Pc Building Simulator

The benchmark data for Pc Building Simulator, captured with an Intel Core i7-14700KF and an AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, reveals a configuration that scales predictably across resolutions and settings. The measured frames per second (FPS) show a system where the graphics card is the primary performance arbiter, while the processor provides ample headroom. This analysis breaks down the results by resolution, component role, and overall ranking.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS progression from 1080p to 4K clearly illustrates where the bottleneck lies in this pairing. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo produces 143.3 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same High preset drops the output to 89.3 FPS, a reduction of 54 FPS. At 4K (3840x2160), the average falls to 45.2 FPS, which is a substantial 98.1 FPS below the 1080p result.

This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. When the resolution increases, the rendering load on the Radeon RX 6750 XT scales dramatically, which directly impacts frame delivery. The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor here; if it were, the FPS would remain relatively flat across resolutions. Instead, the average FPS at 1080p High is more than triple the 4K High result, firmly indicating that the graphics card is doing the heavy lifting.

The scaling pattern holds across all settings. At Low settings, the drop from 280.1 FPS at 1080p to 90.8 FPS at 4K is a 189.3 FPS difference. Even at Ultra, where the absolute numbers are lower, the trend persists: 133 FPS at 1080p versus 45.6 FPS at 4K. The percentage decline is consistent, suggesting a linear scaling of workload with pixel count, which is typical for a simulation game with less complex geometry but high dependence on fill rate and memory bandwidth.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the defining component in this configuration's gaming performance. Its specifications include a 12 GB GDDR6 memory pool on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2150 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, with a game clock rated at 2495 MHz. This memory capacity and bandwidth are sufficient for the texture and asset loads in Pc Building Simulator, but the core clock speeds are what drive the frame rates at higher resolutions.

The GPU's benchmark percentile of 79 indicates it performs better than most graphics cards in the database, yet its nearest rivals show a tight cluster. The data shows it sits within 1.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and within 0.9% of the AMD Radeon 880M, based on average benchmark scores. This proximity in synthetic scores translates to the measured FPS, where the card’s limits are exposed at 4K. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the 45.6 FPS average is below the 60 FPS threshold often sought for smooth gameplay, suggesting the GPU’s raw compute power (13.31 TFLOPS FP32) is stretched thin at this resolution.

The DirectX 12 benchmark score of 80 and the Passmark G3D score of 20700 provide context for the GPU's capability in modern APIs. The card’s 40 ray accelerators and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) are present, but the measured FPS indicates that Pc Building Simulator does not heavily leverage these features, instead relying on traditional rasterization performance where the RX 6750 XT is competent but not exceptional at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

In the specific context of Pc Building Simulator, this CPU-GPU pairing ranks 883 out of 1769 tested combinations. This places it in the 50th percentile of all combos, meaning it performs better than half of the configurations in the database but trails the top half. Given the GPU's 79th percentile ranking among all GPUs, the combo's mid-pack position suggests that the game's performance is not solely dependent on the graphics card, or that the CPU pairing is not optimal for this specific title.

The Intel Core i7-14700KF, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, is a high-end processor that ranks in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700K, has a deltaPct of 0, indicating virtually identical performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is 0.4% faster, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 is 1.3% slower. This CPU strength is not fully utilized in Pc Building Simulator, as evidenced by the combo's rank. The data implies that a less powerful CPU paired with a more powerful GPU would likely achieve a higher rank in this specific game, as the bottleneck is clearly on the graphics side.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings is 89.3 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its closest rival?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44557. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700K, has a deltaPct of 0, meaning they perform identically in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields 280.1 FPS, while the Ultra preset yields 133 FPS. This represents a 147.1 FPS difference between the two extremes.

Q: Is the GPU's memory bandwidth sufficient for 4K gameplay?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The measured 4K performance shows an average of 45.2 FPS at High settings, indicating that while bandwidth is adequate, the core compute limits prevent higher frame rates.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested configurations?

A: This specific combo ranks 883 out of 1769 total tested combinations in Pc Building Simulator.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance for optimal settings. At 1080p, the High preset delivers 143.3 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. However, the Medium preset offers a significant boost to 201.2 FPS, while the visual difference between Medium and High in a simulation game is often minimal. For competitive or fluid UI interaction, the Medium preset at 1080p is the most balanced choice, providing a 57.9 FPS improvement over High.

At 1440p, the High preset produces 89.3 FPS, which is playable, but the Medium preset at 128 FPS is notably smoother. Given the nature of Pc Building Simulator, where precision and smooth camera movement are key, the Medium preset at 1440p is recommended to avoid the dip below 90 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 84.9 FPS, which is a marginal difference from High, making High the better option if visual fidelity is desired over the extra frames.

For 4K, the situation is more restrictive. The High preset yields 45.2 FPS, and Ultra is nearly identical at 45.6 FPS. The Low preset jumps to 90.8 FPS, but this likely compromises visual clarity. The Medium preset at 63.6 FPS is the only 4K option that hits the 60 FPS mark. Therefore, for a 4K display, selecting the Medium preset is the only way to achieve a smooth experience without dropping to Low settings.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 33 MB shared L3 cache. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44557 and single-core score of 6290 demonstrate exceptional processing power, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is to manage the simulation logic, part compatibility checks, and the operating system environment. The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor at any resolution. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 280.1 FPS, which is a frame rate that would expose CPU limitations in many other titles, but here it indicates the processor can feed the GPU efficiently. The Passmark data compression score of 694963 and integer math score of 183056 suggest strong general compute capability, which is relevant for simulation overhead.

The CPU's nearest rival, the Core i7-14700K, shows a deltaPct of 0, meaning this KF variant (without integrated graphics) performs identically in aggregate benchmarks. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is 0.4% faster, and the Xeon Platinum 8270 is 1.3% slower. These margins are negligible in gaming scenarios, reinforcing that the CPU choice is not the primary driver of FPS in this game. The 125 W TDP and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory provide flexibility, but the benchmark results confirm that users should allocate more budget toward the GPU if seeking higher frame rates in this title.