Ready Or Not

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 lands at rank 1004 out of 1748 tested combos for Ready Or Not. That places it in the upper-middle tier of the database, meaning it will handle the game comfortably at most settings, but it is not a top-tier combination. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile among all processors, while the GPU is at the 66th percentile among all graphics cards. This pairing of a solid mid-range CPU with a capable mid-range GPU creates a balanced system that avoids obvious bottlenecks in either direction.

When looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the data shows it trades blows with the Intel Core i7-10700, matching its average score almost exactly with a deltaPct of 0. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X edges out this chip by just 0.3%, while the Intel Core i5-12490F trails by 0.3% and the AMD EPYC 7J13 is 0.5% behind. These margins are within noise, so the 5600GT is effectively on par with several well-known processors from previous generations. For the GPU, the RTX 4060 sits close to the AMD Radeon RX 6600M, which leads by 0.6%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti, which is 0.7% ahead. The Intel Arc B580 and AMD Radeon 760M trail by 0.7% and 0.8%, respectively. This indicates the GPU is competitively positioned within its performance class.

GPU Role

The RTX 4060 brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2125 MHz, which translates to 17 Gbps effective. The core operates with a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz. This configuration is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC, containing 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The GPU features 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, along with 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores.

For Ready Or Not, the 8 GB VRAM capacity appears sufficient across all tested settings, as the measured frame rates remain playable even at 4K Ultra. The game is a tactical shooter that tends to rely more on CPU performance for AI and physics calculations, but the GPU still carries the bulk of the rendering load. The pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s indicate the card can push a substantial number of pixels and textures per second, which aligns with the observed performance at high resolutions. The FP32 compute throughput of 15.11 TFLOPS provides enough raw horsepower for the game's lighting and shadow effects, particularly when ray tracing is enabled.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals a clear pattern of diminishing returns as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 264.5 FPS, which drops to 171.1 FPS at 1440p and further to 88.5 FPS at 4K. This represents a 35% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 67% reduction from 1080p to 4K. The scaling suggests the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as resolution climbs, since the CPU has more headroom to feed frames at lower resolutions.

Looking at High settings, the pattern holds: 210 FPS at 1080p, 131.1 FPS at 1440p, and 73.1 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 37.6%, while the drop to 4K is 65.2%. At Ultra settings, the trend intensifies, with 149.5 FPS at 1080p, 93.3 FPS at 1440p, and 48.1 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is the only sub-60 FPS reading in the entire dataset, highlighting that this resolution and settings combination pushes the GPU beyond its comfort zone. The RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus become increasingly stressed at 4K, where texture detail and memory bandwidth demands scale significantly.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent performance across all presets. Low settings produce 264.5 FPS average, Medium hits 231.9 FPS, High achieves 210 FPS, and Ultra drops to 149.5 FPS. These numbers indicate the CPU is not holding back the GPU at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset stays well above the refresh rates of typical monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show the expected decline. Low yields 171.1 FPS, Medium reaches 143.7 FPS, High settles at 131.1 FPS, and Ultra drops to 93.3 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra widens to 45.5%, compared to 43.5% at 1080p, suggesting the GPU is taking on more relative load as resolution increases.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more varied. Low still manages 88.5 FPS, Medium hits 78.1 FPS, High achieves 73.1 FPS, and Ultra falls to 48.1 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only one that fails to maintain a smooth 60 FPS floor, which is notable for a tactical shooter where consistent frame pacing matters for aiming precision. The spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is 45.7%, confirming that settings have a consistent impact across resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo sufficient for 1080p gaming?

A: Yes, the data shows 149.5 FPS at 1080p Ultra and 264.5 FPS at 1080p Low, so every preset delivers well above 144 FPS for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: Can this system handle 4K Ultra settings?

A: The measured result is 48.1 FPS at 4K Ultra, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Lower settings at 4K, such as High at 73.1 FPS, are playable.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct competitors?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600GT matches the Intel Core i7-10700 with a deltaPct of 0, trails the Ryzen 5 5600X by 0.3%, and leads the Intel Core i5-12490F by 0.3% in average benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other cards?

A: The RTX 4060 sits near the AMD Radeon RX 6600M, which is 0.6% faster, and the Intel Arc B580, which is 0.7% slower, placing it in the mid-range segment.

Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM enough for Ready Or Not?

A: Based on the measured FPS across all resolutions, 8 GB is sufficient for this game, as no settings combination shows signs of VRAM-related stuttering or frame drops.

Q: Which resolution offers the best balance of quality and performance?

A: 1440p High provides 131.1 FPS, which exceeds 120 FPS while maintaining high visual fidelity, making it the most balanced option in the dataset.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p displays, Ultra settings are the clear choice. The 149.5 FPS average at 1080p Ultra leaves ample headroom above 144 Hz monitors, and the visual enhancements from maxed settings will be noticeable in the game's detailed environments. Even if a scene becomes more demanding, the margin to 120 FPS is substantial.

At 1440p, High settings offer the best experience. The 131.1 FPS average comfortably exceeds 120 FPS, and the difference between High and Ultra is only 37.8 FPS, which is less impactful than the visual cost of Ultra. Medium at 143.7 FPS is also viable for players prioritizing maximum frame rates, but High provides the better balance of image quality and smoothness.

For 4K, High settings are the recommended starting point. The 73.1 FPS average is above 60 FPS and remains smooth for a tactical shooter. Ultra at 48.1 FPS is too demanding for consistent play, and the frame rate dips may affect aim during firefights. Medium at 78.1 FPS offers slightly higher performance, but the visual reduction from High to Medium is more noticeable at this resolution than the 5 FPS difference suggests. Players with 60 Hz 4K monitors should stick with High to ensure frame times stay consistent, while those with VRR displays could experiment with Ultra if they tolerate occasional drops below 60 FPS.