Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 106 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 54 | 52 | 71 | 93 |
| 1440p QHD | 84 | 90 | 121 | 142 |
| 1080p Full HD | 125 | 129 | 145 | 165 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT combination delivers a commanding performance in Thief, ranking in the 64th percentile of all tested system pairings. The data indicates this is a high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p machine, with 4K Ultra representing the only setting that falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The measured results show a system where the GPU is the clear performance driver at higher resolutions, while the CPU's strong 8-core, 16-thread configuration ensures no bottleneck at lower settings.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve 144 FPS in Thief?*
A: At 1080p with Low settings, the system reaches 164.9 FPS. To maintain a stable 144 FPS experience, you can also use 1440p with Low settings, which delivers 142.4 FPS.
*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Thief?*
A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K High settings, the average FPS is 51.9, and at 4K Ultra it drops to 54 FPS. For a smoother 4K experience, Medium settings provide 71.2 FPS, while Low settings yield 93.1 FPS.
Q: How much of a performance gap exists between the 1080p and 1440p presets?
A: The difference is moderate. At High settings, moving from 1080p (129.4 FPS) to 1440p (90.4 FPS) results in a 39 FPS reduction. At Low settings, the drop is 22.5 FPS (from 164.9 to 142.4 FPS).
Q: Which setting preset offers the highest FPS at 1440p?
A: Low settings provide the highest average FPS at 1440p with 142.4 FPS. Medium settings follow at 120.8 FPS, then High at 90.4 FPS, and Ultra at 84.2 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to limit performance in this game?
A: Benchmark results indicate the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. From 1080p to 4K, FPS drops significantly across all settings, while the CPU's 16 threads provide ample headroom. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are critical for handling the texture loads at 4K.
Q: What is the performance ranking of this specific combo compared to all tested systems?
A: This pairing ranks 592nd out of 1642 tested combinations for Thief. This places it in the upper tier of systems, with only 36% of tested combos performing better.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is a Zen 3 architecture processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, running at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its 16 MB of L3 cache and 65 W TDP make it a highly efficient processor for gaming workloads. In synthetic benchmarks, it achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655 and a single-core score of 2916, indicating strong multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities.
For Thief, a 2014 stealth title, the CPU's 16 threads ensure that no core is saturated during complex scene rendering. The PassMark multi-thread score of 24303 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 6628 demonstrate that the processor can handle the game's AI and physics calculations without bottlenecking the GPU. The 84th percentile ranking vs all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27220, places it just 0.7% behind the Intel Core i9-9900K and 1.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340.
The CPU's role is evident in the resolution scaling. At 1080p, where the GPU has less work, the system achieves 129.4 FPS on High. At 4K High, the FPS drops to 51.9, which is a 77.5 FPS decrease. This pattern suggests that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck; if it were, the FPS would remain more constant across resolutions. The high single-thread score of 3296 in PassMark ensures that the game's main thread is well-served, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a Navi 32 chip. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's base clock is 1295 MHz, with a boost clock of 2430 MHz and a game clock of 2124 MHz. Its 3840 shading units and 96 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 233.3 GPixel/s, which is critical for high-resolution rendering.
In Thief, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is a significant asset, especially at 4K where texture sizes are large. The measured FPS shows a clear GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p Ultra, the system hits 124.6 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 54 FPS. This 70.6 FPS penalty is a classic sign of GPU limitation, as the rendering resolution increases the pixel fill rate demand. The GPU's passmark G3D score of 24176 and its 76th percentile ranking vs all GPUs confirm its high-end status, with a 0.2% delta from the AMD FirePro S9300 X2 and a -0.7% delta from the NVIDIA T600 Mobile.
The GPU's memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s is crucial for maintaining frame rates at 4K. The data shows that at 4K Low, the system achieves 93.1 FPS, while at 4K High, it drops to 51.9 FPS. This 41.2 FPS difference highlights how the GPU's compute units struggle with higher fidelity settings, but the memory subsystem is sufficient to avoid stuttering. The RDNA 3.0 architecture's 37.32 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is fully utilized, as the game's shader complexity scales with the preset.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific pairing of the Ryzen 7 5700 and RX 7800 XT ranks 592nd out of 1642 tested combinations for Thief. This position places it in the top 36% of all systems, indicating a strong performer for this game. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU's processing power and the GPU's rendering capabilities.
The combo's rank of 592 is a direct result of the GPU's performance ceiling. While the CPU is in the 84th percentile of all processors, the GPU is in the 76th percentile. This suggests that the GPU is the more limiting factor in this pairing. The data supports this, as the FPS scales dramatically with resolution changes, which is a GPU-bound behavior. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar FPS across all resolutions, but instead we see a 2.3x FPS difference between 1080p Low and 4K High.
In the broader context, this combo outperforms many systems with weaker GPUs but similar CPUs. The 1642 tested combos include a wide range of hardware, and this pairing's rank of 592 shows it is well above the median. The nearest rivals for the CPU, such as the Intel Core i9-9900K, would likely produce similar FPS when paired with a comparable GPU, but the RX 7800 XT's 16 GB VRAM gives it an edge in texture-heavy scenarios.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling as resolution increases. At 1080p High, the system averages 129.4 FPS. Moving to 1440p High reduces this to 90.4 FPS, a 39 FPS drop. At 4K High, the average FPS falls to 51.9, a further 38.5 FPS reduction. This consistent drop of roughly 39 FPS per resolution step indicates that the GPU's pixel throughput is the limiting factor.
The scaling is less severe at lower settings. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 164.9 FPS. At 1440p Low, it drops to 142.4 FPS, a 22.5 FPS decrease. At 4K Low, it reaches 93.1 FPS, a 49.3 FPS drop from 1440p. This pattern suggests that at Low settings, the CPU can feed the GPU more effectively, but the 4K resolution still overwhelms the GPU's rendering capacity.
The data also shows diminishing returns from Ultra to High settings. At 1080p, Ultra (124.6 FPS) is only 4.8 FPS slower than High (129.4 FPS). At 4K, Ultra (54 FPS) is 2.1 FPS faster than High (51.9 FPS), which is within the margin of error. This suggests that the Ultra preset does not impose a significant additional load over High, and the GPU's performance is more dependent on the resolution than the preset.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's performance across all resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates across the board: Low settings achieve 164.9 FPS, Medium reaches 144.5 FPS, High hits 129.4 FPS, and Ultra maintains 124.6 FPS. All 1080p presets exceed the 120 FPS threshold, making this an excellent resolution for high-refresh-rate monitors.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows more variation. Low settings reach 142.4 FPS, Medium hits 120.8 FPS, High drops to 90.4 FPS, and Ultra falls to 84.2 FPS. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p is a 30.4 FPS drop, which is significant. The 1440p Low and Medium settings are still above 120 FPS, while High and Ultra are above 84 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates. Low settings achieve 93.1 FPS, Medium reaches 71.2 FPS, High drops to 51.9 FPS, and Ultra is at 54 FPS. Only Low settings at 4K exceed 90 FPS, while High and Ultra fall below 60 FPS. The 4K Medium setting provides a playable 71.2 FPS, but the higher presets require a sacrifice in resolution or settings for smooth gameplay.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p gaming, Ultra settings are recommended, as they provide 124.6 FPS while still delivering the highest visual fidelity. The 4.8 FPS difference between High and Ultra is negligible, so there is no reason to compromise on graphics at this resolution.
For 1440p, Medium settings offer the best balance, achieving 120.8 FPS. This preset provides a smooth experience above the 120 FPS mark while maintaining superior visuals compared to Low settings. High settings at 1440p drop to 90.4 FPS, which is still acceptable for most gamers, but Medium is the sweet spot for competitive play.
For 4K, the recommendation is to use Low settings for the best frame rate, achieving 93.1 FPS. If visual quality is prioritized, Medium settings at 71.2 FPS is the highest preset that remains above 60 FPS. High and Ultra settings at 4K fall below 60 FPS, making them less ideal for a smooth experience. The data suggests that for a consistent 60+ FPS experience at 4K, Medium is the maximum preset, while Low provides a significant headroom of 22 FPS over the Medium preset.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5700
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 93.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 71.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 51.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 142.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 120.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 90.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 84.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 164.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 144.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 129.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 124.6 |
Thief with Ryzen 7 5700 + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RX 7800 XT + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700 + RX 7800 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.