Road 96
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 39 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 13 | 17 | 21 | 29 |
| 1440p QHD | 25 | 32 | 40 | 54 |
| 1080p Full HD | 39 | 50 | 62 | 85 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + Intel Arc B370, In-Depth Analysis
Road 96 is an adventure title that, on the surface, does not appear to demand extreme hardware, yet the measured data for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Arc B370 combination tells a story of severe performance limitations. The benchmark results reveal a system that struggles significantly at higher resolutions, with frame rates dropping to levels that would challenge playability. This analysis examines the measured FPS across various settings and resolutions, the ranking of this combo against others, and the specific roles the CPU and GPU play in producing these outcomes.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data indicates a stark trade-off between visual fidelity and playable frame rates for this hardware configuration. At 1920x1080, the most viable option for a smooth experience is the Low preset, which delivers an average of 85 FPS. This is the only setting that provides a frame rate comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring fluid motion and responsive gameplay. The Medium preset at 1080p also remains playable with an average of 62 FPS, offering a significant visual upgrade over Low for a 27% reduction in average frame rate. For users who prioritize stability, the Medium preset's minimum FPS of 53 is still acceptable, though it occasionally dips below 60.
Moving to higher resolutions, the situation becomes more constrained. At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only setting that maintains a playable average frame rate of 54 FPS. The Medium preset at this resolution drops to 40 FPS, which may be tolerable for a slower-paced adventure game but is not ideal. The High and Ultra presets at 1440p, with averages of 32 and 25 FPS respectively, are difficult to recommend. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves a playable frame rate. The Low preset manages an average of 29 FPS, while Medium drops to 21 FPS, High to 17 FPS, and Ultra to a nearly unplayable 13 FPS.
For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the data suggests using the Medium preset at 1920x1080. This configuration provides a stable 62 FPS average with a minimum of 53 FPS, representing the highest quality setting that still delivers a consistently smooth experience. While the Low preset offers higher frame rates, the jump in visual fidelity from Low to Medium is generally substantial in modern games, making the 23% performance cost worthwhile. For users with lower refresh rate displays or those who prioritize frame rate above all else, the Low preset at 1080p is the definitive choice, offering a 37% performance increase over Medium.
How This Combo Ranks
The performance of this combination in Road 96 is near the bottom of the database. The combo rank is 2680 out of 2903 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 8% of all systems. This is a remarkably low ranking that suggests the Intel Arc B370 is a significant bottleneck. The GPU itself holds a percentile rank of 5 against all other GPUs, indicating that 95% of graphics cards tested outperform it. This low percentile is reflected in its average benchmark score of 1184, which is only marginally higher than its nearest rivals.
The GPU's nearest rival data paints a clear picture of its performance class. The Intel Arc B370 scores a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 1184. This is nearly identical to the scores of the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186, a 0.2% difference) and the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, a 0.5% difference). These are legacy mobile and desktop parts from over a decade ago, highlighting how far behind the modern performance curve this integrated GPU is. The data shows that this is not a case of a slightly underperforming part, but rather one that is fundamentally outclassed by its peers and even by ancient hardware.
In the context of Road 96, this low GPU rank directly translates to the poor frame rates observed. The CPU, on the other hand, is a high-performing part with a percentile rank of 78 against all CPUs. This means the Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms 78% of all CPUs in general benchmarks. The extreme discrepancy between the CPU's strong performance and the GPU's weak performance indicates a massive imbalance, where the GPU is almost certainly the limiting factor in every scenario.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture and is part of the Panther Lake generation. Its specifications reveal a part designed for basic functionality rather than high-end gaming. The GPU has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 render output units. It also features 10 ray tracing cores, though the game's performance suggests these are not providing any meaningful benefit. The base clock is 300 MHz, which can boost up to 2400 MHz. However, the memory configuration is the most critical factor: the B370 uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it relies on the system's main DDR5 RAM for its frame buffer.
The memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which is a significant drawback. The Ryzen 5 7600 supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a peak bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. While this is respectable for a CPU, it is far below the dedicated bandwidth of even a low-end discrete GPU. This shared memory architecture creates a severe bottleneck, as the GPU and CPU compete for the same memory bandwidth. The measured frame rates support this analysis. The GPU's pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, which are low figures that cap the fill rate capabilities.
The impact of this limited GPU is evident in the performance scaling. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 85 FPS, but this is the absolute ceiling. As resolution increases, the frame rate plummets. The data shows that moving from 1080p Low to 1440p Low results in a 36% drop to 54 FPS, and then a further 46% drop to 29 FPS at 4K Low. This rapid degradation with resolution is a classic sign of a GPU that is severely bandwidth and fill-rate limited. The GPU simply cannot handle the increased pixel workload at higher resolutions, regardless of the CPU's capabilities.
FAQ
Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + Intel Arc B370 combo capable of running Road 96 at 60 FPS?
A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low preset, which achieves an average of 85 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p also comes close with an average of 62 FPS. No other resolution or settings combination in the measured data reaches the 60 FPS mark.
Q: What is the best settings preset for this hardware at 1920x1080?
A: The Medium preset is the best balance, offering an average of 62 FPS with a minimum of 53 FPS. It provides a substantial visual improvement over Low while maintaining a mostly stable frame rate. The Low preset is the only option for a higher, more consistent frame rate, averaging 85 FPS.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B370's performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The B370's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1184. This is 0.2% lower than the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570's 1186 and 0.5% lower than the ATI Radeon HD 5770's 1190, placing its raw compute performance in line with those much older parts.
Q: Why is the performance at 3840x2160 so low?
A: The performance at 4K is unplayable across all settings, with the highest average being 29 FPS on Low. This is due to the Intel Arc B370 being an integrated GPU with "System Shared" memory, which creates a severe bandwidth bottleneck when handling the massive pixel workload of 4K resolution.
Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the main bottleneck in this system?
A: The data strongly indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The Ryzen 5 7600 has a high benchmark percentile of 78, while the Arc B370 has a percentile of 5. The frame rates are consistently low even at 1080p, which points to the GPU's limited fill rate and memory bandwidth as the limiting factor.
Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among all tested systems?
A: The combination ranks 2680 out of 2903 tested combos in Road 96. This places it in the bottom percentile of all systems, highlighting its severe performance limitations in this game.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 is a critical indicator of system balance. At the Low preset, the average FPS drops from 85 at 1080p to 54 at 1440p, a 36% decrease. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the FPS drops further to 29, a 46% decrease. This trend is consistent across all settings. For instance, on Medium, the performance goes from 62 FPS at 1080p to 40 FPS at 1440p, and then to 21 FPS at 4K. The High preset sees a drop from 50 FPS at 1080p to 32 FPS at 1440p and finally to 17 FPS at 4K.
The severity of these drops reveals a system that is heavily GPU-limited. A balanced system would typically show a smaller performance penalty when moving from 1080p to 1440p, as the CPU would be able to maintain a higher frame rate. In this case, the frame rate is nearly halved with each resolution step. The data suggests that the integrated GPU's memory bandwidth and fill rate are exhausted early on. The jump from 1080p to 1440p increases the pixel count by 78%, and the B370 cannot handle this increased load. The subsequent jump to 4K increases the pixel count by another 125%, which the GPU can only manage by dropping to very low frame rates.
This scaling behavior indicates that the limiting component is the GPU, not the CPU. The Ryzen 5 7600 has ample headroom, as evidenced by its strong benchmark scores, but it is starved of work by the GPU's inability to process frames quickly. The result is that the system's performance is capped by the GPU at every resolution, and the cap is so low that even the lowest settings at 1080p only yield a playable, but not exceptional, experience.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This is a modern, capable CPU that demonstrates strong performance in synthetic benchmarks. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 12735 and its single-core score is 1852. In the 3DMark tests, it scores 6499 with 16 threads and 999 on the single-thread test. These scores are competitive, placing the CPU in the 78th percentile of all CPUs.
In the context of Road 96, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU. The game's engine is not likely to be heavily multithreaded, given its adventure genre, but the Ryzen 5 7600's strong single-thread performance is more than sufficient. The CPU's performance is not the limiting factor, as evidenced by the massive performance gap between it and the GPU. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX and the Intel Core i9-11900KF, with average score deltas of 0.2% and 0.4% respectively, showing that the 7600 is in good company.
Despite its strength, the CPU's potential is entirely wasted in this configuration. The data shows that the system's performance is consistently bottlenecked by the GPU. At 1080p Low, where the GPU is least stressed, the system only manages 85 FPS. This is not a CPU limitation, as a 6-core Zen 4 chip with a 5.1 GHz boost clock is capable of much higher frame rates in less demanding titles. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1938 and 4-thread score of 3686 suggest the CPU has ample power for gaming. The CPU's 32 MB of L3 cache and DDR5 memory support further ensure it is not a bottleneck. The data suggests that pairing this high-end CPU with such a low-end GPU creates a severely unbalanced system where the CPU's capabilities cannot be utilized.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following data represents the exact measured average frame rates for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Arc B370 combination in Road 96.
1920x1080:
- Ultra: Average FPS is 39.
- High: Average FPS is 50.
- Medium: Average FPS is 62, with a minimum of 53 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS.
- Low: Average FPS is 85.
2560x1440:
- Ultra: Average FPS is 25.
- High: Average FPS is 32.
- Medium: Average FPS is 40, with a minimum of 34 FPS and a maximum of 46 FPS.
- Low: Average FPS is 54.
3840x2160:
- Ultra: Average FPS is 13.
- High: Average FPS is 17.
- Medium: Average FPS is 21, with a minimum of 18 FPS and a maximum of 24 FPS.
- Low: Average FPS is 29.
These numbers confirm the analysis. The only configuration that consistently maintains a frame rate above 60 FPS is 1080p with Low settings. The Medium preset at 1080p is the highest quality setting that provides a stable, playable experience, albeit with an average just above 60 FPS. All other configurations result in sub-60 FPS averages, with the 4K Ultra setting being essentially unplayable at 13 FPS. The data clearly shows that the Intel Arc B370 is the dominant constraint, and the system's performance is capped by its integrated GPU's limitations.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Intel Arc B370
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + Intel Arc B370 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 29.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 21.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 17.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 13.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 54.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 40.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 32.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 25.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 85.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 62.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 50.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 39.0 |
Road 96 with Ryzen 5 7600 + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with Arc B370 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600 + Arc B370
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.