Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title focused on the assembly and management of computer hardware, presents a unique benchmark scenario where the performance of the underlying components directly influences the gameplay experience. The data measured for the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 reveals a configuration that is heavily skewed toward high refresh rate performance, with the GPU acting as the primary scaling factor across different resolutions and graphical presets. The following analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, component roles, and ranking of this specific combination.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for this combination shows a clear and consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, a typical indicator of GPU-bound workloads. At the 1080p resolution, the average frame rates are exceptionally high across all settings, ranging from 175 FPS on Ultra to 367 FPS on Low. This suggests that at this resolution, the system has significant headroom, and the limiting factor is not the graphics card but rather the CPU's ability to feed it frames. The jump from 1080p to 1440p shows a substantial performance cost, with average FPS at High settings dropping from 184 to 116, a reduction of approximately 37%. This scaling is consistent with a GPU that is beginning to work harder to fill the additional pixels.

The transition to 4K resolution (3840x2160) further emphasizes the GPU's role as the primary bottleneck. At 4K High settings, the average FPS drops to 61, which is just above the threshold for smooth 60 Hz gameplay. This represents a 67% reduction in performance compared to the same settings at 1080p. The data indicates that the RTX 4070's compute and memory resources are being heavily taxed at this resolution. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is not linear, with the performance hit being more severe, which is expected due to the exponential increase in pixel count. This behavior confirms that while the CPU is capable of delivering high frame rates at lower resolutions, the GPU becomes the definitive limiting component as the rendering load increases, particularly at 4K where the system settles into a playable but not overly comfortable performance envelope.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the dominant performer in this system, and its specifications directly correlate with the observed FPS data. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient for the textures and assets in Pc Building Simulator at all tested settings and resolutions, as evidenced by the stable average FPS and the absence of any reported minimum FPS drops in the High and Ultra settings, which would be indicative of memory overflow. The GPU's boost clock of 2475 MHz, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, provides the raw compute power necessary to achieve the high frame rates seen at 1440p and 1080p.

The GPU's performance in synthetic benchmarks further contextualizes its in-game results. Its Passmark G3D score of 26927 places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 37648 is nearly identical to that of the NVIDIA Tesla P4, with a delta of 0.1%. This indicates that the RTX 4070 is a high-performing card, but its in-game performance at 4K suggests that Pc Building Simulator's rendering engine is demanding enough to challenge it. The data shows that at 4K, the GPU's capabilities are the primary constraint, as the frame rate scales almost directly with the workload. For instance, at 4K, the difference between Low and Medium settings is a 35 FPS jump (from 121 to 86), while the jump from Medium to High is a 25 FPS drop (from 86 to 61). This non-linear scaling is a hallmark of a GPU-bound scenario where the graphics card's shader units and memory bandwidth are saturated.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 plays a supporting role in this configuration, providing enough processing power to ensure that it does not bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions. With 14 cores and 14 threads running at a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, the CPU is capable of handling the game's simulation logic and draw calls. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 37816 and single-thread score of 4516, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, confirm its strong performance. Its average benchmark score of 46062 is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, which has a delta of 0.1%, and the Intel Core i9-13900HX, which has a delta of -0.1%. This indicates that the Ultra 5 235 is a top-tier contender in CPU performance.

However, the measured FPS data shows that the CPU's influence on the frame rate is most apparent at 1080p. At this resolution, the frame rates exceed 360 FPS on Low settings, demonstrating that the CPU can process the necessary instructions to maintain such high output. The fact that the FPS drops significantly when moving from 1080p to 1440p, while the CPU workload remains relatively constant, proves that the GPU is the limiting factor in this title. The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s are more than adequate for this game. The data indicates that the CPU is a high-performance component that provides a solid foundation, but it is not the component that determines the maximum playable settings or resolution in Pc Building Simulator; that role falls squarely on the GPU.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is ranked 617 out of 3002 tested combos for Pc Building Simulator. This ranking places the system in the top 21% of all tested configurations, indicating that it is a high-performing setup for this particular game. The high ranking is a direct result of the strong synergy between the two components. The CPU's high single-thread performance ensures that it can keep up with the GPU's output at lower resolutions, while the GPU's substantial power enables high frame rates at higher resolutions.

The ranking is particularly impressive considering the game's nature as a simulation title, which often requires strong CPU performance for logic calculations. The fact that this combo ranks in the top percentile suggests that the CPU's 14 cores and high boost clock are sufficient for the game's demands, and the GPU is powerful enough to render the scenes without significant bottlenecks. The data from the measured FPS shows that the system can handle 4K gaming, a feat not all combos can achieve. The rank of 617 out of 3002 demonstrates that while there are more powerful and expensive combinations that perform better, this pairing offers a balanced and highly capable experience for Pc Building Simulator, excelling in both the simulation aspects and the visual rendering.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average FPS values recorded for this system across all tested resolutions and settings. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy, with 1080p providing the highest frame rates and 4K providing the most challenging load.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 367 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 260 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 184 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 175 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 232 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 164 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 116 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 110 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 121 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 86 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 61 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 58 |

The data reveals specific insights for each resolution. At 1080p, the system is overwhelmingly powerful, with even Ultra settings delivering 175 FPS. This suggests the game is not graphically demanding at this resolution. At 1440p, the performance is still very high, with all settings above 110 FPS, making it an ideal resolution for high refresh rate monitors. At 4K, the performance is more moderate. The Low setting at 121 FPS is very playable, but the Ultra setting at 58 FPS shows the GPU's limitations. The data also shows that the jump from High to Ultra at 4K only results in a 3 FPS drop, indicating that the Ultra preset's additional effects are not significantly more demanding than High, or that the GPU is already so saturated that the difference is minimal.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this system depend heavily on the user's target resolution and refresh rate. For users with a 1080p or 1440p monitor, the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation. At 1080p, Ultra delivers an average of 175 FPS, and at 1440p, it delivers 110 FPS. Both are well above the standard 60 FPS threshold and are suitable for high refresh rate displays. There is no meaningful reason to lower the settings at these resolutions, as the performance headroom is substantial.

For users with a 4K display, the recommendation is more nuanced. The High preset, which averages 61 FPS, offers the best balance between visual fidelity and playability. It provides the highest visual quality while remaining just above the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset at 86 FPS is a better choice for those who prioritize a higher frame rate over maximum visual detail, but the drop from Medium to High is significant. The Ultra preset at 58 FPS is technically playable but is just below the 60 FPS mark, which may cause noticeable stuttering on some displays. Therefore, for a 4K experience, High is the recommended setting, as it provides the best visual experience while maintaining a playable frame rate. For users who prefer a smoother experience, Medium is a solid alternative, while Low at 121 FPS is an option for competitive-style play where frame rate is paramount.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this system?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 367, achieved at 1080p resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Pc Building Simulator?

A: Yes, the system can handle 4K gaming. The data shows it can achieve an average of 61 FPS on High settings and 121 FPS on Low settings at 3840x2160 resolution.

Q: How does this system rank compared to other tested combinations?

A: This combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 ranks 617 out of 3002 tested combos for Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the top 21%.

Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p and 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 184 at 1080p to 61 at 4K, representing a substantial 67% reduction in performance.

Q: Which component is the primary bottleneck at 4K resolution?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K. This is indicated by the significant FPS drop from 1440p to 4K and the fact that the CPU's workload does not scale with resolution.

Q: What is the best preset for a 1440p monitor with a 144Hz refresh rate?

A: The Ultra preset is the best option for a 1440p monitor with a 144Hz refresh rate. The measured data shows an average of 110 FPS, which is lower than 144Hz but provides the best visual quality; the High preset at 116 FPS is nearly identical in performance and could be chosen based on preference.