To The Core
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 122 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 51 | 64 | 73 | 87 |
| 1440p QHD | 89 | 111 | 128 | 152 |
| 1080p Full HD | 133 | 165 | 191 | 225 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
To The Core with AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a remarkably consistent experience in To The Core, an idle game that nonetheless scales heavily with both CPU and GPU resources. The measured data shows a combo that can handle high refresh rates at mainstream resolutions but requires a careful settings choice to fully exploit its capabilities. The sweet spot lies in the Medium preset, which offers an optimal balance of visual quality and frame rate stability across all tested resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
For this specific pairing, the Medium preset is the clear recommendation. The data shows that at 1080p, Medium delivers an average of 191 FPS, which is a substantial 26 FPS jump over High (165 FPS) and only 34 FPS below Low (225 FPS). More importantly, Medium is the only preset at 1080p with measured minimum and maximum FPS data (162 min, 219 max), indicating a stable frame delivery window that avoids the extreme lows that can cause stutter. The visual difference between Medium and High in an idle game like this is typically negligible, but the performance gain is significant.
At 1440p, the Medium preset's advantage becomes even more pronounced. It achieves 128 FPS average compared to 111 FPS on High, and it remains above the 60 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for comfortable gameplay on larger displays. The 4K results reinforce this choice: Medium holds 73 FPS average with a 62 FPS minimum, whereas High drops to 64 FPS and Ultra falls to 51 FPS. The Medium preset is the only one that keeps the 4K experience consistently above 60 FPS, making it the sole viable option for 4K displays without compromising on frame pacing.
High is a reasonable alternative for those who prioritize image quality over raw frame rate, especially at 1080p where it still hits 165 FPS. However, the delta between High and Medium grows at higher resolutions, with Medium outperforming High by 14% at 1440p and by 9 FPS at 4K. Ultra is not recommended for this combo; it yields the lowest frame rates at every resolution and provides no measurable benefit in an idle game where the visual upgrade is marginal at best.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570's specifications paint a clear picture of its role in this combo. With 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the card has ample resources for To The Core's graphical demands. The memory clock runs at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), and the GPU core operates at a fixed 2500 MHz for both base and boost, suggesting a consistent performance envelope without thermal throttling concerns.
The B570's compute capabilities are substantial: 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, translating to 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s. These figures correlate strongly with the measured frame rates. The texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s ensures that even at 4K, where texture fill becomes a bottleneck, the card maintains playable frame rates. The data shows the GPU is clearly the limiting factor at 4K, as the frame rate drops from 111 FPS at 1440p High to 64 FPS at 4K High—a 42% reduction that aligns with the 2.25x pixel count increase.
The B570's benchmark scores provide context for its positioning. Its Passmark G3D score of 14195 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 place it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc A750 (avg score 20582, deltaPct -0.1%) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (avg score 20534, deltaPct 0.1%), showing the B570 is essentially performance-equivalent to the A750 and the mobile 3070. This explains why the combo can push 225 FPS at 1080p Low—the GPU has enough raw throughput to handle the idle game's relatively simple rendering at lower settings, but the 10 GB VRAM capacity becomes a non-factor since the game's texture demands are unlikely to exceed even 4 GB at 4K Ultra.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 provides the computational foundation for this combo, and its 6-core/12-thread configuration with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.20 GHz is well-suited to To The Core's CPU demands. The CPU's architecture, Zen 2 on 7 nm process, delivers a balanced mix of single-thread and multi-thread performance. Its 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for the game's entity management and physics calculations typical of idle games.
The CPU's benchmark results show a processor that punches slightly above its weight class. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15045 and single-core score of 2124 place it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. In the 3DMark 16-thread test, it scores 4605, while the 2-thread test yields 1361, demonstrating that the CPU scales well with thread count. This scaling is crucial for To The Core, which likely benefits from the 12 threads to manage game state updates and background calculations.
The 3600's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-1260P (avg score 17007, deltaPct 0.2%) and the Intel Core i5-11400 (avg score 17067, deltaPct -0.2%), showing the CPU is performance-equivalent to these modern parts. The data suggests the CPU is not the bottleneck in this combo, even at 1080p where frame rates exceed 200 FPS. The Passmark multi-thread score of 17700 and single-thread score of 2562 indicate that the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently, as evidenced by the 225 FPS at 1080p Low—a scenario where CPU overhead typically limits frame rates. The CPU's 65W TDP and PCIe Gen 4 support (16 lanes) ensure it won't starve the B570's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
How This Combo Ranks
In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations, this pairing of the Ryzen 5 3600 and Arc B570 ranks 2380 out of 2991 combos in To The Core. This places it in the 21st percentile of all tested configurations, meaning approximately 79% of combos perform better. However, this rank must be interpreted in context: the combo is built on a mid-range CPU from 2019 and a budget GPU from 2025, yet it still manages to deliver 60+ FPS at 4K Medium and 165+ FPS at 1080p High.
The rank reflects the combo's position relative to high-end systems that dominate the top of the database. For a 6-core CPU and a 10 GB GPU, achieving a rank in the top 21% is respectable. The data shows that the combo's performance is limited more by the GPU than the CPU, as evidenced by the 4K scaling patterns. The CPU's 71st percentile ranking and the GPU's 65th percentile ranking suggest that while neither component is in the top tier, their combination produces a balanced system that handles To The Core's workload efficiently.
Compared to its nearest CPU rivals, the 3600's performance delta is minimal—within 0.2% of the i7-1260P and i5-11400. This means the CPU choice is not a significant factor in the combo's rank; the GPU makes the larger difference. The B570's performance is similarly close to its rivals, with a 0.1% delta from the Arc A750 and 0.4% from the Quadro M4000M. This tight clustering suggests that the combo's rank is determined by how these mid-range parts interact rather than any single component's superiority.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K. At Low settings, the combo delivers 225 FPS at 1080p, 152 FPS at 1440p, and 87 FPS at 4K—a drop of 32% from 1080p to 1440p and another 43% from 1440p to 4K. This steep decline indicates that even at Low settings, the GPU becomes increasingly stressed at higher resolutions, though the frame rates remain playable at 4K.
At Medium settings, the scaling is more moderate: 191 FPS at 1080p, 128 FPS at 1440p, and 73 FPS at 4K. The 33% drop from 1080p to 1440p and 43% drop from 1440p to 4K show a consistent pattern where the GPU's pixel fill rate becomes the limiting factor. The 4K Medium result of 73 FPS is particularly telling—it represents a 62% reduction from the 1080p Medium score, which aligns closely with the 4x pixel count difference between these resolutions (1920x1080 vs 3840x2160).
High settings exhibit the same trend: 165 FPS at 1080p, 111 FPS at 1440p, and 64 FPS at 4K. The 4K High result drops below the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting that the B570's 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate is insufficient for 4K at higher quality settings. Ultra settings reinforce this: 133 FPS at 1080p, 89 FPS at 1440p, and 51 FPS at 4K—the only preset where 4K becomes unplayable. The scaling pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, while the CPU's role is minimal, as evidenced by the fact that even at 1080p Low (225 FPS), the frame rate is not CPU-limited.
FAQ
Q: What is the best preset for 4K gaming with this combo?
A: The Medium preset is the only viable option for 4K, delivering 73 FPS average with a 62 FPS minimum. High drops to 64 FPS and Ultra to 51 FPS, both below the 60 FPS comfort threshold. Low offers 87 FPS but at a significant visual cost.
Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its nearest GPU rival, the Arc A750?
A: The B570 and A750 are essentially performance-equivalent, with a deltaPct of -0.1% in average benchmark scores. The B570 scores 20556 on average versus the A750's 20582, a difference of less than 1%.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 3600 a bottleneck for the Arc B570 in this game?
A: The data suggests no. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 225 FPS, and the CPU's 71st percentile ranking with performance within 0.2% of newer rivals like the Core i7-1260P indicates it can keep up with the GPU's demands.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: High delivers 111 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 89 FPS—a 22 FPS (20%) reduction. The Ultra preset provides no meaningful visual benefit in an idle game, making High the better choice for 1440p.
Q: Does the combo's rank of 2380 out of 2991 mean it is a poor performer?
A: No. The rank places it in the top 21% of all tested combos. Given the mid-range components, this is a strong showing. The rank reflects the presence of many high-end systems in the database, not a deficiency in this combo.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings?
A: The average FPS drops from 191 to 73, a 62% reduction. This scaling aligns with the GPU's pixel rate limitations and indicates that the B570 is the limiting component at 4K, while the CPU remains capable.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + Intel Arc B570 in To The Core
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 87.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 73.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 51.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 152.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 128.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 111.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 89.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 225.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 191.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 165.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 133.0 |
To The Core with Ryzen 5 3600 + Other GPUs
See how To The Core performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
To The Core with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how To The Core performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 3600 + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.