The Technomancer

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the AMD Radeon 760M integrated graphics. This combination delivers playable frame rates only at the lowest settings and resolution, with the data indicating a system heavily constrained by its graphics solution. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance metrics from the benchmark database.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data reveals a stark and predictable decline as resolution increases, highlighting the GPU as the primary bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo averages 48 FPS. Moving to 1440p at the same settings drops the average to 32 FPS, a reduction of 16 frames. At 4K with Low settings, the average falls to 17 FPS, which is only about a third of the 1080p performance. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a system where the graphics processor is working at its absolute limit; the pixel throughput required at higher resolutions quickly overwhelms the Radeon 760M's capabilities.

The performance delta between resolutions is consistent across all settings presets. For example, on Medium settings, the average frame rate is 37 FPS at 1080p, 24 FPS at 1440p, and 13 FPS at 4K. Similarly, on High settings, the averages are 32, 21, and 11 FPS respectively. This uniform drop suggests that the rendering load is scaling almost linearly with the number of pixels, which is a classic sign of a fill-rate limited scenario. The CPU is not the limiting factor here; if it were, the frame rate would remain more constant as resolution changes, as the CPU's workload is largely independent of pixel count. The data shows the opposite, confirming that the integrated GPU's processing power is the definitive constraint at every resolution above 1080p.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 4 nm process. Its performance profile is defined by its modest specifications: 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units. The GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2599 MHz, but its memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the system's main memory rather than dedicated VRAM. This shared memory setup is a significant factor in its performance, as memory bandwidth is "System Dependent" and cannot match a dedicated graphics card.

In the context of The Technomancer, the GPU's limitations are evident. The benchmark scores place the Radeon 760M in the 35th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6019. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6400, which scores 6001 (a 0.3% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, which scores 6000 (a 0.3% delta). This puts the integrated solution in the same performance class as older, low-end discrete GPUs. The data shows that even at 1080p, the GPU cannot maintain a smooth 60 FPS at any setting, with the highest average being 48 FPS at Low settings. The frame rates at 4K, ranging from 9 FPS at Ultra to 17 FPS at Low, are effectively unplayable, underscoring that this configuration is not suited for high-resolution gaming in this title.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a mobile processor with 16 cores and 22 threads, based on the Meteor Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. This is a high-end mobile CPU, evidenced by its 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs and a strong average benchmark score of 32697. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T, with a score of 32707 (0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, with a score of 32662 (0.1% delta). In synthetic tests like Cinebench R23, it achieves a multicore score of 15028 and a single-core score of 1743, indicating substantial processing power.

However, in this gaming scenario, the CPU's role is secondary. The benchmark results show that the CPU is not the bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 48 FPS, but the CPU is capable of far more. The Passmark single-thread score of 3468 is robust, and the multi-thread score of 24873 shows immense parallel capability. The fact that frame rates plummet when resolution increases, while the CPU workload remains static, proves that the game is not CPU-limited in this configuration. The CPU is essentially waiting on the GPU to finish rendering frames. This is a classic case of a powerful processor being paired with a weak graphics solution, resulting in a system where the GPU dictates the overall gaming experience. The CPU's capabilities are simply not the limiting factor in The Technomancer.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rate data provides a complete picture of the system's performance across all settings and resolutions. The results are presented as average FPS, with min and max values for Medium settings.

1080p (1920x1080):

• Low: 48 FPS average. This is the only configuration that approaches playability.
• Medium: 37 FPS average, with a minimum of 32 FPS and a maximum of 43 FPS. This shows some frame pacing variance but remains consistent.
• High: 32 FPS average. This is a noticeable drop from Medium, indicating a significant increase in rendering load.
• Ultra: 25 FPS average. This is a playable but not smooth experience, with noticeable stutter likely.

1440p (2560x1440):

• Low: 32 FPS average. This is a 33% reduction from 1080p Low.
• Medium: 24 FPS average, with a minimum of 21 FPS and a maximum of 28 FPS. The frame time variance is becoming more apparent.
• High: 21 FPS average. This is below the threshold for a consistent experience.
• Ultra: 16 FPS average. This is largely unplayable.

4K (3840x2160):

• Low: 17 FPS average. This is a slide show.
• Medium: 13 FPS average, with a minimum of 11 FPS and a maximum of 15 FPS. The frame rate is highly inconsistent.
• High: 11 FPS average. The game becomes a still image in motion.
• Ultra: 9 FPS average. This is the absolute worst-case scenario.

The data shows a clear pattern: the system can only deliver a playable experience at 1080p with Low settings. Every other configuration results in frame rates that are either borderline or unplayable. The min FPS values on Medium settings show that the system can dip below its average, which could cause noticeable hitches during intense scenes.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run The Technomancer at 4K?

A: No. The data shows that at 4K, the highest average frame rate is 17 FPS on Low settings. Medium, High, and Ultra settings yield averages of 13, 11, and 9 FPS respectively, all of which are unplayable.

Q: What is the best settings preset at 1080p for this system?

A: The Low preset is the only one that provides an average frame rate above 45 FPS, hitting 48 FPS. Medium settings drop to 37 FPS, which is a significant compromise for visual quality.

Q: How does the Radeon 760M compare to its nearest rival, the RX 6400?

A: The Radeon 760M has an average benchmark score of 6019, while the AMD Radeon RX 6400 scores 6001. This represents a performance delta of 0.3%, meaning the two are virtually identical in overall performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The frame rate scales directly with resolution, dropping from 48 FPS at 1080p Low to 17 FPS at 4K Low, which indicates a pixel-fill-rate bottleneck. The CPU, which has a high benchmark score, is not the constraint.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 1440p, the average frame rate on Low settings is 32 FPS. On Ultra settings, the average drops to 16 FPS. This is a 50% reduction in performance, making Ultra settings at this resolution impractical.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested combinations for this game?

A: The combo ranks 2817 out of 2825 tested combinations. This places it in the bottom percentile of all systems tested, confirming its status as a low-performance configuration for this specific title.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the only viable configuration for a playable experience is 1080p with the Low preset, which yields an average of 48 FPS. This is the sole setting that clears the 45 FPS threshold, providing a relatively smooth frame rate. While the Medium preset at 1080p offers better visuals, its 37 FPS average is a considerable downgrade in smoothness and may be noticeable to players sensitive to frame pacing. The minimum frame rate of 32 FPS on Medium also introduces a risk of stutter.

For users who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate, the Medium preset at 1080p is the only other option that remains within a playable range, but it is not recommended for fast-paced action. The High and Ultra presets at 1080p, with averages of 32 and 25 FPS, are best avoided as they fall below the threshold for a consistently responsive experience. At 1440p and 4K, no settings preset provides a playable experience. The data strongly suggests that users should stick to 1080p and Low settings to get the best performance from this hardware combination in The Technomancer. Any attempt to raise the resolution or settings will result in a significant and unacceptable drop in frame rate.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon 760M combination ranks 2817 out of 2825 tested combos in The Technomancer. This places it in the bottom 0.3% of all configurations, underscoring its status as a very low-end gaming platform for this title. This ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU's limitations. While the CPU is a high-performance part, ranking in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, the integrated GPU's performance is in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. The system's overall gaming performance is dragged down by the graphics solution.

The fact that the combo ranks so low, despite having a capable processor, highlights the importance of the GPU in gaming. The nearest GPU rivals, such as the Radeon RX 6400 and the GTX 770M, are both older discrete cards that are also considered low-end by modern standards, and the 760M is essentially performing at their level. The data confirms that this integrated graphics solution is not designed for demanding games like The Technomancer, and its performance is among the worst of all tested configurations. This ranking is a clear indicator that users seeking to play this game should look for a system with a dedicated graphics card.