Ready Or Not
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 206 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 72 | 102 | 113 | 129 |
| 1440p QHD | 138 | 196 | 216 | 247 |
| 1080p Full HD | 218 | 311 | 342 | 392 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Ready Or Not with AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, In-Depth Analysis
# Ready Or Not with AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
The pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 presents a curious imbalance in Ready Or Not: a six-core CPU from the 4000 series designed for efficiency sits alongside a Blackwell 2.0 GPU with 12 GB of GDDR7 memory, producing frame rates that range from 72 FPS at 4K Ultra to 392 FPS at 1080p Low. The data reveals a system where the GPU carries most of the rendering load, yet the CPU's Zen 2 architecture—with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost of 4.20 GHz—still manages to keep up at lower resolutions, suggesting the game's tactical shooter engine is not overwhelmingly thread-hungry. This combination ranks 781st out of 3,714 tested combos, placing it in the upper quintile of all configurations, which is remarkable given the CPU's age relative to the GPU's 2025 release.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G brings 6 cores and 12 threads to the table, built on the Zen 2 architecture at a 7 nm process node. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz can reach 4.20 GHz under boost, and the CPU's 65 W TDP suggests it was designed for mainstream systems rather than high-end gaming rigs. The processor's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3, which is modest by modern standards but adequate for a tactical shooter like Ready Or Not. The CPU's benchmark scores show a single-thread performance of 1,919 in Cinebench R23 and a multicore score of 13,593, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 726 and 16-thread score of 4,863.
In the context of Ready Or Not's measured FPS, the CPU's role becomes clearer when examining the scaling across settings at a fixed resolution. At 1080p, the average FPS jumps from 218 on Ultra to 342 on Medium, 311 on High, and 392 on Low—a spread of 174 FPS between the lowest and highest settings. This wide variance indicates that the game is not CPU-bound at this resolution; otherwise, the FPS would cluster more tightly regardless of GPU load. The Ryzen 5 4600G's percentile rank of 71 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17,507, places it slightly above the middle of the pack, yet it still enables frame rates above 300 FPS at 1080p Low. The nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE with a deltaPct of 0.1 and the Intel Core 7 150U with a deltaPct of 0.6, are within a small percentage, confirming the 4600G's competitive standing for this workload.
At 4K, the CPU's influence diminishes further. The FPS at 4K High is 102, while 4K Medium delivers 113 FPS (with a minimum of 96 and maximum of 130), and 4K Low reaches 129 FPS. This scaling pattern—where the CPU's 12 threads are likely not saturated—suggests that Ready Or Not's engine leverages multiple cores but does not require the extreme thread counts of modern flagship processors. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 5,709 and PassMark multithread score of 15,992 indicate the CPU can handle concurrent AI and physics simulations, but the game's performance deltas across settings are more attributable to GPU load than CPU headroom. The data implies that the Ryzen 5 4600G, despite being a 2020 release, provides sufficient computational power for this title, especially since the GPU's 82nd percentile ranking (average benchmark score of 40,377) suggests it is the dominant component in this pairing.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is the star of this configuration, featuring 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. Its base clock runs at 2325 MHz with a boost clock of 2512 MHz, and the memory operates at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The GPU's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process, includes 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The compute capabilities are substantial: 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 (1:1), a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 482.3 GTexel/s. The GPU's passmark G3D score of 29,137 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077 underscore its high-end positioning.
In Ready Or Not, the GPU's role is most evident in the resolution scaling. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS at High settings drops from 311 to 196—a 37% reduction—and from 1440p to 4K, it falls further to 102, a 48% reduction from 1440p. This steep decline at higher resolutions indicates that the RTX 5070's fill rate and memory bandwidth are being taxed as pixel count increases. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM appears sufficient for the game's textures, as the FPS at 4K Ultra (72 FPS) remains playable, though the gap between Ultra and Low at 4K (72 vs. 129 FPS) shows how demanding the highest preset is on the GPU's compute and memory subsystems.
The GPU's nearest rivals in the benchmark database—such as the AMD Radeon Pro 580 with a deltaPct of 0.1 and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 with a deltaPct of 0.8—are close in average score, but the RTX 5070's 82nd percentile ranking places it well above the median GPU. In Ready Or Not, the GPU's performance is clearly the limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where the 72 FPS average is nearly half of the 138 FPS at 1440p Ultra. This suggests that the game's Ultra preset introduces effects (likely ray tracing or volumetric lighting) that heavily burden the GPU's RT cores and shading units, while the CPU remains less involved. The data indicates that the RTX 5070 delivers strong performance for a tactical shooter, but users seeking the highest fidelity will need to accept lower frame rates at 4K.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
Examining the measured FPS across all resolutions and settings, the Medium preset emerges as the most balanced choice for this combo. At 1080p Medium, the average FPS is 342 with a minimum of 290 and maximum of 393, providing a smooth experience with a sufficient frame buffer for fast-paced tactical actions. The High preset at 1080p delivers 311 FPS, which is only 9% lower than Medium, but the visual quality improvement may not justify the performance cost for competitive play. At 1440p Medium, the average FPS is 216 (minimum 183, maximum 248), which remains above the 144 Hz refresh rate of many gaming monitors, making it an excellent choice for high-refresh displays. The 4K Medium preset produces 113 FPS with a minimum of 96 and maximum of 130, which is playable on standard 60 Hz displays but may dip below 100 FPS in demanding scenes.
The Ultra preset, while visually impressive, shows significant performance penalties: 218 FPS at 1080p, 138 FPS at 1440p, and only 72 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is particularly concerning, as the 72 FPS average leaves little headroom for frame drops, and the lack of a reported minimum FPS suggests the data may not capture worst-case scenarios. The Low preset, on the other hand, maximizes frame rates (392 FPS at 1080p, 247 FPS at 1440p, 129 FPS at 4K) but likely sacrifices visual fidelity in a game where environmental detail and enemy visibility are crucial. For most users, the Medium preset offers the best compromise: it maintains frame rates above 100 FPS even at 4K, while the High preset provides a modest visual upgrade with only a slight FPS reduction. Given that the data shows Medium consistently outperforming High by about 10% across all resolutions, Medium is recommended for consistent performance, with High as an alternative for those prioritizing visuals over a few extra frames per second.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 781st out of 3,714 tested combos in Ready Or Not, placing it in the top 21% of all configurations. This ranking is notable because the CPU is from 2020, while the GPU is from 2025, and the data suggests that the GPU's high-end performance compensates for the CPU's older architecture. The combo's percentile position indicates that it outperforms approximately 2,933 other combos, which likely include systems with newer CPUs but less powerful GPUs. The rank also implies that the RTX 5070's capabilities are not fully bottlenecked by the Ryzen 5 4600G in this game, as the CPU's 71st percentile ranking is lower than the GPU's 82nd percentile, yet the combined result still lands in the upper quintile.
When comparing to other combos, the data suggests that this pairing is well-suited for Ready Or Not's specific demands. The game's tactical shooter genre typically benefits from high frame rates for quick target acquisition, and the combo's ability to deliver over 300 FPS at 1080p Medium and over 200 FPS at 1440p Medium places it among the faster configurations. The combo's rank of 781 out of 3,714 also indicates that there is room for improvement—likely by pairing the RTX 5070 with a more modern CPU—but the current setup is far from a weak performer. The nearest CPU rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE and Intel Core 7 150U, have similar average scores (within 1%), suggesting that the 4600G is not an outlier in its class, and the combo's ranking is more influenced by the GPU's strength than any CPU-specific advantage.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear pattern that identifies the GPU as the primary limiting component in this combo. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 311 at 1080p to 196 at 1440p (a 37% reduction) and then to 102 at 4K (a 48% reduction from 1440p). This nonlinear decline is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios, where the rendering load increases quadratically with pixel count. In contrast, if the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain relatively flat across resolutions, as the CPU's workload (game logic, AI, physics) does not scale with resolution. The data shows that the FPS at Low settings follows a similar pattern: 392 at 1080p, 247 at 1440p, and 129 at 4K, with a 37% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 48% drop from 1440p to 4K.
This consistent scaling across settings indicates that the RTX 5070's rendering pipeline—including its 192-bit memory bus and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth—is the constraining factor at higher resolutions. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is likely sufficient, as the FPS does not collapse at 4K (which would indicate memory overflow), but the bandwidth and shading unit throughput determine the frame rates. The CPU's role is more apparent at lower resolutions, where the FPS at 1080p Low (392) approaches the limits of what the Ryzen 5 4600G's 12 threads can feed to the GPU. The PassMark single-thread score of 2,653 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,919 suggest that the CPU can handle the game's single-threaded tasks, but at 1080p Low, the GPU is so fast that the CPU may occasionally struggle to keep up, as evidenced by the 392 FPS ceiling. Overall, the resolution scaling data confirms that the GPU is the dominant component, and the CPU provides sufficient headroom for most settings, except possibly at 1080p Low where frame rates exceed 390 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
At 1920x1080 resolution, the measured FPS values are as follows: Low settings deliver an average of 392 FPS, Medium delivers 342 FPS with a minimum of 290 and maximum of 393, High delivers 311 FPS, and Ultra delivers 218 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 174 FPS, representing a 44% performance reduction from the lowest to highest preset. The Medium preset's minimum of 290 FPS is still well above the 240 Hz refresh rate of many gaming monitors, ensuring smooth gameplay even in intense firefights. The High preset at 311 FPS provides a comfortable margin above 300 FPS, while Ultra's 218 FPS remains playable on high-refresh displays but may show occasional dips if the GPU is taxed by complex scenes.
At 2560x1440 resolution, the FPS values decrease predictably: Low averages 247 FPS, Medium averages 216 FPS (minimum 183, maximum 248), High averages 196 FPS, and Ultra averages 138 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 183 FPS is still above 144 Hz, making it ideal for competitive play on 1440p monitors. The High preset at 196 FPS offers a slight visual upgrade while remaining above 180 FPS, and Ultra at 138 FPS is just below the 144 Hz threshold, which may result in minor screen tearing without V-Sync. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an average reduction of about 37% across settings, consistent with the increased pixel count of 1.78 times.
At 3840x2160 resolution, the FPS values are: Low averages 129 FPS, Medium averages 113 FPS (minimum 96, maximum 130), High averages 102 FPS, and Ultra averages 72 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 96 FPS is close to the 100 FPS threshold, suggesting that demanding scenes may cause noticeable frame drops. The High preset at 102 FPS is acceptable for 4K gaming on 60 Hz displays, but the Ultra preset at 72 FPS is the only setting that falls below 100 FPS, indicating that the RTX 5070 is pushed to its limits at 4K with maximum fidelity. The data shows that 4K Medium is the highest preset that maintains an average above 110 FPS, making it the recommended choice for 4K displays. The overall FPS breakdown reveals that this combo excels at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K requiring compromises in settings to maintain smooth performance.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play Ready Or Not with this combo?
A: The data shows that 1440p Medium delivers 216 FPS (minimum 183, maximum 248), which is above the 144 Hz refresh rate of most gaming monitors. At 1080p Medium, the average FPS is 342, providing even more headroom for high-refresh displays. For 4K, Medium at 113 FPS is the highest preset that maintains an average above 110 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this configuration?
A: The resolution scaling data indicates the GPU is the primary limiting component. From 1080p to 1440p, FPS drops by 37% at High settings, and from 1440p to 4K, it drops another 48%, which is characteristic of GPU-bound rendering. The CPU's 12 threads are sufficient for the game, as evidenced by the high frame rates at lower resolutions.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?
A: This combo ranks 781st out of 3,714 tested combos in Ready Or Not, placing it in the top 21% of all configurations. This ranking is impressive given the CPU's age, suggesting the RTX 5070's performance compensates for the Ryzen 5 4600G's older architecture.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K?
A: At 4K, the Low preset averages 129 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 72 FPS—a difference of 57 FPS, or 44% lower performance for Ultra. This indicates that the Ultra preset imposes a significant rendering load on the GPU, making it less suitable for high-refresh 4K displays.
Q: Does the combo support high-refresh gaming at 1080p?
A: Yes, the data shows that at 1080p Low, the average FPS is 392, and at 1080p Medium it is 342 FPS (minimum 290). Even at 1080p Ultra, the average is 218 FPS, which exceeds the 240 Hz refresh rate of the fastest gaming monitors, ensuring smooth gameplay across all settings.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?
A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 96 FPS at 4K Medium settings. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 183 FPS, and at 1080p Medium, it is 290 FPS. These minimums indicate that the combo maintains playable frame rates even in demanding scenes, with 4K Medium being the most likely to experience drops near 100 FPS.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 in Ready Or Not
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 129.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 113.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 102.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 72.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 247.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 216.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 196.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 138.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 392.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 342.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 311.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 218.0 |
Ready Or Not with Ryzen 5 4600G + Other GPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Ready Or Not with RTX 5070 + Other CPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 4600G + RTX 5070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.