Evolve

The Evolve benchmark page for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is built from measured data, not estimates. Evolve, a 2015 FPS, was tested at three resolutions and four presets, yielding a performance ladder that runs from 30 FPS average at 3840x2160 Ultra up to 187 FPS average at 1920x1080 Low. The combo ranks 2049th out of 3700 tested combinations, which places it below the midpoint of the database even though both the CPU and GPU carry strong individual percentile positions.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's rank among tested systems in Evolve?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + RTX 5070 Mobile combo ranks 2049th out of 3700 tested combinations. That places this pairing in the lower half of the measured database for Evolve.

Q: How much video memory does the RTX 5070 Mobile have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the fastest measured result for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 187 at 1920x1080 Low. The slowest measured average is 30 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 155H perform in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 15028 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1743 in Cinebench R23 single-core. It sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What graphics APIs does the RTX 5070 Mobile support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What are the CPU's nearest rivals by average benchmark score?

A: The Core Ultra 7 155H averages 32697. That is 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, and 0.4% below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H; the delta against the Intel Core i5-14600T is 0.0%.

GPU Role

The RTX 5070 Mobile is a Blackwell 2.0 GPU built around the GB206 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 21,900 million transistors on an 181 mm² footprint. Its compute configuration includes 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 48 ROPs, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores. The GPU runs at a base clock of 907 MHz and a boost clock of 1425 MHz, with memory rated at 1500 MHz and 24 Gbps effective. The frame buffer is 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, producing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The TDP is 50 W, and the interface is PCIe 5.0 x16.

Those numbers translate into a clear Evolve scaling pattern. At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops as settings increase: Low averages 71, Medium averages 55, High averages 43, and Ultra averages 30. At 2560x1440, the same preset ladder produces 125, 97, 76, and 53 FPS. At 1920x1080, the GPU is far less constrained: 187, 145, 114, and 79 FPS. The largest measured gap between adjacent settings appears between 4K Low and 4K Medium, where the average falls from 71 to 55 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 30 FPS shows that the highest visual preset at 2160p is a heavy load for this mobile GPU.

The RTX 5070 Mobile's synthetic benchmark position is also relevant. It posts an average benchmark score of 29928, placing it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are close: it trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti by 0.1%, leads the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti by 0.5%, trails the AMD Radeon RX 6800 by 0.6%, and trails the AMD Radeon RX 6700 by 1.7%. Those tight deltas put the GPU in a crowded performance band. The Evolve data reflects that positioning: the GPU is strong at 1080p and capable at 1440p, but it cannot turn 4K Ultra into a high-FPS experience.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame field places this CPU-GPU pair at 2049 out of 3700 tested combos. That is a below-median result. The CPU alone sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU sits in the 75th percentile, so the in-game rank is lower than the individual synthetic scores might suggest.

This discrepancy matters for interpreting the pair. The Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32697, and the RTX 5070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 29928. Yet in Evolve, 2048 tested combinations finish ahead of this pair. The measured FPS table explains why: the GPU delivers excellent frame rates at lower resolutions and settings, but the Ultra preset results are comparatively modest. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the combo averages 30 FPS. At 2560x1440 Ultra, it averages 53 FPS. Only at 1920x1080 Ultra does it reach 79 FPS.

The rank also benefits from being measured. The dataIsMeasured field is true, so the 2049th-place ranking reflects an actual tested configuration rather than a projected estimate. That means the FPS numbers and the rank can be read as a consistent picture: a mobile platform with strong synthetic credentials that lands in the lower half of Evolve's tested combos, mainly because its high-resolution Ultra results are not competitive with the top of the field.

Measured FPS Breakdown

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|

| 3840x2160 | High | 43 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 71 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 55 | 47 | 64 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 30 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | High | 76 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 125 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 97 | 83 | 112 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 53 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | High | 114 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 187 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 145 | 123 | 167 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 79 | — | — |

The measured rows show a consistent resolution penalty. At Low settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p drops the average from 187 to 125 FPS, and moving from 1440p to 2160p drops it from 125 to 71 FPS. At Ultra settings, the same steps move from 79 to 53 to 30 FPS. In every resolution, Ultra is substantially slower than Low, and Medium sits between the two.

The Medium preset is the only one with min and max FPS values in the data. At 1920x1080 Medium, the combo holds a range from 123 to 167 FPS. At 2560x1440 Medium, the range is 83 to 112 FPS. At 3840x2160 Medium, the range is 47 to 64 FPS. Interestingly, the 4K Medium minimum of 47 FPS is higher than the 4K High average of 43 FPS, while the 1440p Medium minimum of 83 FPS is well above the 1440p Ultra average of 53 FPS. At 1080p Medium, the minimum of 123 FPS is above the 1080p High average of 114 FPS. That makes Medium the row with the most complete frame-time picture for this combo.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a Meteor Lake mobile processor with 16 cores and 22 threads. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz, and its boost clock is 4.80 GHz. The cache layout includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, and supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It connects over PCIe Gen 5 with 8 CPU lanes. The CPU also contains Arc Xe-LPG 128EU integrated graphics, and its launch MSRP is $503.

On synthetic benchmarks, the Core Ultra 7 155H produces a strong profile. It scores 2450 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 255 in Cinebench R15 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 8754 multi-core and 1235 single-core. In Cinebench R23, the scores are 15028 multi-core and 1743 single-core. PassMark results include 24873 for multithread, 3468 for single-thread, 277353 for data compression, 16358 for data encryption, 16456 for extended instructions, 63703 for floating point math, 86870 for integer math, and 1727 for physics. The CPU's average benchmark score is 32697, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.

The CPU's nearest rivals reinforce that position. The Core i5-14600T averages 32707, with a 0.0% delta. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 averages 32662, and the Core Ultra 7 155H is 0.1% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F averages 32750, putting it 0.2% ahead of this CPU. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H averages 32812, putting it 0.4% ahead. These are small margins, which means the Core Ultra 7 155H is not an outlier in either direction; it sits in a tightly packed CPU performance tier.

In Evolve, the CPU's role is visible in the shape of the FPS results. The CPU clocks and core counts are identical across all measured rows, so the large frame rate swings between Low and Ultra come from GPU workload scaling, not from CPU changes. The 4.80 GHz boost clock and 1743 Cinebench R23 single-core score give the CPU enough single-thread headroom for the higher frame rates measured at 1080p Low, where the combo reaches 187 FPS. The 15028 multi-core score indicates that the 16-core, 22-thread layout is not a limiting factor in this game's measured results.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data supports a different ideal preset for each resolution. At 3840x2160, Low is the standout choice. It averages 71 FPS, while Medium drops to 55, High to 43, and Ultra to 30. For a 4K session, Low offers the only measured average that stays comfortably ahead of the Medium result, and it does so while keeping the resolution high.

At 2560x1440, High is the strongest quality-for-performance pick. High averages 76 FPS, which is well above the Ultra average of 53 FPS and still high enough to make the quality jump from Medium worthwhile. Medium also remains playable at 97 FPS, and Low pushes to 125 FPS, but High is the highest measured preset that keeps the average above the 4K Low mark of 71 FPS.

At 1920x1080, Ultra is the recommended preset. It averages 79 FPS, which is higher than the 1440p High result of 76 FPS and much higher than the 4K Low result of 71 FPS. Since Ultra is the highest tested quality setting, and it still produces a 79 FPS average, there is no measured reason to sacrifice quality at 1080p. For users who want more headroom, High averages 114 FPS, Medium averages 145 FPS, and Low averages 187 FPS.

The Medium preset's min/max data provides an additional checkpoint. At 1080p Medium, the combo ranges from 123 to 167 FPS. At 1440p Medium, it ranges from 83 to 112 FPS. At 4K Medium, it ranges from 47 to 64 FPS. Those are the only measured frame ranges in the dataset, and they show that Medium is the smoothest fully documented preset. However, for the best experience by measured averages, 4K Low, 1440p High, and 1080p Ultra are the picks that balance visual settings with the highest achievable average FPS in this Evolve benchmark set.