Undisputed

Undisputed pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, and the measured results show a combination that is heavily GPU-limited at higher resolutions but surprisingly capable at 1080p. The data indicates that this combo sits at rank 1722 out of 2813 tested configurations, which places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, yet the frame rates achieved at 1080p and 1440p tell a more nuanced story about where this system thrives. This analysis will break down the resolution scaling, settings recommendations, GPU and CPU roles, and the exact measured performance numbers to give a clear picture of what this pairing delivers in Undisputed.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent across all settings, revealing that the RTX 5050 becomes the primary limiting factor as pixel count rises. At 1080p Low, the combo delivers 241 FPS, which falls to 174 FPS at 1440p Low and further to 110 FPS at 4K Low. That represents a 28% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 37% reduction from 1440p to 4K, showing a near-linear scaling with pixel count that is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The 1080p Low result of 241 FPS is far beyond the refresh rate of most displays, indicating that the CPU is not holding back the GPU at this resolution.

Moving to Medium settings, the pattern repeats. At 1080p Medium, the average FPS is 173, dropping to 125 FPS at 1440p Medium (a 28% decrease) and then to 79 FPS at 4K Medium (a 37% decrease from 1440p). The minimum FPS values also scale similarly: 147 at 1080p, 107 at 1440p, and 67 at 4K. This consistent percentage drop across settings suggests that the game’s rendering load scales predictably with resolution, and the RTX 5050’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are being taxed progressively harder as resolution increases.

High settings show the same trend with slightly different absolute numbers. The combo achieves 144 FPS at 1080p High, 104 FPS at 1440p High, and 66 FPS at 4K High. The percentage drops are 28% from 1080p to 1440p and 37% from 1440p to 4K, again mirroring the Low and Medium results. Ultra settings produce the lowest frame rates across the board: 92 FPS at 1080p, 67 FPS at 1440p, and 42 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 27%, and from 1440p to 4K is 37%, which is in line with the other presets.

The data strongly indicates that the RTX 5050 is the bottleneck at 1440p and above. The Ryzen 5 5600G, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, has enough headroom at 1080p to let the GPU reach 241 FPS on Low, but the GPU’s raw throughput—13.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 82.30 GPixel/s pixel rate—limits higher resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the 42 FPS average is barely playable for a sports title, and the scaling suggests that even a modest CPU upgrade would not improve 4K performance without a stronger GPU. Conversely, at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 872 in 3dMark and 3177 in PassMark single-thread tests are sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU, as evidenced by the high frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience measured in this dataset, Medium settings at 1080p offer the most balanced combination of visual quality and performance. The average FPS of 173 at 1080p Medium with a minimum of 147 FPS ensures smooth gameplay even during intense boxing exchanges, and the maximum of 200 FPS provides headroom for high-refresh-rate displays. High settings at 1080p drop to 144 FPS average, which is still excellent, but Medium’s higher minimum frame rate makes it the safer choice for consistent performance.

At 1440p, Medium settings again emerge as the sweet spot. The average of 125 FPS with a minimum of 107 FPS is well above the 60 FPS threshold for comfortable play, and the 144 FPS maximum shows that the combo can occasionally hit high refresh rates. High settings at 1440p yield 104 FPS average, which is playable but offers less margin for drops during crowded scenes. Low settings at 1440p produce 174 FPS, but the visual compromise is likely unnecessary given that Medium maintains such strong numbers.

For 4K, the recommendation is more constrained. Medium settings deliver 79 FPS average with a 67 FPS minimum, which is just barely above the 60 FPS target and could be acceptable for players who prioritize resolution over settings. High settings at 4K drop to 66 FPS average, which is borderline, while Ultra at 4K falls to 42 FPS, which is not recommended for competitive play. Low settings at 4K achieve 110 FPS, but the visual downgrade from Medium is significant, and the 79 FPS of Medium is a better trade-off.

Ultra settings are only viable at 1080p, where the combo averages 92 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra drops to 67 FPS, which is playable but not ideal, and at 4K it becomes too slow at 42 FPS. The data suggests that Medium is the highest preset that maintains consistently high frame rates across all three resolutions, making it the default recommendation for this pairing. Players with 1080p displays can safely use Ultra if they accept the lower average, but the measured minimums for Ultra are not listed, so the risk of frame drops is unknown.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications explain the measured performance in Undisputed. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K results suggest that capacity or bandwidth becomes a limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 4K Medium result of 79 FPS is respectable, but the drop to 42 FPS at Ultra indicates that the GPU’s compute resources—2560 shading units and 80 TMUs—are overwhelmed by the combination of high resolution and demanding settings.

The clock speeds of the RTX 5050 are 2317 MHz base and 2572 MHz boost, which are relatively high for a 50-series part. These clocks contribute to the GPU’s 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 205.8 GTexel/s texture rate. In Undisputed, a sports title that likely relies on character models and arena geometry, these figures translate to strong performance at 1080p, where the combo achieves 144 FPS on High. The GPU’s 32 ROPs and 82.30 GPixel/s pixel rate are adequate for the game’s visual effects, but the 4K Ultra result of 42 FPS shows that pixel fill is a bottleneck at extreme resolutions.

The RTX 5050’s benchmark scores place it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which scores 20713 (a 1.6% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, which scores 21153 (a -0.6% delta). These comparisons show that the RTX 5050 is a mid-range GPU that trades blows with older high-end parts. In Undisputed, the measured FPS aligns with this positioning: it can handle 1080p and 1440p with ease but struggles at 4K Ultra.

The GPU’s VRAM of 8 GB is a notable consideration. While the measured results do not show explicit VRAM usage, the fact that 4K Medium drops to 79 FPS from 173 FPS at 1080p Medium suggests that the memory subsystem is under stress. The 4K Low result of 110 FPS, which is higher than 4K Medium, indicates that reducing texture and shadow quality alleviates some of that pressure. For players with 4K displays, the data implies that staying at Medium or below is necessary to avoid severe frame drops, likely due to the 8 GB capacity being exceeded at higher settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The dataset provides average FPS for all twelve resolution-settings combinations, with minimum and maximum values for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1080p, the results are as follows: Low averages 241 FPS, Medium averages 173 FPS with a minimum of 147 and a maximum of 200, High averages 144 FPS, and Ultra averages 92 FPS. These numbers show a clear hierarchy where Low is nearly twice as fast as Ultra, and Medium offers a strong middle ground. The 241 FPS on Low is the highest result in the entire dataset, indicating that the combo has substantial headroom at the lowest settings.

At 1440p, the averages are 174 FPS on Low, 125 FPS on Medium (minimum 107, maximum 144), 104 FPS on High, and 67 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Low to Medium is 49 FPS, which is a 28% reduction, while the drop from High to Ultra is 37 FPS, a 36% reduction. The minimum FPS of 107 at Medium is still well above 60 FPS, making 1440p Medium a viable option for smooth gameplay. The maximum of 144 FPS at this setting shows that the combo can occasionally reach high refresh rates, but the average of 125 is more representative.

At 4K, the averages are 110 FPS on Low, 79 FPS on Medium (minimum 67, maximum 91), 66 FPS on High, and 42 FPS on Ultra. The minimum of 67 FPS at Medium is the lowest recorded minimum in the dataset, but it still clears the 60 FPS threshold. The maximum of 91 FPS at 4K Medium is notably lower than the 144 FPS maximum at 1440p Medium, reinforcing the GPU bottleneck at 4K. The 42 FPS at Ultra is the only result below 60 FPS, making it the only unplayable configuration in the dataset.

Comparing the same settings across resolutions, the scaling is consistent. For example, Medium at 1080p averages 173 FPS, which drops to 125 at 1440p and 79 at 4K. The percentage drops from 1080p to 1440p are 28% for Low, 28% for Medium, 28% for High, and 27% for Ultra. From 1440p to 4K, the drops are 37% for Low, 37% for Medium, 37% for High, and 37% for Ultra. This uniformity indicates that the game’s performance scaling is purely resolution-driven, with no unexpected bottlenecks from the CPU at any setting.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination ranks 1722 out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the 39th percentile of all configurations. This rank is lower than one might expect given the 1080p results, but it reflects the combo’s weaker standing at higher resolutions where the GPU’s limitations become apparent. The rank is determined by an aggregate of performance across all measured settings and resolutions, so the strong 1080p showing is offset by the mediocre 4K Ultra result of 42 FPS.

In the context of the database, this rank means that roughly 61% of tested combos outperform this pairing in Undisputed. Many of those combos likely feature more powerful GPUs that handle 4K better, or CPUs with higher single-thread performance that can push frame rates even higher at 1080p. However, the combo’s rank is not a measure of failure; it is a measure of where it sits relative to a wide range of hardware. The measured FPS at 1080p and 1440p are solid, and the rank primarily reflects the fact that 4K Ultra is not playable.

The CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs is 74, with an average benchmark score of 21088. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-1220P (score 21066, delta 0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (score 21133, delta -0.2%). The GPU’s percentile is 66, with an average score of 21035. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (score 20713, delta 1.6%) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (score 21379, delta -1.6%). Both components are mid-pack performers, and their combined rank in Undisputed reflects that neither is a standout in their respective categories.

The combo rank of 1722 is notably lower than the percentile of either component alone, which suggests that the pairing is not optimal for this specific game. The CPU is in the 74th percentile, and the GPU is in the 66th percentile, but the combination only reaches the 39th percentile in Undisputed. This discrepancy could be due to the game’s sensitivity to GPU memory bandwidth at high resolutions, where the RTX 5050’s 320.0 GB/s is insufficient compared to other GPUs in the database. Alternatively, the CPU’s PCIe Gen 3 interface, which is limited to 16 lanes, might slightly bottleneck the GPU’s PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, although the measured FPS do not show signs of severe CPU limitation at 1080p.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support provide adequate bandwidth for gaming, but the CPU’s integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics are irrelevant when paired with a discrete RTX 5050. In Undisputed, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations, and the measured results suggest it performs this task well at 1080p but may be a secondary bottleneck at higher resolutions.

The CPU’s benchmark scores indicate solid single-thread and multi-thread performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 10551, and single-core is 1409, which are typical for a 6-core Zen 3 part. The Geekbench multi-core score is 8428, and single-core is 1801. These numbers place the CPU in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21088. In Undisputed, the 1080p Low result of 241 FPS demonstrates that the CPU is not limiting the GPU at lower resolutions, as the frame rate is high enough to be constrained by the GPU’s maximum output.

However, the CPU’s PCIe Gen 3 interface (16 lanes) could theoretically limit the RTX 5050, which supports PCIe 5.0 x8. The practical impact of this mismatch is likely minimal in Undisputed, as the measured FPS at 1080p are very high, and the game is not known for being CPU-intensive. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and 7 nm process node also contribute to efficient operation, but these factors do not directly affect measured FPS. The data shows that at 1080p, the combo can reach 241 FPS on Low, which is well beyond the refresh rate of most monitors, indicating that the CPU has headroom.

At 1440p and 4K, the CPU’s role diminishes as the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The consistent percentage drops across resolutions suggest that the CPU is not introducing additional frame time at higher resolutions. If the CPU were struggling, we would expect the frame rate to drop more sharply than the GPU’s rendering load, but the 28% and 37% drops are consistent with pure pixel-count scaling. The CPU’s single-thread score of 872 in 3dMark and 3177 in PassMark are sufficient for a sports game like Undisputed, which likely uses a limited number of threads for simulation and AI.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i3-1220P (0.1% faster) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (0.1% slower), indicating that the 5600G is a competitive mid-range processor. In Undisputed, the CPU’s performance is adequate for the GPU to reach its full potential at 1080p, but the combo’s rank of 1722 suggests that other CPUs paired with the same GPU might achieve slightly higher frame rates, particularly in scenarios where the CPU is the limiting factor. The measured data does not include specific CPU utilization, so the exact extent of the CPU’s influence cannot be quantified, but the frame rate consistency across settings points to a GPU-bound system for most of the tested configurations.