Counter-Strike 2
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 155 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 56 | 72 | 96 | 115 |
| 1440p QHD | 99 | 128 | 171 | 206 |
| 1080p Full HD | 150 | 193 | 259 | 311 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Counter-Strike 2 with AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
Counter-Strike 2 is a competitive FPS where frame rate consistency and high refresh rates often matter more than absolute visual fidelity. The measured data for the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X paired with the Intel Arc B580 provides a clear picture of how this combination behaves across the three most common gaming resolutions. This analysis covers scaling, ranking, and the individual roles of the CPU and GPU in producing these results.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drop from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K reveals the shifting balance of load between the CPU and GPU. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces an average of 311 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 206 FPS, a reduction of 105 FPS. At 4K Low, the average falls further to 115 FPS. The pattern is consistent: higher resolutions demand more from the graphics card, which reduces the frame rate.
The scaling is steep, but the data indicates that the limiting component changes as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU is likely the primary constraint because the GPU can render frames quickly. This is evident in the High settings: 1080p High produces 193 FPS, while 1440p High drops to 128 FPS, and 4K High drops to 72 FPS. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is 65 FPS, while the gap between 1440p and 4K is 56 FPS. The relative drop is larger at lower resolutions, which is typical for a CPU-bound scenario.
At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is massive: 115 FPS versus 56 FPS. This shows that the Intel Arc B580 is working much harder at this resolution, and the CPU has more headroom. The data suggests that for competitive play at 1080p, the CPU is doing the heavy lifting, while at 4K, the GPU’s performance ceiling dictates the final result.
The Medium preset provides a middle ground with 259 FPS at 1080p, 171 FPS at 1440p, and 96 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is a 34% reduction, while from 1440p to 4K it is a 44% reduction. This indicates that the GPU load is increasing disproportionately at higher resolutions. For players targeting 144Hz or 240Hz displays, the 1080p and 1440p results are more than sufficient, but 4K performance will not satisfy high-refresh-rate demands.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database, this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2787th out of 3719 tested combos for Counter-Strike 2. This places the combo in the lower half of all tested configurations, which is a crucial context for the measured FPS. While the raw numbers are high, the ranking shows that many other pairings deliver higher performance in this specific title.
The rank of 2787 out of 3719 means the combo sits at roughly the 75th percentile for in-game performance. This is lower than the component scores might suggest. The CPU alone has a percentile rank of 81 against all CPUs, and the GPU has a percentile rank of 68 against all GPUs. The combination’s in-game rank is below both, indicating that either the game is particularly sensitive to one component or that the pairing has some inefficiency in this specific workload.
The data shows that the Arc B580’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and the RTX 3080, with average benchmark scores within a very tight margin. The RTX 3080 has a deltaPct of -0.7, meaning the Arc B580 scores 0.7% higher in average benchmark. However, in-game performance can differ from synthetic benchmarks. The combo rank suggests that while the components are individually capable, their combined performance in CS2 does not place them near the top of the leaderboard.
It is important to note that the ranking is among all tested combos, which includes configurations with much more powerful CPUs and GPUs. The 2787th position is not a poor score in absolute terms, but it indicates that there are many faster combinations available. For a competitive title like CS2, where every frame counts, this rank might push some builders toward different hardware.
FAQ
Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo achieves in Counter-Strike 2?
A: The highest average FPS recorded is 311 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The lowest average is 56 at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings.
Q: How does the combo perform at 1440p with Medium settings?
A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo produces an average of 171 FPS, with a minimum of 146 FPS and a maximum of 197 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more of a limiting factor at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, the CPU is likely the limiting factor. The 1080p Low result of 311 FPS is very high, and the scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p (311 to 150 FPS) shows the GPU has less impact, indicating the CPU is the bottleneck.
Q: What is the combo’s ranking among all tested combinations for this game?
A: The combo ranks 2787th out of 3719 tested combos for Counter-Strike 2, placing it in the lower half of all configurations.
Q: Does the Intel Arc B580 have enough VRAM for this game at 4K?
A: The Arc B580 features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 4K Ultra result of 56 FPS suggests the memory capacity is sufficient for the game, as performance drops are more likely tied to compute limits.
Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 2080 in average benchmark scores?
A: The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 has an average score of 22895, a deltaPct of 0.6, meaning the Arc B580 scores slightly higher.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured data provides a complete picture of performance across the three primary resolutions and four quality presets. The numbers below are the exact average FPS values recorded for this specific combination.
1920x1080:
- Low: 311 FPS
- Medium: 259 FPS (min 220, max 298)
- High: 193 FPS
- Ultra: 150 FPS
2560x1440:
- Low: 206 FPS
- Medium: 171 FPS (min 146, max 197)
- High: 128 FPS
- Ultra: 99 FPS
3840x2160:
- Low: 115 FPS
- Medium: 96 FPS (min 81, max 110)
- High: 72 FPS
- Ultra: 56 FPS
The 1080p results are exceptional for competitive play. Even at Ultra settings, the combo holds 150 FPS, which is above the refresh rate of most standard monitors. The Medium preset at 1080p shows the best balance of quality and speed, with a minimum of 220 FPS ensuring no drops below high refresh rates.
At 1440p, the performance remains strong. Low settings provide 206 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate 1440p panels. The High preset at 128 FPS is still playable but may not fully saturate a 144Hz display. The Ultra preset at 99 FPS is smooth but not competitive-grade.
At 4K, the results are less impressive. The Low preset at 115 FPS is the only setting that breaks the 100 FPS barrier. Medium settings drop to 96 FPS, and High falls to 72 FPS. Ultra is the weakest at 56 FPS, which is playable but not suitable for fast-paced competitive play. The data shows that 4K is not the intended resolution for this combo in CS2.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage) with a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The core clock is fixed at 2670 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) across a 192-bit bus. This configuration yields 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a substantial figure for the class.
The GPU’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory is more than enough for Counter-Strike 2 at any preset. The game is not known for high VRAM usage, so the capacity is never a bottleneck. The memory bandwidth is also sufficient, as the 4K results are more limited by the raw compute power of the chip.
The Arc B580’s FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. These APIs are all relevant to CS2, which runs on the Source 2 engine. The benchmark data shows the GPU has an average score of 23021 and ranks in the 68th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the RTX 2080 (0.6% slower) and the RTX 3080 (0.7% slower in average score), which puts the B580 in interesting company.
In CS2, the GPU’s role becomes more critical at higher resolutions. The 4K scaling shows a steep drop from Low to Ultra, indicating the GPU is the primary constraint at 4K. The 1080p results, however, show that the GPU can keep up with the CPU when the load is lighter. The data suggests that the Arc B580 is a capable mid-range card that excels at lower resolutions but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with demanding settings.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) using a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The CPU has 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 80 KB of L1 per core. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.
The CPU’s single-threaded performance is particularly strong, as shown by its benchmark scores. It achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2183.5 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1253. These numbers are critical for Counter-Strike 2, which is heavily dependent on single-core performance. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score is 2456, indicating strong performance in lightly threaded workloads.
The Ryzen 5 9600X has an average benchmark score of 29713 and ranks in the 81st percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (0.2% faster) and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (0.6% slower). The CPU is clearly a high-performing part for its class, and its boost clock of 5.40 GHz gives it an edge in games that favor high clock speeds.
In CS2, the CPU’s role is dominant at lower resolutions. The 1080p Low result of 311 FPS is a direct reflection of the CPU’s strong single-thread performance. The game’s engine benefits from the high boost clock and the efficient Zen 5 architecture. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for CS2, which does not scale well beyond a few threads. The data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck until 4K, where the GPU takes over as the limiting factor. For players using high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p or 1440p, this CPU provides the necessary headroom to keep frame rates high.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + Intel Arc B580 in Counter-Strike 2
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 115.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 96.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 72.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 56.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 206.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 171.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 128.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 99.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 311.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 259.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 193.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 150.0 |
Counter-Strike 2 with Ryzen 5 9600X + Other GPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Counter-Strike 2 with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 9600X + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.