The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 64 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 31 | 36 | 47 |
| 1440p QHD | 43 | 56 | 65 | 85 |
| 1080p Full HD | 66 | 85 | 100 | 130 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload for modern hardware, particularly at higher resolutions. This analysis examines the measured performance of the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, using only the provided benchmark data. The results show a system where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, while the CPU provides ample headroom for the game's logic and physics.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable pattern of performance degradation as resolution scales from 1080p to 4K. This scaling behavior is critical for understanding the balance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the system achieves an average of 85 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same preset, the average drops to 56 FPS, a significant 34% reduction. The jump to 3840x2160 further reduces the average to 31 FPS, representing a 45% drop from the 1440p figure and a 64% drop from the 1080p baseline.
This steep decline in performance with each resolution step is a classic indicator that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is the limiting component. The pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K, placing an exponentially larger load on the GPU's shading units, TMUs, and ROPs. The CPU, with its high core count and clock speeds, is not the constraint here; the data suggests the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is capable of feeding frames far faster than the RTX 2060 can render them at higher resolutions.
The pattern holds across all settings presets. For instance, at Low settings, the average FPS goes from 130 at 1080p to 85 at 1440p (a 35% drop) and then to 47 at 4K (a 45% drop from 1440p). The consistency of these percentage drops across different quality presets reinforces that the resolution itself, not the specific graphical features, is the primary driver of performance loss. The system is scaling exactly as one would expect when a GPU is saturated; the frame rate is inversely proportional to the number of pixels being processed.
The 4K Medium preset provides the only min and max FPS data points in the entire set, showing an average of 36 FPS with a range of 30 to 41 FPS. This narrow window suggests that even at this moderate preset, the GPU is working at its limit, with frame times becoming less consistent. The 1080p Medium preset shows a wider range of 85 to 115 FPS with an average of 100 FPS, indicating more headroom and less consistent frame pacing pressure on the GPU.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is a Turing-architecture GPU with 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It operates at a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz. These specifications, combined with a 6 GB GDDR6 memory pool on a 192-bit bus, dictate its performance ceiling. The memory bandwidth is 336.0 GB/s. In the context of The Technomancer, these numbers help explain why the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions.
The 6 GB VRAM capacity is a crucial factor. At 1080p, the GPU is able to maintain playable frame rates, but the data suggests that the memory and compute resources are being heavily utilized. The 1920x1080 Ultra preset yields an average of 66 FPS, which is a 22% drop from the High preset's 85 FPS. This indicates that the Ultra preset's additional graphical effects, likely including higher-resolution textures and more complex shading, are consuming significant GPU resources, but the card still has enough headroom to produce a smooth experience.
However, at 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become stark. The 4K Ultra preset produces a mere 24 FPS average, while the High preset only manages 31 FPS. The gap between settings narrows at 4K, with Low at 47 FPS and Medium at 36 FPS. This compression of performance across presets at 4K is a sign that the GPU is no longer just limited by specific settings; it is fundamentally limited by its raw pixel-pushing capability and memory bandwidth. The 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth is insufficient to feed the 1920 shading units at 4K resolutions, resulting in the low overall frame rates.
The GPU's benchmark scores confirm its mid-range positioning. It scores 14111 in Passmark G3D, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580, AMD Radeon 680M, and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, with performance deltas of less than 1%. This shows that while the RTX 2060 is not a top-tier card, it is a capable performer for its class, but its age (released in 2019) is evident when facing a demanding title at ultra-high resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested hardware combinations for The Technomancer, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ranks 2212 out of 2825 total combos. This places it in the bottom 22% of all tested systems. This ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU's limitations, as the CPU is a high-end component.
To contextualize this, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus alone is a top-tier processor. It has a percentile rank of 96 against all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 96% of all processors in the database. Its average benchmark score is 93785, which is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon 6520P (93786) and slightly lower than the AMD EPYC 4564P (95183). This is a massive amount of computational power. However, in a gaming scenario, this power is only useful if the GPU can keep up.
The low combo rank highlights a significant system imbalance. The data suggests that the RTX 2060 is holding back the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. In less GPU-intensive tasks, this CPU would shine, but in The Technomancer at 4K, the GPU is the sole determinant of performance. The combo rank of 2212 out of 2825 is a strong indicator that users with this specific configuration are not getting the full potential of their CPU in this game. The pairing is akin to putting a high-performance engine in a car with a limited top speed; the engine has more to give, but the car cannot go any faster.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides a clear guide for optimal settings. The goal is to find a balance between visual fidelity and a smooth, playable frame rate. The data shows a clear hierarchy of performance across the three tested resolutions.
At 1920x1080, the system has enough GPU headroom to run the game at high settings. The High preset yields an average of 85 FPS, which is a very good experience for an action RPG. The Ultra preset drops to 66 FPS, but this is still generally considered playable. However, the jump from High to Ultra only offers marginal visual improvements while costing a 22% performance hit. The Medium preset at 100 FPS is also a strong option for those who prioritize frame rate. For 1080p users, High is the recommended starting point, as it offers a smooth experience without sacrificing too much performance, while Ultra is viable for those who want maximum quality.
At 2560x1440, the performance picture changes. The High preset averages 56 FPS, which is on the lower end of playable for a fast-paced game. The Medium preset offers a better experience at 65 FPS average, with a range of 55 to 75 FPS. The Low preset boosts the average to 85 FPS, but this comes with a significant visual downgrade. For 1440p, Medium is the recommended preset, as it provides a decent balance of visual quality and a frame rate that is more consistently playable than High. The Ultra preset at 43 FPS is too demanding for a smooth experience.
At 3840x2160, the system is severely GPU-bound. The High preset averages 31 FPS, which is not smooth. The Medium preset averages 36 FPS, with a minimum of 30 FPS, which is borderline playable. The Low preset is the only option that approaches a comfortable frame rate, averaging 47 FPS. For 4K, the recommendation is to use the Low preset if a higher frame rate is desired, or Medium if the user can tolerate a less stable experience. Ultra at 4K is not a viable option, as the 24 FPS average is a slideshow. The data clearly shows that 4K gaming is not this combo's strength.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play The Technomancer with this hardware?
A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 is the best resolution, as it is the only one where all presets achieve an average FPS above 60, with High settings hitting an average of 85 FPS.
Q: Can this system run The Technomancer at 4K?
A: Yes, but with significant compromises. The data shows an average of 47 FPS at 4K with Low settings and 36 FPS at Medium. High and Ultra presets are not recommended due to average FPS below 31.
Q: How does the RTX 2060 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 2060 has a Passmark G3D score of 14111. Its nearest rivals, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 and AMD Radeon 680M, have average scores that are within 0.1% of this figure, indicating nearly identical synthetic performance.
Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus a high-end processor?
A: Yes. The CPU has a percentile rank of 96 against all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 93785 is virtually tied with the Intel Xeon 6520P, which scores 93786.
Q: Why is the performance at 4K so much lower than at 1080p?
A: The data shows a 64% drop in average FPS from 1080p to 4K at High settings (from 85 to 31 FPS). This is because the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, as the number of pixels to render quadruples, overwhelming the RTX 2060's compute and memory resources.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 85 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 43 FPS. This represents a 49% reduction in average frame rate for the Ultra settings.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a powerful processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on a 3 nm process. It features 24 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. It has a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. In synthetic benchmarks like Cinebench R23, it scores 44253 in multi-core and 2439 in single-core tests. These numbers indicate a processor that is extremely capable in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.
In the context of The Technomancer, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and draw calls. The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this system. This is evident from the resolution scaling analysis: if the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would be similar across all resolutions. Instead, we see a massive drop in performance from 1080p to 4K, proving the GPU is the constraint.
The CPU's high single-thread performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2439 and Passmark single-thread score of 5068, is more than sufficient for the game's main thread. The 24 cores and threads provide ample headroom for background tasks and any multi-threaded aspects of the game engine. The data suggests that the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is effectively "waiting" for the GPU at most resolutions, especially at 1440p and 4K. Its performance is so far ahead of the RTX 2060 that it is unlikely to ever cause a frame rate drop in this title. The CPU's 96th percentile rank against all CPUs confirms that its processing power is not a weakness in this pairing; the weakness lies entirely with the GPU.
Measured FPS Breakdown
This section provides the exact measured average FPS (and min/max where available) for each resolution and settings preset.
1920x1080:
- Low: 130 FPS average.
- Medium: 100 FPS average (min 85, max 115).
- High: 85 FPS average.
- Ultra: 66 FPS average.
2560x1440:
- Low: 85 FPS average.
- Medium: 65 FPS average (min 55, max 75).
- High: 56 FPS average.
- Ultra: 43 FPS average.
3840x2160:
- Low: 47 FPS average.
- Medium: 36 FPS average (min 30, max 41).
- High: 31 FPS average.
- Ultra: 24 FPS average.
The data shows that at 1080p, even the Ultra preset is playable at 66 FPS. At 1440p, the High preset is borderline at 56 FPS, and the Ultra preset is not ideal at 43 FPS. At 4K, only the Low preset achieves an average above 40 FPS, and the Ultra preset is effectively unplayable. This breakdown confirms the analysis: the RTX 2060's performance ceiling is hit at 1440p with high settings, and it is only suitable for low or medium settings at 4K.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 47.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 36.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 31.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 24.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 85.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 65.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 56.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 43.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 130.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 100.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 85.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 66.0 |
The Technomancer with iUltra 7 270K Plus + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 270K Plus + RTX 2060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.