Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 produces a highly playable Fivem experience at mainstream resolutions, with benchmark data showing a clear progression of performance as resolution drops. This combination ranks in the 2345th position out of 3005 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database, yet the measured frames per second reveal that it handles the game’s multiplayer environments with consistent fluidity at 1080p and 1440p. The data indicates a system where the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU provides ample headroom for the game's simulation-heavy workload.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 115, with a minimum of 97 and a maximum of 132 frames per second. This suggests a smooth experience in typical gameplay scenarios, with the minimum frame rate staying well above common 60 FPS thresholds.

Q: How does the combo rank relative to other tested systems?

A: The combination ranks 2345th out of 3005 tested combos. This places it in the 78th percentile of all configurations in the database, indicating it outperforms a significant majority of tested hardware pairings for Fivem.

Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p and 4K at High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 High, the average FPS is 92. At 3840x2160 High, the average FPS drops to 33. This represents a 64% decrease in frame rate, highlighting the significant load placed on the GPU at 4K resolution.

Q: What is the boost clock of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. This high single-core boost capability is relevant for Fivem, which often relies on single-threaded performance for game logic.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s, utilizing 6 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 192-bit bus. This bandwidth is a key factor in texture streaming and data transfer at higher resolutions.

Q: Is the performance difference between the RTX 2060 and its nearest rival significant?

A: The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580, with a deltaPct of 0. This indicates virtually identical average benchmark scores, showing the RTX 2060's performance level is closely matched by that legacy card in general compute benchmarks, though Fivem-specific results may vary.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, operating at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. For a game like Fivem, which is built on a modified version of the Grand Theft Auto V engine, the CPU's single-thread performance is often the deciding factor for frame pacing and simulation speed. The high boost clock of 4.70 GHz is a critical asset here, as it ensures that the main game thread can execute instructions quickly, reducing the likelihood of CPU-bound bottlenecks that can cause stutters in busy multiplayer servers.

The CPU's cache hierarchy, which includes a 32 MB shared L3 cache, provides a substantial buffer for frequently accessed game data. This is beneficial for Fivem's dynamic world, where the CPU is constantly processing player positions, vehicle physics, and server-side scripts. The 65 W TDP indicates an efficient part that does not require an elaborate cooling solution, and its benchmark scores reflect a strong showing for its class. In the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, the CPU scores 21765, while its single-core score is 3072, demonstrating a balanced capability that supports both the heavily threaded background tasks and the primary single-threaded game loop.

When compared to its nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark database, the Ryzen 5 7400F is nearly indistinguishable in average score. It sits just 0.1% above the Intel Core i5-14600T and 0.2% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, while being 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. This tight grouping suggests that for Fivem, the choice between these CPUs is unlikely to produce a dramatic difference in frame rate, as the game's performance ceiling is more likely to be determined by the GPU at most settings. However, the Ryzen 5 7400F's strong single-thread performance, as evidenced by its PassMark Single Thread score of 3689, ensures that it can keep up with the demands of the game's scripting engine without becoming a limiting factor at lower resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is a Turing-architecture GPU with 1920 shading units and a boost clock of 1680 MHz. It features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. In Fivem, the GPU's role is to render the dense urban environments, handle the draw distance, and process the visual effects that define the game's aesthetic. At 1080p and 1440p, the 6 GB VRAM capacity is generally sufficient for the game's texture loads, but the data shows that the GPU is the primary performance limiter as resolution increases to 4K.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 14111, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580, with a deltaPct of 0, and the AMD Radeon 680M, with a deltaPct of 0.1. This indicates that the RTX 2060's raw compute performance is on par with these older or integrated solutions, despite its more modern feature set. The FP32 performance of 6.451 TFLOPS is a key metric for understanding its shading capability, and the 201.6 GTexel/s texture rate shows how quickly it can fill pixels, which is crucial for maintaining high frame rates in a visually detailed game like Fivem.

The memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s becomes a critical factor when moving to higher resolutions. The data shows a dramatic drop in performance from 1080p to 4K, which is a classic sign of GPU memory bandwidth limitations. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS falls to 33, a figure that is below the threshold for smooth playability on many displays. This suggests that while the GPU has enough raw power to render frames at lower resolutions, its memory subsystem is saturated at 4K, leading to a significant bottleneck.

How This Combo Ranks

With a rank of 2345 out of 3005 total combos, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 sits in the lower-middle portion of the performance spectrum for Fivem. This ranking indicates that while it is not a top-tier configuration, it outperforms 660 other tested combinations, which places it ahead of roughly 22% of the systems in the database. This is a notable position, as it shows that the combination is capable of delivering a playable experience in many scenarios, even if it does not reach the frame rates achieved by high-end hardware.

The rank is derived from a combination of CPU and GPU performance, and for Fivem, the balance between the two is crucial. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, as shown by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, helps to maintain a stable frame rate in the game's CPU-intensive multiplayer environments. Meanwhile, the GPU's moderate performance, evidenced by its PassMark G3D score of 14111, is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but struggles at 4K. This imbalance means that the combo's rank is likely held back by the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions, while its CPU ensures that it does not fall lower in the rankings.

When viewing the combo's performance against its constituent parts' rivalries, the picture becomes clearer. The CPU is a top-83rd-percentile part, while the GPU is a 58th-percentile part. This suggests that the combo's overall rank is dragged down by the GPU. If a user were to pair the Ryzen 5 7400F with a more powerful GPU, the combo rank would likely improve significantly, as the CPU has the headroom to support a faster graphics card. Conversely, this pairing represents a balanced system for 1080p gaming, where the GPU is the limiting factor but still provides acceptable frame rates.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and consistent trend of decreasing performance as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 145 at 1080p to 96 at 1440p, and then to 53 at 4K. This represents a 63% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, the drop is even more pronounced: from 92 FPS at 1080p to 60 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 33 FPS at 4K, which is a 64% decrease. This pattern strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is more moderate, with an average FPS drop of approximately 35-38% across all settings. This is a typical result for a GPU with 6 GB of VRAM, as the increased pixel count puts more strain on the rendering pipeline but does not yet exceed the memory capacity. The transition from 1440p to 4K is where the performance collapses, with an average FPS drop of approximately 45-48% from an already lower baseline. This suggests that the GPU's memory bandwidth and fill rate are simply insufficient to handle the 4K resolution, leading to a bottleneck that the CPU cannot overcome.

This data reveals that for a smooth experience, users should target 1080p or 1440p. At 4K, the system is simply not capable of maintaining playable frame rates, with the highest average FPS at 4K being just 53 at Low settings. This indicates that the limiting component at 4K is unequivocally the GPU, as even a significant reduction in graphical settings cannot bring the frame rate up to the levels seen at lower resolutions. The CPU, with its high single-thread performance, is not the cause of this bottleneck, as the frame rate scales almost entirely with the GPU's workload.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent performance across the board. At Low settings, the average FPS is 145, which is exceptionally smooth. Moving to Medium settings, the average FPS is 115, with a minimum of 97 and a maximum of 132, showing a well-maintained frame rate with minimal stuttering. At High settings, the average FPS is 92, which is still very playable. At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 71, which is still a solid experience for most users.

At 2560x1440, performance remains respectable. The Low preset yields an average of 96 FPS, which is quite good for a higher resolution. The Medium preset provides an average of 75 FPS, with a minimum of 64 and a maximum of 87, ensuring a smooth experience with occasional dips. The High preset brings the average down to 60 FPS, which is right at the threshold for many monitors. The Ultra preset produces an average of 47 FPS, which is starting to become less fluid and may be noticeable to users with high refresh rate displays.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The Low preset yields an average of 53 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. The Medium preset drops to an average of 42 FPS, with a minimum of 36 and a maximum of 48, indicating that the experience will have noticeable stutters. The High preset falls to an average of 33 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset produces an average of just 26 FPS, which is not a playable experience for most users. This data confirms that 4K is not a viable resolution for this combination.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combination depend heavily on the target resolution. For users with a 1080p display, the High preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers an average of 92 FPS, which is a smooth and responsive experience. The Ultra preset also performs well at 71 FPS, but the drop from High is significant enough that the visual fidelity gain may not justify the reduced frame rate. For maximum performance, the Medium preset offers 115 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play, but the High preset provides a better balance of visual quality and performance.

For users with a 1440p display, the Medium preset is the best choice, as it provides an average of 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS, ensuring a mostly stable experience. The High preset at 60 FPS is also viable, but the minimum frame rate is not reported, and the average is at the edge of what is considered smooth. The Low preset at 96 FPS is recommended for users who prioritize frame rate above all else. The Ultra preset at 47 FPS is not recommended, as the lower frame rate will detract from the gameplay experience.

For 4K displays, the data strongly suggests that this combination is not suitable for a consistent high-quality experience. The Low preset at 53 FPS is the only playable option, and even that may suffer from occasional dips. The Medium preset at 42 FPS is borderline, but the minimum of 36 FPS indicates that stuttering will be prevalent. The High and Ultra presets, at 33 and 26 FPS respectively, are not recommended for any gameplay scenario. Users with 4K displays should consider lowering the resolution or upgrading the GPU to achieve a satisfactory frame rate.