Rust
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 59 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 22 | 29 | 34 | 51 |
| 1440p QHD | 37 | 49 | 58 | 87 |
| 1080p Full HD | 54 | 71 | 85 | 126 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Rust with Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 6600, In-Depth Analysis
FAQ
Q: What is the average FPS for this combo at 1920x1080 on Low settings?
A: The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 delivers an average of 126 FPS at 1920x1080 on Low settings in Rust, making it the highest measured framerate across all tested resolutions and settings in the data.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in overall benchmark score?
A: The Core i7-12700K has an average benchmark score of 35287, which is 0.1% below the Intel Core i5-13600T (35305), 0.2% below the Intel Core i7-12700KF (35365), and 0.3% below the Intel Core i7-13700T (35403). These differences are within a narrow margin.
Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested GPUs?
A: The Radeon RX 6600 sits at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19036. Its nearest rival by score is the NVIDIA Quadro K6000, which has a delta of 0%, meaning they perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks.
Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo?
A: The lowest average FPS is 22, recorded at 3840x2160 resolution on Ultra settings. This is the most demanding configuration in the measured data, representing a significant drop from the 1080p Low result.
Q: Does the data include minimum FPS values for all settings?
A: No. Minimum FPS values are only provided for Medium settings at each resolution. At 1920x1080 Medium the minimum is 72 FPS, at 2560x1440 Medium it is 49 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Medium it is 29 FPS. All other settings rows list a null minFps.
Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how might it relate to Rust's performance?
A: The Radeon RX 6600 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. Given the large framerate drops at higher resolutions, this memory configuration appears to be a limiting factor when pixel throughput demands increase.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, using the Navi 23 chip fabricated on a 7 nm process by TSMC. Its base clock is 1626 MHz, with a game clock of 2044 MHz and a boost clock of 2491 MHz. The memory operates at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed. These clock figures, combined with 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, define its raw throughput capabilities.
In Rust, the GPU's role becomes increasingly evident as resolution rises. At 1920x1080 on Low, the combo achieves 126 FPS, but at 3840x2160 on Low, that figure falls to 51 FPS — a reduction of 75 FPS when pixel count quadruples. The RX 6600's 8 GB frame buffer and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth appear adequate for 1080p, but the data suggests that at 4K, the GPU cannot maintain playable framerates. Even at Medium settings, the 4K average drops to 34 FPS with a minimum of 29 FPS, indicating that the GPU is saturated.
The GPU's benchmark scores corroborate this. Its PassMark G3D score of 15096 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 place it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival comparisons show it trading blows with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (0% delta) and falling slightly behind the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (-0.1%). These synthetic results suggest a mid-range part that excels at lower resolutions but struggles when the render load expands.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of scaling from 1080p to 4K. At Low settings, average FPS drops from 126 at 1920x1080 to 87 at 2560x1440, and further to 51 at 3840x2160. This represents a 59.5% reduction from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is even steeper at High settings: 71 FPS at 1080p, 49 FPS at 1440p, and 29 FPS at 4K — a 59.2% drop.
Medium settings follow the same trajectory: 85 FPS at 1080p, 58 FPS at 1440p, and 34 FPS at 4K. Ultra settings show the most dramatic decline, moving from 54 FPS at 1080p to 37 FPS at 1440p and finally 22 FPS at 4K. The consistency of these drops across all settings indicates that the limiting component is the GPU. When the resolution increases, the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth of the RX 6600 become the bottleneck, rather than the CPU.
The minimum FPS values at Medium settings further illustrate this. At 1080p, the minimum is 72 FPS, which remains playable. At 1440p, the minimum falls to 49 FPS, and at 4K, it plummets to 29 FPS. These minimums suggest that frame pacing becomes more erratic as resolution climbs, likely due to the GPU hitting its limits during complex scenes with many entities, a common trait in Rust's survival gameplay.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i7-12700K and AMD Radeon RX 6600 holds a combo rank of 2900 out of 3723 tested combos in Rust. This places it in the 22nd percentile of all combos, meaning roughly 78% of tested systems perform better in this game.
The relatively low ranking is somewhat surprising given the CPU's strong performance. The i7-12700K ranks in the 84th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35287. However, the RX 6600's 63rd percentile GPU ranking drags the overall combo down. Rust, being a game that can be demanding on both CPU and GPU depending on server population and base complexity, appears to be more sensitive to GPU throughput in the measured scenarios.
The gap between the CPU's high percentile and the combo's low rank suggests that the GPU is the primary constraint. The nearest rival comparisons for the GPU show it matching the Quadro K6000 and nearly matching the RTX 4050 Mobile, both of which are not high-end gaming parts. This positions the RX 6600 as a capable 1080p card, but the combo ranking reflects its limitations at higher resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the data shows a wide spread across settings. Low settings yield an average of 126 FPS, which is the highest recorded value in the entire dataset. Medium settings produce 85 FPS, with a minimum of 72 FPS and a maximum of 97 FPS. High settings drop to 71 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 54 FPS. The transition from Low to Medium costs 41 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs 17 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the averages compress. Low settings deliver 87 FPS, Medium provides 58 FPS (minimum 49, maximum 67), High achieves 49 FPS, and Ultra drops to 37 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings is a 39 FPS loss, and at Ultra settings, it is a 17 FPS loss. The relative gap between settings narrows at 1440p, indicating that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor.
At 3840x2160, the results are marginal for playability. Low settings average 51 FPS, Medium drops to 34 FPS (minimum 29, maximum 40), High falls to 29 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 22 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 29 FPS, which is smaller than the 72 FPS difference at 1080p. This compression of performance across settings at 4K strongly suggests that the GPU is fully saturated, and further settings reductions yield diminishing returns.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the optimal balance of framerate and visual fidelity is found at 1920x1080 with Medium settings. This configuration delivers an average of 85 FPS with a minimum of 72 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay during intense moments in Rust. The 72 FPS minimum is above the 60 FPS threshold commonly considered playable, and the 85 FPS average provides headroom for fluctuations.
For players prioritizing maximum framerate, 1920x1080 on Low settings is the clear choice, offering 126 FPS. This is the only configuration in the dataset that exceeds 120 FPS, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. However, the visual quality reduction may impact visibility in a survival game where spotting distant players is critical.
At 2560x1440, Medium settings are the only viable option for maintaining playability, with an average of 58 FPS and a minimum of 49 FPS. The minimum dips below 60 FPS, which could cause noticeable stutters during combat. Low settings at 1440p offer 87 FPS, but the visual tradeoff is significant. High and Ultra settings at 1440p fall below 50 FPS, making them less desirable for competitive play.
At 3840x2160, no settings configuration achieves a consistently playable framerate. Low settings average 51 FPS, but the lack of minimum FPS data makes it unclear how stable this is. Medium settings have a minimum of 29 FPS, which is far too low for smooth gameplay. Ultra at 4K is effectively unplayable at 22 FPS. Players seeking 4K should consider this combo inadequate for Rust.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-12700K is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. Its base clock is 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides substantial multi-threading capability, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19784 and single-core score of 1850.5.
In the context of Rust, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, entity updates, and server communication. The i7-12700K's 20 threads and high boost clock should theoretically excel in these tasks. Its Geekbench multi-core score of 15790 and single-core score of 2308 place it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong performance across both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads.
The data suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combo. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 126 FPS, which is a high framerate that would require substantial CPU throughput to maintain. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see less variation across resolutions. Instead, the FPS drops sharply as resolution increases, pointing to the GPU as the constraint. The 3DMark results for the CPU (9276 in 16-thread, 1043 in single-thread) further confirm its capability to feed the GPU at lower resolutions without becoming a bottleneck.
The nearest rival comparisons for the CPU show it performing within 0.4% of the Intel Core i5-13600T, i7-12700KF, i7-13700T, and Core 5 213PE. These small deltas indicate that the i7-12700K is a well-balanced processor, but its strong CPU performance does not translate to a high combo rank in Rust because the RX 6600 limits the overall system.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700K
AMD Radeon RX 6600
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 6600 in Rust
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 34.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 29.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 22.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 87.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 58.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 49.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 37.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 126.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 85.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 71.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 54.0 |
Rust with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs
See how Rust performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Rust with RX 6600 + Other CPUs
See how Rust performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700K + RX 6600
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.