Road 96

Road 96

AVERAGE FPS
66
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 66 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 23 29 36 49
1440p QHD 43 54 67 92
1080p Full HD 67 85 106 145

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 49
3840x2160 Medium 36
3840x2160 High 29
3840x2160 Ultra 23
2560x1440 Low 92
2560x1440 Medium 67
2560x1440 High 54
2560x1440 Ultra 43
1920x1080 Low 145
1920x1080 Medium 106
1920x1080 High 85
1920x1080 Ultra 67

Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 5 5600X + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers playable frame rates in Road 96 across most settings, but the data reveals a clear performance ceiling that shifts depending on resolution and graphical preset. This analysis examines the measured FPS results to understand how the CPU and GPU each contribute to the overall experience, where the bottlenecks lie, and which settings offer the best balance of visual quality and smoothness.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured frame rates show a steep and consistent performance decline as resolution increases, which strongly indicates that the Intel Arc B570 becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 145 FPS, but dropping to 1440p Low yields 92 FPS, a 37% reduction, and 4K Low falls to 49 FPS, a 66% drop from the 1080p baseline. This scaling pattern is classic GPU-bound behavior—the CPU's work load remains roughly constant across resolutions while the GPU must render exponentially more pixels, so the frame rate collapses as pixel count rises.

The pattern persists across all settings presets. At Medium settings, the frame rate falls from 106 FPS at 1080p to 67 FPS at 1440p (a 37% drop) and then to 36 FPS at 4K (a 66% drop from 1080p). High settings show 85 FPS at 1080p, 54 FPS at 1440p (36% lower), and 29 FPS at 4K (66% lower). Ultra settings follow the same trajectory: 67 FPS at 1080p, 43 FPS at 1440p (36% lower), and 23 FPS at 4K (66% lower). The consistency of these percentage drops across every preset is striking—it suggests the scaling penalty is purely resolution-driven rather than settings-driven.

This uniform scaling behavior implies that the GPU's rendering throughput, not memory bandwidth or CPU overhead, is the dominant constraint. The Arc B570 has a 160-bit memory bus and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is substantial but not exceptional for a modern graphics card. The fact that performance degrades so predictably with pixel count indicates that the GPU's shading units and ROPs are being saturated, rather than the system hitting a memory bandwidth wall or CPU instruction bottleneck. The data suggests that at 1080p, there may be some headroom for the CPU to push higher frame rates if the GPU were faster, but the GPU's capabilities cap the output at every resolution tested.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, built on TSMC's 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with 32 MB of L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 1,541 points in Cinebench R23 single-core and 11,838 points in multi-core, with a Geekbench single-core score of 1,989 and multi-core score of 9,173. These numbers place the CPU in the 75th percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 21,771.

For Road 96, an adventure game, the CPU's single-thread performance is likely more relevant than its multi-core throughput. The game's genre typically involves scripted sequences, dialogue-driven interactions, and environmental storytelling rather than massive simulation calculations or thousands of concurrent entities. The 5600X's single-core score of 1,541 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-thread performance, which should handle the game's logic and AI without becoming a bottleneck. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz provides the raw speed needed for frame pacing, and the 12 threads offer ample headroom for background processes and any lightly threaded game systems.

The CPU's nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (0.1% higher average score), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (0.5% higher), the Intel Core i7-11700 (0.5% higher), and the AMD EPYC 9554P (0.6% higher). These deltas are all within 0.6%, meaning the 5600X is effectively on par with a wide range of CPUs across different market segments. This suggests that the CPU is not a differentiator in this game—any of these processors would likely produce similar frame rates in Road 96 if paired with the same GPU.

The fact that the 5600X has a 65W TDP and supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s means it is a mainstream, efficient part that won't starve the GPU of data. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 lanes provides sufficient bandwidth for the Arc B570, which uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 connection. The CPU's 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die indicate a dense, modern design, but for a game like Road 96, the practical impact of these architectural details is likely minimal—the CPU simply needs to keep up with the GPU's frame output, which it appears to do at every resolution tested.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B570 is a Battlemage-generation GPU built on TSMC's 5 nm process, featuring 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. It has 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs, with 18 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz, and its memory runs at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) across a 160-bit bus, yielding 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 10 GB of GDDR6 memory is a notable feature for an adventure game, providing ample capacity for high-resolution textures and assets.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Arc B570 scores 14,195 in PassMark G3D and 83,514 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% higher average score), the Intel Arc A750 (0.1% lower), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (0.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (0.5% lower). These deltas are all under 0.5%, indicating that the B570 performs similarly to a range of mid-range GPUs from different generations and market segments.

For Road 96, the GPU's 10 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient—the game's art style and scope don't demand the massive texture pools of AAA open-world titles. The 160-bit memory bus and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for the pixel throughput required at 1080p and 1440p, but the data suggests they become limiting at 4K. The measured frame rates at 4K (29 FPS at High, 36 FPS at Medium, 49 FPS at Low) indicate that the GPU's raw compute and memory bandwidth simply cannot sustain smooth performance at that resolution, regardless of settings.

The GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate provide context for its capabilities, but the measured game results are the most telling. The fact that even at Low settings the 4K frame rate is only 49 FPS—below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth play—suggests that the B570 is a 1080p-to-1440p class GPU, not a 4K solution. The Arc B570's predecessor, Alchemist, and its newer Battlemage architecture don't change this fundamental performance ceiling in Road 96.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce 145 FPS average, which is exceptionally smooth and indicates the GPU is not heavily taxed at this resolution. Medium settings yield 106 FPS with a minimum of 90 FPS and maximum of 122 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS with only occasional dips. High settings drop to 85 FPS, still well within smooth territory, while Ultra settings fall to 67 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 78 FPS, representing a 54% performance penalty for maximum visual quality.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance degrades noticeably. Low settings average 92 FPS, which remains smooth, but the margin shrinks compared to 1080p. Medium settings average 67 FPS with a minimum of 57 FPS and maximum of 78 FPS—the minimum is close to the 60 FPS target, suggesting occasional stutter in demanding scenes. High settings average 54 FPS, which is playable but not consistently smooth, and Ultra settings fall to 43 FPS, below the ideal threshold for action sequences. The 1080p to 1440p drop is consistent at roughly 36-37% across all settings, as noted earlier.

At 3840x2160, the results are marginal at best. Low settings average 49 FPS, which is below 60 FPS but playable for a slower-paced adventure game. Medium settings average 36 FPS with a minimum of 30 FPS and maximum of 41 FPS, meaning the experience will frequently dip below 30 FPS in demanding moments. High settings average 29 FPS, and Ultra settings average 23 FPS—both are below playable thresholds for most users. The 4K results show that this combo is not suited for 4K gaming in Road 96, even at the lowest settings.

The Medium settings rows are the only ones that include min and max FPS values across all resolutions, which is useful for understanding frame pacing. At 1080p Medium, the 90-122 FPS range shows good consistency with a 32 FPS spread. At 1440p Medium, the 57-78 FPS range has a 21 FPS spread, tighter in percentage terms. At 4K Medium, the 30-41 FPS range has an 11 FPS spread, but the low average means even small dips are noticeable. This data suggests the game's frame time variance increases at lower resolutions where frame rates are higher, but the impact is less perceptible because the baseline is already smooth.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X + Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2,324 out of 2,903 tested combos in Road 96, placing it in the bottom 20% of all configurations. This ranking is curious given that the measured frame rates at 1080p are respectable—145 FPS at Low settings is far from a poor result. The low rank suggests that many other CPU-GPU pairings achieve higher frame rates, likely because the GPU is the limiting factor and faster GPUs can push much higher numbers at 1080p.

The ranking percentile is somewhat at odds with the component-level benchmarks. The CPU is in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, yet their combination ranks in the 20th percentile for this specific game. This discrepancy implies that Road 96 may be particularly demanding on GPU resources relative to other games, or that the game's engine favors certain GPU architectures. The Arc B570's nearest rivals include the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750, which are comparable in synthetic benchmarks, but the game-specific ranking suggests that the B570 may not translate its theoretical performance into actual frame rates as effectively as those competitors.

The rank of 2,324 out of 2,903 means that only 579 tested combos perform worse. This places the 5600X + B570 in the lower tier of configurations for this game, even though both components are mid-range or better in their respective categories. The implication is that Road 96 rewards GPU-heavy systems, and the B570's mid-range performance holds the combo back. A faster GPU paired with the 5600X would likely rank much higher, while a slower CPU with the same GPU would probably not improve the ranking significantly because the GPU is already the bottleneck at most settings.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and the user's tolerance for frame rate dips. At 1080p, High settings (85 FPS) provide an excellent balance of visual quality and smoothness, with enough headroom above 60 FPS to absorb scene complexity. Ultra settings (67 FPS) are also viable if maximum visual fidelity is preferred, but the 18 FPS drop from High to Ultra may not justify the visual gains in a game like Road 96, where the art style is stylized rather than photorealistic.

At 1440p, Low settings (92 FPS) are the only preset that provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. Medium settings (67 FPS average, 57 FPS minimum) are borderline—the average is fine, but the minimum suggests occasional stutter. For users who prioritize smoothness, Low settings are the safe choice at 1440p. High settings (54 FPS) and Ultra settings (43 FPS) are playable for a narrative-driven adventure game, but they will be visibly less smooth, especially during any camera pans or action sequences.

At 4K, the data does not support any preset for a consistently smooth experience. Low settings (49 FPS) are the only option that approaches playability, and even then, the frame rate will dip below 60 FPS. Medium settings (36 FPS) and below are not recommended unless the user is willing to accept significant frame pacing issues. For 4K gaming, this combo is effectively not viable in Road 96, and users should either reduce resolution or upgrade the GPU.

The Medium settings rows are the only ones with min/max data, which provides insight into frame consistency. At 1080p Medium, the 90 FPS minimum is still smooth, while at 1440p Medium, the 57 FPS minimum is borderline, and at 4K Medium, the 30 FPS minimum is often below the threshold for acceptable play. This suggests that Medium settings are a good middle ground at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for smooth gameplay?

A: At 1920x1080, High settings deliver 85 FPS average, while Medium settings provide 106 FPS with a 90 FPS minimum. At 2560x1440, Low settings achieve 92 FPS, but Medium settings drop to 67 FPS with a 57 FPS minimum. For the most consistent experience, 1080p High or Medium is recommended.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Road 96?

A: The measured data shows 4K performance is limited. Low settings average 49 FPS, Medium averages 36 FPS, High averages 29 FPS, and Ultra averages 23 FPS. Only Low settings approach playability, and even then, the frame rate is below 60 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The B570's average benchmark score is 20,556, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 3070 Mobile, 0.1% lower than the Arc A750, 0.4% higher than the Quadro M4000M, and 0.5% lower than the Radeon R9 M390X. These differences are negligible in synthetic tests.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X a bottleneck in this game?

A: The CPU scores in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, and the frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K follows a consistent pattern that indicates GPU limitation. The CPU's single-core performance (1,541 in Cinebench R23) appears sufficient for Road 96's demands.

Q: What settings should I use for a locked 60 FPS experience?

A: At 1080p, High settings (85 FPS) and Medium settings (106 FPS) both exceed 60 FPS. At 1440p, only Low settings (92 FPS) maintain an average above 60 FPS, but Medium settings (67 FPS) come close despite a 57 FPS minimum. No 4K preset achieves 60 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: This CPU-GPU pairing ranks 2,324 out of 2,903 tested combos in Road 96, placing it in the lower 20% of configurations. The rank is lower than the individual component percentiles might suggest, indicating the GPU limits overall performance in this title.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4600 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B570

VRAM 10 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2500 MHz MHz
TDP 150 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600X + Intel Arc B570 in Road 96

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 49.0
3840x2160 Medium 36.0
3840x2160 High 29.0
3840x2160 Ultra 23.0
2560x1440 Low 92.0
2560x1440 Medium 67.0
2560x1440 High 54.0
2560x1440 Ultra 43.0
1920x1080 Low 145.0
1920x1080 Medium 106.0
1920x1080 High 85.0
1920x1080 Ultra 67.0

Road 96 with Ryzen 5 5600X + Other GPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Road 96 with Arc B570 + Other CPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600X + Arc B570

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.