Control

Control is a demanding action-adventure title, and this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT produces a highly capable setup for it. The benchmark data reveals a system that can handle the game’s supernatural chaos at high frame rates across most resolutions, though the most demanding settings at 4K will require some compromise. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, component roles, and optimal settings based solely on the provided facts.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 107.5. This suggests a very smooth experience for standard monitors.

Q: How much of a performance drop occurs when moving from 1080p to 4K at High settings?

A: At 2560x1440, the average is 83.6 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it drops to 56 FPS. This represents a significant 47.9% decrease in average FPS from 1080p to 4K.

Q: What is the best performance option for a 4K display?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, the Low preset yields an average of 85.4 FPS, while the Ultra preset yields only 45.4 FPS. Choosing the Low preset is the only way to exceed 60 FPS at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has an average benchmark score of 27220. This is 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900K and 0.8% ahead of both the Intel Core i7-12700H and the Intel Core i7-1370P.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has an average benchmark score of 32619. This places it 0.2% ahead of the AMD FirePro S9300 X2 and 0.7% ahead of the AMD FirePro S10000, while being 0.4% behind the NVIDIA P104-100.

Q: What is the best resolution to use for a consistent 60+ FPS experience with all settings?

A: At both 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, even the Ultra preset maintains an average FPS above 60, with 97.5 and 71.4 FPS respectively. This makes either resolution viable for high-fidelity gameplay.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is the primary driver of visual performance in Control, and its memory configuration is a key asset. The GPU comes equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This substantial frame buffer is likely a significant factor in maintaining playable frame rates at higher resolutions, as the game can store more textures and geometry data locally without bottlenecking.

Clock speeds also play a crucial role in the observed results. The GPU has a base clock of 1295 MHz, a game clock of 2124 MHz, and a boost clock of 2430 MHz. The high boost clock is what allows the card to deliver the raw computational throughput needed for the particle effects and physics in Control. This is supported by its 3840 shading units and a peak FP32 performance of 37.32 TFLOPS. The benchmark results show this power scaling predictably with settings: at 1080p, the average FPS ranges from 174 on Low to 97.5 on Ultra.

The data implies that the GPU is the dominant factor in performance scaling with graphical settings. When moving from the High preset to the Ultra preset at 1440p, the average FPS drops from 83.6 to 71.4. This 12.2 FPS difference is a direct result of the increased rendering load placed on the GPU. The card’s 60 ray tracing cores also indicate it is prepared for additional workloads, though the current data does not specify their effect in this title. Overall, the GPU’s balance of memory, clock speed, and compute units makes it the clear performance leader in this combo.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable trend: performance degrades as resolution increases, which is expected given the GPU is the primary bottleneck. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average FPS drops from 107.5 to 83.6, a 22.2% decrease. The jump to 3840x2160 is more severe, with the average FPS falling further to 56, another 33% decrease from the 1440p figure.

This scaling pattern indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is being pushed harder as pixel count increases. At 1080p, the GPU has ample headroom, as evidenced by the high frame rates even on the Ultra preset (97.5 FPS). The performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p is 76.5 FPS, which shows the GPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution. As the resolution increases to 4K, the gap between settings narrows in percentage terms, but the overall frame rates become more demanding.

The data suggests a shift in the bottleneck. At 1080p, the frame rate is likely more influenced by the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU, as even the Low preset produces 174 FPS. However, at 4K, the GPU’s rendering workload becomes the dominant constraint. The 4K Ultra preset’s average of 45.4 FPS is a clear sign that the GPU is fully saturated, while the 4K Low preset’s 85.4 FPS shows that reducing the load on the GPU can recover significant performance.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT holds a rank of 599 out of 1636 tested combos for Control. This places it in the top 36.6% of all tested systems, indicating a solidly above-average configuration for this game. The data suggests that while it is not a top-tier, bleeding-edge setup, it is more than capable of delivering a high-quality experience.

The ranking is a function of both components. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 27220 places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 32619 places it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs. The combination of two well-above-average parts results in a system that is well-optimized for gaming workloads. The fact that it sits in the upper third of all combos tested in this specific game is consistent with the performance figures we see in the measured FPS data. It is not a pairing that will struggle, but it is also not one that will dominate every other configuration.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 provides the processing foundation for this combination. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, it is well-suited for modern game engines. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz ensure strong single-threaded performance, which is often critical for game logic and draw calls. The CPU’s 16 MB of L3 cache helps reduce memory latency, which can improve frame pacing.

The benchmark data shows this is a very capable processor. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 and single-core score of 2916 indicate substantial processing power. This is reinforced by its percentile ranking of 84, meaning it outperforms 84% of all tested CPUs. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score, such as the Intel Core i9-9900K, are within 0.8% of its score, confirming it is a high-performance part in its class.

In the context of Control, this CPU is likely not the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The measured FPS scaling with resolution points to the GPU being the main constraint. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance allows it to keep up with the GPU’s demands, ensuring that frame rates are not artificially limited by processor speed. The high frame rates seen at 1080p Low (174 FPS) are proof of the CPU’s ability to handle a high number of frames per second without becoming a limiting factor.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data is directly from the measured FPS records for this hardware combination.

1920x1080:

• Low: 174.0 average FPS
• Medium: 125.7 average FPS
• High: 107.5 average FPS
• Ultra: 97.5 average FPS

2560x1440:

• Low: 132.2 average FPS
• Medium: 93.8 average FPS
• High: 83.6 average FPS
• Ultra: 71.4 average FPS

3840x2160:

• Low: 85.4 average FPS
• Medium: 62.1 average FPS
• High: 56.0 average FPS
• Ultra: 45.4 average FPS

This data reveals a consistent pattern. At 1080p, every preset is well above the 60 FPS threshold, with the lowest being Ultra at 97.5 FPS. At 1440p, all presets are also above 60 FPS, making it an excellent resolution for this combo. The situation changes at 4K, where the Medium preset is the only one that maintains an average FPS above 60. The High and Ultra presets fall below this threshold, indicating that high-fidelity 4K gaming is not possible without compromises.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend on the user’s display and performance targets.

For 1080p displays, the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation. The average FPS of 97.5 is far above the standard 60 FPS target, and it provides the highest visual quality. There is no performance reason to use a lower preset at this resolution.

For 1440p displays, the Ultra preset is also recommended, as it maintains a solid average of 71.4 FPS. This delivers a high-quality experience with a high refresh rate potential. The High preset offers a more significant performance buffer at 83.6 FPS, which might be preferable for users with 144Hz monitors who want to be closer to that refresh rate.

For 4K displays, the data suggests a significant trade-off. The Ultra preset’s 45.4 FPS is not ideal for a smooth experience. The High preset at 56 FPS is playable but not optimal. The Medium preset is the sweet spot, providing an average of 62.1 FPS, which just crosses the 60 FPS line and offers a better visual experience than the Low preset’s 85.4 FPS. Users with 4K displays should select the Medium preset for the best balance of visual fidelity and smooth performance based on the measured results.