Doom

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT combination delivers a strong performance profile in Doom, with measured frame rates that consistently exceed the thresholds for smooth, high-refresh-rate gameplay. The data shows a pairing where the 8-core CPU provides ample headroom, and the GPU’s substantial memory and bandwidth resources drive performance across all tested resolutions and settings. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results, focusing on the specific contributions of each component and how they interact to produce the observed frame rates.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. In the context of Doom, a fast-paced FPS, the CPU’s job is to handle game logic, physics, and draw calls without becoming a bottleneck. The benchmark scores for this CPU show a strong single-thread performance, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 901 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2916. This is crucial for maintaining high frame rates, as older game engines often rely heavily on a few threads.

The processor’s multi-threading capabilities are also robust, as indicated by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 and a 3dmark_max_threads score of 6617. While Doom is not typically a title that scales perfectly with many cores, having 16 threads ensures that background tasks and heavier engine workloads do not cause stutters. The CPU’s percentile ranking, at 84% versus all CPUs, places it in the upper tier of processors. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a nearly identical average benchmark score, with a deltaPct of only 0.7% versus the Intel Core i9-9900K and 0.8% against the Intel Core i7-12700H. This means the Ryzen 7 5700 offers comparable computational performance to those chips, but its real-world impact here is best seen in the measured FPS, where it never appears to limit the GPU.

In the measured FPS data, the CPU’s influence is most apparent at lower resolutions and settings, where the GPU can produce frames faster. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combination reaches 284.2 FPS. This high frame rate suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to exceed 280 frames per second. Even at the highest tested preset, 1920x1080 Ultra, the system maintains 172 FPS, indicating that the processor’s single-thread performance is sufficient to push frames well beyond the 144 Hz mark. The 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support provide the necessary bandwidth for the CPU to keep up with the GPU’s output, ensuring consistent performance rather than occasional frame drops.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is the primary driver of visual performance in this configuration. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This large memory pool is a significant advantage at higher resolutions, as it prevents the GPU from running out of VRAM, which would cause severe frame rate dips. The GPU’s boost clock is listed at 2430 MHz, with a game clock of 2124 MHz, and it is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture.

The GPU’s raw compute power is substantial, with an FP32 performance of 37.32 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 233.3 GPixel/s. These specifications translate directly into the measured frame rates. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the RX 7800 XT manages an average of 75.1 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The performance scales well with lower settings; at 2160p Low, it achieves 98.3 FPS, and at 2160p Medium, it hits 84.6 FPS. The drop from Medium to Ultra at 4K is notable, with the Ultra preset falling to 58 FPS, indicating that the most demanding visual features have a significant performance cost.

The GPU’s percentile ranking versus all GPUs is 76%, and its average benchmark score of 32619 is closely matched by its nearest rivals. The data shows a deltaPct of just 0.2% versus the AMD FirePro S9300 X2 and -0.4% against the NVIDIA P104-100. This indicates that in synthetic benchmarks, the RX 7800 XT is in a tight performance band with those cards. However, in Doom, the measured FPS demonstrates the practical benefits of its 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth. At 2560x1440, the GPU really shines, producing 132.6 FPS on High and 179.6 FPS on Low, which are excellent results for a 1440p gaming experience. The transition from 1080p to 1440p shows a clear scaling pattern, with the GPU’s compute power being the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achieved by this combination in Doom?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 284.2, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU’s single-thread performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 has a 3dmark_single_thread score of 901, and its average benchmark score is 0.7% higher than the Intel Core i9-9900K, which is a negligible difference in practice.

Q: Is the GPU capable of handling 4K resolution in this game?

A: Yes, the data shows playable frame rates at 3840x2160, with an average of 75.1 FPS on High settings and 58 FPS on Ultra. Lowering settings to Low raises the average to 98.3 FPS.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The RX 7800 XT has a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This high bandwidth contributes to the strong performance at 2560x1440, where the GPU maintains over 110 FPS on all settings.

Q: How does this system rank among all tested combinations for this game?

A: The combination ranks 623 out of 1681 tested combos, placing it in the upper portion of the database.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the average frame rate drops from 284.2 FPS on Low to 172 FPS on Ultra, a difference of 112.2 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Radeon RX 7800 XT combination holds a rank of 623 out of 1681 tested combos in Doom. This places it in the top 37% of all configurations in the database. This ranking reflects a strong overall performance, but it is not at the very top, which is expected given that there are more powerful CPUs and GPUs available. The rank suggests that this system is capable of delivering a high-quality experience, but it may not be the absolute best for those seeking maximum frame rates at the highest settings.

The data indicates that the system’s strength lies in its balance. The CPU’s performance is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and high bandwidth allow it to perform admirably at 1440p, where it delivers over 110 FPS on the Ultra preset. The rank of 623 is a composite measure, but the measured FPS data suggests that for most users, this system will provide a very smooth experience. The gap between this combo and higher-ranked ones is likely in the extreme high-end, such as 4K Ultra settings with maximum refresh rates, where the RX 7800 XT’s 58 FPS at 2160p Ultra might be a limiting factor. For 1440p gaming, this combo is clearly in its element, offering performance that would satisfy most competitive players.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of how this system performs across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system shows exceptional performance. With Low settings, the average frame rate is 284.2 FPS. Moving to Medium increases the visual fidelity while still maintaining an excellent 247 FPS. High settings produce 209 FPS, and even the most demanding Ultra preset yields a very high 172 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is heavily GPU-bound, but the GPU is powerful enough to deliver frame rates that exceed the refresh rates of most high-end monitors.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains impressive. The Low preset achieves an average of 179.6 FPS, while Medium and High settings deliver 161.4 FPS and 132.6 FPS, respectively. The Ultra preset at 1440p still provides a smooth experience with an average of 110.1 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for this combination, as it balances visual quality with high frame rates. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant but expected, with the Ultra preset seeing a reduction from 172 FPS to 110.1 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system is pushed harder. The Low setting yields an average of 98.3 FPS, which is playable. Medium settings produce 84.6 FPS, and High settings result in 75.1 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the most demanding scenario, with the average frame rate dropping to 58 FPS. While this is still technically playable, it falls below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for a smooth experience. The scaling from 1080p to 4K is consistent, with the GPU’s fill rate and bandwidth becoming the primary limiting factors at the higher resolution.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this system depend on the user’s resolution and refresh rate preferences. For users with a 1920x1080 monitor, the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation. At 172 FPS, the system provides a buttery-smooth experience that will take full advantage of any 144 Hz or even 165 Hz display. There is no need to lower settings at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset provides over 170 FPS.

For 2560x1440 users, the High preset is the best balance of visual quality and performance. At 132.6 FPS, it is well above the 100 FPS mark and provides a highly responsive experience. The Ultra preset at 110.1 FPS is also a viable option for those who prioritize graphics over raw frame rates. However, given the fast-paced nature of Doom, the High preset’s higher frame rate is preferable for competitive play. The Low and Medium presets at 1440p offer even higher frame rates, but the visual compromise is unnecessary given the system’s capability.

At 3840x2160, the recommendation is to use the Medium preset. The 84.6 FPS average is smooth and offers a good balance between visual fidelity and performance. The High preset at 75.1 FPS is acceptable, but the Medium preset provides a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The Low preset at 98.3 FPS is the best choice for those who prioritize frame rate above all else, but it significantly reduces the visual quality. The Ultra preset at 58 FPS is not recommended, as it dips below the 60 FPS threshold, which can lead to noticeable stuttering in a fast-moving game. The data shows that the Medium preset at 4K is the sweet spot for this combination, providing a playable and visually pleasing experience.