Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 produces a distinctive performance profile in Fivem, a multiplayer title where frame pacing and consistency often matter more than peak throughput. The benchmark data for this combination reveals a system that scales predictably with resolution and settings, offering clear insights into which component governs performance at different graphical loads.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G brings 8 cores and 16 threads to the table, built on the Zen 3 architecture with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This processor sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 25626. Its nearest rivals in aggregate CPU performance include the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, which scores 25706 (a minuscule 0.3% differential), and the Intel Xeon D-2752TER at 25532 (0.4% behind the 5700G). The data shows this is a mid-to-high tier desktop processor, well-suited for gaming workloads that benefit from multiple threads.

However, Fivem's behavior at lower resolutions and settings suggests that CPU single-thread performance becomes a relevant factor. Looking at the measured FPS data, at 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 213.3 FPS. This is substantially higher than the 135.7 FPS seen at 1080p High, indicating that as the GPU workload decreases, the CPU's ability to feed frames becomes more prominent. The 5700G's single-thread benchmark scores — 899 in 3dmark single-thread, 295 in Cinebench R15 single-core, and 3283 in Passmark single-thread — place it in a range where it can support high frame rates in moderately-threaded game engines. The 3dmark multi-thread scores show scaling from 1758 at 2 threads to 5648 at 8 threads, with only a marginal gain to 6627 at max threads, suggesting that beyond 8 threads, additional parallelism yields diminishing returns for this title.

The processor's 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for feeding the RTX 3070 in most scenarios. In Fivem, which is known for its heavy scripting and entity simulation in multiplayer environments, the 8-core/16-thread configuration provides headroom for background tasks without starving the game of processing resources. The data indicates that at 1440p, the CPU is less of a bottleneck — the 90.5 FPS at High settings versus 138.7 FPS at Low shows a 48.2 FPS spread, which is narrower than the 77.6 FPS spread seen at 1080p between Low and High settings.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is the primary driver of visual fidelity in this configuration. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 1725 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). With 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, the RTX 3070 is a capable Ampere-generation part, ranking in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 28238.

Its nearest rivals in aggregate GPU score include the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT at 27985 (0.9% behind the RTX 3070) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti at 27956 (1% behind). The RTX 3070's Passmark G3D score of 22214 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 provide a baseline for its raw compute capabilities. In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes evident when examining the resolution scaling. At 4K Ultra, the system produces 38 FPS, while at 4K Low it reaches 79.5 FPS. This 41.5 FPS difference between the lowest and highest settings at 4K underscores how much the GPU is stressed by the game's rendering demands at high pixel counts.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a notable consideration. While the FACT PACK does not provide specific VRAM usage figures for Fivem, the performance drop from 4K Medium (58.6 FPS) to 4K Ultra (38 FPS) suggests that the highest settings may be approaching memory or bandwidth limits. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantial, but at 4K with Ultra settings, the GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is being pushed heavily, as evidenced by the sub-40 FPS result. The RTX 3070's performance at 1080p Ultra (102.8 FPS) versus 1080p Low (213.3 FPS) shows a 110.5 FPS spread, indicating that the GPU has significant headroom at lower resolutions but becomes the limiting factor as settings increase.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions provides a clear picture of how the workload shifts between CPU and GPU. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 213.3 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low, the frame rate drops to 138.7 FPS, a reduction of 74.6 FPS (approximately 35% lower). At 4K Low, the system produces 79.5 FPS, which is 133.8 FPS below the 1080p Low result — a 62.7% decrease. This steep decline as resolution increases points to the GPU becoming the dominant constraint at higher pixel counts, even with minimal graphical features enabled.

At High settings, the scaling pattern is similar but with lower absolute values: 135.7 FPS at 1080p, 90.5 FPS at 1440p, and 46.7 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K at High settings is 65.6%, which is slightly steeper than the Low setting drop, reinforcing that the RTX 3070's rendering pipeline is increasingly stressed. At Ultra settings, the numbers tell a more dramatic story: 102.8 FPS at 1080p, 66.4 FPS at 1440p, and 38 FPS at 4K. The 1080p-to-4K reduction of 64.8 FPS (63%) at Ultra settings shows that even with the most demanding configuration, the relative scaling is consistent.

The Medium settings bracket shows 167.2 FPS at 1080p, 113 FPS at 1440p, and 58.6 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p drop of 54.2 FPS is proportionally smaller than the 1440p to 4K drop of 54.4 FPS, but the absolute differences are similar. This pattern indicates that the limiting component changes character across the resolution spectrum. At 1080p, particularly with Low and Medium settings, the high frame rates (213.3 and 167.2 FPS respectively) suggest that the CPU's frame generation capability is adequate, and the GPU is not fully saturated. As resolution climbs to 4K, the GPU's fill rate and shading throughput become the binding constraint, with all settings converging toward lower frame rates — the spread between Low (79.5 FPS) and Ultra (38 FPS) at 4K is 41.5 FPS, whereas at 1080p the spread between Low and Ultra is 110.5 FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 213.3, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in aggregate performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G scores 25626 on average, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U at 25706, and 0.4% higher than the Intel Xeon D-2752TER at 25532.

Q: What is the largest FPS drop between settings at a single resolution?

A: At 1080p, the difference between Low (213.3 FPS) and Ultra (102.8 FPS) settings is 110.5 FPS, which is the largest settings-based spread across all tested resolutions.

Q: Does the system maintain playable frame rates at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: The data shows 38 FPS average at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is the lowest measured performance in the dataset.

Q: How does the GPU's nearest rival compare in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 3070 scores 28238 on average, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 27985 — a 0.9% difference — and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 27956, a 1% difference.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each component relative to all tested parts?

A: The CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Fivem, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 ranks 836th out of 1792 total combinations. This places it near the middle of the distribution, which is notable given the individual component rankings. The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile and the GPU in the 72nd percentile, yet the combination lands at roughly the 46.7th percentile (836 divided by 1792). This discrepancy suggests that Fivem's performance characteristics do not reward raw component strength in a linear fashion, or that other combinations with lower-tier parts achieve similar results due to the game's specific engine constraints.

The rank of 836 out of 1792 combos indicates that while this system delivers solid frame rates — particularly at 1080p where it exceeds 100 FPS on all settings — it is not an outlier in terms of overall combination performance. The data shows that the combination's measured FPS figures are competitive, but the mid-pack ranking implies that many other tested pairs produce comparable or better results in this multiplayer title. This could be due to Fivem's sensitivity to memory latency, driver optimization, or the fact that the game's server-side scripting can introduce variability that synthetic benchmarks do not capture. The combo's rank should be interpreted as average within the tested pool, with the understanding that the component-level percentiles are higher than the combination's percentile.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete measured FPS data for this combination in Fivem is as follows:

At 1920x1080 resolution, the system achieves 213.3 FPS on Low settings, 167.2 FPS on Medium, 135.7 FPS on High, and 102.8 FPS on Ultra. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline of roughly 30-40 FPS per settings tier, with the largest single-step drop being 31.5 FPS from Medium to High.

At 2560x1440 resolution, the measured averages are 138.7 FPS on Low, 113 FPS on Medium, 90.5 FPS on High, and 66.4 FPS on Ultra. The settings spread narrows compared to 1080p, with a 72.3 FPS difference between Low and Ultra.

At 3840x2160 resolution, the system produces 79.5 FPS on Low, 58.6 FPS on Medium, 46.7 FPS on High, and 38 FPS on Ultra. The Low-to-Ultra spread here is 41.5 FPS, the smallest across all resolutions, indicating that the GPU is the dominant limiter at 4K regardless of settings.

The full dataset shows that the RTX 3070 and Ryzen 7 5700G combination delivers playable frame rates (above 60 FPS) at 1080p for all settings, at 1440p for Low through High settings, and at 4K only for Low settings. The 4K Ultra result of 38 FPS and the 4K High result of 46.7 FPS fall below the 60 FPS threshold, which is an important consideration for users prioritizing smooth gameplay at high resolutions.