Ready Or Not

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Comet Lake architecture, built on Intel's 14 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, and it sits on the LGA 1200 socket. Its cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 12 MB L3 cache. This CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, and it connects to the system via PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes.

Benchmark data places this processor in the 68th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 14185. Single-threaded performance is modest, as evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 688 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1451. Multi-threaded performance scales reasonably well with its 12 threads; for instance, its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 10283, and its PassMark multithread score is 12115. In the context of Ready Or Not, a tactical shooter that often relies on a balance of physics, AI, and rendering, the CPU's six physical cores and twelve threads are sufficient to feed a high-end GPU without becoming a severe bottleneck, though its single-thread performance, while not class-leading, is adequate for maintaining high frame rates. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6756E, has an average score of 14163, which is a mere 0.2% higher, indicating that the i5-10400F's raw compute capability is closely matched to that enterprise chip, though gaming performance depends on more than just aggregate scores.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Core i5-10400F provides a foundation of 6 cores and 12 threads, a configuration that is well-suited for modern game engines that can distribute tasks across multiple threads. The boost clock of 4.30 GHz is the key frequency for gaming, as most game logic, including the AI-driven squad behavior in Ready Or Not, is often bound to a few primary threads. The data shows that this CPU can keep up with the RTX 5070 across all tested settings, as frame rates scale significantly with resolution, which is a hallmark of GPU-bound scenarios rather than CPU-bound ones.

Examining the measured FPS data, at 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 381 FPS, which is an extremely high frame rate. This suggests that the CPU is not a limiting factor at lower resolutions where the GPU has less work to do per frame. Even at 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 218, indicating that the CPU can sustain high instruction throughput. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 4748 and the 8-thread score of 3929 show that the CPU has decent multi-threaded headroom, which is beneficial for handling background tasks and the game's simulation layer simultaneously. However, the relatively low single-thread score of 688 in 3DMark and 2541 in PassMark single-thread tests means that in scenarios with extremely high frame rates, the CPU's per-core performance could become a theoretical wall, but the observed numbers suggest this wall is not being hit in this game.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while not exceptional, is sufficient for the game's data streaming needs. The L3 cache of 12 MB shared across all cores is a moderate size; it helps with data reuse but is not as large as some modern competitors. In practice, the benchmark results indicate that the i5-10400F provides a stable platform that allows the RTX 5070 to express its full potential, as evidenced by the smooth scaling of frame rates from 1080p to 1440p and 4K. The data suggests that the processor is never the primary constraint in this pairing, as the frame rate deltas between resolution steps are consistent and large, which is typical of a GPU-limited scenario.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is the dominant component in this pairing. It features the GB205 chip based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The GPU's core clocks are set at a base of 2325 MHz and a boost of 2512 MHz, with memory running at an effective 28 Gbps. It contains 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units, alongside 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. This hardware configuration delivers a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 482.3 GTexel/s, with an FP32 performance of 30.87 TFLOPS.

In terms of benchmark standing, the RTX 5070 ranks in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40377. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 580, has a score of 40318, which is only 0.1% lower, placing them in a statistical tie. The GPU's 12 GB of VRAM is a crucial factor for Ready Or Not, a game that features detailed environments and multiple AI characters. At 4K Ultra settings, the combo averages 72 FPS, suggesting that the VRAM capacity and bandwidth are sufficient to handle the high-resolution textures without causing a significant performance collapse. The high memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s ensures that texture streaming and frame buffer operations at 4K do not become a bottleneck, which is reflected in the 4K High settings score of 102 FPS.

The GPU's compute capabilities, as shown by its PassMark G3D score of 29137, are substantial. This is a tactical shooter that likely uses various post-processing effects, and the GPU's raw throughput ensures that these effects are rendered without compromising frame rates. The 48 RT cores are present, but the measured data does not specify whether ray tracing is enabled in the tested rows; however, the GPU's architecture is capable of handling such workloads if activated. The data indicates that the RTX 5070 is the primary driver of performance in this system, as frame rates vary dramatically with resolution and settings, which is the expected behavior for a GPU-bound game. The 250 W TDP and the suggested 600 W PSU highlight that this is a power-hungry component, but the benchmark results demonstrate that this power is translated into high frame rates across all resolutions.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern that identifies the GPU as the limiting component in this configuration. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 381 FPS at 1080p to 247 FPS at 1440p, and then to 129 FPS at 4K. This represents a reduction of 35% when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 48% reduction when moving from 1440p to 4K. Such a steep decline with increasing resolution is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario, where the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed frames, but the GPU's rendering workload grows exponentially with pixel count.

A similar pattern is observed at High settings, where the average FPS is 311 at 1080p, 196 at 1440p, and 102 at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is 37%, and from 1440p to 4K is 48%. This consistent reduction across different settings indicates that the rendering pipeline is the bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see a plateau in frame rates at lower resolutions, where the GPU is underutilized. Instead, the frame rates continue to rise at 1080p, reaching 381 FPS, which far exceeds typical display refresh rates, confirming that the CPU can deliver frames faster than the GPU can render them at lower resolutions.

At Medium settings, the data includes minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p Medium, the average is 342 FPS with a minimum of 290 and a maximum of 393. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 216 FPS with a minimum of 183 and a maximum of 248. At 4K Medium, the average is 113 FPS with a minimum of 96 and a maximum of 130. The minimum frame rates at 4K are notably lower, suggesting that while the average is playable, there are moments where the GPU is heavily taxed, likely during scenes with complex lighting or multiple characters. This scaling behavior strongly suggests that for users with high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p or 1440p, the RTX 5070 is the star of the show, while the i5-10400F provides adequate support without introducing stutter or frame pacing issues.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achievable with this CPU and GPU combo?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded in the data is 381 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the i5-10400F compare to its closest rival in raw processing power?

A: The i5-10400F has an average benchmark score of 14185, while its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6756E, scores 14163, which is 0.2% higher, making them effectively equivalent in aggregate performance.

Q: Is 12 GB of VRAM on the RTX 5070 enough for 4K gaming in Ready Or Not?

A: Yes, the data shows that at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average of 72 FPS, and at High settings it reaches 102 FPS, indicating that the 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for this game at 4K.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck in this system?

A: The scaling data indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor. For example, at High settings, the average FPS drops from 311 at 1080p to 102 at 4K, a 67% reduction, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound workload.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset yields an average of 247 FPS, while the Ultra preset yields 138 FPS, representing a 44% decrease in performance when moving to the highest quality settings.

Q: How does the RTX 5070's benchmark score compare to the AMD Radeon Pro 580?

A: The RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40377, while the AMD Radeon Pro 580 scores 40318, showing that the RTX 5070 is 0.1% faster, which is a negligible difference.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Ready Or Not, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-10400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 holds a rank of 807 out of 3714 total combos. This places it in the top 22% of all tested systems, which is a strong showing for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The rank reflects the overall performance potential of the system, which is heavily weighted by the GPU's capabilities. The i5-10400F, while not a top-tier processor, does not significantly drag down the ranking, as the GPU is able to deliver high frame rates across all resolutions.

The fact that this combo ranks in the 807th position out of 3714 indicates that there are many systems with more powerful CPUs that achieve higher frame rates, but also that this combination outperforms the majority of tested setups. The GPU's 82nd percentile ranking among all GPUs is a major contributor to this result. The CPU's 68th percentile ranking is lower but still respectable. The delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles suggests that the system is well-balanced for gaming, where the GPU is the primary driver of performance. The data shows that for a game like Ready Or Not, which is not typically used as a CPU benchmark, this combo provides an excellent experience, as evidenced by the high average frame rates even at 4K Ultra settings. This ranking suggests that users with this setup can expect a high level of performance without needing to upgrade the processor to achieve smooth gameplay.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the choice of settings depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For users with a 1080p display, even the Ultra preset is viable, as it averages 218 FPS, which is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate of most gaming monitors. The Medium preset at 1080p offers a significant bump to 342 FPS, which is beneficial for competitive play or for users with 240 Hz or 360 Hz displays, though the visual fidelity trade-off may not be worth it for a tactical shooter where spotting enemies is crucial.

At 1440p, the High preset appears to be the optimal balance, delivering an average of 196 FPS. This is high enough to take advantage of 144 Hz and 165 Hz monitors, while providing better visual quality than Medium, which runs at 216 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 138 FPS, which is still playable but may be below the refresh rate of some high-end monitors. The data suggests that High is the sweet spot for this resolution, as it maintains a high frame rate while offering most of the visual enhancements.

For 4K gaming, the High preset is the recommended choice, as it yields an average of 102 FPS, which is smooth for a single-player tactical shooter. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 72 FPS, which is still playable but may feel less responsive. The Medium preset at 4K provides an average of 113 FPS, but the minimum FPS of 96 indicates that there may be occasional dips. Given the available data, the High preset at 4K offers the best combination of visual quality and performance, ensuring a consistent experience without the frame rate volatility seen in the Medium preset. The Low preset is only recommended for users seeking the absolute highest frame rates, such as 381 FPS at 1080p, but it sacrifices too much visual detail for most players.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is a detailed breakdown of the average frame rates measured for this system in Ready Or Not, organized by resolution and settings preset.

At 1920x1080, the Low settings preset achieves an average frame rate of 381 FPS. The Medium preset produces an average of 342 FPS, with a minimum of 290 FPS and a maximum of 393 FPS. The High preset yields an average of 311 FPS. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 218 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the Low settings preset averages 247 FPS. The Medium preset averages 216 FPS, with a minimum of 183 FPS and a maximum of 248 FPS. The High preset averages 196 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 138 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the Low settings preset averages 129 FPS. The Medium preset averages 113 FPS, with a minimum of 96 FPS and a maximum of 130 FPS. The High preset averages 102 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 72 FPS.

This data illustrates a clear hierarchy: lower resolutions and lower settings yield higher frame rates, with the GPU being the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The minimum FPS values provided for the Medium preset across all resolutions show that the frame rate is relatively stable, with the 4K Medium setting having the largest gap between minimum and average (96 vs 113), indicating more intense scenes cause a noticeable dip. The Ultra preset at 4K, while having the lowest average of 72 FPS, does not have a listed minimum, so it is unclear if it is more stable than the Medium preset. Overall, the numbers confirm that this combo is capable of delivering a high-refresh-rate experience at 1080p and 1440p, and a smooth 60+ FPS experience at 4K on High settings.