Downfall

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 lands at rank 1016 out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall, placing it comfortably in the top 27% of all configurations measured. This is a strong showing for a mobile CPU paired with a flagship-tier GPU, and the ranking reflects a system that is clearly GPU-bound at most settings. The combo’s position in the database suggests it outperforms the vast majority of tested setups, though it is not at the absolute top, where more exotic desktop CPU pairings with the same or higher-tier graphics cards reside. The CPU’s own percentile of 87 against all CPUs and the GPU’s identical 87th percentile against all GPUs indicate a balanced pairing, with neither component dragging the other down significantly in this title.

How This Combo Ranks

The rank of 1016 out of 3716 combos places this system in the upper echelon of tested hardware configurations for Downfall. To interpret this, consider that the ranking is not simply about raw FPS, but about how the specific CPU and GPU combination performs together in this horror title. The data shows that the RTX 5080 is the dominant factor, as the FPS scaling across resolutions and settings follows GPU load patterns closely. The Core Ultra X7 368H, with its 16 cores and 16 threads, provides enough headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck at 1080p, where frame rates are extremely high.

When compared to its nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark database, the Ultra X7 368H posts an average benchmark score of 40518, which is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and the Intel Xeon 6507P. It slightly trails the Intel Core 7 253PE and Core 5 223PE by 0.1% and 0.2% respectively. These deltas are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning that the CPU is performing exactly as expected for its class. For Downfall specifically, this means the combo’s rank is almost entirely determined by the GPU’s capability, and the CPU is simply providing consistent, reliable frame delivery without any notable regression.

The combo’s placement at the 27th percentile of all combos (calculated from the rank position) is a practical indicator that this is a high-end setup. Most users will never see frame rates this high at 4K, and the fact that this combo achieves 92 FPS at 4K High reflects the GPU’s power. In the context of the database, this rank is a clear signal that the RTX 5080 is doing the heavy lifting, and the CPU is a capable partner that does not limit the experience.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is the undisputed star of this combo, and its specifications directly explain the measured FPS figures. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is critical for Downfall at high resolutions and settings, as horror titles often load large textures and require substantial memory throughput. The 16 GB capacity ensures that the GPU does not run out of memory at 4K Ultra, which would cause stuttering or texture pop-in; instead, the data shows smooth, high frame rates.

Clock speeds are equally important. The GPU’s base clock of 2295 MHz and boost clock of 2617 MHz, combined with 10752 shading units, produce a raw compute throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS for FP32 operations. This raw power translates directly to the pixel and texture rates of 293.1 GPixel/s and 879.3 GTexel/s respectively. In Downfall, which relies heavily on dynamic lighting and shadow effects to create its horror atmosphere, these specifications mean the GPU can process complex scenes without bottlenecking. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores also play a role, though the measured FPS data does not separate ray tracing effects from standard rasterization.

The performance delta between the RTX 5080 and its nearest rivals in the GPU database further underscores its role. With an average benchmark score of 56083, it sits 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2%. These small deltas mean that in practice, the RTX 5080 is performing at the expected level for a card of its class, and the FPS numbers in Downfall are not anomalous. The GPU’s 87th percentile ranking against all GPUs confirms that it is a top-tier part, and the measured FPS data shows it is being utilized effectively.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear GPU-bound scenario. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 308 at 1080p to 220 at 1440p, a 28.6% reduction, and then to 137 at 4K, a further 37.7% reduction from 1440p. This steep decline as resolution increases is the classic signature of a GPU-limited workload. The CPU is not the constraint here, because the absolute frame rates at 1080p Low are extraordinarily high (308 FPS), which would require a very powerful CPU to feed, and the Ultra X7 368H manages this without issue.

At High settings, the scaling is slightly different. The FPS drops from 206 at 1080p to 147 at 1440p (a 28.6% drop) and then to 92 at 4K (a 37.4% drop from 1440p). The percentage drops are nearly identical to Low settings, which indicates that the GPU is still the primary limiter. The fact that the scaling pattern does not change significantly between Low and High settings suggests that the CPU has sufficient headroom to handle the increased draw calls and physics calculations at higher settings without becoming a bottleneck.

However, the Ultra settings tell a different story. At Ultra, the FPS drops from 129 at 1080p to 92 at 1440p (a 28.7% drop) and then to 57 at 4K (a 38.0% drop from 1440p). The scaling percentages remain consistent, which shows that even at the highest settings, the GPU is still the limiting factor. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a smaller FPS drop when moving from 1080p to 1440p, because the CPU load would not increase as much as the GPU load. The data does not show this, confirming that the RTX 5080 is the component that determines the frame rate at all resolutions and settings tested.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed picture of performance across the three resolutions and four settings presets.

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 308 FPS, which is far beyond what most monitors can display. Medium settings yield 252 FPS, with a minimum of 214 FPS and a maximum of 289 FPS, indicating a consistent frame delivery with no major dips. High settings drop to 206 FPS, and Ultra settings bring the average down to 129 FPS. Even at Ultra, the frame rate is high enough for a 120Hz or 144Hz monitor, though the minimum FPS data is not provided for this setting, so it is unclear if there are any stutters.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. Low settings average 220 FPS, which is still very high. Medium settings average 180 FPS, with a minimum of 153 FPS and a maximum of 207 FPS, showing that the frame rate stays well above the 144Hz threshold. High settings average 147 FPS, which is right at the edge of a 144Hz monitor’s refresh rate, and Ultra settings average 92 FPS, which is playable but not as smooth. The minimum FPS data for Medium settings (153 FPS) suggests that even in the most demanding scenes, the frame rate does not drop below the refresh rate of standard high-refresh monitors.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limits become more apparent. Low settings average 137 FPS, which is excellent for 4K. Medium settings average 112 FPS, with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 129 FPS. This is a very playable range for a 4K high-refresh monitor, as the minimum FPS stays above 90. High settings average 92 FPS, which is still smooth for most players, but the gap between Medium and High is significant. Ultra settings drop to 57 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for a playable experience, though it is still usable on a VRR display.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo better at 1080p or 4K for the best experience?

A: The data shows that at 1080p, the combo delivers 206 FPS on High and 129 FPS on Ultra, which is far beyond the refresh rate of most monitors. At 4K, the same settings yield 92 FPS on High and 57 FPS on Ultra. For a balanced experience, 1440p Medium (180 FPS) or High (147 FPS) offers the best combination of high frame rates and visual quality, as the FPS stays above 144Hz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H has an average benchmark score of 40518, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core 7 253PE and 0.2% lower than the Intel Core 5 223PE. It is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and the Intel Xeon 6507P. These differences are within the margin of error and do not translate to measurable performance differences in Downfall.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and why does it matter?

A: The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient to handle the texture loads at 4K Ultra without running out of memory, as the measured FPS at 4K Ultra is 57 FPS, indicating the GPU is compute-bound rather than memory-bound.

Q: Is the combo GPU-bound or CPU-bound at 1080p High?

A: The frame rate at 1080p High is 206 FPS, which is very high. The scaling pattern across resolutions shows a consistent drop in FPS when resolution increases, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU has 16 cores and 16 threads, providing enough headroom to keep up with the GPU at these frame rates.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 144Hz monitor at 1440p?

A: At 1440p, Medium settings average 180 FPS with a minimum of 153 FPS, which is above the 144Hz threshold. High settings average 147 FPS, which is just above 144Hz, but the minimum FPS is not provided. If you want to ensure no dips below the refresh rate, Medium is the safer choice.

Q: How much faster is the GPU than the AMD Radeon 8060S?

A: The RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56083, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon 8060S’s score of 55757. This is a negligible difference, and the measured FPS in Downfall is likely to be nearly identical between the two cards.

Settings Recommendations

The data suggests that the best experience depends heavily on your monitor’s resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p, the combo is severely GPU-overpowered, and even Ultra settings at 129 FPS are more than sufficient for any standard monitor. However, the jump from High (206 FPS) to Ultra (129 FPS) is a 37.4% performance drop for what is likely a modest visual improvement. For most users, High at 1080p is the sweet spot, as it delivers over 200 FPS and leaves headroom for background tasks.

For 1440p, Medium settings (180 FPS) are the best recommendation if you have a 144Hz or 165Hz monitor. The minimum FPS of 153 FPS ensures that you will not experience drops below the refresh rate. If you have a 120Hz monitor, High settings (147 FPS) are also viable, but the lack of a minimum FPS figure for High means there is a risk of dips below 120 FPS in heavy scenes. Ultra at 1440p (92 FPS) is only recommended for players who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate and have a VRR display that can handle the 90-100 FPS range.

For 4K, the choice is more nuanced. Low settings (137 FPS) provide a very smooth experience, but the visual quality is likely too poor for a horror game that relies on atmosphere. Medium settings (112 FPS) with a minimum of 95 FPS offer a good balance, making it the best choice for 4K gaming on a high-refresh monitor. High settings (92 FPS) are playable but will be noticeably less smooth on a 120Hz or 144Hz display. Ultra settings (57 FPS) should be avoided unless you have a 60Hz monitor and are willing to accept the lower frame rate for maximum visual fidelity. The data clearly indicates that Medium at 4K is the most practical preset, as it provides a high average FPS and a minimum FPS above 90, ensuring a stable and immersive experience.