Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 102 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 47 | 52 | 65 | 85 |
| 1440p QHD | 80 | 85 | 112 | 144 |
| 1080p Full HD | 117 | 126 | 149 | 163 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
# How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT lands at rank 658 out of 1,642 tested combos in Thief. That places this configuration in the upper-middle tier of all tested systems, sitting just inside the top 40% of combinations. The ranking reflects a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically bottlenecks the other, though the data suggests the GPU carries more of the workload in this particular title.
The CPU itself ranks in the 84th percentile against all processors, with an average benchmark score of 27,220. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-9900K (0.7% ahead), Intel Core i7-12700H (0.8% ahead), and Intel Core i7-1370P (0.8% ahead). The margins are razor-thin — less than one percent separates this CPU from those competitors, indicating that the Ryzen 7 5700's position in the overall hierarchy is well-established. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 sits 1.2% ahead, still a negligible gap in real-world gaming scenarios.
For the GPU, the RX 7700 XT holds the 73rd percentile against all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 30,097. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, matches it exactly at 0% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 570 sits 0.2% behind, while the NVIDIA Tesla M60 trails by 0.4%. This clustering suggests the RX 7700 XT occupies a competitive performance tier where small architectural differences determine placement.
The combined rank of 658 out of 1,642 combos indicates that roughly 60% of tested pairings outperform this one. That may seem surprising given the individual component percentiles, but Thief's engine appears to favor certain hardware configurations. The data implies that while each part is competent on its own, the combination doesn't unlock any exceptional synergy — it performs as expected for its tier.
GPU Role
The Radeon RX 7700 XT brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The GPU's base clock sits at 1435 MHz, boosting to 2544 MHz, with a game clock of 2171 MHz. These specifications position the card as a capable 1440p performer, which aligns with the measured results in Thief.
The GPU's shading units number 3,456, accompanied by 216 texture mapping units and 96 render output units. The 54 ray tracing cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate, though Thief's 2014 release predates widespread RT implementation. The pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s provide raw throughput that the game can utilize at higher resolutions.
At 4K Ultra, the combo manages 47.3 FPS average — playable but not smooth. The GPU's 12 GB frame buffer proves adequate for Thief's demands, as the game doesn't appear to exceed memory capacity even at maximum settings. The FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS provides ample compute headroom, though the game's engine likely relies more on traditional rasterization than compute-heavy effects.
The GPU's 73rd percentile ranking against all graphics cards places it in solid mid-range territory. Its matching score with the RTX 5060 suggests that in synthetic benchmarks, these cards trade blows. However, in Thief specifically, the RX 7700 XT's architecture — RDNA 3.0 on TSMC's 5 nm process — delivers consistent frame rates across all tested settings.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals predictable scaling patterns as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 162.9 FPS, while at 4K Low it drops to 85.3 FPS — a 47.6% reduction. This scaling suggests the GPU becomes increasingly stressed at higher resolutions, with the CPU maintaining adequate frame delivery even at 1080p.
Looking at High settings, the progression from 1080p (125.8 FPS) to 1440p (84.6 FPS) to 4K (52.4 FPS) shows a consistent halving of performance roughly every resolution step. The 1440p to 4K transition incurs a 38.1% performance penalty, while the 1080p to 1440p step costs 32.8%. This nonlinear scaling indicates the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources become limiting factors as pixel count increases.
At Ultra settings, the pattern holds: 116.7 FPS at 1080p, 80.2 FPS at 1440p, and 47.3 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 4K represents a 59.5% reduction in frame rate. This steep decline points to the GPU being the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the CPU's 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides sufficient headroom even at 1080p Ultra where the frame rate stays above 116 FPS.
The resolution scaling data suggests that 1440p represents the sweet spot for this combination. At 1440p High, the 84.6 FPS average exceeds the 60 FPS threshold comfortably, while 4K Ultra dips below 50 FPS — a noticeable step down in smoothness. The GPU's 432.0 GB/s bandwidth appears well-matched to 1440p workloads, but 4K demands more than the card can consistently deliver at maximum settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. Low settings produce 162.9 FPS average, while Medium reaches 148.9 FPS. High settings achieve 125.8 FPS, and Ultra drops to 116.7 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 46.2 FPS, representing a 28.4% performance range. This relatively tight spread indicates that even at maximum settings, the GPU has enough headroom to keep frame rates well above 100 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers show a clear step down. Low settings deliver 144.3 FPS, Medium hits 112.1 FPS, and High reaches 84.6 FPS. Ultra bottoms out at 80.2 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra widens to 64.1 FPS, a 44.4% range. Notably, 1440p Low outperforms 1080p Ultra by 27.6 FPS, suggesting that resolution scaling affects performance more dramatically than settings changes at this tier.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become evident. Low settings produce 85.3 FPS, Medium drops to 64.8 FPS, and High falls to 52.4 FPS. Ultra settings yield just 47.3 FPS. The range between Low and Ultra at 4K is 38 FPS, representing a 44.6% spread. Every 4K setting except Low falls below 65 FPS, indicating that 4K gaming at high refresh rates is not viable with this combination.
Across all resolutions, the pattern remains consistent: Low settings provide the highest frame rates, with each successive preset tier costing more performance. The Medium preset at 1440p (112.1 FPS) almost matches High at 1080p (125.8 FPS), demonstrating that the GPU can compensate for resolution increases up to a point. Beyond that point, at 4K, even Low settings cannot match the 1080p Ultra experience.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 features 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz boosts to 4.60 GHz, and the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption modest. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration, offering 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth — sufficient for gaming workloads.
In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 20,655 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2,916 in single-core. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 901 (single thread) to 6,617 (max threads), indicating strong multi-threaded performance. PassMark results reinforce this with a multithread score of 24,303 and a single-thread score of 3,296.
The game's performance at 1080p Low (162.9 FPS) suggests the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them at lower resolutions. However, the 1080p Ultra result of 116.7 FPS remains high, implying the CPU isn't severely limiting even at maximum settings. The 16 MB L3 cache provides adequate data locality for Thief's game world, which was designed for 2014-era hardware.
The CPU's 84th percentile ranking and its near-tie with the Core i9-9900K (0.7% difference) suggest that the Ryzen 7 5700 holds its own against older flagship processors. In Thief, a game that benefits from strong single-thread performance, the 2,916 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures responsive frame delivery. The 8-core configuration also handles background tasks without interfering with game performance.
Settings Recommendations
For 1080p gaming, the data supports using Ultra settings without concern. The 116.7 FPS average at 1080p Ultra exceeds the refresh rate of most standard monitors, and the performance gap to Low (162.9 FPS) won't be perceptible on a 60 Hz display. Medium settings at 148.9 FPS offer a middle ground for high-refresh-rate monitors, but the visual fidelity trade-off may not justify the 32.2 FPS gain over Ultra.
At 1440p, High settings (84.6 FPS) provide the best balance of visual quality and smoothness. Ultra (80.2 FPS) is nearly identical in performance, differing by only 4.4 FPS, so players with adaptive sync displays could choose either. Medium (112.1 FPS) offers a significant boost for competitive play, while Low (144.3 FPS) maximizes frame rate at the cost of visual detail. The data suggests that the jump from Medium to High costs 27.5 FPS, which may be noticeable on high-refresh displays.
For 4K, the recommendations narrow considerably. Low settings (85.3 FPS) provide the only smooth experience, while Medium (64.8 FPS) barely holds 60 FPS. High (52.4 FPS) and Ultra (47.3 FPS) both fall below the 60 FPS threshold, making them suboptimal for most players. The 38 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K represents a significant visual quality trade-off, but for consistent smoothness, Low is the only reliable choice.
The measured data indicates that 1440p High is the sweet spot for this combination. It delivers 84.6 FPS — comfortably above 60 — while maintaining high visual fidelity. For players prioritizing frame rate over visuals, 1440p Medium at 112.1 FPS offers excellent responsiveness. The 4K tier should be reserved for slower-paced exploration or screenshot purposes, as the frame rates at High and Ultra settings dip below optimal playability.
FAQ
Q: What is the combo's overall rank in Thief?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT combination ranks 658th out of 1,642 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all tested systems.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 7 5700 scores 27,220 on average, sitting 0.7% behind the Intel Core i9-9900K and 0.8% behind both the Intel Core i7-12700H and Intel Core i7-1370P. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 leads by 1.2%.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?
A: The data indicates 2560x1440 is optimal, with High settings delivering 84.6 FPS and Medium reaching 112.1 FPS. Both exceed the 60 FPS threshold while maintaining strong visual quality.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?
A: At 4K, only Low settings (85.3 FPS) provide smooth performance. Medium hits 64.8 FPS, while High (52.4 FPS) and Ultra (47.3 FPS) fall below 60 FPS, making them less ideal for action-heavy gameplay.
Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060?
A: The RX 7700 XT and RTX 5060 have identical average benchmark scores (30,097 vs 30,109 respectively), with a 0% delta between them. The RX 7700 XT also edges out the Radeon RX 570 by 0.2%.
Q: What settings provide the highest frame rates at 1080p?
A: Low settings produce 162.9 FPS at 1920x1080, followed by Medium at 148.9 FPS, High at 125.8 FPS, and Ultra at 116.7 FPS. Even Ultra exceeds 100 FPS, making 1080p gaming viable at any preset.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5700
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 85.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 64.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 52.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 47.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 144.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 112.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 84.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 80.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 162.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 148.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 125.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 116.7 |
Thief with Ryzen 7 5700 + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RX 7700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700 + RX 7700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.