The Technomancer

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents an interesting challenge for the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 combination. The data shows a system that is clearly capable of delivering smooth gameplay, but the balance between the modern 6-core CPU and the older Turing-based GPU shifts dramatically depending on the resolution and settings chosen. The measured frames per second reveal a pairing where the graphics card often becomes the primary constraint, especially as pixel count increases, while the CPU provides a solid foundation that rarely bottlenecks. This analysis will break down the performance metrics, focusing on how each component contributes to the final experience.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture and codenamed Raphael. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and can boost up to 4.70 GHz. While the FACT PACK does not include CPU-specific frame times or per-core utilization for The Technomancer, the overall performance pattern suggests that this processor is more than sufficient for the game's demands. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072, the 7400F sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong headroom for both threaded and lightly-threaded workloads.

The game, being from 2016, is unlikely to be heavily optimized for many-core processors. However, the 7400F's high single-thread performance is crucial for maintaining high frame rates. The benchmark results support this; at 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 130 FPS average, which is a scenario where CPU overhead is most likely to be a limiting factor. The fact that the FPS scales down to 66 FPS at Ultra settings at the same resolution suggests that the load shifts heavily onto the GPU, but the CPU is still able to feed the graphics card with enough data to maintain these high numbers. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache and the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample data throughput for a game of this era.

The nearest rivals for the CPU in aggregate benchmark scores include the Intel Core i5-14600T and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, with deltaPct values of 0.1% and -0.2% respectively. This places the 7400F in a competitive position, but its actual in-game performance is dictated by the GPU pairing. The data indicates that for The Technomancer, the CPU is not the bottleneck at any tested setting; the frame rate drops are consistently more pronounced when moving from 1080p to 1440p to 4K, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation. The 7400F's role is to provide a stable platform, ensuring that frame pacing is consistent, which is reflected in the steady FPS numbers at lower resolutions.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Examining the measured FPS across all presets, the Medium setting appears to offer the most balanced experience, particularly at 1080p and 1440p. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers an average of 100 FPS, with a minimum of 85 FPS and a maximum of 115 FPS. This is a significant jump from the Ultra preset, which only manages 66 FPS average. The difference between Medium and High at 1080p is also notable, with High yielding 85 FPS. The 15 FPS gain from High to Medium, combined with the 34 FPS gain from Ultra to Medium, makes Medium the sweet spot for high refresh rate monitors, as it keeps the frame rate well above 60 FPS with room to spare.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset again proves its worth. It achieves an average of 65 FPS, with a minimum of 55 FPS and a maximum of 75 FPS. This is the only preset at 1440p that maintains an average above 60 FPS. High drops to 56 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for a smooth experience, while Ultra falls to 43 FPS. For users with a 1440p display, Medium is the recommended choice to ensure consistent performance. The Low preset at 1440p does offer 85 FPS, but the visual compromise is significant. The data suggests that Medium is the optimal balance between visual fidelity and performance, as it provides the highest frame rates that still maintain a stable minimum, indicating a playable experience without major stutters.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The scaling of average FPS across resolutions with the High preset is telling. At 1080p, the system achieves 85 FPS. Moving to 1440p, this drops to 56 FPS, a 34% reduction. At 4K, the average falls to 31 FPS, a 64% reduction from 1080p and a 45% reduction from 1440p. This dramatic drop-off as resolution increases is a clear indicator that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is the limiting component. The GPU's rendering workload scales almost linearly with the number of pixels, and the 6 GB of VRAM and 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth become strained at higher resolutions.

This pattern is consistent across all settings. For instance, with the Low preset, the system goes from 130 FPS at 1080p to 85 FPS at 1440p and further down to 47 FPS at 4K. The frame rate almost halves when moving from 1440p to 4K, which is a classic symptom of a GPU that is running out of pixel processing power and memory bandwidth. The CPU, with its high single-thread score of 3072 in Cinebench R23, is not the culprit here. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, with a significant drop only at 4K. Instead, the FPS drops consistently at each step, pointing squarely at the RTX 2060 as the primary constraint. The data implies that for this game, the CPU has ample headroom, and the GPU is the deciding factor for playable resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is ranked 2212 out of 2825 tested combos in The Technomancer. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the ranking, which is expected given the age and tier of the graphics card. The percentile of the GPU alone is 58%, meaning it performs better than 58% of all GPUs, but the CPU is in the 83rd percentile. This mismatch suggests that the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU, and the overall combo ranking is held back by the graphics card's performance.

The ranking of 2212 out of 2825 indicates that there are many other combinations that achieve higher frame rates in this game. However, this ranking must be interpreted in the context of the specific metrics. The RTX 2060's nearest rivals in aggregate benchmark scores are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 and the AMD Radeon 680M, with deltaPct values of 0% and 0.1%. This shows that the GPU is on par with much older or integrated solutions in raw compute, but its 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and Turing architecture give it an edge in modern games that rely on specific features. The combo's rank suggests that while it is not a top-tier performer, it is capable of running the game at acceptable settings, as evidenced by the 1440p Medium result of 65 FPS. The data shows a system that is well-balanced for 1080p gaming, but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K, which justifies its position in the rankings.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, based on the TU106 chip and Turing architecture, is a 12 nm processor with a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz. It features 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. Its memory configuration of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is a critical factor in The Technomancer, as the game's textures and geometry require significant data transfer. The fact that the 4K Ultra preset drops to 24 FPS average highlights the GPU's struggle to handle the high pixel count and memory demands simultaneously.

The GPU's 6 GB of VRAM is likely a limiting factor at 4K, where texture detail and draw distances can exceed this capacity. The measured FPS at 4K High is 31 FPS, which is barely playable, and the drop to 24 FPS at Ultra suggests that the card is hitting a memory bandwidth or capacity wall. The boost clock of 1680 MHz is relatively modest, and the FP32 performance of 6.451 TFLOPS is low by modern standards. This explains why the GPU is the bottleneck in most scenarios. The RTX 2060's performance percentile of 58% is reflected in these results, as it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming comfortably, but falls short at 4K. The data implies that the GPU's role is to provide a solid 1080p and entry-level 1440p experience, but it is not suited for high-resolution, high-detail gaming in this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its best performance. With Low settings, the average FPS is 130. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 100 FPS, with a minimum of 85 and a maximum of 115. High settings yield an average of 85 FPS, while Ultra brings the average down to 66 FPS. This shows a clear scaling pattern, where each step up in visual fidelity costs approximately 15-20 FPS. The minimum FPS of 85 at Medium indicates a stable experience, whereas the Ultra preset, with no reported minimum, may have more variance.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops significantly. Low settings still provide a high average of 85 FPS, but Medium falls to 65 FPS, with a minimum of 55 and a maximum of 75. High settings average 56 FPS, and Ultra averages 43 FPS. The minimum of 55 FPS at Medium is concerning for a 60 Hz display, as it suggests occasional dips below the refresh rate. The gap between Low and Medium is 20 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is only 9 FPS, indicating diminishing returns at higher settings.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles. Low settings average 47 FPS, Medium averages 36 FPS with a minimum of 30 and a maximum of 41, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 24 FPS. The minimum of 30 FPS at Medium shows that the system is right at the edge of playability, and the Ultra preset's 24 FPS average is not a smooth experience. The data clearly shows that 4K is only viable for Low settings, and even then, the average FPS is below 60. This breakdown confirms that the system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with Medium settings being the recommended maximum for a consistent frame rate.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for a smooth 60 FPS experience?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 with Medium settings achieves an average of 100 FPS, while 2560x1440 with Medium settings averages 65 FPS. For a locked 60 FPS experience, 1080p Medium is ideal, while 1440p Medium is sufficient with a minimum of 55 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in The Technomancer?

A: At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 47 with Low settings. Medium settings average 36 FPS, and High/Ultra drop to 31 and 24 FPS respectively. The system can run 4K at Low settings, but it is not recommended for a smooth experience.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in this game?

A: The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a significant drop in FPS, which indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's high single-thread score and the consistent FPS drops with resolution suggest the RTX 2060 is the primary constraint.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400F compare to its nearest rivals in terms of overall CPU score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, has a score of 32707, which is a delta of 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H has a score of 32812, which is -0.2% lower than the 7400F.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile compared to all other GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it performs better than 58% of the tested graphics cards. Its average benchmark score is 15290.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS for the Medium preset at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the measured minimum FPS is 55 and the maximum is 75, with an average of 65 FPS. This provides a range that is close to a 60 FPS target but may dip below it occasionally.