The Long Drive

The Long Drive

AVERAGE FPS
66
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 66 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 19 27 44 53
1440p QHD 34 49 79 96
1080p Full HD 52 75 120 146

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 53
3840x2160 Medium 44
3840x2160 High 27
3840x2160 Ultra 19
2560x1440 Low 96
2560x1440 Medium 79
2560x1440 High 49
2560x1440 Ultra 34
1920x1080 Low 146
1920x1080 Medium 120
1920x1080 High 75
1920x1080 Ultra 52

The Long Drive with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the Intel Arc B570 presents a classic mid-range combination for The Long Drive. The benchmark data shows a system capable of smooth 1080p play at medium settings, but one that struggles significantly at 4K resolution with high graphical presets. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, contextualizes the hardware's standing relative to other tested combinations, and provides clear guidance on how to get the most out of this pairing.

FAQ

*Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among all tested systems for The Long Drive?*

A: This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2342 out of 2934 tested combos in the game's database.

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for achieving 60+ FPS?

A: The data shows that 1080p with Low settings achieves an average of 146 FPS, while 1080p with Medium settings achieves 120 FPS. These are the only two tested configurations that comfortably exceed the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in general benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 5 2600's average benchmark score of 21484 is nearly identical to its closest competitors. It is 0.2% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V and 0.5% faster than the Intel Core i9-11900H, while being 0.7% slower than the Intel Xeon D-1746TER and 1.2% faster than the AMD EPYC 9454.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile relative to all other GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20556 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs in the database, indicating it performs better than the majority of graphics cards tested.

Q: Does the game's performance scale more from reducing the resolution or lowering the settings?

A: Both have a significant impact, but the data suggests resolution scaling is the more powerful lever. For example, moving from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings drops the average FPS from 120 to 79, while dropping from High to Low settings at 1440p increases FPS from 49 to 96.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc B570 is equipped with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is the primary driver of graphical fidelity in this configuration. Its role is defined by its memory capacity, clock speeds, and raw compute power. The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory, which is sufficient to handle the textures and geometry of The Long Drive at the tested settings and resolutions. The memory operates at an effective speed of 19 Gbps over a 160-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

The Arc B570's compute capabilities are substantial. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units, along with 18 ray tracing cores. The core clock is steady at 2500 MHz for both base and boost. This hardware configuration allows for a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. In terms of floating-point performance, the GPU can achieve 11.52 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 23.04 TFLOPS for FP16 operations.

These specifications translate directly into the measured frame rates. The GPU's ability to render frames is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 4K with Ultra settings, the average frame rate collapses to 19 FPS, suggesting the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are overwhelmed by the sheer number of pixels and the complexity of the Ultra preset. The data indicates that this GPU is best utilized at 1080p where it can produce high frame rates, but its performance at 4K is marginal even on lower presets.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides a clear hierarchy for optimizing the experience with this hardware. The primary goal is to achieve a playable frame rate, and the results show a significant trade-off between visual quality and performance across the four presets.

At 1080p, the Medium preset is the clear recommendation for the best balance of performance and visual fidelity. It achieves an average of 120 FPS, with a minimum of 102 FPS and a maximum of 138 FPS. This is a substantial improvement over the High preset, which averages 75 FPS, and it is a massive leap from the Ultra preset, which drops to 52 FPS. While the Low preset yields an even higher 146 FPS, the jump from Medium to Low is less impactful than the jump from High to Medium, making Medium the sweet spot for a smooth and visually acceptable experience.

At 1440p, the situation changes. The Medium preset still holds up well, with an average of 79 FPS, but the Low preset becomes the more sensible choice for those prioritizing smoothness, offering 96 FPS. The High preset at 49 FPS is borderline, and Ultra at 34 FPS is not ideal for gameplay.

At 4K, the data suggests that only the Low preset is viable, with an average of 53 FPS. The Medium preset produces a playable but not ideal 44 FPS. The High preset at 27 FPS and Ultra at 19 FPS are effectively unplayable for a smooth experience. For this resolution, users should stick to Low settings to maintain a reasonable frame rate.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 5 2600 and the Intel Arc B570 ranks 2342 out of 2934 tested combos for The Long Drive. This places it in the lower half of the performance spectrum, which aligns with the measured results that show 4K and high-fidelity settings are out of reach. The ranking is a holistic measure that considers all tested resolutions and settings, and the poor high-end performance significantly drags the overall rank down.

The individual components provide context for this ranking. The CPU, while older, performs admirably compared to its peers. Its average benchmark score of 21484 is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, which scores 21440, and it is actually faster than the AMD EPYC 9454, which scores 21223. This indicates that the processor is not the primary bottleneck in this system.

The GPU, on the other hand, has a more mixed standing. Its average benchmark score of 20556 places it just behind the Intel Arc A750, which scores 20582. It is also nearly matched by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534. While these scores are close, the Arc B570's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it is a competent mid-range card. However, its performance in The Long Drive at high resolutions is limited, contributing to the system's lower overall rank.

Resolution Scaling

The data reveals a steep performance cliff as resolution increases, which is a strong indicator of the GPU being the limiting component. The frame rate drops are not linear, but rather exponential, pointing to the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth being saturated.

At Medium settings, the progression is as follows: 120 FPS at 1080p, 79 FPS at 1440p, and 44 FPS at 4K. Moving from 1080p to 1440p results in a 34% reduction in frame rate, while moving from 1440p to 4K results in a 44% reduction. This accelerating drop-off is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario where the pixel count outpaces the rendering capabilities.

The Low preset shows a similar trend: 146 FPS at 1080p, 96 FPS at 1440p, and 53 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are less severe (34% and 45%, respectively), but the pattern is the same. Even at the lowest settings, the performance penalty for moving to 4K is immense, reinforcing that the Intel Arc B570 is not designed for that level of output.

The fact that this scaling is consistent across all presets confirms that the GPU is the primary bottleneck. A CPU bottleneck would typically show little performance difference between 1080p and 4K, as the GPU would be idle waiting for the processor. Instead, the frame rates are tightly coupled to the pixel count, signifying that the GPU's rendering pipeline is the constraint.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1080p:

The data shows a wide range of performance at 1080p. The Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 146. The Medium preset provides a solid 120 FPS average, with a minimum of 102 and a maximum of 138 FPS. The High preset drops to 75 FPS average. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, yielding an average of only 52 FPS.

1440p:

At this resolution, the Low preset is the only one to break the 90 FPS barrier, with an average of 96 FPS. The Medium preset offers a playable 79 FPS average, with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 91 FPS. The High preset averages 49 FPS, which is a significant step down. The Ultra preset becomes quite demanding, with an average of just 34 FPS.

4K:

Performance at 4K is heavily constrained. The Low preset is the only option that approaches playability, with an average of 53 FPS. The Medium preset averages 44 FPS, with a minimum of 37 and a maximum of 50 FPS. The High preset drops to 27 FPS, and the Ultra preset is nearly unplayable at 19 FPS.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen+ architecture. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. The CPU's cache structure includes 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides a solid foundation for gaming, and its performance in synthetic benchmarks supports this.

The Ryzen 5 2600's average benchmark score of 21484 places it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. Its performance is remarkably consistent with its nearest rivals, showing a delta of less than 1.2% against all of them. This consistency suggests that the CPU is not a source of significant variance in the game's performance.

In the context of The Long Drive, the CPU's role is to manage game logic, physics, and AI, while the GPU handles the rendering. The benchmark results indicate that the Ryzen 5 2600 is more than capable of keeping up with the Arc B570 at lower resolutions. The fact that frame rates scale so heavily with resolution and settings points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the 146 FPS average is high enough to suggest the CPU can feed the GPU adequately. However, at 4K, the CPU is likely not the limiting factor, as the GPU's performance dramatically drops, indicating the processor has ample headroom to process the game's simulation at those lower frame rates.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 3900 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B570

VRAM 10 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2500 MHz MHz
TDP 150 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + Intel Arc B570 in The Long Drive

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 53.0
3840x2160 Medium 44.0
3840x2160 High 27.0
3840x2160 Ultra 19.0
2560x1440 Low 96.0
2560x1440 Medium 79.0
2560x1440 High 49.0
2560x1440 Ultra 34.0
1920x1080 Low 146.0
1920x1080 Medium 120.0
1920x1080 High 75.0
1920x1080 Ultra 52.0

The Long Drive with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs

See how The Long Drive performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Long Drive with Arc B570 + Other CPUs

See how The Long Drive performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + Arc B570

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.