, the drop from Low (224.5 FPS) to Ultra (83.7 FPS) is 62.7%. At 3840x2160, the drop from Low (142.7 FPS) to Ultra (53.9 FPS) is 62.2%. The consistency of this ~62% penalty across resolutions indicates the Ultra preset imposes a uniform additional load regardless of pixel count.

Q: How does the CPU's nearest rival compare in average benchmark score?

A: The closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U with an average score of 25,706, which is 0.3% higher than the Ryzen 7 5700G's 25,626. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER scores 25,532 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Core 5 210H scores 25,490 (0.5% lower). These deltas are all within 1%, indicating near-identical overall CPU performance among these four processors.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data reveals a clear hierarchy across presets. The Low preset delivers extraordinary frame rates—308 FPS at 1080p, 224.5 FPS at 1440p, and 142.7 FPS at 4K—but sacrifices visual fidelity. The Medium preset offers a substantial improvement in visuals while maintaining 224.1 FPS at 1080p and 163.9 FPS at 1440p, with 100.9 FPS at 4K. The High preset strikes the optimal balance: 182 FPS at 1080p, 133.1 FPS at 1440p, and 86.3 FPS at 4K.

For competitive play at 1080p, the Medium preset is the recommended starting point. It delivers 224.1 FPS, which is 23.2% higher than High and only 27.2% lower than Low. The jump from Medium to High costs 18.8% performance at 1080p (224.1 to 182 FPS) but provides noticeably better image quality. At 1440p, High becomes more attractive since the 133.1 FPS average still comfortably exceeds 120 FPS for high-refresh displays.

The Ultra preset is problematic across all resolutions. At 1080p it drops to 119 FPS, at 1440p to 83.7 FPS, and at 4K to 53.9 FPS. The 37.5% penalty from High to Ultra at 4K is severe, and even at 1080p the 34.6% drop from High (182 FPS) to Ultra (119 FPS) is difficult to justify. For 4K gaming, the High preset is the clear recommendation—86.3 FPS is far more playable than Ultra's 53.9 FPS. Users with 120Hz displays should stick to 1440p High or 1080p Medium for the best combination of fluidity and visual quality.

How This Combo Ranks

The Undisputed benchmark places this combination at rank 722 out of 1,580 tested combos. This mid-pack position is interesting given the individual component percentiles. The CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile among all processors, and the GPU ranks in the 72nd percentile among all graphics cards. Yet the combined system lands near the middle of the pack for this specific game.

This discrepancy suggests Undisputed may not scale perfectly with raw hardware capability. The game's sports genre typically relies on consistent frame pacing rather than extreme peak performance. The 45.7th percentile ranking means the system outperforms slightly less than half of all tested configurations. The nearest CPU rivals—the Ryzen 7 6800U, Xeon D-2752TER, and Core 5 210H—all show average scores within 0.6% of the Ryzen 7 5700G, indicating that CPU-bound scenarios in this game would likely perform similarly across these processors.

The GPU's nearest rival, the Radeon RX 6600 XT, scores 0.9% lower on average, while the GTX 980 Ti scores 1% lower. These small deltas suggest the RTX 3070 holds a slight edge over its closest competitors in general compute, but the game-specific ranking reflects how other system components and driver optimizations influence real-world results.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the average frame rates span from 308 FPS at Low settings down to 119 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset achieves 224.1 FPS, while High reaches 182 FPS. This creates a stepwise progression: Low to Medium represents a 27.2% drop, Medium to High is an 18.8% drop, and High to Ultra is a 34.6% drop. The Ultra preset's penalty is disproportionately large, suggesting it enables effects that are particularly demanding on the GPU.

At 2560x1440, the results follow a similar pattern with lower absolute numbers. Low produces 224.5 FPS, Medium drops to 163.9 FPS (27.0% lower), High reaches 133.1 FPS (18.8% lower than Medium), and Ultra falls to 83.7 FPS (37.1% lower than High). The relative penalties between presets are nearly identical to 1080p, indicating the settings' computational cost scales consistently with resolution.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates compress significantly. Low achieves 142.7 FPS, Medium drops to 100.9 FPS (29.3% lower), High reaches 86.3 FPS (14.5% lower than Medium), and Ultra falls to 53.9 FPS (37.5% lower than High). The 4K results show a smaller gap between Medium and High compared to lower resolutions, suggesting that at 4K the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck and the difference between these two presets narrows.

GPU Role

The RTX 3070's specifications provide context for the observed results. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantial, but the 256-bit bus width and 14 Gbps effective memory speed determine how quickly textures can be streamed. The GPU's 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines work together to process the graphical workload. The boost clock of 1,725 MHz and base clock of 1,500 MHz define the processing cadence.

The FP32 performance of 20.31 TFLOPS indicates strong raw compute capability. At 4K Ultra, the 53.9 FPS average suggests the GPU's memory bandwidth or capacity becomes a limiting factor. The 37.5% performance drop from High to Ultra at 4K, compared to a 34.6% drop at 1080p, shows that Ultra settings place proportionally more strain on the GPU at higher resolutions. The PassMark G3D score of 22,214 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,162 provide synthetic benchmarks that align with the measured gaming performance. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs means it outperforms 72% of graphics cards in general compute tasks.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 7 5700G brings 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, manufactured on a 7nm process. Its base clock of 3.80 GHz can boost up to 4.60 GHz, and the 16 MB of L3 cache (with 512 KB L2 per core) provides fast access to frequently used data. The CPU supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel configuration and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, which feeds data to the processor efficiently.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,755 and single-core score of 2,930 demonstrate balanced performance. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,629 versus single-thread score of 899 shows the CPU scales well with thread count. For Undisputed, the game's sports genre typically uses fewer cores, making the single-thread performance particularly relevant. The 4.60 GHz boost clock helps ensure that the CPU doesn't bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 308 FPS average indicates the CPU can feed frames fast enough, but the 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs suggests some configurations may outperform it in specific workloads.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1080p to 1440p to 4K reveals how the system's performance scales with pixel count. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 308 at 1080p to 224.5 at 1440p (27.1% reduction) and then to 142.7 at 4K (36.4% reduction from 1440p). At High settings, the progression goes from 182 at 1080p to 133.1 at 1440p (26.9% reduction) and then to 86.3 at 4K (35.2% reduction from 1440p). These consistent scaling patterns indicate that resolution has a predictable impact on frame rates.

The 4K results are particularly revealing. At 4K Low, the system still produces 142.7 FPS, which is remarkably high. At 4K High, the 86.3 FPS average remains playable, but at 4K Ultra, the 53.9 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings shows a 35.6% reduction (from 83.7 to 53.9), which is steeper than the 1080p to 1440p drop of 29.7% (from 119 to 83.7). This suggests that at 4K Ultra, the GPU is increasingly constrained, likely by memory bandwidth or capacity.

The ratio between 1080p and 4K FPS varies by preset: at Low it's 2.16x (308 vs 142.7), at Medium it's 2.22x (224.1 vs 100.9), at High it's 2.11x (182 vs 86.3), and at Ultra it's 2.21x (119 vs 53.9). The stability of this ratio across presets indicates that resolution scaling is largely independent of graphics settings, pointing to a consistent bottleneck—likely the GPU's rendering pipeline rather than CPU limitations.