Undisputed

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data for Undisputed reveals a clear and consistent scaling pattern across the three tested resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo delivers 221 FPS, which drops to 160 FPS at 1440p and further to 101 FPS at 4K. This represents a 27.6% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 36.9% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The scaling is not linear, indicating that the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as resolution rises.

Looking at High settings, the pattern holds: 132 FPS at 1080p, 95 FPS at 1440p (a 28.0% drop), and 60 FPS at 4K (a 36.8% drop from 1440p). The consistency of these percentage drops across different quality presets suggests that the resolution scaling behavior is independent of the graphics settings chosen. This is a hallmark of a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU has ample headroom at lower resolutions.

The Medium preset offers the most complete data, including minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p Medium, the average is 159 FPS with a minimum of 135 FPS and maximum of 183 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average falls to 115 FPS (a 27.7% drop), with a minimum of 98 FPS and maximum of 132 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average is 73 FPS (a 36.5% drop from 1440p), with a minimum of 62 FPS and maximum of 84 FPS. The frame time consistency, as evidenced by the min-max ranges, remains tight even at 4K, suggesting no severe frame pacing issues.

Ultra settings tell a more demanding story. The jump from Medium to Ultra at 1080p reduces the average FPS from 159 to 85, a 46.5% penalty. At 1440p, Ultra yields 61 FPS compared to 115 FPS on Medium, a 47.0% reduction. At 4K, Ultra produces just 39 FPS, versus 73 FPS on Medium, a 46.6% reduction. The near-identical percentage penalties across resolutions indicate that the Ultra preset imposes a consistent additional load on the GPU, regardless of resolution.

The data strongly suggests that the Intel Arc B580 is the limiting component at 4K, particularly on Ultra settings where the average FPS falls to 39. The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, appears more than capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions, as evidenced by the 221 FPS result at 1080p Low. The 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS is the only measurement that falls below the 60 FPS threshold commonly associated with smooth gameplay.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and features a base clock of 3.90 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The processor has a 65W TDP and is built on TSMC's 4 nm process node. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 9600X demonstrates strong single-thread performance with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1253 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2923. Its multi-thread capabilities are reflected in a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17528.5 and a Geekbench multicore score of 14438. The processor's percentile ranking of 81 among all CPUs indicates it sits comfortably above the median, though it is not at the very top of the performance ladder.

The nearest rivals in synthetic average score provide context. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 29656, which is 0.2% higher than the 9600X's average benchmark score of 29713. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868, which is 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29879, which is 0.6% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 29955, which is 0.8% lower. These deltas are all within 1%, indicating that the 9600X performs essentially on par with these competitors in aggregate benchmarks.

For Undisputed specifically, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 221 FPS, which is well beyond what most displays can show. Even at 1080p Ultra, the 85 FPS result suggests the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution. The fact that FPS scales so predictably with resolution — with nearly identical percentage drops from 1080p to 1440p and from 1440p to 4K — indicates that the CPU is not introducing variable bottlenecks across these configurations.

The 9600X's boost clock of 5.40 GHz is particularly relevant for a game like Undisputed, which is a sports title that likely benefits from high single-thread performance. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2456 and 4-thread score of 4649 suggest that the processor can deliver strong performance in lightly-threaded workloads, which is typical for sports games that may not scale perfectly across many cores.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the database of tested combinations for Undisputed, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X with the Intel Arc B580 holds a rank of 2794 out of 3718 total combos. This places it in the 75.1st percentile of all tested configurations, meaning that roughly a quarter of all tested combos perform better, while three-quarters perform worse.

This ranking is notably lower than what the individual component percentiles might suggest. The CPU alone ranks in the 81st percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The combination's rank of 2794 out of 3718 (75.1st percentile) is below both individual component percentiles, indicating that this pairing may not be optimally balanced for Undisputed.

The rank suggests that there are many combinations that deliver better performance in this specific title, despite the individual components being reasonably capable. This could be due to the game's particular optimization patterns, which may favor certain architectures or driver implementations. The Arc B580's relatively recent release in December 2024, compared to the game's October 2023 release date, might mean that game-specific optimizations were not fully mature at the time of testing.

The data indicates that while this combo is not a top-tier performer in Undisputed, it is also not among the worst. The 2794th rank out of 3718 combos means that users with this configuration will be in the upper-middle portion of the performance distribution, which is consistent with the measured FPS results that show playable frame rates at most settings and resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers strong performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 221 FPS. Medium settings yield 159 FPS on average, with a minimum of 135 FPS and a maximum of 183 FPS. High settings result in 132 FPS on average. Ultra settings reduce the average to 85 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 136 FPS, with Ultra delivering only 38.5% of the Low setting's frame rate.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low settings average 160 FPS. Medium settings average 115 FPS, with a minimum of 98 FPS and a maximum of 132 FPS. High settings average 95 FPS. Ultra settings average 61 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 99 FPS, with Ultra delivering 38.1% of Low's performance.

At 3840x2160, the demands of 4K become evident. Low settings still manage an average of 101 FPS, which is respectable for 4K. Medium settings average 73 FPS, with a minimum of 62 FPS and a maximum of 84 FPS. High settings average 60 FPS. Ultra settings drop to an average of 39 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 4K is 62 FPS, with Ultra delivering 38.6% of Low's performance.

The consistent percentage relationship between Low and Ultra across all three resolutions (38.5%, 38.1%, and 38.6%) is striking. This indicates that the Ultra preset imposes a nearly identical relative burden on the GPU regardless of resolution, which suggests the settings are scaling resolution-independent features rather than resolution-dependent ones.

The Medium preset is the only one with complete min-max data. At 1080p, the 135 FPS minimum and 183 FPS maximum represent a range of 48 FPS. At 1440p, the 98 FPS minimum and 132 FPS maximum represent a range of 34 FPS. At 4K, the 62 FPS minimum and 84 FPS maximum represent a range of 22 FPS. The narrowing range at higher resolutions indicates that frame times become more consistent as the GPU becomes more fully utilized.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip, designated BMG-G21, contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2670 MHz and a boost clock of 2670 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective.

The B580 features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is a substantial amount of VRAM for a modern GPU, and in the context of Undisputed, it is unlikely to be a limiting factor at any of the tested settings. The GPU's 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units provide a pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 13.67 TFLOPS.

In the GPU benchmark hierarchy, the B580 holds a percentile ranking of 68 among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 23021 places it in close competition with several notable GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, which is 0.2% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, which is 0.6% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, which is 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, which is 1.0% higher. These deltas are all within 1%, indicating that the B580 performs competitively with these GPUs in aggregate benchmarks.

For Undisputed, the GPU's role is clearly dominant in determining frame rates at higher resolutions and settings. The 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS strongly suggests the GPU is the bottleneck in this configuration. The 12 GB VRAM allocation is more than sufficient for a sports title like Undisputed, even at 4K Ultra, so memory capacity is not the limiting factor. Instead, the raw compute throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS appears to be the constraint at the highest settings.

The B580's 190W TDP and 450W suggested PSU requirement indicate it is a mid-range power draw GPU. Its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is sufficient for this class of GPU, and the 1x 8-pin power connector is standard for the segment. The dual-slot form factor and 272 mm length are typical for modern GPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Undisputed?

A: Based on the measured data, 1440p offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. At 1440p High, the combo averages 95 FPS, while 4K High averages 60 FPS. The 1440p result provides a significant frame rate advantage over 4K while still delivering a high-resolution experience.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K Medium, the average FPS is 73, with a minimum of 62 FPS. At 4K High, the average is 60 FPS. However, 4K Ultra drops to 39 FPS, which may not be smooth enough for competitive play. The 4K Low setting achieves 101 FPS, showing the GPU can handle 4K when settings are reduced.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X has an average benchmark score of 29713. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, scores 29656, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868 (0.5% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29879 (0.6% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 29955 (0.8% lower). All rivals are within 1% of the 9600X's score.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the Low preset averages 221 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 85 FPS. This represents a 136 FPS difference, with Ultra delivering only 38.5% of the Low setting's performance. The Medium preset averages 159 FPS, and High averages 132 FPS.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor in this combo for Undisputed?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. The consistent percentage drops in FPS as resolution increases, coupled with the CPU's strong single-thread benchmarks (1253 in 3DMark single-thread), suggest the CPU has ample headroom. The 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS is a clear indication of GPU limitation.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations in Undisputed?

A: This combo ranks 2794 out of 3718 total tested combinations. This places it in the 75.1st percentile of all combos, meaning it outperforms approximately 75% of tested configurations while being outperformed by the remaining 25%.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience in Undisputed with this hardware combination, the data suggests prioritizing the Medium preset across all resolutions. The Medium preset offers the only complete frame time data, with minimum FPS values of 135 at 1080p, 98 at 1440p, and 62 at 4K. These minimums indicate that the Medium preset maintains acceptable frame pacing even at 4K, where the average of 73 FPS is smooth and the minimum of 62 FPS stays above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 1080p, the High preset at 132 FPS is also a strong choice, offering a 17% reduction in average FPS compared to Medium (159 FPS) while presumably delivering better visual quality. However, the lack of min-max data for High makes it difficult to assess frame consistency, so Medium remains the safer recommendation.

For 1440p, the High preset at 95 FPS is a viable option, but the Medium preset at 115 FPS with a 98 FPS minimum provides a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset at 61 FPS at 1440p is borderline, as it sits just above the 60 FPS threshold but may not provide consistent performance.

The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution for this combo. At 1080p, it delivers 85 FPS, but the 46.5% penalty over Medium settings suggests a significant visual quality trade-off is not being matched by frame rate benefits. At 4K, Ultra's 39 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold and will likely result in noticeable stuttering during gameplay.

The Low preset, while achieving the highest frame rates (221 FPS at 1080p, 160 FPS at 1440p, 101 FPS at 4K), sacrifices visual fidelity to the point where it may not represent the intended game experience. The Medium preset provides the best balance of visual quality, frame rate, and frame time consistency across all three resolutions.

For players with 60 Hz displays, the 4K Medium setting at 73 FPS average with a 62 FPS minimum is the only 4K option that guarantees smooth gameplay. For 1440p displays, Medium or High both provide excellent experiences, with the former offering more headroom. For 1080p displays, even Ultra at 85 FPS is playable, but Medium or High will provide the smoothest experience with no risk of frame rate drops.