Road 96
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 43 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 15 | 19 | 23 | 32 |
| 1440p QHD | 28 | 35 | 44 | 60 |
| 1080p Full HD | 43 | 56 | 69 | 94 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + Intel Arc B390, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the Intel Arc B390 produces a very specific performance profile in Road 96, one that is heavily constrained by the graphics solution. The data indicates a system where the CPU has ample headroom, but the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, particularly as resolution and graphical fidelity increase. This analysis walks through the measured FPS data to understand the scaling behavior, component roles, and optimal settings for this combination.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a clear and steep decline as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. This pattern is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario, where the rendering workload outpaces the graphics processor's capabilities.
At the Low settings preset, the frame rate drops from 94 FPS at 1920x1080 to 60 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 34 FPS. Moving further up to 3840x2160 yields only 32 FPS, which is less than half the 1080p performance. This steep drop-off at 4K indicates that even at the lowest graphical settings, the Intel Arc B390 is struggling to fill the pixel count required at that resolution.
The Medium preset shows a similar trend, albeit at lower absolute values. The average FPS goes from 69 at 1080p to 44 at 1440p, and finally to 23 at 4K. The gap between 1440p and 4K is significant, highlighting the exponential cost of pixel pushing at higher resolutions.
For the High preset, the numbers are 56 FPS at 1080p, 35 FPS at 1440p, and just 19 FPS at 4K. The 4K result is below the threshold for comfortable playability, showing that this setting is not viable at that resolution for this combo.
The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with 43 FPS at 1080p, 28 FPS at 1440p, and a very low 15 FPS at 4K. The scaling here suggests that the combination of high resolution and maximum settings overwhelms the GPU's 7.680 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power.
The data strongly indicates that the limiting component is the GPU. While the CPU is powerful, the frame rate drops are directly proportional to the increase in pixel count and rendering complexity, a hallmark of a graphics bottleneck. The 1920x1080 resolution is the only one where the combo consistently achieves playable frame rates across multiple presets, while 2560x1440 becomes marginal and 3840x2160 is mostly untenable.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture and built on a 5 nm process. It has a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Its benchmark scores are robust, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15236 and a single-core score of 1965. It sits in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a strong performer.
In the context of Road 96, an Adventure game, the CPU's role is to manage game logic, physics, and frame pacing. Given the steep FPS drops with resolution, the CPU is clearly not the bottleneck. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6879 and the max-thread score of 6845 show that the processor has substantial multi-threaded capacity. However, this capacity is largely underutilized in this title, as the GPU is saturated first.
The nearest rivals for this CPU, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, have average benchmark scores that are nearly identical, with a deltaPct of only 0.2. This indicates that the CPU's performance is very competitive with its peers, but in this specific game test, its superior processing power does not translate to higher frame rates because the Intel Arc B390 cannot keep up. The CPU is effectively waiting on the GPU to finish its work, making the processor's strong single-thread and multi-thread performance a non-factor in the final FPS numbers.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B390 is the clear limiting factor in this combo. It is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture and built on a 3 nm process. It features a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. Its memory is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the system's DDR5 memory, and its bandwidth is "System Dependent," which can vary. The GPU has 1536 shading units and a pixel rate of 60.00 GPixel/s.
The GPU's benchmark results are very low. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1482, placing it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are older, entry-level discrete GPUs like the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and GT 710, with average scores around 1443-1463. This places the Arc B390's performance in a very low tier, which is consistent with the measured FPS data in Road 96.
The GPU's performance explains the resolution scaling perfectly. At 1080p Low, the 94 FPS average is achievable, but the GPU is already working hard. The drop to 60 FPS at 1440p Low shows that the increased pixel load is too much. The 32 FPS at 4K Low confirms that the GPU's texture rate of 120.0 GTexel/s and fill rate are insufficient for high-resolution rendering. The measured FPS for the Medium preset at 4K shows a min FPS of 20 and a max of 27, indicating inconsistent frame pacing as the GPU struggles to maintain a stable output. The GPU's 24 ROPs are likely a major bottleneck for fill-rate-heavy tasks at high resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
Given the GPU's limitations, the settings choices are critical for achieving a playable experience. The data shows that the Low preset is the only way to get consistently high frame rates at 1920x1080, with an average of 94 FPS. This is the smoothest option, though it will require sacrificing visual fidelity.
For a better balance, the Medium preset at 1920x1080 offers an average of 69 FPS, with a min FPS of 59 and a max of 79. This is still very playable and will look noticeably better than Low. The 59 FPS minimum suggests occasional dips, but it should remain smooth overall.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only option that reaches 60 FPS average. The Medium preset at this resolution drops to 44 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced scenes. The High preset at 1440p is borderline, with 35 FPS, and should be avoided if a stable experience is desired.
The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution. At 1080p, it produces 43 FPS, which is a significant drop from Medium. At higher resolutions, it falls below 30 FPS, making it unplayable. The data suggests that the best experience for this combo is the Medium preset at 1920x1080, as it provides a good balance between visual quality and performance, with an average of 69 FPS. If frame rate is the absolute priority, the Low preset at 1080p is the best choice.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combos for Road 96, this specific pairing of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Arc B390 ranks at 2575 out of 2903 combinations. This places it in the bottom 11% of all tested systems. This low ranking is directly attributable to the GPU's performance, as the CPU is a high-tier component. The combo's rank is a reflection of the imbalanced nature of the pairing, where a powerful processor is severely handicapped by an underpowered graphics solution.
This ranking makes sense when comparing the components. The CPU's percentile rank of 79 is high, but the GPU's 9th percentile rank is very low. The overall combo rank is dragged down by the GPU, which is the limiting factor in this game. The measured FPS data confirms this, as the performance is consistent with a low-end GPU. This combo is not suitable for high-resolution gaming, but it can handle less demanding titles or older games at 1080p with lower settings.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Road 96?
A: Based on the data, 1920x1080 is the best resolution. It is the only resolution where the combo consistently achieves high frame rates (94 FPS on Low, 69 FPS on Medium). At 2560x1440, performance drops significantly, and at 3840x2160, it falls below playable thresholds for most presets.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this system for Road 96?
A: The GPU (Intel Arc B390) is the bottleneck. The steep FPS drops as resolution increases are a clear sign of GPU limitation. The CPU (AMD Ryzen 5 7600X) has high benchmark scores and ample processing power, but it cannot overcome the GPU's low rendering capabilities.
Q: Can this system run Road 96 at 4K?
A: Not at playable frame rates. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 32 FPS on the Low preset. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets produce 23, 19, and 15 FPS respectively, which are all too low for a smooth experience.
Q: What settings preset provides the smoothest experience?
A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 provides the smoothest experience, with an average of 94 FPS. This is the best option for high frame rates, though it sacrifices visual quality.
Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to its rivals?
A: The Intel Arc B390's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1482 is slightly above the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1463) and GT 710 (1443), with deltas of 1.3% and 2.7% respectively. This indicates it is in a similar, very low performance tier.
Q: What is the overall ranking of this combo among tested systems?
A: This combo ranks 2575th out of 2903 tested combinations in Road 96. This places it in the bottom 11% of systems, reflecting the GPU's significant performance limitation.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table details the exact measured average FPS for all tested configurations. For the Medium preset, min and max FPS values were also recorded.
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |
| :--------- | :------- | :------ | :------ | :------ |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 94 | - | - |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 69 | 59 | 79 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 56 | - | - |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 43 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 60 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 44 | 37 | 50 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 35 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 28 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 32 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 23 | 20 | 27 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 19 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 15 | - | - |
The data confirms a linear degradation of performance with increasing resolution and settings. The 1080p Low and Medium presets are the only configurations that offer a consistently smooth experience, while all 4K presets and the 1440p High/Ultra presets fail to reach 60 FPS. The 1440p Medium preset, with an average of 44 FPS and a minimum of 37, is the only other viable option for a stable frame rate outside of 1080p. This breakdown serves as a definitive guide for users of this specific hardware combination.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
Intel Arc B390
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + Intel Arc B390 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 32.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 23.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 19.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 15.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 60.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 44.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 28.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 94.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 69.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 56.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 43.0 |
Road 96 with Ryzen 5 7600X + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with Arc B390 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + Arc B390
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.