The Technomancer

The Technomancer is a 2016 Action RPG that stresses both CPU and GPU, and the pairing of AMD’s Ryzen 5 4600G with Intel’s Arc B570 produces a specific set of performance characteristics. The data shows a combo that is firmly mid-pack, ranking 2256 out of 2825 tested combinations, indicating that while it can handle the game, it requires careful settings management to achieve a smooth experience at higher resolutions. This analysis breaks down the measured results, the role of each component, and the optimal ways to configure the game.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play The Technomancer with this combo for a 60+ FPS experience?

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 is the only resolution where this combo reliably exceeds 60 FPS on multiple presets. At 1080p, the Low preset achieves 121 FPS, Medium achieves 93 FPS, and High achieves 80 FPS. At 2560x1440, only the Low preset (79 FPS) breaks the 60 FPS barrier.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K (3840x2160) gaming in The Technomancer?

A: The data indicates that 4K is not a viable option for smooth gameplay. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 44 FPS on the Low preset, which drops to 33 FPS on Medium and 29 FPS on High. The Ultra preset falls to an unplayable 22 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Arc B570’s average benchmark score is 20556, which is 0.1% lower than the Arc A750’s score of 20582. This indicates that the B570 performs nearly identically to its predecessor in general GPU benchmarks.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Ryzen 5 4600G and the Intel Core i3-14100T?

A: The Ryzen 5 4600G has an average benchmark score of 17507, which is 0.8% higher than the Core i3-14100T’s score of 17648. This makes the AMD processor slightly faster on average in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 4600G a capable processor for this game?

A: Yes, the data suggests it is more than adequate. Its average benchmark score of 17507 places it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, and its multi-threaded performance, as shown by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13593, provides ample headroom for this title.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a balance of visual quality and performance at 2560x1440?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 52 FPS, which is close to but below the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset provides a more stable experience with 61 FPS and a measured minimum of 52 FPS, making it the best choice for a smoother frame rate without dropping to the Low preset.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is the primary driver of frame rates in this pairing, especially at higher resolutions. Its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for a game from 2016. The GPU’s core clocks are fixed at 2500 MHz for both base and boost, and while there is no measured game clock, this consistent frequency helps maintain predictable performance.

The data shows a clear pattern: as resolution increases, frame rates drop significantly, highlighting the GPU’s role in pixel throughput. At 1920x1080, the B570 is not the bottleneck, as even the High preset achieves 80 FPS. However, at 3840x2160, the GPU’s limits become apparent. The 22 FPS average on the Ultra preset at 4K indicates that the 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are insufficient for the demands of 4K Ultra settings in this title.

The Arc B570’s performance is closely matched with its rivals, according to the data. Its average benchmark score of 20556 is within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534) and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662). This suggests that in The Technomancer, users can expect performance similar to these other mid-range options. The GPU’s 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs further reinforces its position as a solid mid-range part, capable of handling 1080p and 1440p gaming with ease but struggling at 4K.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G serves as a capable foundation for this combo. With 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 2 architecture, it provides solid multi-threading for modern game engines. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.20 GHz are respectable, and the 8 MB of shared L3 cache helps with data access. The CPU’s 65W TDP suggests it runs cool and efficiently, making it a good pairing for a mid-range system.

The benchmark data shows that the 4600G is a well-rounded processor. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13593 and Geekbench multicore score of 6637 indicate strong multi-threaded capabilities, which are beneficial for games that use multiple cores. However, its single-thread performance, with a Geekbench singlecore score of 1460 and a Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 1919, is more modest. In The Technomancer, this single-thread performance is likely sufficient, as the frame rates at 1080p are high enough that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck.

The CPU’s overall average benchmark score of 17507 places it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (17482, 0.1% slower) and the Intel Core 7 150U (17395, 0.6% slower). This data confirms that the 4600G is a competitive budget-to-mid-range option that will not hold back the Arc B570 in most gaming scenarios. The combo’s performance, particularly at 1080p, demonstrates that the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU effectively.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2256 out of 2825 tested combos for The Technomancer. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, specifically around the 20th percentile from the top. This ranking is not a reflection of poor individual components but rather the result of a mid-range CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, which is a common and balanced configuration.

The ranking suggests that while this combo can play the game, many other systems will deliver higher frame rates. For context, the GPU’s individual performance is in the 65th percentile, and the CPU is in the 71st percentile. The combo’s lower ranking indicates that despite the components being individually solid, there are other pairings that yield better results in this specific title. This could be due to the game’s engine favoring certain hardware combinations or the CPU’s single-thread performance being a slight limiting factor in some scenarios.

The data shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can achieve high frame rates. At 1440p, it is still playable but requires lowering settings. At 4K, it is not a viable option for a smooth experience. The measured FPS data supports this, showing a clear performance cliff as resolution increases. The 2256th rank out of 2825 combos is a warning that users should have realistic expectations, especially at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience with this combo, the resolution and settings must be chosen carefully based on the target frame rate. The data provides clear guidance for each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the user has the most flexibility. The High preset (80 FPS) offers a great balance of visual quality and performance. For a competitive edge or maximum frame rates, the Medium preset (93 FPS) or even the Low preset (121 FPS) are excellent choices. The Ultra preset (62 FPS) is also playable but is the least stable of the playable options, so High is recommended for a better experience.

At 2560x1440, the options narrow. The Low preset (79 FPS) is the only one that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS. The Medium preset (61 FPS) is right at the target, with a minimum of 52 FPS, which may cause noticeable dips. The High preset (52 FPS) is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. The Ultra preset (41 FPS) is not recommended. For a smooth 1440p experience, the Medium preset is the best balance, with Low as the fallback for a more consistent frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the data is clear: this combo cannot deliver a consistently playable experience. The Low preset (44 FPS) is the only option that approaches playability, but it still falls short of 60 FPS. All other presets are below 33 FPS, which is not recommended. Users with 4K displays should either lower the resolution to 1440p or accept a significant reduction in visual fidelity and frame rate.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is a detailed breakdown of the measured average frame rates for this combo, along with any available minimum and maximum FPS data.

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: 44 FPS average. This is the highest score at 4K, but still below the 60 FPS target.
• Medium: 33 FPS average, with a minimum of 28 FPS and a maximum of 39 FPS. This preset shows significant frame time variance.
• High: 29 FPS average. This is not a smooth experience.
• Ultra: 22 FPS average. This is the lowest score of all measured tests and is unplayable.

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: 79 FPS average. This is the only 1440p preset to achieve a high frame rate.
• Medium: 61 FPS average, with a minimum of 52 FPS and a maximum of 70 FPS. This is the best balance of quality and performance at this resolution.
• High: 52 FPS average. This is playable but has less headroom.
• Ultra: 41 FPS average. This is below the desired 60 FPS and is not recommended.

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: 121 FPS average. This is the highest measured frame rate for this combo.
• Medium: 93 FPS average, with a minimum of 79 FPS and a maximum of 107 FPS. This preset offers a very smooth and responsive experience.
• High: 80 FPS average. This is an excellent preset for a balance of visuals and performance.
• Ultra: 62 FPS average. This is the most demanding preset, and the frame rate is barely above the 60 FPS target.

The data shows a consistent trend: the gap between Low and Ultra settings is significant, with a 79 FPS difference at 1080p (121 vs 62) and a 22 FPS difference at 4K (44 vs 22). This indicates that the Ultra preset is very demanding and should be avoided for this combo. The Medium and High presets offer the best value, providing a significant visual upgrade over Low while maintaining playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p.