Thief
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 38 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 16 | 15 | 25 | 29 |
| 1440p QHD | 30 | 29 | 41 | 50 |
| 1080p Full HD | 44 | 43 | 55 | 75 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 combination lands at rank 1591 out of 1642 tested combos for Thief, placing it in the bottom 3% of all systems. This is a low-tier position, but the data reveals a specific and usable performance envelope: the combo is capable of smooth 1080p play at medium settings, but collapses at higher resolutions and demanding presets. The benchmark results indicate a system that is strictly bound by its graphics card, with the CPU providing ample headroom that never becomes the limiting factor in this 2014 stealth title.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 1591 out of 1642 places it in the bottom 3% of all tested configurations for Thief. This is a poor overall standing, but it is not a catastrophic one. The ranking reflects the GTX 1650’s position in the GPU hierarchy: it sits at the 43rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8713. Its nearest rivals in raw compute are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile (deltaPct -0.4), AMD Radeon 550X (deltaPct -0.4), and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 (deltaPct 0.5). These are all within 0.5% of the GTX 1650’s average score, meaning the card is statistically tied with a cluster of mid-to-low-tier options.
The CPU, however, is a different story. The Ryzen 7 3700X scores at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 28631. Its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-12600 (deltaPct -0.1) and AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (deltaPct 0.1), are within 0.2% of its score. This means the processor is a high-end part relative to the GPU. The mismatch is stark: a top-15% CPU paired with a bottom-half GPU results in a combo that is entirely GPU-limited in Thief. The low overall rank is a direct consequence of the GPU, not the CPU.
GPU Role
The GTX 1650 is the decisive component in this pairing. It features 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 128.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2001 MHz (8 Gbps effective), with a base clock of 1485 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz. These specifications place the card firmly in the entry-level segment, which is reflected in its 43rd percentile ranking among all GPUs.
In Thief, the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth become the primary constraints. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p Low and Medium presets, but the data shows a sharp drop when moving to High or Ultra. At 1080p, the jump from Medium (54.5 FPS) to High (42.7 FPS) is a 21.6% loss, and from High to Ultra (43.8 FPS) there is a slight recovery, but the pattern indicates the card is struggling with the higher texture and shading loads. The GPU’s 896 shading units and 32 ROPs are simply not enough to maintain fluid frame rates at higher quality settings, even at 1080p.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data shows a severe penalty as resolution increases, confirming the GPU as the bottleneck. From 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings, average FPS drops from 54.5 to 41.3, a 24.2% decrease. From 1440p to 4K at Medium, the drop is even steeper, falling to 25.0 FPS, a 39.5% loss. This trend is consistent across all presets. At High settings, 1080p produces 42.7 FPS, 1440p yields 28.7 FPS, and 4K falls to 15.1 FPS. The 4K results are uniformly unplayable, with all presets below 30 FPS: Low at 29.3, Medium at 25.0, High at 15.1, and Ultra at 15.6.
The scaling pattern indicates that the GTX 1650’s memory bandwidth (128.1 GB/s) is insufficient for 4K workloads, regardless of preset. The pixel rate of 53.28 GPixel/s also limits fill-rate-heavy scenes at higher resolutions. The CPU’s role in this scaling is negligible; the Ryzen 7 3700X’s 32 MB L3 cache and 8 cores are more than adequate for Thief’s single-threaded and lightly threaded workloads, so the FPS drops are almost entirely attributable to the GPU’s rendering limits.
Settings Recommendations
For a playable experience, the data points to 1080p with Medium settings as the optimal configuration for this combo. At 1080p Medium, the average FPS is 54.5, which is comfortably above the 30 FPS threshold for a smooth experience in a stealth game. Dropping to Low raises the average to 74.7 FPS, providing a significant margin for frame-time spikes, but the visual quality loss is substantial. High settings at 1080p yield 42.7 FPS, which is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes; Ultra at 43.8 FPS is similar but inconsistent with the High preset’s lower score, suggesting the card is near its limit.
At 1440p, the only viable option is Low, which produces 49.5 FPS. Medium at 1440p (41.3 FPS) is borderline, while High (28.7 FPS) and Ultra (30.3 FPS) fall below acceptable standards. 4K is entirely non-viable; even the Low preset at 29.3 FPS is below 30 FPS. The data suggests that users should prioritize 1080p Medium for a balanced experience, or 1080p Low if they prefer higher frame rates over visual fidelity.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. Low settings produce an average of 74.7 FPS, which is the highest score in the entire dataset. Medium settings yield 54.5 FPS, High produces 42.7 FPS, and Ultra achieves 43.8 FPS. The Ultra score being slightly higher than High is an anomaly in the data, but both are within a narrow band of 42-44 FPS, indicating the GPU is saturated at these presets.
At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably. Low settings average 49.5 FPS, Medium drops to 41.3 FPS, High falls to 28.7 FPS, and Ultra manages 30.3 FPS. The step from Medium to High is a 30.5% reduction, showing a clear cliff where the GPU’s resources become insufficient.
At 3840x2160, all presets are below playable thresholds. Low averages 29.3 FPS, Medium averages 25.0 FPS, High averages 15.1 FPS, and Ultra averages 15.6 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra is negligible, confirming that the GPU is completely overwhelmed at this resolution. The data shows no min or max FPS values, so the averages represent the full picture of performance, which is consistently poor at 4K.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo capable of playing Thief at 4K?
A: No. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset averages only 29.3 FPS, which is below the 30 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. All other presets are lower, with High and Ultra both below 16 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset for 1080p gaming?
A: Medium settings at 1920x1080 provide the best balance, with an average of 54.5 FPS. Low settings achieve 74.7 FPS, but Medium offers significantly better visuals while remaining playable.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The GTX 1650 has an average benchmark score of 8713, which is within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile (8746), AMD Radeon 550X (8749), and AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 (8761). It is statistically tied with these parts.
Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck in this game?
A: No. The Ryzen 7 3700X scores at the 85th percentile among all CPUs and has an average score of 28631, which is within 0.2% of the Intel Core i5-12600. Its performance is far above what Thief requires, so the GPU is the limiting factor.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1080p and 1440p at Medium settings?
A: At 1080p Medium, the average is 54.5 FPS. At 1440p Medium, it drops to 41.3 FPS, a 24.2% decrease. This confirms the GPU’s bandwidth constraints at higher resolutions.
Q: Why is the Ultra preset at 1080p (43.8 FPS) slightly faster than High (42.7 FPS)?
A: The data shows this anomaly, but both scores are within a narrow range, indicating the GPU is saturated. The difference is not statistically significant, and both presets are playable but not ideal.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is a high-performance processor that is largely underutilized in Thief. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its 32 MB L3 cache and 7 nm process node (TSMC) contribute to strong benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19087 and a single-core score of 2694. The CPU’s percentile rank of 85 and average score of 28631 place it above the vast majority of processors, with its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600, being only 0.1% slower.
In Thief, this CPU provides massive headroom. The game’s stealth gameplay typically relies on a few threads, and the 3700X’s 16 threads are far more than needed. The data confirms this: at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 74.7 FPS, which is the highest score in the dataset, and this is likely limited by the GPU, not the CPU. Even at 4K, where the GPU is clearly maxed out, the CPU’s performance is not a factor. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and DDR4 support are adequate for the game’s demands. The conclusion is that the Ryzen 7 3700X is a future-proof component that will not hinder performance in Thief, but the GTX 1650 will need to be upgraded to unlock higher settings and resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 29.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 25.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 15.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 15.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 49.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 41.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 30.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 28.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 74.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 54.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 43.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 42.7 |
Thief with Ryzen 7 3700X + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with GTX 1650 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 3700X + GTX 1650
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.