The Technomancer

The Technomancer

AVERAGE FPS
73
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 73 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 34 40 52
1440p QHD 49 63 72 99
1080p Full HD 75 95 116 147

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 52
3840x2160 Medium 40
3840x2160 High 34
3840x2160 Ultra 29
2560x1440 Low 99
2560x1440 Medium 72
2560x1440 High 63
2560x1440 Ultra 49
1920x1080 Low 147
1920x1080 Medium 116
1920x1080 High 95
1920x1080 Ultra 75

The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT delivers a mid-pack performance tier for The Technomancer, landing at rank 1100 out of 1656 tested combinations. This places the combo in the 34th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly two-thirds of the configurations in the database outperform it. The ranking underscores that while this pairing is far from the bottom of the barrel, it is positioned in the lower-middle segment of the performance spectrum, a placement driven more by the GPU's capabilities than the CPU's headroom in this particular title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1100 out of 1656 indicates a system that handles the game comfortably at mainstream resolutions but struggles to push into the upper echelons of performance. In the context of the CPU's synthetic workload, the Ryzen 7 5700G holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25626. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, scores 25706, a negligible delta of -0.3%, meaning the 5700G is essentially performance-equivalent to that mobile chip in CPU-bound tasks. The gap to the Intel Xeon D-2752TER is similarly tight, with the 5700G trailing by just 0.4%.

However, the game's actual frame rates are dictated by the graphics card. The RX 6650 XT sits at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29024. Its closest competitor, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, scores 29011, a delta of 0%, showing that in raw compute, the desktop card and the laptop part are indistinguishable. The data suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck here; even at 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 147.4 FPS, a figure that leaves ample CPU headroom. The limiting factor is the GPU, whose performance ceiling is what anchors the combo to its 1100th-place finish.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 23 chip, fabricated on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s. The GPU's clocks are substantial: a base clock of 2055 MHz, a game clock of 2410 MHz, and a boost clock of 2635 MHz. Memory runs at 2190 MHz, translating to 17.5 Gbps effective.

For The Technomancer, these specifications translate into a card that can handle the game's demands at 1080p and 1440p with ease, but that begins to buckle at 4K. With 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, the card delivers a pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 10.79 TFLOPS provides the raw compute needed for the game's action-RPG effects, but the 8 GB VRAM buffer is a limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings, as the 4K Ultra result of 29.4 FPS suggests the card is running out of memory bandwidth and capacity. The GPU's 176 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU indicate a power-hungry part, but the data shows it is the performance, not the power draw, that dictates the gaming experience.

FAQ

Q: How does the RX 6650 XT compare to its nearest rival, the RX 6800M, in this game's context?

A: The two GPUs have nearly identical average benchmark scores, with the RX 6650 XT at 29024 and the RX 6800M at 29011, a delta of 0%. This indicates that in synthetic compute, they are performance equals, and the measured FPS in The Technomancer reflects that parity, with the desktop card being the limiting factor.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700G a bottleneck at 1080p with Low settings?

A: No. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 147.4 FPS average. Given that the CPU's multi-threaded benchmark score (20755 in Cinebench R23) is respectable, the frame rate is high enough to indicate the GPU is the primary driver, not the CPU.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming on this combo?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset yields 62.6 FPS, which is playable. The Medium preset delivers 71.7 FPS, offering a smoother experience. Ultra drops to 49.1 FPS, which is borderline. The data suggests High or Medium are the optimal choices for a balance of quality and fluidity.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K resolution in The Technomancer?*

A: Barely. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 29.4 FPS, which is below the 30 FPS threshold for smooth play. The Low preset averages 52.2 FPS, but that requires significant visual compromises. The 4K results indicate the GPU is the limiting factor, as the frame rates scale directly with the GPU's workload.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance affect the game?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G scores 2930 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is strong. Since The Technomancer is an Action RPG that often relies on single-threaded logic for game physics and AI, this score is sufficient to avoid CPU-related stutters, as evidenced by the high frame rates at lower resolutions.

Q: What does the combo's rank of 1100 out of 1656 imply for future titles?

A: The rank suggests the system is mid-tier. While it performs well in this 2016 title, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are modest by modern standards. The data implies that for newer, more demanding games, this combo would likely fall further down the rankings, making it a budget-oriented option rather than a high-end one.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates strong performance across all presets. The Low preset averages 147.4 FPS, providing an exceptionally smooth experience. Medium drops to 115.6 FPS, still well above the 60 FPS threshold. High maintains a solid 94.9 FPS, while Ultra settles at 75.1 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the RX 6650 XT has ample headroom, and the CPU is not a limiting factor at any setting.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down predictably. Low delivers 98.9 FPS, which is excellent for 1440p. Medium averages 71.7 FPS, offering a good balance. High drops to 62.6 FPS, which is still playable. Ultra falls to 49.1 FPS, which may cause noticeable judder in fast-paced combat. The data shows a clear degradation as settings increase, with the GPU becoming the bottleneck.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low averages 52.2 FPS, which is borderline acceptable. Medium drops to 39.6 FPS, High to 34.1 FPS, and Ultra to 29.4 FPS. The 4K results are consistently below the 60 FPS target, and only the Low preset approaches playability. This resolution pushes the GPU to its limits, confirming that the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface are insufficient for high-fidelity 4K gaming.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a significant dependency on the GPU. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS across all settings drops by approximately 33% (e.g., from 94.9 to 62.6 FPS on High). This is a typical scaling factor for a GPU-bound scenario, where the pixel count increases by 1.78x but the frame rate drops by a smaller margin, indicating the GPU is still within its efficient operating range.

However, the scaling from 1440p to 4K is more severe. At 2560x1440 High, the system runs at 62.6 FPS, but at 3840x2160 High, it drops to 34.1 FPS, a reduction of 45%. This disproportionate drop indicates that the GPU is hitting a hard wall, likely due to memory bandwidth saturation on the 128-bit bus. The 4K resolution requires 2.25x the pixels of 1440p, but the frame rate falls by more than half, showing that the card cannot sustain the memory throughput needed.

The limiting component is unequivocally the GPU. The CPU's performance is consistent across resolutions, as evidenced by the fact that the frame rate at 1080p Low (147.4 FPS) is not capped by CPU limits. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would see similar frame rates across all resolutions, but the data shows a clear decline as resolution increases. The RX 6650 XT, with its 280.3 GB/s bandwidth, is simply not equipped to handle 4K in The Technomancer beyond the Low preset. For 1440p and below, the combo is well-balanced, but for 4K, the GPU is the clear performance limiter.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 4600 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2635 MHz MHz
TDP 176 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT in The Technomancer

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 52.2
3840x2160 Medium 39.6
3840x2160 High 34.1
3840x2160 Ultra 29.4
2560x1440 Low 98.9
2560x1440 Medium 71.7
2560x1440 High 62.6
2560x1440 Ultra 49.1
1920x1080 Low 147.4
1920x1080 Medium 115.6
1920x1080 High 94.9
1920x1080 Ultra 75.1

The Technomancer with Ryzen 7 5700G + Other GPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Technomancer with RX 6650 XT + Other CPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700G + RX 6650 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.