Archeage
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 105 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 33 | 49 | 72 | 81 |
| 1440p QHD | 58 | 86 | 126 | 142 |
| 1080p Full HD | 87 | 127 | 187 | 211 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Archeage with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis
ArcheAge places the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination in a strong position, ranking 633rd out of 2761 tested configurations. The benchmark data shows a system that is heavily GPU-limited at higher resolutions but possesses enough CPU headroom to deliver exceptional frame rates at 1080p, making it a versatile performer for this MMORPG.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear and predictable performance curve, with the most dramatic drop occurring between 1440p and 4K. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 127 FPS at 1920x1080 to 86 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 41 FPS. Moving to 3840x2160, the average drops further to 49 FPS, representing a 37 FPS decline from the 1440p result. This steep 4K penalty indicates that the RTX 4070's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 192-bit bus are being pushed to their limits, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck.
The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the system produces 211 FPS at 1080p, 142 FPS at 1440p, and 81 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is approximately 62%, while at High settings it is also around 61%, showing that resolution scaling is largely independent of the quality preset. This consistency suggests that the limiting factor is the GPU's raw throughput rather than any specific rendering feature.
At Ultra settings, the performance curve steepens considerably. The system manages 87 FPS at 1080p, 58 FPS at 1440p, and only 33 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is particularly telling—it drops below the 30 FPS threshold for playability in many scenarios, indicating that this configuration is not suitable for maximum quality at 4K. The gap between Medium and Ultra at 4K (72 FPS versus 33 FPS) is larger than the gap between Low and Medium (81 FPS versus 72 FPS), suggesting that the Ultra preset enables features that are disproportionately expensive at high pixel counts.
The data indicates that 1440p is the sweet spot for this combination. At High settings, the 86 FPS average is smooth, while even Ultra settings at 1440p produce a playable 58 FPS. The 1080p results are exceptional across all presets, with even Ultra settings maintaining 87 FPS, but the ceiling of 211 FPS at Low settings shows the CPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution. The system's behavior at 4K, particularly the 33 FPS Ultra result, confirms that this is a GPU-bound scenario where the RTX 4070's 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is insufficient for maximum quality.
Settings Recommendations
Benchmark results indicate that Medium settings offer the best balance of visual quality and performance across all three tested resolutions. At 1080p, the Medium preset delivers 187 FPS with a minimum of 159 FPS and a maximum of 215 FPS, providing a wide margin above any refresh rate commonly found in gaming monitors. At 1440p, Medium produces 126 FPS with a minimum of 107 FPS, which remains comfortably above 100 FPS for high-refresh-rate displays. Even at 4K, Medium achieves 72 FPS with a minimum of 61 FPS, making it the only preset besides Low that maintains playable frame rates at this resolution.
For users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity, High settings represent a reasonable compromise at 1080p and 1440p. The 127 FPS average at 1080p and 86 FPS at 1440p are both playable, though the 4K High result of 49 FPS falls short of the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset is only recommended at 1080p, where the 87 FPS average provides a playable experience. At 1440p, Ultra drops to 58 FPS, which is borderline, and at 4K the 33 FPS result is not recommended for action-oriented gameplay.
The Low preset, while delivering the highest frame rates (211 FPS at 1080p, 142 FPS at 1440p, 81 FPS at 4K), sacrifices too much visual quality for the gains it provides. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs only 24 FPS on average (from 211 to 187 FPS) while presumably offering significantly better visuals. Similarly, at 1440p the difference between Low and Medium is just 16 FPS (142 to 126 FPS). The data suggests that Medium is the default recommendation, with High as an option for those with 1080p or 1440p displays who prioritize image quality over frame rate headroom.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combination in ArcheAge?
A: Based on the measured results, 2560x1440 offers the best overall experience. At Medium settings, the system produces 126 FPS with a minimum of 107 FPS, which is smooth and responsive. High settings at 1440p also work well at 86 FPS. The 4K results, particularly the 49 FPS High and 33 FPS Ultra, are too low for consistent playability.
Q: How does the RTX 4070 perform at 4K in ArcheAge?
A: The data shows that 4K performance is marginal. At Low settings, the average is 81 FPS, which is playable. Medium settings produce 72 FPS with a minimum of 61 FPS, which is acceptable. However, High settings drop to 49 FPS and Ultra falls to 33 FPS, both of which are below the ideal 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 a bottleneck at 1080p?
A: The benchmark data suggests the CPU is not the limiting factor at 1080p. The system achieves 211 FPS at Low settings and 187 FPS at Medium settings, which are high values that indicate the GPU is still the primary constraint. The CPU's 14 cores and 5.00 GHz boost clock provide sufficient headroom for these frame rates.
Q: What is the difference in performance between Medium and Ultra settings?
A: At 1080p, the difference is 100 FPS (187 FPS versus 87 FPS). At 1440p, the difference is 68 FPS (126 FPS versus 58 FPS). At 4K, the difference is 39 FPS (72 FPS versus 33 FPS). The Ultra preset consistently costs roughly half the frame rate of Medium across all resolutions.
Q: How does this system compare to other configurations in the benchmark database?
A: The combination ranks 633rd out of 2761 tested configurations, placing it in the top 23% of all tested systems. The GPU's average benchmark score of 37648 puts it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU's average score of 46062 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs.
Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 1440p with maximum settings?
A: At Ultra settings, the average frame rate at 1440p is 58 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS target. The minimum frame rate is not specified for this configuration, but the average suggests that users will experience occasional drops below 60 FPS. High settings at 1440p (86 FPS) are a safer choice for a consistent 60 FPS experience.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest performance across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 211 FPS, Medium settings achieve 187 FPS with a minimum of 159 FPS and a maximum of 215 FPS, High settings reach 127 FPS, and Ultra settings average 87 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 124 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset carries a substantial performance cost. The Medium preset's minimum of 159 FPS ensures that even demanding scenes remain well above 144 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming.
At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows the expected resolution penalty. Low settings average 142 FPS, Medium settings produce 126 FPS with a minimum of 107 FPS and a maximum of 145 FPS, High settings reach 86 FPS, and Ultra settings average 58 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 107 FPS is still comfortably above 100 FPS, while the High preset's 86 FPS average provides a smooth experience for standard 60 Hz displays. The Ultra preset's 58 FPS average is borderline, with occasional drops likely below 60 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the system's limitations become apparent. Low settings average 81 FPS, Medium settings produce 72 FPS with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 83 FPS, High settings reach 49 FPS, and Ultra settings average 33 FPS. The Medium preset is the only quality level that maintains a minimum above 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for 4K displays. The High and Ultra presets both fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra dipping to an average of 33 FPS, which is only suitable for slow-paced content. The measured data shows a consistent pattern where each resolution step halves the available performance headroom at higher settings.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 serves as the primary performance driver in this configuration, particularly at higher resolutions. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gameplay but becomes a limiting factor at 4K. The GPU's 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines deliver the raw compute throughput needed for ArcheAge's rendering workload.
The GPU's clock behavior is notable. The base clock of 1920 MHz boosts to 2475 MHz, providing a 29% increase in operating frequency under load. This boost clock, combined with the Ada Lovelace architecture's efficiency on a 5 nm process, allows the RTX 4070 to maintain high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU's 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 455.4 GTexel/s texture rate are well-matched to the demands of this MMORPG at lower resolutions.
The benchmark data shows that the GPU is the bottleneck at 4K, particularly at Ultra settings where the average frame rate drops to 33 FPS. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is not exceeded at any tested setting, but the memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s appears insufficient for 4K Ultra rendering. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 26927 places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 37648 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507), showing that it performs in line with its peers despite being an end-of-life product.
The RTX 4070's role is clearly demonstrated by the scaling between resolutions. The consistent frame rate drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p to 4K indicate that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors. At 1080p, the GPU has ample headroom, producing 211 FPS at Low settings. At 4K, the same settings produce only 81 FPS, a 62% reduction that aligns with the 4x increase in pixel count. This behavior confirms that the RTX 4070 is the dominant performance constraint in this system.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 provides the computational foundation for this configuration, and the benchmark data indicates it is not the limiting factor in ArcheAge. The CPU features 14 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample data storage for game logic and physics calculations. The 65 W TDP and 3 nm process node from TSMC ensure efficient operation without thermal throttling.
The CPU's benchmark results demonstrate strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 2085 in single-core and 14769 in multi-core tests. The PassMark single-thread score of 4516 and multi-thread score of 37816 further confirm its capabilities. The CPU's average benchmark score of 46062 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030, 0.1% slower) and Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098, 0.1% faster). This indicates the Ultra 5 235 performs on par with high-end laptop and desktop processors from previous generations.
In ArcheAge, the CPU's 14 cores are more than sufficient for the game's MMORPG workloads, which typically involve many concurrent entities and player interactions. The 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures that single-threaded tasks, such as UI rendering and network packet processing, are handled quickly. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 2570 and floating-point math score of 117951 indicate strong computational throughput for game physics and simulation.
The data shows that the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU at any tested resolution or setting. At 1080p Low settings, the system produces 211 FPS, which is a high enough frame rate that any CPU limitation would be evident. The fact that performance scales consistently with resolution—dropping by roughly 40% from 1080p to 1440p and another 40% from 1440p to 4K—indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint. The CPU's performance is sufficient to feed the RTX 4070 at all settings, making it a balanced pairing for this game.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 235
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Archeage
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 81.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 72.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 49.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 33.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 142.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 126.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 86.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 58.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 211.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 187.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 127.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 87.0 |
Archeage with iUltra 5 235 + Other GPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Archeage with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 235 + RTX 4070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.