Pc Building Simulator
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 115 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 41 | 43 | 61 | 86 |
| 1440p QHD | 79 | 83 | 117 | 165 |
| 1080p Full HD | 125 | 131 | 186 | 262 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, In-Depth Analysis
Settings Recommendations
For Pc Building Simulator, the measured data shows a clear pattern: Medium settings deliver the best balance of visual quality and frame rate across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, Medium produces 186 FPS average, which is 40% higher than High's 131 FPS while still maintaining a playable minimum of 158 FPS. The jump from Medium to High costs 55 FPS at 1080p, which is a substantial penalty for what is typically a modest visual improvement in a simulation game focused on UI elements and component models.
At 2560x1440, Medium again stands out with 117 FPS average and a 100 FPS minimum, keeping the experience comfortably above 60 FPS even during demanding scenes. High drops to 83 FPS, which remains playable but leaves less headroom for scene complexity. Ultra settings at 1440p yield 79 FPS, only 4 FPS below High, suggesting diminishing returns as you push beyond Medium.
The 4K results reinforce this recommendation. Medium at 3840x2160 achieves 61 FPS average with a 52 FPS minimum, just barely clearing the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. High drops to 43 FPS, and Ultra falls to 41 FPS — both below the smoothness threshold. Low at 4K hits 86 FPS, but the visual compromise in a game where you read component labels and inspect hardware details is likely not worth the extra frames.
The data indicates that Medium is the optimal preset for this combination. It provides the largest performance margin above the playability threshold while retaining enough graphical fidelity for a game that involves reading text and examining parts. For users with 1080p or 1440p displays, Medium offers double the headroom needed for consistent frame times. At 4K, Medium is the only settings tier that maintains a 60+ FPS average without resorting to Low.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile sits in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, placing it above the median but not at the top tier. Its average benchmark score of 29928 places it in close competition with desktop-class cards from previous generations. The nearest rival data shows it running within 0.6% of the RTX 3070 Ti and 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti, with the RX 6800 trailing by 0.6% and the RX 6700 behind by 1.7%.
The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration proves adequate for Pc Building Simulator at the tested resolutions, as the game's asset load is moderate. The 4608 shading units and 144 texture mapping units provide substantial compute throughput, reflected in the FP32 performance of 13.13 TFLOPS. The 48 raster output units handle pixel processing at 68.40 GPixel/s.
Clock behavior shows a base of 907 MHz and boost of 1425 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective). The relatively modest boost clock compared to the raw shader count suggests this is a power-constrained mobile implementation, with the 50 W TDP confirming a laptop-oriented design. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides ample bandwidth, though Pc Building Simulator's data demands are unlikely to stress even PCIe 4.0.
The DirectX 12 score of 93 in Passmark indicates strong modern API performance, while the DirectX 11 score of 192 suggests excellent legacy API throughput. This matters for Pc Building Simulator, which is a 2019 title that may not fully utilize DirectX 12 Ultimate features. The Vulkan score of 116960 in Geekbench shows the GPU handles alternative APIs well, though the game's engine likely uses DirectX 11 or 12.
The RTX 5070 Mobile's performance profile in this game tracks closely with its synthetic benchmarks. At 1080p Medium, the GPU delivers 186 FPS, indicating it is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient — the game does not appear to hit memory capacity limits at any tested settings tier, as the performance scaling between Low and Ultra follows a smooth curve rather than showing a cliff from memory exhaustion.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate progression from 1080p to 4K reveals important information about where the bottleneck lies in Pc Building Simulator. At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 186 at 1920x1080 to 117 at 2560x1440, then to 61 at 3840x2160. This represents a 37% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a 48% further reduction from 1440p to 4K.
The scaling pattern changes across settings tiers. At Low settings, 1080p yields 262 FPS, 1440p yields 165 FPS (37% drop), and 4K yields 86 FPS (48% drop). At High settings, 1080p yields 131 FPS, 1440p yields 83 FPS (37% drop), and 4K yields 43 FPS (48% drop). The consistent percentage drops across settings indicate that resolution scaling is GPU-bound — the render resolution determines the frame rate regardless of the settings preset.
The Ultra preset shows a similar pattern: 125 FPS at 1080p, 79 FPS at 1440p (37% drop), and 41 FPS at 4K (48% drop). The near-identical percentage reductions across all four settings tiers strongly suggest that the GPU's pixel throughput is the primary constraint as resolution increases. The 48% drop from 1440p to 4K is close to the theoretical 44% pixel count increase, indicating the GPU is delivering near-linear scaling with resolution.
This behavior confirms that Pc Building Simulator is not heavily CPU-limited at lower resolutions. The CPU can feed frames fast enough that the GPU becomes the bottleneck by 1440p, and certainly by 4K. At 1080p Low, the 262 FPS result shows the GPU has significant headroom, and the CPU's role becomes more important at that extreme. However, the consistent resolution scaling suggests that for practical gaming scenarios (Medium settings and above), the RTX 5070 Mobile is the limiting component.
Users with 1080p displays can expect excellent performance at any settings tier, with even Ultra clearing 120 FPS. For 1440p panels, Medium and above stay above 79 FPS, which is smooth for this genre. At 4K, users must accept Medium settings to stay near 60 FPS, or drop to Low for 86 FPS.
FAQ
Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p display?
A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 deliver 117 FPS average with a 100 FPS minimum. This provides the best combination of visual quality and performance headroom. High drops to 83 FPS and Ultra to 79 FPS, both of which are playable but offer less margin for scene complexity.
Q: Can this laptop GPU handle 4K gaming in Pc Building Simulator?
A: At 3840x2160, Medium settings achieve 61 FPS average with a 52 FPS minimum, which is playable. High and Ultra fall to 43 FPS and 41 FPS respectively, which may feel less smooth. Low settings reach 86 FPS but require significant visual compromises.
Q: How does the RTX 5070 Mobile compare to desktop GPUs from previous generations?
A: Benchmark data shows the RTX 5070 Mobile scores 29928 on average, placing it within 0.1% of the RTX 3070 Ti (29945) and 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti (29783). It trails the RX 6800 by 0.6% and the RX 6700 by 1.7%.
Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM sufficient for this game?
A: The measured results show smooth scaling across all settings tiers without any performance cliffs that would indicate VRAM capacity issues. The 8 GB GDDR7 memory with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for Pc Building Simulator at all tested resolutions and settings.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with maximum settings?
A: Ultra settings at 1920x1080 produce 125 FPS average. This is well above the smoothness threshold and indicates the GPU is not heavily taxed at this resolution, leaving headroom for additional background tasks or future game updates.
Q: How does the CPU affect performance in this game?
A: At 1080p Low, the system reaches 262 FPS, suggesting the CPU can feed frames at a high rate. The consistent resolution scaling percentages across settings tiers indicate the GPU becomes the limiting factor by 1440p and especially at 4K.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread mobile processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 7 nm process. It operates at a 3.80 GHz base clock with a 4.80 GHz boost clock, within a 28 W TDP envelope. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5 interface.
In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 and a single-core score of 1743. The Passmark multi-thread score of 24873 and single-thread score of 3468 place it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 32697 puts it in a tight cluster with the Core i5-14600T (32707, 0% delta), Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.1% delta), Ryzen 5 7400F (32750, -0.2% delta), and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, -0.4% delta).
For Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is moderate. The game's simulation logic and component interaction calculations benefit from multi-threaded performance, and the 22 threads provide ample parallel processing capacity. The Passmark physics score of 1727 and integer math score of 86870 indicate strong computational throughput for game logic and physics calculations. The floating point score of 63703 supports the simulation's numerical processing needs.
The data suggests the CPU is not a significant bottleneck in Pc Building Simulator. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 262 FPS, and the resolution scaling analysis shows GPU-bound behavior from 1440p upward. The CPU's single-thread performance of 3468 in Passmark and 1743 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the game's main thread can process input and UI responses without holding back the frame rate.
The 28 W TDP classifies this as a power-efficient mobile processor, and the measured frame rates indicate it handles this simulation game comfortably. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s provides sufficient data throughput for the game's asset streaming and component database access. The L3 cache of 24 MB shared across 16 cores helps maintain performance when multiple simulation systems are active simultaneously.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RTX 5070 Mobile and Core Ultra 7 155H combination delivers strong performance across all settings. Low settings produce 262 FPS average, which is the highest measured result in the entire dataset. Medium settings yield 186 FPS average with a 158 FPS minimum and 214 FPS maximum, providing a wide performance envelope. High settings achieve 131 FPS average, and Ultra settings produce 125 FPS average. The spread from Low to Ultra is 137 FPS, representing a 52% performance reduction for maximum visual quality.
At 2560x1440, performance remains robust. Low settings deliver 165 FPS average. Medium settings produce 117 FPS average with a 100 FPS minimum and 135 FPS maximum. High settings achieve 83 FPS average, and Ultra settings reach 79 FPS average. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by 37% across all settings tiers, consistent with the increased pixel count. The Medium preset's minimum of 100 FPS ensures smooth gameplay even during complex scenes with many components displayed.
At 3840x2160, the GPU faces its greatest challenge. Low settings produce 86 FPS average, which remains playable. Medium settings achieve 61 FPS average with a 52 FPS minimum and 70 FPS maximum, just clearing the 60 FPS threshold. High settings drop to 43 FPS average, and Ultra settings fall to 41 FPS average. The 48% reduction from 1440p to 4K across all settings confirms the GPU-bound nature of the workload at this resolution.
The Medium settings row is the only one with complete min/max data across all three resolutions, providing insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p, the 158-214 FPS range shows a 56 FPS spread. At 1440p, the 100-135 FPS range shows a 35 FPS spread. At 4K, the 52-70 FPS range shows an 18 FPS spread. This narrowing range at higher resolutions indicates more consistent frame pacing when the GPU is under heavier load, likely because the CPU has more time to prepare frames.
The data indicates this combo ranks 2060 out of 3723 combinations in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the ranking distribution. The measured results are real-world data points, not extrapolations, providing reliable guidance for system builders considering this mobile platform for simulation gaming.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 86.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 61.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 43.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 41.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 165.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 117.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 83.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 79.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 262.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 186.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 131.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 125.0 |
Pc Building Simulator with iUltra 7 155H + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Other Games with iUltra 7 155H + RTX 5070 Mobile
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.