Road 96
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 66 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 23 | 29 | 36 | 49 |
| 1440p QHD | 43 | 54 | 67 | 92 |
| 1080p Full HD | 67 | 85 | 106 | 145 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a playable but demanding experience in Road 96, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions. The data shows a system that is firmly GPU-limited at higher settings, while the 12-core CPU provides ample headroom for the game’s adventure-genre workloads. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, settings impact, and the respective roles of the processor and graphics card.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear and steep performance drop as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K. At 1080p with High settings, the system achieves an average of 85 FPS. Moving to 1440p High drops that average to 54 FPS, a substantial 36% reduction. At 4K High, the average falls to 29 FPS, which is a 66% decrease from the 1080p figure. This scaling pattern indicates that the Intel Arc B570 is the primary bottleneck; the rendering load increases exponentially with pixel count, and the GPU’s compute and memory bandwidth are strained at higher resolutions.
The trend is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the average FPS goes from 145 at 1080p, to 92 at 1440p, and finally to 49 at 4K. This represents a 37% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a further 47% drop from 1440p to 4K. The relative performance hit is similar at every preset, confirming that resolution scaling is independent of the graphics quality level. It is purely a function of the GPU's pixel throughput capabilities.
The 4K results are particularly telling. At 4K Ultra, the system averages just 23 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. Even at 4K Low, the average of 49 FPS is not ideal for a fast-paced experience, though it is playable. The data suggests that 4K is only viable for this combination if the user is willing to accept lower framerates or is playing a genre where 30 FPS is acceptable. For a consistent 60 FPS experience, 1440p is the practical ceiling for this hardware configuration in Road 96.
The scaling from 1440p to 4K is more punishing than from 1080p to 1440p. For example, at Medium settings, the drop is from 67 FPS to 36 FPS, a 46% reduction. This is because 4K has 2.25 times the pixels of 1440p, whereas 1440p has 1.78 times the pixels of 1080p. The GPU’s fillrate and memory bandwidth, rated at 200.0 GPixel/s and 380.0 GB/s respectively, are simply overwhelmed by the 3840x2160 resolution. This makes the limiting component unequivocally the Intel Arc B570.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows provide a clear hierarchy for optimizing the experience. The sweet spot for this hardware is the Medium preset. At 1080p, Medium delivers an average of 106 FPS with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 122 FPS. This provides a smooth, high-refresh-rate experience with a significant visual upgrade over Low. At 1440p, Medium still offers a respectable 67 FPS average, with a minimum of 57 FPS, which is adequate for most players.
The jump from Low to Medium is substantial in terms of visual quality, but the performance cost is manageable. At 1080p, the average drops from 145 FPS to 106 FPS, a 27% decrease, but the resulting 106 FPS is still excellent. The data indicates that the game is not particularly demanding on the CPU, as the Ryzen 9 5900X has 12 cores and 24 threads, so the extra graphical load from Medium is handled entirely by the GPU. The minimum FPS of 90 at 1080p Medium shows that the frame pacing remains stable.
High settings are a viable option for users prioritizing visual fidelity over raw framerate. At 1080p, High produces an average of 85 FPS, which is still smooth. At 1440p, High drops to 54 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive or fast-paced action. The data suggests that High is the best choice for 1080p gaming, while Medium is the best compromise for 1440p. Ultra settings are not recommended for this configuration, as they push the GPU too hard, resulting in 67 FPS at 1080p and 43 FPS at 1440p.
For 4K, the recommendation is to use Low settings, which yields an average of 49 FPS. This is the only way to approach playable framerates at that resolution. Medium at 4K drops to 36 FPS, and High falls to 29 FPS. The data strongly suggests that 4K is not a target resolution for this GPU in this title unless the user is willing to accept a 30 FPS experience. The best overall experience, balancing visual quality and performance, is clearly the Medium preset at 1440p.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Road 96 at 4K with high settings?*
A: No. The measured data shows an average of 29 FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings. This is below the standard for smooth gameplay. To achieve a more playable framerate at 4K, you must use Low settings, which yields an average of 49 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for a 60 FPS target at 1440p?
A: The Medium preset is the optimal choice. The data shows an average of 67 FPS with a minimum of 57 FPS at 2560x1440. The High preset at this resolution averages only 54 FPS, which misses the 60 FPS target, while Low provides a much higher 92 FPS but with reduced visual quality.
Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its closest rivals?
A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X has an average benchmark score of 41376. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, scores 41263, which is a 0.3% difference. Another rival, the Intel Core i7-14650HX, scores 41576, which is -0.5% relative to the 5900X. This indicates the CPU is very competitively positioned.
Q: Is the Intel Arc B570 a good match for the Ryzen 9 5900X in this game?
A: The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU has a high average benchmark score of 41376 and ranks in the 87th percentile, while the GPU has a lower average score of 20556 and ranks in the 65th percentile. This imbalance means the GPU is the bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: The difference is substantial. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 145 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 67 FPS. This is a 54% reduction in performance for the maximum visual quality settings.
Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to its nearest competitors?
A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20534, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, which is -0.1% relative to the B570, showing they are nearly identical in synthetic benchmarks.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The complete set of measured FPS data for Road 96 with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and Intel Arc B570 is as follows:
At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields an average of 145 FPS. The Medium preset averages 106 FPS, with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 122 FPS. The High preset averages 85 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 67 FPS. This shows a clear progression where each step up in quality costs a significant amount of performance, but even Ultra provides a playable framerate.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 92 FPS. The Medium preset averages 67 FPS, with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 78 FPS. The High preset averages 54 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 43 FPS. This resolution is the practical limit for high-refresh-rate gaming, with Medium being the only preset that consistently stays above 60 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 49 FPS. The Medium preset averages 36 FPS, with a minimum of 30 FPS and a maximum of 41 FPS. The High preset averages 29 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 23 FPS. This resolution is only suitable for Low settings if a 30-50 FPS experience is acceptable. The data clearly shows a steep decline in performance at 4K across all settings.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570 is the central component determining the playability of Road 96 at higher resolutions. Its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This memory subsystem is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the data shows it struggles to feed the GPU at 4K, where the pixel load is immense. The 23.04 TFLOPS of FP16 performance and 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are the raw compute figures that handle the game's rendering.
The GPU's clock speeds are a constant 2500 MHz for both base and boost. This consistent clock rate suggests that the card is not thermal or power throttling within the game's workload, but rather hitting the limits of its compute units. The B570 has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s is a hard limit on how quickly it can fill the screen, which is why 4K performance falls so dramatically.
The GPU's benchmark scores support the FPS data. A Passmark G3D score of 14195 and a Passmark DirectX 12 score of 72 indicate modern API support. Its average benchmark score of 20556 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750, is only 0.1% behind, showing that the B570 is a strong performer in its class. The data suggests that the B570 is a capable 1080p and 1440p card, but its 10 GB memory and 160-bit bus are not enough for a smooth 4K experience in this title.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X plays a supportive but crucial role in this configuration. With 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, it provides far more processing power than Road 96 requires. The game's adventure genre typically relies on single-thread performance for game logic and AI, but the 5900X's robust multi-threading ensures there are no CPU-related bottlenecks. The base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz offer high per-core performance.
Synthetic benchmarks confirm the CPU's strength. A Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16262 and a single-core score of 1527 demonstrate its ability to handle both lightly and heavily threaded workloads. The Geekbench multicore score of 14118 and single-core score of 2083 reinforce this. The 64 MB of L3 cache is another asset, helping to keep frequently accessed data close to the cores for faster processing.
The CPU's average benchmark score is 41376, which places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are within a 0.5% performance margin, such as the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H at 41263 and the Intel Core i7-14650HX at 41576. This high level of performance means that in Road 96, the CPU is never the limiting factor. The FPS drops at higher resolutions are entirely attributable to the GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed the graphics card at any setting. The data indicates that this processor will not hold back the Arc B570 in this game.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + Intel Arc B570 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 49.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 36.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 29.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 23.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 92.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 67.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 54.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 43.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 145.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 106.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 85.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 67.0 |
Road 96 with Ryzen 9 5900X + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 5900X + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.