Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER delivers a remarkably consistent experience in Fivem, with performance scaling that clearly shifts from a CPU-bound state at lower resolutions to a GPU-bound state as pixel count rises. The data shows this combination is exceptionally strong for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p play, while 4K remains viable at medium settings, placing the combo in the 85th percentile of all tested configurations.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a classic performance curve that heavily favors lower resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 290 FPS, which drops to 229 FPS at Medium, 183 FPS at High, and 142 FPS at Ultra. This scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p represents a 51% performance reduction, indicating that even at the highest settings the system has substantial headroom, likely due to the CPU's ability to feed frames quickly at this resolution.

Moving to 1440p, the averages shift to 191 FPS at Low, 151 FPS at Medium, 120 FPS at High, and 93 FPS at Ultra. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p at each preset is consistent: Low falls by 34%, Medium by 34%, High by 34%, and Ultra by 35%. This uniformity suggests that the scaling penalty is primarily resolution-driven rather than settings-driven, pointing to a balanced system that responds predictably to pixel count increases.

At 4K, the picture changes dramatically. The average FPS at Low is 106, at Medium it is 84, at High it is 67, and at Ultra it falls to 52. The jump from 1440p to 4K at Low settings represents a 44% drop, while at Ultra the drop is 44% as well. However, the absolute numbers tell the real story: at 4K Ultra, the system produces 52 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold many users consider playable, while 4K Medium at 84 FPS and 4K High at 67 FPS remain smooth.

The data indicates that the limiting component shifts between resolutions. At 1080p, the gap between Low (290 FPS) and Ultra (142 FPS) is 148 FPS, a wide margin that suggests the GPU is not the bottleneck at Low settings, allowing the CPU to push very high frame rates. At 4K, the same comparison shows a smaller absolute gap of 54 FPS (106 to 52), indicating the GPU is now the primary constraint, as the higher pixel count demands more from the RTX 4070 SUPER regardless of quality preset.

GPU Role

The RTX 4070 SUPER's specifications directly explain its 4K behavior. With 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, the card delivers 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for Fivem's asset streaming at 4K Medium but becomes strained at Ultra settings where texture and draw distance demands increase. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed, and the 7168 shading units operating at a boost clock of 2475 MHz provide the compute throughput needed for the game's particle and lighting effects.

The GPU's percentile ranking against all tested GPUs is 83, placing it above the majority of cards. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, with deltaPct values of -0.1% and -0.1% respectively, indicating the RTX 4070 SUPER scores essentially identically to these cards in aggregate benchmarks. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile sits 1% higher in average score, showing the desktop RTX 4070 SUPER is competitive with even top-tier mobile parts.

In Fivem specifically, the GPU's role is most evident in the 4K results. The transition from 4K Medium at 84 FPS to 4K High at 67 FPS is a 20% drop, while the jump from 4K High to 4K Ultra at 52 FPS is another 22% reduction. These steep penalties at the highest settings indicate the card's 12 GB frame buffer and 192-bit bus are the limiting factors, as the game's Ultra preset likely increases texture resolutions that exceed what the memory subsystem can efficiently handle without significant frame pacing issues.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER ranks 448 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 15% of all configurations. This rank is particularly impressive given that the database includes many higher-end CPU and GPU pairings, and it reflects the balanced nature of this setup where neither component severely bottlenecks the other in most scenarios.

The combo's performance at 1440p High (120 FPS) and 1080p High (183 FPS) suggests it outperforms many combinations that feature more expensive CPUs but weaker GPUs, as Fivem's multiplayer environments often benefit more from raw GPU rasterization than from extra CPU cores. The rank of 448 indicates that while there are 447 combos ahead of it, the vast majority of the 3005 tested configurations fall behind, making this a strong mid-to-high tier pairing.

Compared to the CPU's individual percentile of 83 and the GPU's percentile of 83, the combo rank of 448 out of 3005 (approximately 85th percentile) shows slight synergy above what each component achieves alone. This suggests the pairing extracts more performance than either part would deliver with a less compatible mate, likely because the Ryzen 5 7400F's 6 cores and 12 threads provide enough throughput to keep the RTX 4070 SUPER fed at lower resolutions without introducing stutter.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to hit 144 FPS?

A: At 1080p with Low settings, the combo averages 290 FPS, and at Medium it averages 229 FPS, both well above 144 FPS. At 1440p, only Low settings (191 FPS) and Medium settings (151 FPS) exceed 144 FPS, while High settings dip to 120 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K Medium, the average FPS is 84, and at 4K High it is 67, both playable. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 52 FPS, which may feel less smooth due to the lower frame rate.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43223, which is 0.1% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and 0.1% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile. It scores 1% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance relative to its peers?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 21765 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which places it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, while sitting 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H.

Q: Is the 12 GB VRAM sufficient for Fivem's highest settings?

A: The data shows that at 4K Ultra the average FPS drops to 52, indicating the 12 GB frame buffer may struggle with the game's Ultra preset at high resolutions. At 1440p Ultra, the average is 93 FPS, which is more comfortable.

Q: What is the frame time consistency at 1440p Medium?

A: At 1440p Medium, the measured minimum FPS is 128 and the maximum is 173, with an average of 151 FPS. This indicates a relatively stable frame delivery, though the 45 FPS range between min and max suggests some variance in demanding scenes.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F contributes significantly to the combo's strong low-resolution performance, with its 6 cores and 12 threads running at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. This Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, is built on a 5 nm process by TSMC and features 32 MB of shared L3 cache, which helps reduce memory latency in Fivem's open-world environment where many entities are active simultaneously.

In CPU benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 7400F scores 21765 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3072 in single-core, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3689. These figures place it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 32750 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, +0.1% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697, +0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, -0.2%). This tight grouping indicates the CPU is well-matched to its peers in raw throughput.

The CPU's role in Fivem becomes apparent when comparing 1080p Low versus 1440p Low. At 1080p Low, the system produces 290 FPS, while at 1440p Low it produces 191 FPS. The 34% drop suggests the CPU is able to maintain high frame rates even as GPU load increases, indicating it is not a bottleneck at these settings. However, at 1080p Ultra, the average falls to 142 FPS, which is a 51% drop from Low, showing that the GPU becomes the limiting factor once quality settings increase, even at lower resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend on the target refresh rate and resolution. For 1080p users with a 240 Hz monitor, Low settings at 290 FPS and Medium at 229 FPS both exceed 240 FPS, while High at 183 FPS and Ultra at 142 FPS do not. For a 144 Hz display at 1080p, High settings at 183 FPS provide a comfortable margin, and even Ultra at 142 FPS is close to the target.

At 1440p, the best experience for high refresh rates is Low settings, which delivers 191 FPS, or Medium at 151 FPS for those wanting better visuals without sacrificing smoothness. High settings at 120 FPS are suitable for 120 Hz monitors, while Ultra at 93 FPS is playable but may not satisfy users seeking 100+ FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p shows a minimum of 128 FPS and a maximum of 173 FPS, indicating good frame pacing for competitive play.

For 4K, the data strongly suggests Medium settings as the sweet spot, with an average of 84 FPS and a tight range between 71 FPS minimum and 96 FPS maximum. High settings at 67 FPS are acceptable for 60 Hz displays, but Ultra at 52 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold and may introduce noticeable judder in fast-paced multiplayer scenarios. Low settings at 4K produce 106 FPS, which is surprisingly high and indicates the GPU is not fully taxed at this preset, making it a viable option for competitive play at 4K if visual fidelity is deprioritized.