Rust

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER pairing delivers a highly capable Rust experience, with benchmark data showing a clear progression from playable 4K to high-refresh 1080p. The combination ranks in the top 14% of all tested combos for this game, indicating strong overall performance. The measured frame rates reveal a system where the GPU becomes the primary scaling factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s six Zen 4 cores provide a solid foundation for the game's simulation-heavy workload.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael codename) using a 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, which are the figures that directly influence how quickly it processes game logic and physics. For Rust, a survival game with complex world interactions, the CPU's single-thread performance is crucial. The processor’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 places it well above average, and its Passmark single-thread score of 3689 reinforces this strength. This high single-thread capability is likely why the 1080p Low preset achieves an average of 216 FPS, as the CPU is able to feed frames to the GPU without becoming a bottleneck at lower graphical loads.

The processor’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 6,570 million transistors also contribute to its performance profile. The L3 cache is particularly relevant in Rust, where frequent data access to the game world and entity states can benefit from faster on-die memory. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 25645 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21765 show it has ample parallel processing power for background tasks and the multiple simulation threads Rust often uses. In the measured data, the difference between 1080p High (142 FPS) and 1080p Low (216 FPS) suggests that at lower settings, the CPU is still capable of pushing more frames, meaning the limiting factor shifts to the GPU as settings increase.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7400F sits in a tight performance band. Its average benchmark score of 32750 is only 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H. It is also 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 but 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. These marginal deltas indicate that the CPU's raw compute power is not a differentiator in this tier; the game's performance is more dependent on how the GPU handles the rendering load at various resolutions and settings. The 7400F’s 65 W TDP and support for DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth round out a package that is well-matched to the GPU’s capabilities without creating a significant performance ceiling.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the best resolution for achieving a consistent 60 FPS or higher in Rust with this combo?

A: At 4K with High settings, the average FPS is 58, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold. For a reliable 60+ FPS experience, 1440p with High settings provides an average of 98 FPS, and 1080p with Ultra settings achieves 108 FPS. The data shows that 4K requires a step down to Medium settings (68 FPS average) to comfortably exceed 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its direct competitors for this game's workload?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F’s average benchmark score of 32750 is nearly identical to its closest rivals. It is 0.1% faster than the Intel Core i5-14600T and 0.2% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, while being 0.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. These differences are negligible, suggesting the CPU is not a differentiating factor in Rust performance.

Q: What is the impact of the CPU's single-thread performance on the game's frame rates?

A: The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3689 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 are strong. This is reflected in the 1080p Low preset achieving 216 FPS average, indicating that the CPU can handle high frame rates when the GPU load is low, and it is likely not the limiting factor in most scenarios.

Q: Is the GPU or the CPU the limiting component at 1440p resolution?

A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases. At 1440p, the average FPS drops from 172 on Low to 74 on Ultra, a significant 57% reduction. This large drop due to settings changes indicates that the GPU is struggling with the increased pixel and shading workload, while the CPU has enough headroom to maintain high frame rates at lower settings.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for Rust?

A: This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER ranks 408th out of 2953 tested combos, placing it in the top 13.8% of all systems. This high percentile indicates that it is a very capable setup for this game.

Q: What is the difference in performance between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the Low preset yields an average of 216 FPS, while the Ultra preset yields an average of 108 FPS. This represents a 50% decrease in performance when moving from Low to Ultra, showing the significant graphical load added by the higher settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination holds a combo rank of 408 out of 2953 tested configurations in Rust. This places the system in the 86th percentile, meaning it outperforms 86% of all other tested combos. This is a strong result, indicating that this pairing is well-optimized for Rust’s specific demands. The high ranking is not surprising given the balanced nature of the components: the CPU provides robust single-threaded performance for game logic, while the GPU offers substantial rasterization power for the game's visuals.

The ranking implies that users can expect a smooth experience at most settings, with the primary caveat being the most demanding 4K Ultra preset. The data shows that 2,545 other combos rank lower, which includes systems with less capable CPUs or GPUs. This combo’s position in the top 14% suggests it is a high-end solution for Rust, capable of handling the game's demanding environments and large player bases without significant performance degradation. The fact that the GPU is end-of-life and the CPU is relatively new (released in January 2025) shows that this pairing is designed for current-generation gaming, and the ranking reflects its ability to handle the game's contemporary requirements.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at the combo’s performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1080p, the system excels, starting with an average of 216 FPS on Low settings. Moving to Medium drops the average to 168 FPS, with a minimum of 143 FPS and a maximum of 193 FPS. High settings produce an average of 142 FPS, while Ultra still maintains a playable 108 FPS. This shows that at 1080p, the system is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming even at maximum quality.

At 1440p, the performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU's workload. The Low preset achieves an average of 172 FPS, which is a 20% drop from 1080p. Medium settings average 116 FPS (min 98, max 133), High settings average 98 FPS, and Ultra drops to 74 FPS. The trend is clear: each step up in settings has a more pronounced effect at this resolution, with the difference between Low and Ultra being 98 FPS.

The 4K results show the system’s limits. Low settings provide an average of 102 FPS, which is still very playable. Medium settings average 68 FPS (min 58, max 79), High settings average 58 FPS, and Ultra drops to 44 FPS. The data shows that 4K Ultra is not a viable option for smooth gameplay, while 4K Medium offers a decent balance. The minimum FPS of 58 at 4K Medium suggests that there can be occasional dips below 60 FPS, but the average remains acceptable. This breakdown illustrates a system that is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for lower settings.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is significant and reveals the limiting component. At Ultra settings, the average FPS falls from 108 at 1080p to 74 at 1440p (a 31% decrease) and then to 44 at 4K (a 59% decrease from 1080p). This steep decline is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance. As the resolution increases, the GPU must render more pixels, and the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are eventually overwhelmed by the workload.

Conversely, the scaling at Low settings is less severe but still significant. The FPS drops from 216 at 1080p to 172 at 1440p (a 20% decrease) and then to 102 at 4K (a 53% decrease from 1080p). The larger relative drop from 1440p to 4K at Low settings suggests that even at low graphical fidelity, the 4K pixel count is a massive challenge for the GPU. The CPU's performance does not show a similar bottleneck; if the CPU were the primary limiter, we would expect the FPS to remain more constant across resolutions. Instead, the consistent FPS decrease across all settings indicates that the GPU’s rendering throughput is the primary constraint at higher resolutions.

The data implies that at 1080p, the system is balanced, with the CPU able to push high frame rates and the GPU keeping up. At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU being the limit, and at 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. For users aiming for maximum frame rates, 1080p is the target, while 1440p offers a good balance of visual quality and performance. 4K is only viable for less demanding settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user's display resolution and performance targets. For 1080p users with high-refresh-rate monitors (144Hz or higher), the Ultra preset is recommended, as it provides an average of 108 FPS, which is close to the 144Hz mark and offers the best visual fidelity. If a user prioritizes maximum frame rates, the Medium preset at 168 FPS is a strong alternative, offering a 55% performance increase over Ultra with a moderate visual compromise. The Low preset at 216 FPS is only useful for competitive play where every frame counts, as it sacrifices most visual quality.

For 1440p users, the High preset is the sweet spot, delivering an average of 98 FPS. This is sufficient for smooth gameplay on most standard 60Hz monitors and even some 100Hz displays. The Medium preset at 116 FPS is also a viable option for those wanting a higher refresh rate, but the visual difference between Medium and High is often noticeable. The Ultra preset at 74 FPS is playable but may not be ideal for fast-paced action, while the Low preset at 172 FPS is a good choice for esports-style play.

For 4K users, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, offering an average of 68 FPS. This is the only preset that consistently stays above 60 FPS on average, though the minimum of 58 FPS indicates occasional dips. The Low preset at 102 FPS is also viable but lacks visual polish. The High preset at 58 FPS is borderline, and the Ultra preset at 44 FPS is not recommended for a smooth experience. In summary, the data suggests that the combo is best experienced at 1440p High for a balance of quality and speed, or 1080p Ultra for maximum visual settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a critical component in this pairing, and its specifications directly correlate with the measured FPS results. The GPU features 7,168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs, which are the core elements responsible for pixel and texture processing. Its boost clock of 2475 MHz and FP32 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS provide the raw compute power needed to render Rust's environments. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the data shows it is a limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 44.

The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 29995 places it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 43223 is competitive. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, is nearly identical in score (43262), with a delta of -0.1%. This suggests that the RTX 4070 SUPER’s raw performance is on par with a professional-grade card, though its feature set is geared toward gaming. The GPU’s role in Rust is clear: it is the primary driver of visual fidelity, and its performance scales inversely with resolution and settings.

The data shows that the GPU is the bottleneck at 4K, as the FPS drops significantly from Low (102 FPS) to Ultra (44 FPS). This is not a CPU limitation, as the Ryzen 5 7400F has ample headroom. The GPU’s 220 W TDP and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface are standard for its class, and its 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die show a dense, powerful architecture. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s performance in Rust is excellent up to 1440p, but users seeking 4K performance must be prepared to lower settings to Medium or Low to maintain playable frame rates. Its end-of-life production status suggests it is a last-generation part, but its benchmark results show it remains a highly capable gaming GPU.