The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 73 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 27 | 37 | 40 | 53 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 63 | 76 | 98 |
| 1080p Full HD | 76 | 97 | 113 | 149 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload that scales significantly with resolution. Benchmark data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT reveals a clear performance hierarchy across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, with the GPU consistently emerging as the primary performance limiter as pixel count increases.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a dramatic and predictable decline as resolution increases, moving from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At 1080p with High settings, the combo averages 96.8 FPS, which drops to 63.4 FPS at 1440p—a 34.5% reduction—and further to 36.8 FPS at 4K, representing a 62% drop from the 1080p baseline. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a system where the GPU is the bottleneck; if the CPU were the limiting factor, the FPS would remain relatively flat across resolutions.
The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens substantially at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the spread from Low (148.5 FPS) to Ultra (75.5 FPS) is 73 FPS, while at 4K the same settings spread is only 25.3 FPS (from 52.6 to 27.3). This compression at 4K indicates that the GPU is so heavily loaded at high pixel counts that even dropping to Low settings cannot fully compensate, whereas at 1080p the CPU can feed frames quickly enough for the GPU to flex its muscle with higher settings.
The 4K Ultra result of 27.3 FPS is below playable thresholds, while 4K Medium (40.1 FPS) and 4K High (36.8 FPS) are marginal. The 1440p results are more promising, with Medium (75.5 FPS) and High (63.4 FPS) both exceeding 60 FPS, and even Ultra (50.3 FPS) remains reasonably playable. At 1080p, all settings except Ultra (75.5 FPS) exceed 90 FPS, with Low reaching 148.5 FPS. The data suggests that the limiting component shifts from the CPU at 1080p Low to the GPU at higher resolutions, a common pattern for a mid-range graphics card paired with a high-end processor.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process. Its base clock of 3.90 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz provide substantial single-thread headroom, which is critical for older game engines like the one powering The Technomancer. The CPU’s benchmark scores reinforce its strength: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50009 and a single-core score of 7060 place it in the 97th percentile among all CPUs. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4904 is notably high, suggesting excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded workloads.
In The Technomancer, the CPU’s role is most evident at 1080p Low settings, where the average FPS of 148.5 approaches the engine’s likely frame rate ceiling. The fact that 1080p Ultra (75.5 FPS) is exactly equal to 1440p Ultra (75.5 FPS) is a key indicator that the CPU is not the limiting factor at these settings; rather, the GPU is delivering the same performance regardless of resolution, which is impossible. This equality suggests that the 75.5 FPS figure at Ultra represents a CPU or engine constraint, not a GPU limit. The 20-core count and 30 MB of shared L3 cache provide ample compute resources, but the game does not appear to scale beyond a few cores, as evidenced by the relatively modest FPS gains from Low to Ultra at 1080p compared to the massive difference in GPU load.
The processor’s nearest rivals in overall benchmark scores include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF (deltaPct -0.2%), Intel Core i9-14900KF (deltaPct -0.2%), and Intel Core i9-14900K (deltaPct -0.9%), all of which are within 1% of the 265K’s average score. This indicates that for CPU-bound scenarios, swapping to any of these chips would yield negligible differences in The Technomancer. The 265K’s 97th percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of installed CPUs, so any FPS limitations in this game are unlikely to be addressed by a CPU upgrade.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is a RDNA 3.0 architecture GPU on the Navi 33 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock of 2755 MHz and game clock of 2470 MHz are competitive for its class, and its 2048 shading units deliver a peak FP32 throughput of 22.57 TFLOPS. The GPU’s 63rd percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the mid-range tier, which aligns with its measured performance in this title.
The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM capacity is substantial, but The Technomancer, being a 2016 title, is unlikely to stress this capacity even at 4K Ultra. Instead, the GPU’s raw compute and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS of 27.3 indicates that the GPU is severely overburdened, while the 4K Low result of 52.6 FPS shows that reducing graphical fidelity can nearly double performance. The 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards, and this likely contributes to the steep performance drop at 4K compared to 1440p.
The RX 7600 XT’s nearest rivals in aggregate benchmark scores are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (deltaPct -0.6%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER (deltaPct 1.9%), and AMD Radeon RX 460 (deltaPct 0.3%). The RX 7600 XT trails the RX 7600 by a mere 0.6%, indicating that the XT variant’s extra memory and slightly higher clocks do not translate into a meaningful performance advantage in this game. The RTX 2060 SUPER, an older card, is 1.9% behind, while the RX 460, a much older budget card, is essentially tied at 0.3% ahead—these deltas are within margin of error and suggest that the RX 7600 XT’s positioning is tightly clustered with these alternatives.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, the High preset (96.8 FPS) offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, delivering over 60 FPS with headroom for demanding scenes. The Medium preset (113.3 FPS) is a viable alternative for users prioritizing higher frame rates, while Low (148.5 FPS) is excessive for most displays but useful for competitive play. Ultra (75.5 FPS) is playable but provides diminishing returns over High.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset (75.5 FPS) is the recommended choice, as it stays above 60 FPS while offering improved visual fidelity over Low. High (63.4 FPS) is also acceptable but leaves less margin for frame drops. Ultra (50.3 FPS) is borderline and should be avoided unless the user can tolerate sub-60 FPS gameplay. Low (97.8 FPS) is the only preset that provides a comfortable cushion above 60 FPS at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, no preset achieves a consistent 60 FPS. Low (52.6 FPS) is the only option that approaches playability, while Medium (40.1 FPS) and High (36.8 FPS) are stutter-prone. Ultra (27.3 FPS) is not recommended for any gameplay scenario. For 4K users, the data indicates that the RX 7600 XT is not sufficient for smooth performance, and either lowering resolution or accepting Low settings is necessary. The measured rows suggest that 1440p Medium is the sweet spot for this combo, offering 75.5 FPS—identical to the 1080p Ultra result—while providing higher resolution clarity.
How This Combo Ranks
In the comprehensive database of tested combinations, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT combo holds a rank of 1067 out of 1656 total combos for The Technomancer. This places it in the 35th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly two-thirds of configurations outperform it in this specific game. This ranking is notably lower than the individual component percentiles (CPU at 97th, GPU at 63rd), which underscores the GPU’s dominant role in determining overall gaming performance in this title.
The combo’s rank of 1067 reflects that while the CPU is top-tier, the GPU is mid-range, and The Technomancer is heavily GPU-bound at most settings. The gap between the combo’s rank and the CPU’s percentile suggests that pairing this processor with a higher-tier GPU would yield significantly better results, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed a more powerful graphics card. Conversely, the GPU’s 63rd percentile ranking is more indicative of the combo’s overall performance, confirming that the RX 7600 XT is the limiting factor.
The data indicates that this configuration is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming at Medium to High settings, where it delivers smooth frame rates. At 4K, it falls below the 60 FPS threshold across all presets, and its rank of 1067 reflects this limitation. Users seeking higher performance in The Technomancer should consider a more powerful GPU, as the CPU is unlikely to be a bottleneck in any realistic scenario for this game. The combination’s rank, while not top-tier, is respectable given the GPU’s mid-range positioning, and it performs exactly as the component benchmarks would predict.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 52.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 40.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 36.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 27.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 97.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 75.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 63.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 50.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 148.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 113.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 96.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 75.5 |
The Technomancer with iUltra 7 265K + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265K + RX 7600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.