Revolution Idle
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 46 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 15 | 23 | 24 | 32 |
| 1440p QHD | 28 | 44 | 46 | 61 |
| 1080p Full HD | 44 | 69 | 72 | 96 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Revolution Idle with AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
Revolution Idle is not a typical twitch shooter, but its benchmark data still reveals a clear performance hierarchy for the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and Intel Arc B570 combination. The measured frames per second show a system that is heavily constrained by the graphics card at higher resolutions, while the CPU remains a steady foundation. The data indicates a playable experience at 1080p, a manageable one at 1440p, and a challenging one at 4K, with the choice of settings being the primary lever for adjusting performance.
Resolution Scaling
The most striking pattern in the measured data is how average FPS collapses as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 96 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 with the same Low preset drops that to 61 FPS, a reduction of 35 frames. The jump to 3840x2160 at Low settings further decreases the average to 32 FPS, meaning the 4K result is exactly one-third of the 1080p Low score. This steep, linear decline points directly to the GPU as the limiting factor; the rendering workload at higher resolutions is overwhelming the Intel Arc B570.
The scaling pattern holds across all settings presets. For instance, at High settings, the average FPS goes from 69 at 1080p, to 44 at 1440p, and finally to 23 at 4K. The difference between 1440p and 4K is a 21 FPS drop, which is nearly as large as the 25 FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p. This indicates that the pixel count increase from 1440p to 4K is disproportionately taxing for this GPU, pushing it well past its comfort zone. The game is not becoming more CPU-bound at higher resolutions; rather, the GPU's fill rate and shading capabilities are being saturated.
The fact that even the Low preset at 4K only manages 32 FPS reinforces this analysis. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see less variance between resolutions, as the processor's workload would remain relatively constant. Instead, the data shows a near-halving of performance with each step up in resolution tier, a classic signature of a GPU-limited scenario. The Ryzen 5 4600G, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is evidently keeping pace with the GPU's output at lower resolutions but becomes irrelevant once the GPU is fully occupied.
Settings Recommendations
For players targeting a smooth experience, the data strongly suggests that 1080p is the optimal resolution for this combo. At 1920x1080, even the Ultra preset achieves an average of 44 FPS, which is playable for many genres, though the Medium preset offers a more comfortable 72 FPS. The Low preset at 1080p is the clear performance champion, hitting 96 FPS, which provides a significant margin above typical 60 FPS displays. The Medium preset at 1080p, with its 72 FPS average and a measured minimum of 62 FPS, appears to be the best balance for consistent frame times without sacrificing too much visual fidelity.
At 2560x1440, the recommendations become more conservative. The Low preset is the only option that clears the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 61 FPS. The High and Medium presets, at 44 and 46 FPS respectively, are viable for slower-paced games but may feel less responsive. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls to 28 FPS, which is generally too low for a comfortable experience. Therefore, for 1440p gaming, the data indicates that Low settings are the only reliable choice for maintaining high frame rates.
The 3840x2160 resolution is not recommended for this combination. All four presets fail to reach 30 FPS, with the Ultra preset bottoming out at 15 FPS. The best-case scenario at 4K is the Low preset at 32 FPS, which is below the threshold for most action games. Given the data, users with a 4K display should either lower the resolution to 1440p or accept a significant compromise in frame rate. The measured FPS values show that the Arc B570 does not have the raw throughput to handle 4K rendering in this title at any setting.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570 is the primary determinant of performance in this system, as evidenced by the resolution scaling. Its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for the textures at 1080p and 1440p but appears to be a limiting factor at 4K. The GPU's 2304 shading units and 80 ROPs are responsible for the pixel processing, and the data shows they are simply overwhelmed at 3840x2160. The base and boost clocks are both listed at 2500 MHz, indicating a fixed clock speed that does not dynamically adjust under load.
The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with a Passmark G3D score of 14195. This is a mid-range performance tier, which aligns with the observed frame rates. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750, has a nearly identical average benchmark score of 20582, showing a delta of just -0.1%, suggesting the B570 is a very close performance match to its predecessor in synthetic tests. However, in this specific game, the B570's strengths do not translate to 4K capability, highlighting that synthetic benchmarks do not always predict real-world resolution scaling.
The GPU's memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s is a key specification to consider. At 1080p, the data shows the GPU can maintain high frame rates, suggesting that bandwidth is not a bottleneck at that resolution. The significant drop at 4K, however, suggests that the memory subsystem is struggling to feed the shaders with enough texture data for the larger frame buffer. The fact that the 4K Medium preset has a minimum FPS of 20 and a maximum of 27 further indicates that the GPU is hitting hard limits, unable to sustain even its average output consistently.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates a wide range of performance. The Low preset delivers an average of 96 FPS, indicating a very fluid experience. The Medium preset averages 72 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 62 FPS and a maximum of 83 FPS, showing good frame pacing. The High preset averages 69 FPS, which is nearly identical to Medium, suggesting a point of diminishing returns where the GPU is still the primary limiter. The Ultra preset drops to an average of 44 FPS, a significant step down, indicating that the extra graphical effects are costly.
At 2560x1440, the average frame rates are substantially lower. The Low preset leads with 61 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset averages 46 FPS, with a minimum of 39 FPS and a maximum of 53 FPS, which shows more variability than at 1080p. The High preset averages 44 FPS, closely trailing Medium. The Ultra preset falls to 28 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The data shows a clear hierarchy at this resolution, with Low being the only preset that provides a consistently high frame rate.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles across the board. The Low preset averages 32 FPS, which is the highest score at this resolution. The Medium preset averages 24 FPS, with a minimum of 20 FPS and a maximum of 27 FPS. The High preset averages 23 FPS, nearly identical to Medium. The Ultra preset is the worst, averaging only 15 FPS. These numbers indicate that the GPU is completely saturated at 4K, and no settings adjustment can bring the frame rate to a playable level. The gap between the 1440p and 4K results is stark, confirming the GPU as the primary bottleneck.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2373 out of 2986 tested combos in Revolution Idle. This places it in the bottom 21st percentile of all tested systems, meaning that roughly 4 out of 5 other CPU-GPU pairings deliver higher frame rates in this game. This ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions, as the combo's 1080p performance is respectable but its 4K performance is poor, dragging down its overall standing in the aggregate ranking.
This specific ranking suggests that the combo is not well-suited for high-end 4K gaming in this title. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor, and its mid-range position in the GPU benchmark percentile (65th) does not compensate for the extreme demands of 4K rendering. The combo's rank is likely pulled down by the 4K data points, which are consistently low. If the ranking were based solely on 1080p performance, the position would likely be much higher, but the aggregate score penalizes the system for its lack of headroom at higher resolutions.
When compared to other combos, this pairing is in the lower half, indicating that users with this setup should not expect to push maximum settings at high resolutions. The rank of 2373 is a clear signal that this is a 1080p-centric configuration. The fact that the GPU's nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750, has a nearly identical average benchmark score suggests that swapping the B570 for its predecessor would not meaningfully change this combo's ranking in the game, as the performance characteristics are too similar.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Revolution Idle at 4K?
A: The data shows it is not recommended. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 32 FPS on Low settings, while the Ultra preset only reaches 15 FPS. All four presets at this resolution fall below the generally accepted 30-60 FPS playable range.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming?
A: The Medium preset at 1920x1080 is a strong choice, offering an average of 72 FPS with a minimum of 62 FPS. The Low preset is faster at 96 FPS, but for a balance of visuals and performance, the data points to Medium.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in this system?
A: The resolution scaling data clearly indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. As resolution increases from 1080p to 1440p to 4K, average FPS drops dramatically, which is a signature of GPU saturation, not CPU limitation.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B570's performance compare to its nearest rival?
A: In synthetic benchmarks, the Intel Arc B570 has an average score of 20556. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750, has an average score of 20582, showing a delta of -0.1%. They are effectively performance equals in general benchmarks.
Q: What is the combo's overall ranking in this game?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2373 out of 2986 tested combos in Revolution Idle, placing it in the lower portion of all tested systems.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 4600G's integrated graphics relevant here?
A: The integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics are not a factor in these measured results, as the system is using the discrete Intel Arc B570 GPU. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to avoid becoming a bottleneck at lower resolutions, as shown by the high frame rates at 1080p.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G provides the processing foundation for this combo. With 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 2 architecture, it has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. In this game, the CPU's role appears to be a supporting one, as the performance scaling is overwhelmingly dictated by the GPU. At 1080p Low settings, the combo hits 96 FPS, which suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough draw calls and game logic updates to sustain high frame rates.
The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are demonstrated by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13593, which is a solid result for a 65W TDP processor. Its Passmark multithread score of 15992 further confirms its ability to handle parallel workloads. However, in Revolution Idle, the data shows that the CPU is not the primary constraint. The significant FPS drops when moving to 4K are not accompanied by any indication of CPU saturation, such as frame rate plateaus across different resolutions.
The processor's memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s with dual-channel DDR4 is adequate for this workload. The 8 MB of shared L3 cache is a moderate amount, but it does not appear to hinder performance in this title. The CPU's benchmark percentile of 71 places it above average compared to all other CPUs, and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE, shows only a 0.1% difference in average score. This indicates that the 4600G is a capable mid-range processor that is well-matched with the Arc B570 for 1080p gaming, but its performance is overshadowed by the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions. The data suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield a far greater performance increase in this game than upgrading the CPU.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + Intel Arc B570 in Revolution Idle
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 32.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 24.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 23.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 15.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 61.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 46.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 44.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 28.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 96.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 72.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 69.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 44.0 |
Revolution Idle with Ryzen 5 4600G + Other GPUs
See how Revolution Idle performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Revolution Idle with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Revolution Idle performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 4600G + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.