Road 96
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 75 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 26 | 33 | 40 | 55 |
| 1440p QHD | 48 | 62 | 76 | 104 |
| 1080p Full HD | 76 | 97 | 120 | 164 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and Intel Arc B580 pairing delivers a distinctive performance profile in Road 96, a game that clearly scales with both CPU and GPU resources. The data shows a combination that is capable of high frame rates at mainstream resolutions but struggles to maintain smooth gameplay at 4K Ultra. Benchmark results indicate a system where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher settings, while the CPU’s six-core architecture proves sufficient for the game’s logic at lower resolutions.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 brings six cores and twelve threads to the table, a configuration that is well-suited for the demanding single-threaded tasks often found in adventure titles. Its base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.20 GHz provide the raw frequency needed to drive game logic and physics calculations. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU achieves a single-thread score of 836 in 3DMark and 2319 in Cinebench R23, indicating solid per-core performance that translates to responsive gameplay in Road 96.
Multi-threaded performance is equally robust, with the CPU scoring 5411 in 3DMark’s max-thread test and 16429 in Cinebench R23 multicore. This suggests that the Ryzen 5 5500 can handle any background tasks or additional game systems without causing frame drops. The 16 MB of L3 cache provides adequate data locality for the game’s asset streaming, though the PCIe Gen 3 interface may slightly limit data transfer rates compared to newer platforms.
The CPU’s percentile ranking of 73 against all processors places it in a competitive position, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 and Intel Core i5-12500. The benchmark data shows the Ryzen 5 5500 is within 0.7% of these competitors in average score, meaning its performance in Road 96 is unlikely to be a limiting factor at any resolution. The 65W TDP indicates efficient power delivery, allowing the CPU to sustain boost clocks during extended gaming sessions without thermal throttling.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The Intel Arc B580 is the defining component in this pairing, equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This generous VRAM allocation ensures that Road 96’s textures and environments are stored locally, preventing stutter from memory swapping. The GPU’s base and boost clocks are both set at 2670 MHz, delivering a consistent performance level across workloads. With 2560 shading units and 80 ROPs, the B580 is architecturally capable of handling the game’s visual effects.
The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS suggests strong raw compute power, which is reflected in its benchmark scores. The Arc B580 achieves a PassMark G3D score of 15748 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, with the B580 performing within 1% of these cards in average benchmark scores.
However, the measured FPS data reveals that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings. At 4K Ultra, the combo achieves only 26 FPS, which is below playable thresholds. The GPU’s 190W TDP and dual-slot design indicate it is a power-hungry component, but the 12 GB VRAM ensures that memory capacity is never an issue in this game. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the game’s data streams, though the CPU’s Gen 3 support may create a slight mismatch in data transfer speeds.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
In the database of tested combinations, this pairing of AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2797 out of 3713 combos in Road 96. This places it in the 25th percentile of all tested systems, indicating that while it is not a top-tier configuration, it is far from the bottom. The ranking suggests that many other CPU-GPU pairings outperform this combo, likely due to more powerful GPUs or CPUs with higher boost clocks.
The combo’s rank is somewhat surprising given the individual components’ benchmark standings. The CPU’s 73rd percentile and GPU’s 68th percentile would suggest a more favorable overall ranking, but the measured FPS data reveals that the combo struggles at 4K resolutions. This indicates that the game’s engine is particularly demanding on the GPU at high resolutions, and the B580’s performance at 4K Ultra (26 FPS) drags down the overall ranking.
Comparatively, the combo performs better at 1080p, where it achieves 164 FPS on Low settings, placing it in a more competitive position. The rank of 2797 reflects an average across all tested resolutions and settings, meaning the poor 4K results disproportionately impact the overall standing. Systems with more powerful GPUs, such as those with higher average benchmark scores, would likely rank higher, while those with weaker CPUs or GPUs would rank lower.
FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data
Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this combo in Road 96?
A: The highest average FPS is 164, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.
Q: How does the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5500’s average benchmark score of 19593 is within 0.7% of its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 (19617) and Intel Core i5-12500 (19668), indicating near-identical multi-threaded capabilities.
Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth, and does it impact performance?
A: The Intel Arc B580 has a memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for the game’s asset streaming, as evidenced by the lack of stutter in the measured FPS data at lower resolutions.
Q: Is the combo more limited by CPU or GPU at 4K resolution?
A: At 4K, the GPU is the limiting factor, as shown by the drop from 55 FPS on Low to 26 FPS on Ultra, while the CPU’s performance remains constant across resolutions.
Q: What is the combo’s ranking compared to all tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 2797 out of 3713 tested combinations in Road 96, placing it in the lower-middle range of all tested systems.
Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?
A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $159, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 249 USD.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, highlighting the GPU as the primary bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 164 FPS, which drops to 104 FPS at 1440p Low and 55 FPS at 4K Low. This represents a 66% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K at the lowest settings, indicating that the GPU’s pixel processing capabilities are being stressed.
The scaling is even more pronounced at higher settings. At 1080p Ultra, the combo manages 76 FPS, but this falls to 48 FPS at 1440p Ultra and 26 FPS at 4K Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 37%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 46%, showing that the GPU’s render output units (80 ROPs) are insufficient for the pixel fill rate required at 4K. The pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s is simply not enough to maintain high frame rates at this resolution.
This scaling pattern suggests that the CPU is not a limiting factor at any resolution, as the frame rate drops are entirely attributable to the GPU’s workload. The Ryzen 5 5500’s single-thread performance remains constant, and the game’s logic does not become more demanding at higher resolutions. The data indicates that players should target 1080p or 1440p for optimal performance, as 4K is only playable at Low settings with 55 FPS.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1080p, the Medium preset offers the best balance, achieving 120 FPS with a minimum of 102 FPS and maximum of 138 FPS. This provides smooth gameplay with no frame drops below 100 FPS, making it ideal for competitive or fast-paced segments. The High preset at 1080p achieves 97 FPS, which is still playable but sacrifices some smoothness for visual fidelity.
At 1440p, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, delivering 76 FPS with a minimum of 65 FPS and maximum of 88 FPS. This maintains a playable frame rate while offering improved visual quality over Low settings. The High preset at 1440p achieves 62 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay, while Low achieves 104 FPS but with reduced visual quality.
At 4K, the Low preset is the only viable option, achieving 55 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 40 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for most players, and High and Ultra are not recommended due to 33 FPS and 26 FPS respectively. The data suggests that 4K gaming is not a strong suit for this combo, and players should either lower the resolution or accept reduced visual quality.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 164 FPS, while Medium achieves 120 FPS with a minimum of 102 FPS and maximum of 138 FPS. High settings yield 97 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 76 FPS. This resolution provides the widest range of playable settings, with even Ultra maintaining frame rates above 60 FPS.
At 2560x1440, performance drops significantly but remains playable at lower settings. Low settings achieve 104 FPS, while Medium delivers 76 FPS with a minimum of 65 FPS and maximum of 88 FPS. High settings produce 62 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 48 FPS. The data shows that Medium is the sweet spot at this resolution, offering a good balance between visual quality and frame rate.
At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings achieve 55 FPS, while Medium drops to 40 FPS with a minimum of 34 FPS and maximum of 46 FPS. High settings produce 33 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 26 FPS. The minimum FPS at 4K Medium (34 FPS) indicates noticeable stuttering, making this resolution unsuitable for anything beyond Low settings. The data clearly shows that 4K gaming is not viable for this combo, and players should stick to 1080p or 1440p for the best experience.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + Intel Arc B580 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 55.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 40.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 33.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 26.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 104.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 76.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 62.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 48.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 164.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 120.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 97.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 76.0 |
Road 96 with Ryzen 5 5500 + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5500 + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.