Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2 is a title where frame rate consistency and raw speed directly translate to competitive advantage, and the measured results for the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination reflect a system built for high-refresh-rate play. The data shows a clear hierarchy across presets and resolutions, with the most balanced experience emerging at the Medium preset, which offers a substantial jump in visual fidelity over Low while retaining frame rates well above the refresh rates of most high-end monitors. At 1440p, the Medium preset delivers an average of 323 FPS, a figure that drops to 274 FPS in the minimum frame time measurement, still comfortably within the bounds of elite competitive performance. While the Low preset pushes averages to 388 FPS at 1440p and 587 FPS at 1080p, the incremental gains in speed come at the cost of visual clarity, making Medium the recommended default for players who prioritize both responsiveness and situational awareness.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data indicates that the Medium preset provides the optimal balance between visual quality and frame rate for this combination. At 2560x1440, Medium produces an average of 323 FPS, which is 85 FPS higher than the High preset’s 241 FPS average and only 65 FPS lower than Low’s 388 FPS. The minimum FPS at Medium (274 FPS) remains exceptionally high, suggesting that frame pacing is stable enough for demanding competitive scenarios. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset scales even better, achieving 487 FPS average with a minimum of 414 FPS, which is more than sufficient for the fastest 360 Hz displays on the market. The High preset, while visually superior, introduces a significant performance penalty—at 4K it drops to 135 FPS average, and even at 1080p it only reaches 364 FPS, which is a 25% reduction compared to Medium. Ultra is the least practical option for competitive play, as it reduces 1440p performance to 187 FPS and 4K to 105 FPS, making it suitable only for slower-paced or single-player scenarios where visual fidelity outweighs the need for extreme responsiveness.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. In Counter-Strike 2, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions, where the measured frame rates diverge more significantly from the CPU-bound results at 1080p. At 1920x1080, the GPU operates with considerable headroom, as evidenced by the 587 FPS average on Low settings, which suggests the CPU is the primary limiter. However, at 4K, the GPU’s compute capabilities come to the forefront—the Ultra preset yields 105 FPS, while the Low preset achieves 217 FPS, a 107% difference that indicates the GPU is now heavily engaged. The GPU’s boost clock of 2475 MHz and FP32 throughput of 35.48 TFLOPS are sufficient to maintain playable frame rates at 4K, but the data shows that the RTX 4070 SUPER is best utilized at 1440p and below for this title. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor, as even at 4K Ultra, the game’s memory footprint does not approach this threshold, and the measured performance degradation at Ultra is more attributable to shader and pixel workload than memory capacity.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combo in Counter-Strike 2?

A: The data indicates that 2560x1440 on Medium settings offers the best balance, with an average of 323 FPS and a minimum of 274 FPS. This resolution provides a significant visual upgrade over 1080p while maintaining frame rates that are well above the refresh rates of most high-end gaming monitors.

Q: Does the Medium preset provide a meaningful advantage over High?

A: Yes, the performance gap is substantial. At 1440p, Medium delivers 323 FPS average compared to High’s 241 FPS, a 34% improvement. At 4K, the difference is even more pronounced, with Medium achieving 180 FPS versus High’s 135 FPS.

Q: How does the system perform at 4K, and is it playable?

A: At 3840x2160, the system remains playable across all presets, with averages ranging from 105 FPS on Ultra to 217 FPS on Low. The Medium preset produces 180 FPS average with a minimum of 153 FPS, which is acceptable for casual play but below the threshold preferred by competitive players.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: The frame rates at 1920x1080, such as 587 FPS on Low and 487 FPS on Medium, are so high that they exceed the practical refresh rates of available monitors, indicating that the GPU is not fully utilized and the CPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution.

Q: What is the minimum FPS I can expect on Medium settings at 1440p?

A: The measured minimum FPS at 2560x1440 Medium is 274 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates stable frame pacing even in demanding scenes. This is a key metric for competitive integrity, as it ensures no significant stuttering occurs.

Q: How does the combo rank relative to other tested configurations?

A: This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER ranks 437th out of 2870 tested combos in Counter-Strike 2, placing it in the top 15.2% of all configurations tested for this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates provide a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional speed: the Low preset achieves 587 FPS average, Medium reaches 487 FPS with a minimum of 414 FPS and a maximum of 561 FPS, High produces 364 FPS, and Ultra settles at 283 FPS. This scaling pattern shows that even at the highest settings, the system never dips below 280 FPS at 1080p, making it ideal for esports tournaments where 360 Hz monitors are becoming standard. Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains robust: Low yields 388 FPS, Medium drops to 323 FPS with a minimum of 274 FPS and a maximum of 371 FPS, High achieves 241 FPS, and Ultra manages 187 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p results in a 34% reduction in frame rate on the Medium preset, which is a modest penalty given the 78% increase in pixel count. At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to feel the strain: Low produces 217 FPS, Medium averages 180 FPS with a minimum of 153 FPS and a maximum of 207 FPS, High drops to 135 FPS, and Ultra falls to 105 FPS. The minimum FPS at 4K Medium (153 FPS) is still above the refresh rate of most 4K gaming monitors, but the Ultra preset’s 105 FPS average suggests that this setting is best reserved for less demanding titles.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER holds a rank of 437 out of 2870 tested combos in Counter-Strike 2. This places the system in the 84.8th percentile, meaning it outperforms approximately 84.8% of all configurations tested for this game. The ranking is notably strong given that the individual components are not flagship products—the CPU sits in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU also ranks in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. The combination’s performance in Counter-Strike 2 exceeds what the individual component percentiles might suggest, indicating that the pairing is well-suited to the game’s engine requirements. The CPU’s nearest rivals in overall benchmark scores include the Intel Core i5-14600T (0.1% ahead), Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.2% ahead), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (0.2% behind), all of which are within a 0.3% margin, showing that the 7400F is competitive with mid-range mobile and desktop parts. The GPU’s nearest rivals, including the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, are also within a 1% performance delta, reinforcing that the RTX 4070 SUPER is a stable mid-to-high-end performer.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. In Counter-Strike 2, the CPU’s single-thread performance is critical, and the benchmark data reflects this—the processor achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3689. The CPU’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample headroom for the game’s engine, which is known to be sensitive to memory latency and cache capacity. The measured frame rates at 1080p, where the CPU is the primary limiter, show that the 7400F can sustain 587 FPS on Low settings, which reflects its strong single-core performance. The multi-threaded capabilities, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a PassMark multithread score of 25645, ensure that background tasks and game server processes do not introduce stuttering. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and 5 nm process node contribute to efficient operation, but the performance data shows that the processor is not a bottleneck at any resolution above 1080p, where the GPU takes over as the primary performance determinant.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic transition from a CPU-bound to a GPU-bound workload. At 1080p Medium, the system achieves 487 FPS, which drops to 323 FPS at 1440p (a 34% reduction) and further to 180 FPS at 4K (a 44% reduction from 1440p). This scaling pattern is steeper than what would be expected from pixel count alone, indicating that the GPU becomes increasingly constrained as resolution rises. The Low preset shows a similar trend: 587 FPS at 1080p, 388 FPS at 1440p (34% decrease), and 217 FPS at 4K (44% decrease from 1440p). The consistent percentage drops across presets suggest that the CPU’s contribution to frame time remains relatively constant, while the GPU’s workload scales predictably with resolution. However, the Ultra preset exhibits a different behavior: 283 FPS at 1080p, 187 FPS at 1440p (34% decrease), and 105 FPS at 4K (44% decrease from 1440p). The fact that the percentage drops are nearly identical across all presets indicates that the limiting factor is the GPU’s fill rate and shader throughput, not the CPU. The data points to a system that is exceptionally well-balanced for 1440p gaming, where the CPU and GPU are both sufficiently capable to maintain high frame rates, but it also shows that 4K remains a viable resolution for this combination, albeit with a more noticeable compromise in frame rate sustainability.