The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 97 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 38 | 47 | 56 | 72 |
| 1440p QHD | 66 | 86 | 100 | 129 |
| 1080p Full HD | 103 | 128 | 149 | 196 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer with an AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT presents a clear case of a GPU-bound experience at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s limitations become visible only at the lowest settings. The measured frame rates show a consistent scaling pattern across all four quality presets, with the gap between 1080p and 4K widening dramatically as settings increase. This combination lands in the 690th spot out of 1,656 tested combos, placing it in the upper half of the database. The data indicates that the RX 7700 XT is the primary driver of performance in this pairing, but the Ryzen 5 5600G still has enough headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and directly proportional to the graphics workload. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 127.9 at 1920x1080 to 86.1 at 2560x1440, then to 47.2 at 3840x2160. This represents a 63% reduction from 1080p to 4K, which is a typical pattern for a GPU-heavy title. The Ultra preset shows an even more pronounced decline: 102.5 FPS at 1080p drops to 66.3 at 1440p and then to 37.5 at 4K, a 63% loss overall. Low settings tell a different story, with 196.1 FPS at 1080p falling to 129.1 at 1440p and 71.8 at 4K — the percentage drop from 1080p to 4K here is also 63%, but the absolute numbers are much higher, indicating that the GPU is still the limiting factor even when detail levels are minimal.
The scaling behavior reveals that the RX 7700 XT’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient to handle the game’s demands at all tested resolutions. The consistent percentage losses across presets suggest that the rendering pipeline is not hitting a memory capacity wall at 4K. Instead, the raw compute throughput of the GPU — 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 — becomes the bottleneck. The 47.2 FPS average at 4K High is playable, but the 37.5 FPS at 4K Ultra falls below the 40 FPS threshold that many players consider acceptable for smooth action. The data shows that resolution scaling is smooth and predictable, with no sudden cliffs that would indicate a CPU or VRAM limitation.
How This Combo Ranks
With a combo rank of 690 out of 1,656 tested combinations, this pairing sits in the 58th percentile of all tested systems. This is a solid mid-tier result, but not a top performer. The RX 7700 XT’s individual percentile of 73 against all GPUs is higher than the combo’s overall rank, which suggests that the CPU is slightly dragging down the combined score. The Ryzen 5 5600G’s percentile of 78 against all CPUs is also respectable, but the game’s engine appears to favor systems with more balanced high-end components. The nearest GPU rivals for the RX 7700 XT include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 with a delta of 0%, meaning they perform identically in synthetic benchmarks, but the actual in-game results may differ due to driver optimizations.
The combo rank improves when considering the CPU’s synthetic scores. The Ryzen 5 5600G posts an average benchmark score of 19,983, which is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11600H and 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-11800H. This places the CPU in a tight cluster of similarly performing processors, meaning the 5600G is not a weak link in the chain. The data indicates that this combo would rank higher in less GPU-intensive titles, but for The Technomancer, the GPU’s 73rd percentile is the more relevant metric. The 690th rank out of 1,656 is a representative result for a mid-range CPU paired with an upper-mid-range GPU.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the star of this pairing, and its specifications explain the measured FPS results. Built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, this GPU features 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The boost clock of 2,544 MHz and game clock of 2,171 MHz provide substantial compute headroom, which translates directly to the high frame rates seen at 1080p. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for The Technomancer’s 2016-era graphics demands. The GPU’s passmark G3D score of 22,547 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,316 confirm its mid-range positioning.
The VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor in any of the measured scenarios. Even at 4K Ultra, the game does not appear to exceed the 12 GB allocation, as the frame rate drops are consistent with compute-bound behavior rather than memory swapping. The GPU’s 54 ray tracing cores are present but unused, as The Technomancer does not implement ray-traced effects. The pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s are more than sufficient for the game’s visual fidelity. The data shows that the RX 7700 XT delivers 196.1 FPS at 1080p Low, which is close to the 200 FPS mark, indicating that the GPU is not fully saturated until higher resolutions and settings are applied.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RX 7700 XT delivers exceptional performance across all presets. The Low preset reaches an average of 196.1 FPS, Medium drops to 149.4 FPS, High maintains 127.9 FPS, and Ultra still manages 102.5 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the GPU has enough headroom to handle even the most demanding settings without breaking a sweat. The 1440p results are equally strong: Low hits 129.1 FPS, Medium achieves 100.2 FPS, High stays at 86.1 FPS, and Ultra produces 66.3 FPS. The step from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 34-37% of performance, which is a typical scaling factor for modern GPUs.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes significantly. The Low preset still provides a playable 71.8 FPS, but Medium drops to 55.6 FPS, High falls to 47.2 FPS, and Ultra sinks to 37.5 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 34.3 FPS, which is a larger absolute difference than at lower resolutions. The 4K High result of 47.2 FPS is borderline for a smooth experience, while the 4K Ultra result of 37.5 FPS is below the 40 FPS threshold for comfortable gameplay. The data shows that the GPU’s compute resources are fully taxed at 4K, and the 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 rating becomes the deciding factor.
Settings Recommendations
For 1080p and 1440p displays, the Ultra preset is the clear choice. At 1080p, Ultra delivers 102.5 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. At 1440p, Ultra still provides 66.3 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. For 1440p users with 120 Hz or higher displays, the High preset at 86.1 FPS is the better option, as it maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while sacrificing minimal visual quality. The Medium preset at 100.2 FPS is a reasonable compromise for those who prioritize frame rate over fidelity.
For 4K, the recommendation is more nuanced. The High preset at 47.2 FPS is the highest quality setting that remains playable, but it falls short of the 60 FPS ideal. The Medium preset at 55.6 FPS is the best balance for 4K gaming, as it provides a more stable frame rate while still offering respectable visual detail. The Low preset at 71.8 FPS is the only 4K option that exceeds 60 FPS, but it does so at a significant visual cost. The Ultra preset at 37.5 FPS should be avoided unless the user is willing to accept sub-40 FPS gameplay. The data suggests that 1440p High or 1080p Ultra are the sweet spots for this combination.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its synthetic performance is respectable, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16,758 and a single-core score of 2,365. The CPU’s 16 MB of L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are adequate for gaming, but its PCIe Gen 3 interface (16 lanes) limits bandwidth to the GPU compared to newer Gen 4 systems. The 3DMark max-threads score of 5,455 and 2-thread score of 1,705 indicate that the CPU can handle both lightly and heavily threaded workloads.
In The Technomancer, the CPU’s role is secondary to the GPU, but it still matters at low settings. At 1080p Low, the frame rate of 196.1 FPS approaches the CPU’s limit for this game. The 4K Low result of 71.8 FPS shows that even at lower resolutions, the CPU is not the bottleneck — the GPU is still doing the heavy lifting. The CPU’s passmark physics score of 900 and multithread score of 19,717 suggest it can handle the game’s AI and physics calculations without issue. The 65W TDP and 7nm process node (TSMC) make it an efficient choice, and its 78th percentile ranking against all CPUs confirms that it is not a weak component in this pairing. However, the 0.2% delta against the Intel Core i7-11600H shows that the 5600G is not a performance outlier.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU combo in The Technomancer?
A: The data shows 2560x1440 High at 86.1 FPS is the best balance of quality and performance. At 3840x2160, the High preset drops to 47.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in The Technomancer?
A: Yes, but with caveats. The Low preset at 3840x2160 produces 71.8 FPS, while Medium yields 55.6 FPS and High manages 47.2 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K falls to 37.5 FPS, which is not recommended for smooth gameplay.
Q: How does the RX 7700 XT compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RX 7700 XT has an average benchmark score of 30,097, which is exactly 0% different from the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060’s score of 30,109. It is 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 570 and 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla M60.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5600G a bottleneck at 1080p?
A: At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 196.1 FPS, which approaches the CPU’s practical limit. However, at 1080p Ultra, the frame rate is 102.5 FPS, indicating the GPU is still the primary constraint. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 19,983 is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11600H.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?
A: The Low preset at 2560x1440 produces 129.1 FPS, while Ultra drops to 66.3 FPS. This represents a 62.8 FPS difference, showing that the GPU’s compute resources are heavily taxed by the Ultra preset’s visual effects.
Q: How does this combo rank against all tested systems?
A: The combination ranks 690th out of 1,656 tested combos, placing it in the 58th percentile. The GPU’s individual percentile is 73, while the CPU’s percentile is 78, indicating the GPU has a slightly larger impact on this game’s performance.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 71.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 55.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 47.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 37.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 129.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 100.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 86.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 66.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 196.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 149.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 127.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 102.5 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 5 5600G + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RX 7700 XT + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600G + RX 7700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.