Pc Building Simulator
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 152 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 56 | 59 | 81 | 116 |
| 1440p QHD | 102 | 109 | 155 | 221 |
| 1080p Full HD | 163 | 175 | 244 | 345 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with Intel Core i7-14700KF + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a high-end combination that ranks in the 69th percentile of all tested combos for Pc Building Simulator, landing at position 549 out of 1769. This places it firmly in the upper tier of systems, though not at the absolute top, which is expected given the simulation genre's reliance on both CPU and GPU throughput. The data shows a setup capable of delivering excellent frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K performance that is playable but requires settings tuning to maintain smoothness.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo holds the 549th position out of 1769 tested configurations, a strong result that puts it ahead of roughly 69% of all systems tested. This ranking reflects a balanced pairing where neither component is a glaring bottleneck in Pc Building Simulator. The CPU's average benchmark score of 70104 places it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 34780 puts it in the 79th percentile of all GPUs. The disparity in percentile rankings suggests the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card, which influences how the system scales across resolutions and settings.
Against its nearest CPU rivals, the i7-14700KF is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-14700K, showing a 0% delta in average score (70074 vs 70104). It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9115 and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 leads it by 1.3%. These are marginal differences, meaning the CPU is not the differentiating factor in this combo's in-game ranking. On the GPU side, the RX 9070 is similarly clustered with its nearest rivals: it trails the NVIDIA A2 by 0.2%, leads the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 by 0.3%, the AMD Radeon HD 7970 by 0.7%, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 by 0.8%. The tight grouping indicates that the graphics card's raw compute is competitive with these alternatives, but the in-game performance is what ultimately matters.
The rank of 549 suggests that while this combo is capable, there are many systems with higher-end GPUs or more optimized pairings that push ahead. In a game like Pc Building Simulator, which can be CPU-intensive during complex simulations, the i7-14700KF's 20 cores and 28 threads provide substantial headroom, yet the RX 9070's mid-tier positioning relative to top GPUs keeps the combo from breaking into the top 500. The measured FPS data confirms this: the system excels at lower resolutions but begins to show strain at 4K Ultra, which aligns with its overall ranking.
FAQ
Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700KF a strong processor for this game?
A: Yes, the CPU scores 44557 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 6290 in single-core, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its 20 cores and 28 threads at up to 5.60 GHz boost provide ample processing power for simulation workloads.
Q: How does the RX 9070's memory configuration affect performance?
A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. This is more than sufficient for Pc Building Simulator at any resolution, as the game's demands are modest even at 4K Ultra, where the combo still averages 55.5 FPS.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?
A: Based on measured FPS, 1440p High offers a strong balance at 108.9 FPS average, while 1080p High delivers 175 FPS. For 4K, High settings at 59 FPS is playable, but users targeting 60+ FPS should consider Medium settings at 80.6 FPS.
Q: How does the combo perform at 1080p Low settings?
A: The system achieves 344.7 FPS average at 1080p Low, which is exceptionally high and indicates the CPU and GPU are both delivering near their limits. This makes the combo ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K?
A: The data shows a 50.8% FPS drop from 1080p High (175 FPS) to 4K High (59 FPS), suggesting the GPU becomes the primary limiter at higher resolutions, as the CPU's relative strength (96th percentile) outweighs the GPU's (79th percentile).
Q: How does this combo compare to its closest CPU rival in gaming?
A: The i7-14700KF is statistically identical to the i7-14700K in average benchmark score (70104 vs 70074, 0% delta), so users should expect no meaningful difference in Pc Building Simulator performance between the two.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 plays a critical role in determining frame rates at higher resolutions, given its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU's base clock is 1330 MHz, with a game clock of 2070 MHz and a boost clock of 2520 MHz, which are the clocks that matter for sustained gaming workloads. The 3584 shading units and 128 ROPs provide a solid foundation for rasterization, and the 56 ray-tracing cores indicate modern API support, though Pc Building Simulator does not stress these features heavily.
In the context of this game, the GPU's 79th percentile ranking (average benchmark score 34780) is adequate but not exceptional. The measured FPS data reveals that the GPU can push 344.7 FPS at 1080p Low, but this drops dramatically as resolution increases. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS falls to 55.5, which is below the 60 FPS threshold many players prefer. The GPU's 36.13 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is substantial, yet the game's simulation nature means CPU interactions can also limit performance, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed.
The RX 9070's 16 GB VRAM is a future-proofing advantage, ensuring no memory-related stutters in Pc Building Simulator, which is unlikely to exceed even 8 GB in practice. The 256-bit memory bus and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for texture streaming and asset loading, as evidenced by the smooth scaling from Low to Ultra settings at each resolution. The GPU's launch MSRP is 549 USD, but this pricing detail is secondary to its measured performance in this specific title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across four settings presets and three resolutions. At 1080p, the system delivers exceptional results: Low settings average 344.7 FPS, Medium averages 244.1 FPS, High averages 175 FPS, and Ultra averages 162.9 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the combo is never CPU or GPU bound in a way that compromises playability, with even Ultra settings comfortably above 144 FPS for high-refresh-rate displays.
Moving to 1440p, the FPS figures remain strong but show a clear step down. Low settings average 221.2 FPS, Medium averages 155.4 FPS, High averages 108.9 FPS, and Ultra averages 101.7 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is more pronounced at higher settings, with Ultra losing 61.2 FPS (from 162.9 to 101.7) and Low losing 123.5 FPS (from 344.7 to 221.2). This suggests the GPU is becoming more of a factor, but the system still delivers smooth gameplay at all presets.
At 4K, the performance curve steepens significantly. Low settings average 116.1 FPS, Medium averages 80.6 FPS, High averages 59 FPS, and Ultra averages 55.5 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra at 4K is just 3.5 FPS, indicating diminishing returns from the highest preset. The 4K Ultra result of 55.5 FPS is the only measured row that falls below 60 FPS, marking it as the weakest point in the entire dataset. All other 11 rows exceed 59 FPS, with the majority well above 100 FPS.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals how the bottleneck shifts as resolution increases. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 175 at 1080p to 108.9 at 1440p (a 37.8% decrease) and then to 59 at 4K (a 66.3% decrease from 1080p). This pattern is consistent with GPU-bound behavior at higher resolutions, where the RX 9070's compute limits become apparent. At Low settings, the drop is even more dramatic: 344.7 FPS at 1080p falls to 221.2 at 1440p (35.8% decrease) and to 116.1 at 4K (66.3% decrease), showing that even at minimal graphics load, the GPU cannot sustain the same frame rates as resolution scales.
The CPU's role is evident in the 1080p results, where the i7-14700KF's strength allows the GPU to operate near its maximum. The 344.7 FPS at 1080p Low is likely near the CPU's limit for the game's simulation logic, as the GPU has ample headroom. At 4K, however, the GPU becomes the clear limiter, as evidenced by the narrow gap between High (59 FPS) and Ultra (55.5 FPS) — only a 5.9% difference, suggesting the GPU is saturated regardless of settings. The data indicates that for players prioritizing 4K, the RX 9070 is the component to upgrade, while for 1080p and 1440p, the combo is well-balanced and unlikely to cause frustration.
Settings Recommendations
For 1080p gaming, the Ultra preset at 162.9 FPS is the clear recommendation, as it delivers the highest visual quality without sacrificing the frame rate needed for competitive or high-refresh-rate play. The 175 FPS at High is also excellent, but Ultra's additional detail comes at a negligible cost of 12.1 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra settings at 101.7 FPS remain ideal, providing a smooth experience on 144Hz monitors, while High at 108.9 FPS is nearly identical in performance and may be preferred for consistency. The 155.4 FPS at Medium is overkill for most displays and the visual downgrade is unnecessary.
At 4K, the recommendation shifts to High settings at 59 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS target but offers a playable experience on standard 60Hz monitors. Medium at 80.6 FPS is the better choice for players who want a safety margin above 60 FPS, as the visual difference between Medium and High is often subtle in a simulation game. Ultra at 55.5 FPS should be avoided unless the player is willing to tolerate slight stutter, as the 3.5 FPS gain over High does not justify the potential for dropped frames. Low settings at 116.1 FPS are unnecessary at 4K, as the system is not struggling at Medium or High, and the visual degradation is significant.
The optimal experience across all resolutions is to prioritize High settings at 1080p and 1440p, and Medium at 4K. This balances visual fidelity with headroom above 60 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay in Pc Building Simulator's simulation-heavy scenes. The measured data shows that the combo is versatile, but its sweet spot lies in 1440p High, where it delivers 108.9 FPS with plenty of CPU and GPU resources to spare.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-14700KF
AMD Radeon RX 9070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700KF + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 116.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 80.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 59.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 55.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 221.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 155.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 108.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 101.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 344.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 244.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 175.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 162.9 |
Pc Building Simulator with ii7-14700KF + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Pc Building Simulator with RX 9070 + Other CPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-14700KF + RX 9070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.