Ready Or Not

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination was benchmarked in Ready Or Not using the measured FPS rows provided below. This page presents the complete dataset: per-resolution and per-preset average frame rates, the combo's ranking relative to other tested systems, and the respective roles of CPU and GPU in this tactical shooter. All figures come from the fact pack; no external data is introduced.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1920x1080 with Medium settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 247, with a minimum and maximum of 210 and 285 respectively.

Q: How does the CPU's synthetic benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has an average benchmark score of 39,768. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, scores 39,603, a delta of +0.4%. Another rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, sits at 40,048 (−0.7%), meaning the tested CPU is slightly behind that part while narrowly ahead of the 8840HS.

Q: What is the GPU's Geekbench Vulkân score?

A: The RTX 5060 scores 113,321 in Geekbench Vulkan and 112,787 in Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: What is the combo's rank in Ready Or Not?

A: The combo ranks 1,641st out of 3,714 total combinations tested in this game.

Q: Which preset yields the highest average FPS at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, Low settings yield 94 FPS, followed by Medium at 82, High at 74, and Ultra at 52. Low is the highest average FPS in this set.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data reveals distinct behavior across the three resolutions and all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra). At 1080p, every preset exceeds a 60 FPS threshold, but the margin is substantial: Low averages 284 FPS, Medium 247, High 225, and Ultra 158. The minimum FPS recorded in this resolution appears only for Medium (210), and the maximum for Medium is 285. Because the Ultra preset still delivers more than double the 60 Hz baseline, for 1080p the Ultra preset provides the best visual fidelity while maintaining a perfectly smooth frame rate for a 144 Hz-plus monitor.

For 2560x1440, the spread is similar in shape but proportionally lower. Low yields 179 FPS, Medium 156, High 142, and Ultra 100. Again Ultra produces triple-digit frames, and even at the highest quality the average stays above 100, so at 1440p Ultra is the preferred choice for a 144 Hz display. For 4K (3840x2160), only Low (94) and Medium (82) exceed the 60 FPS threshold. High dips to 74, and Ultra falls to 52 FPS. For a 60 Hz 4K monitor, Medium or High are safe alternatives; High is playable, but if the target is a locked 60 with the best quality, Medium is the highest setting that stays comfortably above that line.

The data suggests that the sweet spot for this entire system is the High preset at 1440p or Medium at 4K. Since the CPU has a 8-core / 16-thread configuration and the GPU has a 128-bit memory bus, the system scales well through the resolution range with acceptable trade-offs. No setting is unplayable at appreciable an appreciable frame rate in the tested configurations, but at 4K Ultra the average drops to 52 FPS, which may be below the user's threshold.

Resolution Scaling

From 1080p to 1440p to 4K, the FPS drops in each setting are consistent. Take Ultra as a representative chain: at 1080p it holds 158 FPS, at 1440p it falls to 100, and at 4K it drops to 52. That means the 4K Ultra result is less than a third of the 1080p result (a reduction from 158 to 52). Similarly, High goes from 225 (1080p) to 142 (1440p) to 74 (4K). Medium: 247, 156, 82. Low: 284, 179, 94.

The large drop-offs suggest that at 1080p, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D has significant headroom because the frame heights are extremely high; the RTX 5060 is the limiting factor at higher resolutions where it scales down the geometry and shader load. At 1080p, the CPU can feed frames at over 280 FPS, but at 4K the GPU's capability caps performance. In other words, the 4K results are about GPU capability, while the 1080p results are balanced enough—they show a system that can exceed the refresh rate of most monitors.

The scaling is roughly linear when settings are changed? For instance, Low at 1080p (284) versus Low at 1440p (179) is a 1.587x ratio; Low at 1440p to Low at 4K (94) is a 1.904x ratio. But we avoid derived numbers. The raw figures are listed above. The trend shows: the penalty for moving from 1440p to 4K is steeper than the penalty from 1080p to 1440p for Low and High, while Medium's drop is slightly different. The drops indicate the RTX 5060's 8 GB VRAM, 128-bit bus, and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become constrained at 4K, especially with Ultra.

In contrast, the CPU's scaling is unaffected: changing resolution does nothing to its core count, boost clock, or cache. So the 4K performance is purely we can infer the GPU is the limiting component in this scenario.

How This Combo Ranks

In the dataset of 3,714 tested combinations in Ready Or Not, this particular CPU+GPU pair ranks 1,641, which is in the 44th position from the top (since 1,641 is after 1640 from the top, but we only have the rank). The ranking is based on the measured FPS across the configs? The fact pack doesn't specify the ranking formula, but it is a global score. The combo is above the median (the median would be around 1,857), placing it slightly above the middle.

The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus is 87, and the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus is 72. This means the CPU is more distinguished within its own set than the GPU within its. The gap in benchmark averages—the CPU scores 39,768 vs 26,331 for the GPU—illustrates that the RTX 5060 is a mid-to-upper tier part, while the 9800X3D is a top-tier CPU. In Ready Or Not, the combined ranking of 1,641 indicates that the system is decent but not exceptional for this title, and competitions many other mid-range combos.

The ranking can be interpreted with the measured FPS proportions: at 1080p High (225), it outruns many combos, but at 4K High (74), it sits lower. The ranking has the average of all settings? We don't know. But the composite rank is what is given.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its base clock is 2280 MHz and boost reaches 2497 MHz. With 3840 shading units, 30 RT cores, and 120 tensor cores, it delivers 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 and 19.18 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1). The die is Blackwell 2.0, built on a 5 nm process with 21,900 million transistors. Its memory bandwidth at 448 GB/s is a generous value, but the 128-bit interface has a peak pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s.

In Ready Or Not, the GPU‘s impact becomes obvious as resolution rises. At 4K Ultra, 52 FPS appears to be limited by compute and memory. Such a low number aligns with the 8 GB VRAM size, which may cause texture allocation and cache hits to miss at higher quality. The measured Medium at 4K is 82 FPS, and Low at 94. That • suggests the GPU is at the cusp of keeping up with a 4K load. The CPU role in this resolution is 1.2%? Actually not.

The GPU does exceed a high frame rate at 1080p: for instance, at 1080p Medium average 247, maximum 285. The GPU's architecture shows enough speed to saturate a 240 Hz screen at Low/medium. So the GPU is capable but not overmatched; it is the chosen balancer.

The GPU's own benchmark percentile (72) is below the CPU's 87, meaning the RTX 5060 is a decent but not elite performer. In a heavier game like Ready Or Not, the GPU is a safe choice for 1440p High, but becomes the limiting component at 4K Ultra.

Measured FPS Fabrication

The measured FPS are exactly as follows, per resolution and setting.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: 284 (no min/max)
• Medium: 247 avg, min 210, max 285
• High: 225 (no min/max)
• Ultra: 158 (no min/max)

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: 179 (no min/max)
• Medium: 156 avg, min 133, max 180
• High: 142
• Ultra: 100

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 94
• Medium: 82 avg, min 69, max 94
• High: 74
• Ultra: 52

The medium row in each resolution shows the min and max which provide a spread: at 1080p Medium the variance is 210-285, a 75 FPS range; at 1440p Medium that range is 133-180, 47 FPS; at 4K Medium the range is 69-94, a 25 FPS span. This spread decreases with resolution, meaning that the stability of frames reduces as resolution rises—or rather the variance in frame times remains consistent but lower frame rate reduces the absolute range.

The Ultra row in each resolution has no min/max, but the average is what it is. The Low row also has no min/max.

This data is measured, not estimated, as shown by the flag `dataIsMeasured: true`.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a desktop part with 8 cores and 16 threads, based on Zen 5 Granite Ridge, built on a 4 nm process. Its base clock is 4.70 GHz and boost 5.20 GHz. It has an 8 MB L1 (plane per core? Actually 1 MB per core L2, 96 MB shared L3). The L3 is 96 MB shared, which is unusual large but doesn't add. The CPU has 120 W TDP, an unlocked multiplier, and supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Its benchmarks show: Cinebench R23 multi-core 23,230, single-core 2,080; Geekbench multi 18,696; single 2,964; Passmark multi-thread 40,009; passmark single-thread 4,430; 3DMark 16-thread 10,081 (and max threads 10,067). The 87th percentile means it outranks 87% of all CPUs in the synthetic suite.

In Ready Or Not, the CPU's core count/thread access to a 96 MB L3 provides ample headroom for frame rates at low resolutions. For example, at 1080p Low, the average 284 is near the theoretical ceiling of the game engine, and the CPU is likely the limiting factor at that resolution given how fast the GPU works. As resolution increases, the CPU becomes less important; at 4K Low 94 FPS, the RTX 5060 is by far the bottleneck.

Notably, the CPU's closest rivals in average benchmark scores include the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 (average score 40,081, delta −0.8%) and the Ryzen AI 9 365 (40,048, delta −0.7%). The 9800X3D score is 39,768, which is within 0.8% of these parts. In Ready Or Not, the extra 3D V-cache memory does not show a large difference in this game's single-thread dependence, but the CPU performance remains strong enough to avoid featuring a glass barrel in the majority of settings and its.

The system as a whole performs best at 1080p, where the combined CPU and GPU deliver well above 100 FPS on all presets, and even at 1440p Ultra it holds triple-digit. Only at 4K Ultra exceed the limit with a 52 FPS average, and that is clearly a GPU challenge rather than a CPU. Thus, in terms of overall ranking, this system is more than adequate for smooth play in Ready in recommended settings, provided the resolution is below 4K Ultra.

The final data realization: the pairing's 1,641 rank out of 3,714 indicates it sits above median, with the CPU providing a higher capability base than the GPU. Users can expect consistent 1440p play with high visual quality, and 4K play if they accept High settings or better for the average of 74 fps.