Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
182
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 182 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 65 104 126 155
1440p QHD 104 167 203 248
1080p Full HD 146 233 284 348

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 155
3840x2160 Medium 126
3840x2160 High 104
3840x2160 Ultra 65
2560x1440 Low 248
2560x1440 Medium 203
2560x1440 High 167
2560x1440 Ultra 104
1920x1080 Low 348
1920x1080 Medium 284
1920x1080 High 233
1920x1080 Ultra 146

Downfall with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination delivers exceptional performance in Downfall, ranking in the 85th percentile of all tested hardware combos for this title. The data reveals a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, with the CPU providing ample headroom even at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to explain how each component contributes to the game's performance and which settings offer the best experience.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael). It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, which are the relevant figures for gaming workloads. In Downfall, a horror title that typically relies on consistent frame pacing rather than extreme multi-threaded physics, the CPU's strong single-core performance is the primary driver of its capability. The processor’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 and multi-core score of 21765 indicate a balanced profile, but the single-core result is what ensures the game's main simulation thread is not a bottleneck.

The CPU’s benchmark data places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: it is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. This clustering shows that the 7400F is in a highly competitive performance tier, but the measured game FPS suggests that this CPU performance is more than sufficient for Downfall.

Looking at the measured FPS data, the CPU's influence is most apparent at 1080p with Low settings, where the system achieves 348 FPS. This high frame rate, even with the RTX 4070 SUPER, indicates that the processor can feed the GPU with data without becoming a limiting factor. The L3 cache is a shared 32 MB, which is a standard configuration for this class of processor and is adequate for the game's memory access patterns. The 65W TDP and DDR5 memory support (dual-channel, 83.2 GB/s bandwidth) round out a platform that is designed for high-throughput gaming.

The data strongly suggests that in Downfall, the Ryzen 5 7400F is not the performance ceiling. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 65, while at 1080p Low it is 348. This massive scaling difference is due to the GPU workload increasing with resolution and settings, not a CPU limitation. The CPU's job is to maintain a stable frame delivery, and the high FPS at lower resolutions proves it does so with considerable headroom. The processor's Passmark multi-thread score of 25645 and single-thread score of 3689 further corroborate that it has the raw throughput to handle the game's logic, leaving the rendering burden to the graphics card.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the dominant component in this pairing for Downfall. It features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's boost clock is 2475 MHz, and it is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with 7168 shading units. For a horror game, the 12 GB VRAM capacity is a significant asset, as it allows for high-resolution textures and complex lighting effects without exceeding memory limits, which is crucial for maintaining stable frame times in dark, detail-rich environments.

The GPU's benchmark performance is strong, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 43223. Its nearest rivals show it is performing as expected: it is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, 0.2% behind the NVIDIA Quadro M6000, and 1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. This indicates that the RTX 4070 SUPER is a high-tier performer, and the game data reflects this.

The influence of the GPU is clear when examining the scaling of FPS with settings at a fixed resolution. At 4K, the average FPS drops from 155 at Low settings to 65 at Ultra settings. Similarly, at 1440p, it drops from 248 at Low to 104 at Ultra, and at 1080p from 348 at Low to 146 at Ultra. This pattern is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario: as the graphical load increases, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and the frame rate decreases proportionally. The GPU's FP32 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS and texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s are the resources being taxed by the higher settings.

The 12 GB VRAM buffer is not the limiting factor in these tests, as even the 4K Ultra preset, which would use the most memory, still achieves a playable 65 FPS average. The GPU's ability to maintain over 100 FPS at 4K High settings (104 FPS) shows that it has the computational power to handle the game's demands at high resolutions. The data confirms that the RTX 4070 SUPER is the primary driver of performance, and its capabilities define the gaming experience across all tested configurations.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data shows a clear and consistent pattern of performance scaling across resolutions, which provides insight into which component is the primary limiter. When moving from 1080p to 1440p, and then to 4K, the average FPS drops significantly at every settings level. This scaling is the definitive evidence that the system is GPU-bound in Downfall.

At High settings, the average FPS drops from 233 at 1080p to 167 at 1440p, and further to 104 at 4K. This represents a 55% drop from 1080p to 4K. At Low settings, the drop is from 348 at 1080p to 248 at 1440p to 155 at 4K, a 55% reduction as well. The Medium settings show a similar trend: 284 FPS at 1080p drops to 203 FPS at 1440p and then to 126 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic scaling, dropping from 146 FPS at 1080p to 104 FPS at 1440p and finally to 65 FPS at 4K, a 55% decrease.

This consistent percentage drop across all settings is the key indicator. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a plateau in FPS at lower resolutions or settings, where the CPU's maximum output is reached. However, the data shows FPS scaling directly with the number of pixels rendered, which is a purely GPU-centric workload. The 4K Ultra result of 65 FPS is the lowest score in the dataset, and it is still a playable frame rate, but it highlights the heavy demand of the higher resolution on the GPU's pixel and texture processing units.

The implication is that the Ryzen 5 7400F has ample headroom. Even at 1080p Low, where the system produces 348 FPS, the CPU is not struggling. The GPU is the component that determines the final frame rate, and its performance scales predictably with resolution. For users seeking maximum frame rates, lowering the resolution will yield a direct and substantial benefit. Conversely, for those prioritizing visual fidelity at 4K, the GPU will be the deciding factor, and the CPU will not prevent the GPU from reaching its full potential.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset for the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in Downfall depends on the target resolution and the user's preference for frame rate versus visual quality.

At 1080p, the High preset is the standout choice. It delivers an average of 233 FPS, which is well above the refresh rate of most monitors and provides a smooth experience. The Low preset offers 348 FPS, which provides little practical benefit over High for most users, as the frame rate is already exceptionally high. The Ultra preset at 1080p yields 146 FPS, which is still excellent, but the 60% performance drop from High to Ultra (233 to 146 FPS) may not justify the marginal visual improvements in a horror game where atmosphere is key. The High settings offer the best balance of high frame rate and visual fidelity.

At 1440p, the High preset is again the recommended option, achieving 167 FPS. This provides a great experience for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors. The Medium preset at 203 FPS is also viable for competitive play, but High offers a better visual experience with only a 18% reduction in frame rate. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 104 FPS, which is playable but may not be ideal for those who prefer the highest possible frame rates. The data shows that High at 1440p is the sweet spot for this resolution.

At 4K, the High preset is the clear winner, delivering 104 FPS. This is a superb result for 4K gaming, offering a smooth and detailed experience. The Medium preset at 126 FPS is also excellent, but High provides a better visual quality with a modest 17% performance penalty. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 65 FPS, which is still playable but may suffer from occasional frame pacing issues in a horror game's intense moments. The Low preset at 155 FPS is unnecessary, as it sacrifices too much visual quality for a frame rate that is already high. Therefore, High is the recommended preset for 4K.

In summary, the High preset provides the best overall experience across all three tested resolutions. It consistently delivers the highest frame rates that are still well above 100 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay without the performance penalty of Ultra settings. The data suggests that the RTX 4070 SUPER is powerful enough to handle High settings at 4K, making it the ideal choice for this hardware combination.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this hardware in Downfall?*

A: The highest average FPS is 348, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

*Q: Is the system capable of 4K gaming in Downfall?*

A: Yes, the data shows it is. At 3840x2160 resolution with High settings, the average FPS is 104, which is a very smooth and playable experience.

Q: How much performance is lost when switching from High to Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 167 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 104 FPS. This represents a 38% reduction in average frame rate.

Q: Which component is the primary bottleneck for this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The FPS scales consistently with resolution and settings, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound workload. The CPU has enough headroom to support the frame rates seen at 1080p.

Q: Does the CPU's benchmark performance align with its in-game performance?

A: The CPU is in the 83rd percentile for all CPUs, and it competes closely with rivals like the Intel Core i5-14600T (0.1% difference). However, its in-game role is not limiting, as the FPS drops are tied to GPU load, not CPU load.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the data?

A: The lowest average FPS is 65, recorded at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. The only other min FPS values provided are 107 FPS at 4K Medium, 173 FPS at 1440p Medium, and 242 FPS at 1080p Medium.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following table details the exact average FPS measurements for each resolution and settings preset combination.

1920x1080 (1080p)

  • Low: 348 FPS average
  • Medium: 284 FPS average (min 242, max 327)
  • High: 233 FPS average
  • Ultra: 146 FPS average

2560x1440 (1440p)

  • Low: 248 FPS average
  • Medium: 203 FPS average (min 173, max 234)
  • High: 167 FPS average
  • Ultra: 104 FPS average

3840x2160 (4K)

  • Low: 155 FPS average
  • Medium: 126 FPS average (min 107, max 145)
  • High: 104 FPS average
  • Ultra: 65 FPS average

The data shows a clear performance hierarchy. At 1080p, the system is capable of extremely high frame rates, with even the Ultra preset exceeding 140 FPS. The Medium preset is the only one with min/max data, showing a stable range of 242 to 327 FPS. At 1440p, the frame rates remain high, with the High preset delivering 167 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh monitors. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 104 FPS, which is still solid. At 4K, the High preset is the most balanced, offering 104 FPS, while the Ultra preset is the most demanding, at 65 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K provides a good middle ground at 126 FPS with a min/max range of 107 to 145 FPS. This breakdown confirms that the RTX 4070 SUPER is the key to maintaining high frame rates across the board, with the CPU providing a stable foundation.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4700 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2475 MHz MHz
TDP 220 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 155.0
3840x2160 Medium 126.0
3840x2160 High 104.0
3840x2160 Ultra 65.0
2560x1440 Low 248.0
2560x1440 Medium 203.0
2560x1440 High 167.0
2560x1440 Ultra 104.0
1920x1080 Low 348.0
1920x1080 Medium 284.0
1920x1080 High 233.0
1920x1080 Ultra 146.0

Downfall with Ryzen 5 7400F + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RTX 4070 SUPER + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7400F + RTX 4070 SUPER

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.