The Technomancer

The Technomancer

AVERAGE FPS
175
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 175 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 66 86 99 129
1440p QHD 121 154 181 234
1080p Full HD 185 234 273 343

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Ultra 66
3840x2160 High 86
3840x2160 Medium 99
3840x2160 Low 129
2560x1440 Ultra 121
2560x1440 High 154
2560x1440 Medium 181
2560x1440 Low 234
1920x1080 Ultra 185
1920x1080 High 234
1920x1080 Medium 273
1920x1080 Low 343

The Technomancer with Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload that scales significantly with resolution and settings. When paired with the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, the data reveals a configuration that is firmly GPU-bound at higher resolutions but becomes increasingly CPU-limited at 1080p. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy: the combination delivers excellent performance at 1440p, but drops below the coveted 60 FPS threshold at 4K with Ultra settings, highlighting the need for careful settings adjustments to achieve a smooth experience.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for this combo shows a substantial performance drop as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, confirming that the RTX 5080 is the primary limiting factor at higher pixel counts. At High settings, the average frame rate plummets from 150 FPS at 1920x1080 to 98 FPS at 2560x1440, and finally to 54 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 64% reduction in performance from 1080p to 4K, a scaling pattern typical of a GPU that is being pushed to its limits by the increased pixel workload.

The scaling behavior across settings presets further reinforces this conclusion. At Low settings, the frame rates are 229 FPS at 1080p, 150 FPS at 1440p, and 82 FPS at 4K. The fact that even the lowest settings cannot maintain playable frame rates at 4K (82 FPS average) while the CPU has headroom suggests that the GPU is the bottleneck. However, the gap between Low and High settings at 1080p is relatively modest (229 vs 150 FPS), indicating that the CPU begins to exert influence at lower resolutions.

A more telling observation comes from comparing the resolution scaling at Medium settings, which is the only preset with complete min and max FPS data. At 1080p Medium, the average is 176 FPS with a minimum of 150 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 115 FPS with a minimum of 98 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average falls to 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS. The consistent drop from 1440p to 4K (from 115 to 63 FPS, a 45% reduction) is substantially larger than the drop from 1080p to 1440p (from 176 to 115 FPS, a 35% reduction), which indicates that the GPU is becoming progressively more saturated as resolution increases.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the system is partially CPU-limited, as the RTX 5080 is capable of producing frame rates well above what this particular CPU can sustain. The 229 FPS at Low settings is likely near the CPU's maximum throughput for this game, while the GPU could theoretically render more frames if the CPU were faster. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward GPU limitation, and at 4K, the GPU is clearly the dominant constraint, with performance dropping to levels where the CPU's influence is minimal.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and RTX 5080 combination ranks 717th out of 2,825 tested combos in The Technomancer, placing it in the top 25% of all configurations. This rank reflects a strong overall performance, but the game's age and the specific demands of its engine mean that newer, more powerful combinations can achieve higher frame rates. The rank of 717 out of 2,825 suggests that this combo is competitive but not at the absolute top tier for this particular title.

The CPU's overall benchmark percentile provides context for this ranking. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H achieves an 87th percentile ranking across all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40,518. This places it in the upper echelon of processors, though its nearest rivals show very tight competition. The Intel Core 7 253PE scores 40,557 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40,585 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40,431 (0.2% lower), and the Intel Xeon 6507P scores 40,426 (0.2% lower). These negligible deltas indicate that the CPU is well-matched with its peers, and the ranking in-game is not likely to be significantly affected by processor choice alone.

The GPU's ranking is similarly strong, with an 87th percentile across all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 56,083. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757, 0.6% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698, 0.7% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828, 2.3% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57,367, 2.2% higher). The RTX 5080's position relative to these rivals suggests it is a high-performing GPU, and the in-game rank of 717 out of 2,825 is consistent with a configuration that combines two 87th-percentile components.

The fact that the combo ranks 717th rather than higher is likely due to the game's specific optimization and the fact that many tested combos include desktop-class components with higher power envelopes. The mobile CPU in this combo, despite its strong benchmark scores, may not sustain the same performance as a desktop equivalent under prolonged gaming loads, though the measured FPS data does not explicitly confirm this.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU built on a 5 nm process, featuring 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2617 MHz, and it houses 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines. The GPU also includes 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores, which support the DirectX 12 Ultimate API and Vulkan 1.4, though The Technomancer's age means these modern features have limited impact on its performance.

The GPU's memory configuration is notably generous for this game. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is more than sufficient for The Technomancer's requirements, even at 4K Ultra settings, where the measured average FPS is 42. The high memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s ensures that texture streaming and asset loading are not bottlenecks, allowing the GPU to focus its compute resources on rendering. The GDDR7 memory operates at 1875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective speed, which is a significant factor in the GPU's ability to maintain consistent frame rates.

The measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the limiting component at 4K resolution. At Ultra settings, the average FPS of 42 is below the 60 FPS target, and at High settings, the average of 54 FPS is still below this threshold. The GPU's raw compute power, rated at 56.28 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, is substantial, but The Technomancer's engine appears to be heavily reliant on rasterization performance rather than modern features like ray tracing. The GPU's pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s are high, yet the game's demands at 4K overwhelm these capabilities when settings are maxed out.

Comparing the GPU to its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score provides context for its in-game performance. The RTX 5080's score of 56,083 is 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon 8060S, suggesting that these GPUs perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks. However, in The Technomancer, the RTX 5080's specific architectural strengths and driver optimizations may yield different results. The launch MSRP of 999 USD for this GPU reflects its high-end positioning, and the benchmark data confirms that it delivers top-tier performance, but the game's age and engine limitations prevent it from fully utilizing the GPU's capabilities.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable at 4K resolution with this combo?

A: The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 82 FPS, which is achieved at Low settings. At High settings, the average drops to 54 FPS, and at Ultra settings, it falls to 42 FPS.

Q: How does the combo perform at 1440p with High settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average FPS is 98, which provides a smooth gaming experience. The minimum FPS is not listed for High settings, but the Medium preset shows a minimum of 98 FPS with an average of 115 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the data suggests the CPU is the limiting factor, as the frame rates at Low settings (229 FPS) are significantly higher than at High settings (150 FPS), indicating that the GPU is not fully saturated. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking and its benchmark scores support this interpretation.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested configurations in The Technomancer?

A: The combo ranks 717th out of 2,825 tested combos, placing it in the top 25% of all configurations tested for this game.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest GPU rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56,083, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757) and 2.2% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57,367).

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo at 4K Medium settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 54, with an average of 63 FPS and a maximum of 73 FPS.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a 16-core, 16-thread mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 3, based on the Panther Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process. Its base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and it features 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus with 153.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and its 25 W TDP indicates a power-efficient design suited for mobile platforms.

The CPU's benchmark results show strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 28,221 in multi-core and 3,984 in single-core tests. The PassMark multi-thread score is 32,956, and the single-thread score is 4,005. These scores place the CPU in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40,518. The nearest rival, the Intel Core 7 253PE, scores 40,557, which is only 0.1% higher, indicating that the Ultra X7 368H is well-matched with its direct competitors.

In The Technomancer, the CPU's role is most evident at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the primary bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the average FPS of 229 is likely near the CPU's maximum frame rate capability for this game. The fact that increasing settings to High only reduces the average to 150 FPS, rather than a more dramatic drop, suggests that the CPU is handling the game's physics and AI workloads effectively. The 16 threads provide ample parallelism for the game's engine, which was designed for the multi-core processors of its 2016 release era.

The CPU's boost clock of 5.00 GHz is beneficial for single-threaded performance, which is often critical in games that rely on a primary game thread. The Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1,673 and R15 single-core score of 401 indicate strong per-core performance, which helps maintain frame time consistency. However, the data shows that at 4K resolution, the CPU's influence diminishes significantly, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor and the frame rates are constrained by the GPU's rendering capabilities rather than the CPU's processing speed.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimizing the gaming experience with this combo. At 4K resolution, the only way to achieve a playable frame rate above 60 FPS is to use Low settings, which yields an average of 82 FPS. Medium settings at 4K produce an average of 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS, which is technically playable but may experience noticeable stutters during demanding scenes. High settings at 4K drop to 54 FPS average, and Ultra settings fall to 42 FPS, both of which are below the 60 FPS threshold and not recommended for a smooth experience.

For players prioritizing visual quality over raw frame rate, 1440p offers a better balance. At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average FPS of 98 provides a smooth and responsive experience, while Ultra settings maintain an average of 77 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p yields 115 FPS average with a minimum of 98 FPS, making it the recommended choice for those who want a high refresh rate experience without sacrificing too much visual fidelity. At 1440p, all settings presets are above the 60 FPS threshold, so players have the freedom to choose based on their preference for visuals versus performance.

At 1080p, the system is CPU-limited, and the data shows that even Ultra settings achieve an average of 117 FPS. This means that players with 1080p displays can max out the game's settings without any performance concerns. High settings at 1080p produce 150 FPS average, and Medium settings reach 176 FPS with a minimum of 150 FPS. The Low preset at 1080p achieves 229 FPS, which is useful for competitive play or for players with high refresh rate monitors, but the visual trade-offs are significant.

The optimal settings recommendation depends on the player's display resolution and performance priorities. For 4K displays, Medium settings (63 FPS average) offer the best compromise between visual quality and playability, though players who prioritize smoothness should select Low settings (82 FPS). For 1440p displays, High settings (98 FPS) provide an excellent balance, with Ultra (77 FPS) as an option for those who want maximum visual fidelity. For 1080p displays, Ultra settings (117 FPS) are recommended as they deliver the best visual experience without sacrificing performance, and the CPU's capability ensures that frame rates remain high across all settings.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Cores / Threads 16 / 16
Base Clock 2000 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 25W
Socket Intel BGA 2540
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

VRAM 16 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2617 MHz MHz
TDP 360 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in The Technomancer

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Ultra 66.0
3840x2160 High 86.0
3840x2160 Medium 99.0
3840x2160 Low 129.0
2560x1440 Ultra 121.0
2560x1440 High 154.0
2560x1440 Medium 181.0
2560x1440 Low 234.0
1920x1080 Ultra 185.0
1920x1080 High 234.0
1920x1080 Medium 273.0
1920x1080 Low 343.0

The Technomancer with iUltra X7 368H + Other GPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Technomancer with RTX 5080 + Other CPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra X7 368H + RTX 5080

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.